AB 229 — Violent felonies.
Last action — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law defines the term "violent felony" for various purposes, including, among others, enhancing the punishment for felonies pursuant to existing sentencing provisions commonly known as the Three Strikes Law. This bill would expand the crimes that are within the definition of a violent felony for all purposes, including for purposes of the Three Strikes Law, to include additional forms of sexual crimes, as defined, human trafficking, as defined, and felony domestic violence, as defined. By expanding the scope of an enhancement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 01/11/23 - Introduced Current pdf January 11, 2023
- AB229 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, final hearing. Failed passage.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 11.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Joe Patterson · Primary
- Phillip Chen · Cosponsor
- Diane Dixon · Cosponsor
- Heath Flora · Cosponsor
- James Gallagher · Cosponsor
- Josh Hoover · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- Joe Patterson · Cosponsor
- Mike Fong · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Patterson, Joe Republican
Co-sponsors (9)
- Chen, Phillip Republican
- Dixon, Diane Republican
- Flora, Heath Republican
- Gallagher, James Republican
- Hoover, Josh Republican
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Mathis
- Patterson, Joe Republican
- Fong, Mike Democratic
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 25% | 75% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Nay |
| Ortega, Liz | Democratic | Nay |
| Zbur, Rick Chavez | Democratic | Nay |
| Alanis, Juan | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 229 do?
- Existing law defines the term "violent felony" for various purposes, including, among others, enhancing the punishment for felonies pursuant to existing sentencing provisions commonly known as the Three Strikes Law. This bill would expand the crimes that are within the definition of a violent felony for all purposes, including for purposes of the Three Strikes Law, to include additional forms of sexual crimes, as defined, human trafficking, as defined, and felony domestic violence, as defined. By expanding the scope of an enhancement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 229?
- AB 229 is sponsored by Patterson, Joe (Republican), Chen, Phillip (Republican), Dixon, Diane (Republican), Flora, Heath (Republican), Gallagher, James (Republican), Hoover, Josh (Republican), Lackey, Tom (Republican), Mathis, and Fong, Mike (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 229?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 229?
- Track AB 229 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 229
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 229
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →