Vermont 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

S. 72 — An act relating to requiring telemarketers to provide accurate caller identification information

Last action — Signed by Governor on June 8, 2017

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 50% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read S. 72 on the official Vermont source →

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor on June 8, 2017

  2. Signed by Governor on 6/8/17

  3. Delivered to Governor on 6/2/17

  4. As passed by Senate and House

  5. House message House passed bill in concurrence

  6. Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. Turner of Milton

  7. Senate Proposal of Amendment to the House Proposal of Amendment agreed to

  8. Senate message, House proposal of amendment concurred in with further amendment thereto

  9. Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Ashe

  10. House proposal of amendment concurred in with proposal of amendment, on motion of Senator Cummings

  11. Proposal of amendment by Senator(s) Cummings; text

  12. House proposal of amendment; text

  13. Proposal of amendment to be offered by Senator(s) Cummings

  14. Unfinished Business/House Proposal of Amendment

  15. Unfinished Business/House Proposal of Amendment

  16. New Business/House Proposal of Amendment

  17. House message House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment

  18. House Proposal of Amendment

  19. Read Third time and Passed in Concurrence with Proposal of Amendment

  20. Third Reading Ordered

  21. Report of Committee on Commerce and Economic Development agreed to.

  22. Rep. Kimbell of Woodstock reported for the committee on Commerce and Economic Development

  23. Read Second Time

  24. Read First Time and Referred to the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development

  25. Read 3rd time & passed

  26. New Business/Third Reading

  27. 3rd reading ordered

  28. Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs agreed to

  29. Senator Campion requested & granted leave to withdraw rec. of amendment of Finance of amendment

  30. Reported favorably by Senator Baruth for Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs with recommendation of amendment

  31. Read second time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator Campion for Committee on Finance

  32. Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs

  33. Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance

  34. New Business/Second Reading

  35. Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee onEconomic Development, Housing and General Affairs

  36. Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee onFinance

  37. Committed to Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs with report of Committee on Finance intact, under suspension of Senate Rule 49, on motion of Senator Cummings

  38. Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance

  39. Unfinished Business/Second Reading

  40. Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance

  41. New Business/Second Reading

  42. Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee onFinance

  43. Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Finance

Sponsors

  • Brian Campion · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 189 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Brian Campion

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (189)

189 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 189 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors S. 72?
S. 72 is sponsored by Brian Campion.
What is the current status of S. 72?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track S. 72?
Track S. 72 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S. 72

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of S. 72

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →