Concerning the collection of blood samples for forensic testing.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5186 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5186.
You're tracking SB 5186
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5186 — Concerning the collection of blood samples for forensic testing.
Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of SB 5186 expands the definition of who is qualified to take blood samples for forensic testing without a person's consent. Previously, only licensed health professionals like physicians and nurses were allowed to do this; now, the bill includes "forensic phlebotomists" and any person certified by the Department of Health for performing blood draws. This change is important because it potentially increases the number of trained professionals available to collect blood samples in urgent situations, which could lead to more effective law enforcement responses in intoxication cases.
S-0977.3SUBSTITUTES-0687.1SENATE SENATE BILL 5186State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Padden and Pearson)READPearsonRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/02/17.AN01/16/17. ACT Relating to the collection of blood samples for forensic testing;
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.AN ACT Relating to the collection of blood samples for forensic testing;
c 3 s 21 are each amended to read as follows:It is not professional misconduct for a physician((physician licensed under chapter 18.71 RCW;
advanced emergency medical technician or paramedic licensed under chapter ((18.73))18.73 18.71 RCW;
((untiluntil July 1, 2016, health care assistant certified under chapter 18.135 RCW;
or))or medical assistant-certified or medical assistant-phlebotomist certified under chapter 18.360 RCW, or person holding another credential under Title 18 RCW whose scope of practice includes performing venous blood draws, or hospital, or duly licensed clinical laboratory employing or utilizing services of such licensed or certified health care provider,provider,)) person qualified by the department of health to collect a blood sample without a person's consent when the physician((physician licensed under chapter 18.71 RCW;
advanced emergency medical technician or paramedic licensed under chapter ((18.73))18.73 18.71 RCW;
((untiluntil July 1, 2016, health care assistant certified under chapter 18.135 RCW;))RCW; or medical assistant-certified or medical assistant-phlebotomist certified under chapter 18.360 RCW, or person holding another credential under Title 18 RCW whose scope of practice includes performing venous blood draws, or hospital, or duly licensed clinical laboratory employing or utilizing services of such licensed or certified health care provider withdrawing blood was directed by a law enforcement officer to do so for the purpose of a blood test under the provisions of a search warrant or exigent circumstances:
PROVIDED,or Thatmedical nothingassistant-certified inor thismedical sectionassistant-phlebotomist shallcertified relieveunder achapter physician18.360 RCW, or hospital, or duly licensed clinical laboratory employing or utilizing services of such licensed or certified health care provider)) person qualified by the department of health withdrawing blood was directed by a law enforcement officer to do so for the purpose of a blood test under chapterthe 18.71provisions RCW;of a search warrant or exigent circumstances:
PROVIDED, That nothing in this section shall relieve a ((physician licensed under chapter 18.71 RCW;
advanced emergency medical technician or paramedic licensed under chapter ((18.73))18.73 18.71 RCW;
((untiluntil July 1, 2016, health care assistant certified under chapter 18.135 RCW;))RCW; or medical assistant-certified or medical assistant-phlebotomist certified under chapter 18.360 RCW, or person holding another credential under Title 18 RCW whose scope of practice includes performing venous blood draws, or hospital, or duly licensed clinical laboratory employing or utilizing services of such licensed or certified health care provider withdrawing blood from professional discipline arising from the use of improper procedures or from failing to exercise the required standard of care.NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 46.04 RCW to read as follows:"Forensic phlebotomist" means a police officer, law enforcement officer, or employee of a correctional facility or detention facility, who meets the training and proficiency standards of his or her employer and who is collecting a venous blood sample for forensic testing pursuant to a search warrant, a waiver of the warrant requirement, or exigent circumstances.Sec. 3. RCW 46.61.506 and 2016 c 203 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Upon the trial of any civil or criminal action or proceeding arising out of acts alleged to have been committed by any person while driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, if the person's alcohol concentration is less than 0.08 or the person's THC concentration is less than 5.00, it is evidence that may be considered with other competent evidence in determining whether the person was under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug.(2)(a) The breath analysis of the person's alcohol concentration shall be based upon grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of breath.(b) The blood analysis of the person's THC concentration shall be based upon nanograms per milliliter of whole blood.(c) The foregoing provisions of this section shall not be construed as limiting the introduction of any other competent evidence bearing upon the question whether the person was under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug.(3) Analysis of the person's blood or breath to be considered valid under the provisions of this section or RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504 shall have been performed according to methods approved by the state toxicologist and by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the state toxicologist for this purpose.
or medical assistant-certified or medical assistant-phlebotomist certified under chapter 18.360 RCW)) person qualified by the department of health, or hospital, or duly licensed clinical laboratory employing or utilizing services of such licensed or certified health care provider withdrawing blood from professional discipline arising from the use of improper procedures or from failing to exercise the required standard of care.NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 46.04 RCW to read as follows:"Forensic phlebotomist" means a police officer, law enforcement officer, or employee of a correctional facility or detention facility, who meets the training and proficiency standards of his or her employer and who is collecting a venous blood sample for forensic testing pursuant to a search warrant, a waiver of the warrant requirement, or exigent circumstances.Sec. 3. RCW 46.61.506 and 2016 c 203 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Upon the trial of any civil or criminal action or proceeding arising out of acts alleged to have been committed by any person while driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, if the person's alcohol concentration is less than 0.08 or the person's THC concentration is less than 5.00, it is evidence that may be considered with other competent evidence in determining whether the person was under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug.(2)(a) The breath analysis of the person's alcohol concentration shall be based upon grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of breath.(b) The blood analysis of the person's THC concentration shall be based upon nanograms per milliliter of whole blood.(c) The foregoing provisions of this section shall not be construed as limiting the introduction of any other competent evidence bearing upon the question whether the person was under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug.(3) Analysis of the person's blood or breath to be considered valid under the provisions of this section or RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504 shall have been performed according to methods approved by the state toxicologist and by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the state toxicologist for this purpose.
Instead, such challenges may be considered by the trier of fact in determining what weight to give to the test result.(5) When a blood test is administered under the provisions of RCW 46.20.308, the withdrawal of blood for the purpose of determining its alcoholic or drug content may be performed only by a physician((physician licensed under chapter 18.71 RCW;
an advanced emergency medical technician or paramedic licensed under chapter ((18.73))18.73 18.71 RCW;
((untiluntil July 1, 2016, a health care assistant certified under chapter 18.135 RCW;))RCW; or a medical assistant-certified or medical assistant-phlebotomist certified under chapter 18.360 RCW, person holding another credential under Title 18 RCW whose scope of practice includes performing venous blood draws, or a forensic phlebotomist.
Whenor thea bloodmedical testassistant-certified isor performedmedical outsideassistant-phlebotomist thecertified stateunder ofchapter Washington18.360 theRCW)) withdrawalforensic ofphlebotomist blood for the purpose of determining its alcoholic or druga content may be performed by any person whoqualified is authorized by the out-of-statedepartment jurisdictionof tohealth. perform venous blood draws.
This limitation shall not apply to the taking of breath specimens.(6) When a venous blood sample is performed by a forensic phlebotomist, it must be done under the following conditions:(a) If taken at the scene, it must be performed in an ambulance or aid service vehicle licensed by the department of health under chapter 18.73 RCW.(b) The collection of blood samples must not interfere with the provision of essential medical care.(c) The blood sample must be collected using sterile equipment and the skin area of puncture must be thoroughly cleansed and disinfected.(d) The person whose blood is collected must be seated, reclined, or lying down when the blood is collected.(7) The person tested may have a licensed or certified health care provider listed in subsection (5) of this section, or a qualified technician, chemist, or other qualified person of his or her own choosing administer one or more tests in addition to any administered at the direction of a law enforcement officer.
The failure or inability to obtain an additional test by a person shall not preclude the admission of evidence relating to the test or tests taken at the direction of a law enforcement officer.(((7)))officer.(7) (8) Upon the request of the person who shall submit to a test or tests at the request of a law enforcement officer, full information concerning the test or tests shall be made available to him or her or his or her attorney.Sec. 4. RCW 46.61.508 and 2015 2nd sp.s.
c 3 s 23 are each amended to read as follows:No physician((physician licensed under chapter 18.71 RCW;
advanced emergency medical technician or paramedic licensed under chapter ((18.73))18.73 18.71 RCW;
((untiluntil July 1, 2016, health care assistant certified under chapter 18.135 RCW;))RCW; or medical assistant-certified or medical assistant-phlebotomist certified under chapter 18.360 RCW, person holding another credential under Title 18 RCW whose scope of practice includes performing venous blood draws, or a forensic phlebotomist, or hospital, or duly licensed clinical laboratory employing or utilizing services of such licensed or certified health care provider, shall incur any civil or criminal liability as a result of the act of withdrawing blood from any person when directed by a law enforcement officer to do so for the purpose of a blood test under the provisions of a search warrant, a waiver of the search warrant requirement, exigent circumstances, or any other authority of law((, or RCW 46.20.308, as now or hereafter amended)):
PROVIDED,or Thatmedical nothingassistant-certified inor thismedical sectionassistant-phlebotomist shallcertified relieveunder suchchapter licensed18.360 RCW)) forensic phlebotomist or certifieda healthperson carequalified provider,by ((or))the hospitaldepartment of health, or hospital, or duly licensed clinical laboratory,laboratory employing or forensicutilizing phlebotomistservices fromof such licensed or certified health care provider, shall incur any civil or criminal liability arisingas froma result of the useact of improperwithdrawing proceduresblood orfrom failingany person when directed by a law enforcement officer to exercisedo so for the requiredpurpose standardof a blood test under the provisions of care.---a ENDsearch ---warrant, a waiver of the search warrant requirement, exigent circumstances, or any other authority of law((, or RCW 46.20.308, as now or hereafter amended)):
PROVIDED, That nothing in this section shall relieve such licensed or certified health care provider, or hospital or duly licensed clinical laboratory, or forensic phlebotomist, from civil liability arising from the use of improper procedures or failing to exercise the required standard of care.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Placed on Rules White Sheet.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
First reading, referred to Public Safety (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 30; nays, 19; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Law & Justice.
Sponsors
- Padden · Primary
- Pearson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Padden
Co-sponsors (1)
- Pearson
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 39% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angel | — | Yea |
| Baumgartner | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Nay |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Nay |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Nay |
| Rossi | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Nay |
| Darneille | — | Nay |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Fain | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Nay |
| Kuderer | — | Nay |
| McCoy | — | Nay |
| Miloscia | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Nay |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Pearson | — | Yea |
| Ranker | — | Nay |
| Takko | — | Nay |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Nay |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Nay |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Nay |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Nay |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Nay |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Nay |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Nay |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5186?
- SB 5186 is sponsored by Padden and Pearson.
- What is the current status of SB 5186?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5186?
- Track SB 5186 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5186
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5186
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →