An act relating to miscellaneous judiciary procedures
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S. 222 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S. 222.
You're tracking S. 222
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S. 222 — An act relating to miscellaneous judiciary procedures
Last action — Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Ashe
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read S. 222 on the official Vermont source →Action History
-
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Ashe
-
As passed by Senate and House
-
Senate Message, House proposal of amendment concurred in
-
House proposal of amendment to Senate proposal of amendment concurred in
-
House proposal of amendment to Senate proposal of amendment, text
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Ashe
-
House proposal of amendment to Senate proposal of amendment
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
House message House concurred in Senate proposal of amendment to House proposal of amendment, with further proposal of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. Turner of Milton
-
Senate Proposal of Amendment concurred in with further amendment thereto, as offered by Rep. Jessup of Middlesex
-
Senate Proposal of Amendment considered
-
Rules Suspended and Taken up for Immediate Consideration as moved by Rep. Savage of Swanton
-
Senate message, House proposal of amendment concurred in with further amendment thereto
-
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Ashe
-
Proposal of amendment agreed to
-
Senator Sears moved to concur in House proposal of amendment with proposal of amendment; text
-
House proposal of amendment; text
-
Unfinished Business/House Proposal of Amendment
-
Unfinished Business/House Proposal of Amendment
-
New Business/House Proposal of Amendment
-
House message House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
-
House Proposal of Amendment
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. Turner of Milton
-
Read Third time and Passed in Concurrence with Proposal of Amendment
-
Third Reading Ordered
-
Report of Committee on Judiciary agreed to.
-
Rep. Jessup of Middlesex reported for the committee on Judiciary
-
Read Second Time
-
Read First Time and Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
-
Read 3rd time & passed
-
New Business/Third Reading
-
3rd reading ordered
-
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary agreed to
-
Read second time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator Sears for Committee on Judiciary
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
New Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee onJudiciary
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
Sponsors
- Richard Sears · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 189 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Richard Sears
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (189)
189 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 189 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S. 222?
- S. 222 is sponsored by Richard Sears.
- What is the current status of S. 222?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track S. 222?
- Track S. 222 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S. 222
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S. 222
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →