California 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 171 — Employment.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 52, Statutes of 2024.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Gavin Newsom (Democratic) on July 02, 2024.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the State Civil Service Act, regulates employment with the state and vests in the Department of Human Resources all powers, duties, and authorities necessary to operate the state civil service system in accordance with Article VII of the California Constitution, the Government Code, the merit principle, and applicable rules duly adopted by the State Personnel Board. Former law required that, unless otherwise provided by law, the salaries of state officers be paid monthly out of the General Fund. Existing law, operative July 10, 2023, requires the salaries of state officers and employees to be paid out of the General Fund, or another recognized state fund that funds a respective employee's position, on a uniform payroll cycle established by the department. Various provisions of existing law, relating to conflicts with memorandums of understanding, pay and benefits provisions relating to military service, travel reimbursement claims, salary classification, workweek groups, sick leave, nonindustrial disability leave, and layoffs, are inconsistent with the implementation of a uniform payroll cycle that is not monthly. This bill would revise those various provisions to accommodate the implementation of a uniform payroll cycle that is not monthly. (2) Existing law governing state employment procedures authorizes an appointing power, to prevent the stoppage of public business when an emergency arises, or because work will be of limited duration not exceeding 60 working days, to make emergency appointments without utilizing persons on employment lists and, if necessary, without regard to existing classes. This bill, until December 1, 2026, would authorize the Department of Industrial Relations to make emergency appointments that exceed 60 working days, subject to specified constitutional limits. The bill would require the department to report its usage of this emergency appointment authority to the Director of the Department of Human Resources and to take other related actions with the Department of Human Resources and the State Personnel Board, in coordination with applicable collective bargaining organizations, to develop a process to streamline the hiring of positions, as prescribed. The bill would further require the Department of Industrial Relations to provide quarterly reports to specified legislative committees concerning the positions filled. The bill would repeal these provision on January 1, 2027, and would include related legislative findings. (3) Existing law generally grants public employees the right to join employee organizations and to be represented by those organizations in their employment relations. Existing law requires specified public employers to provide exclusive employee representatives access to new employee orientations, as prescribed. Existing law, until June 30, 2025, provides that if a public employer has not conducted an inperson new employee orientation within 30 days of a newly hired employee's start date, and the new employee is working in person, the exclusive representative is entitled to schedule an inperson meeting at the worksite during employment hours, during which newly hired employees have the opportunity to attend and are required to be relieved of other duties for purposes of attending. Existing law further requires the exclusive representative, during this meeting, to be permitted to communicate directly with newly hired employees in the applicable bargaining unit for up to 30 minutes on paid time, subject to various other conditions. This bill would extend the operation of the above provisions until June 30, 2027. (4) Existing law requires the Controller to operate a uniform state payroll system for all state agencies, except the California Exposition and State Fair and the University of California, in conformance with the accounting system for all state agencies supervised by the Department of Finance. This bill would require, on and after January 1, 2025, that payments to employees made through the uniform state payroll system for master payroll paid on June 30 of each year be issue dated on July 1, provided that employees, in any event, be paid promptly. The bill would require that these payments be considered payables incurred in the fiscal year in which the payment is issue dated, except as specified. (5) The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) creates the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) for the purpose of providing pension and benefits to state employees and their beneficiaries and prescribes the rights and duties of employers participating in the system. Under PERL, benefits are funded by investment income and employer and employee contributions, which are deposited into the Public Employees' Retirement Fund, a continuously appropriated trust fund administered by the system's board of administration. PERL prescribes methods for the calculation and payment of the state employer contribution for its employees who are PERS members. PERL provides for an annual adjustment of the state's contribution in the budget and quarterly appropriations to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund from the General Fund and other funds that are responsible for payment of the employer contribution. Existing law makes additional General Fund appropriations to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund for the 2020–21, 2021–22, 2022–23, and 2023–24 fiscal years. Supplemental payments connected with appropriations for those fiscal years are to be apportioned to the state employee member categories generally, as directed by the Department of Finance, and to specified state employee member categories, including to the state miscellaneous member category, the industrial member category, the state safety member category, and the state peace officer/firefighter member category. The California Constitution establishes the Budget Stabilization Account in the General Fund and requires the Controller, in each fiscal year, to transfer from the General Fund to the Budget Stabilization Account amounts that include a sum equal to 1.5% of the estimated amount of General Fund revenues for that fiscal year. These provisions further require, until the 2029–30 fiscal year, that the Legislature appropriate a percentage of these moneys, the amount of which is generated pursuant to specified calculations, for certain obligations and purposes, including addressing unfunded liabilities for state-level pension plans. This bill would appropriate $337,000,000 from the General Fund for the purposes identified in the constitutional provisions described above, to supplement the state's appropriation to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund. The bill would specify that this appropriation represents a portion of the amount identified in a specific provision of the Budget Act of 2024. The bill would require the Department of Finance to provide the Controller with a schedule establishing the timing of specific transfers. The bill would require the supplemental payment to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund to be apportioned to specified state employee member categories, not to exceed $180,098,000 to the state miscellaneous member category, $9,125,000 to the state industrial member category, $21,167,000 to the state safety member category, and $126,610,000 to the state peace officer/firefighter member category. The bill would require the appropriation described above to be applied to the unfunded state liabilities for the state employee member categories that are in excess of the base amounts for the 2024–25 fiscal year. (6) Existing law requires that, except as specified, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages be paid to workers employed on public works and imposes misdemeanor penalties for a willful violation of this requirement. Existing law defines "public works" for the purposes of regulating public works contracts as, among other things, construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for, in whole or in part, out of public funds. Existing law generally requires a contractor or subcontractor to be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or engage in the performance of any public work contract. Existing law requires a contractor or subcontractor to meet specific conditions to qualify for this registration, including that a contractor or subcontractor pay an initial application fee and an annual renewal fee set by the Director of Industrial Relations. Existing law authorizes the department to establish and adjust annual registration and renewal fees up to $800 by publishing the fees on the department's internet website. Existing law imposes misdemeanor penalties for a willful violation of those provisions. This bill would, among other things, specifically exempt the establishment and adjustment of those fees from the Administrative Procedure Act. (7) Existing law requires projects or developments undertaken pursuant to the Middle Class Housing Act of 2022, the Affordable Housing and High Road Job Act of 2022, the Affordable Housing on Faith and Higher Education Lands Act of 2023, and housing development approvals, as specified, to be subject to specified prevailing wage or skilled and trained workforce requirements. Existing law authorizes a development proponent to submit an application for a development subject to a streamlined, ministerial approval process when certain conditions are met. Existing law also outlines the requirements for a housing development project application when the development is on land owned on or before January 1, 2024, by an independent institution of higher education or a religious institution, including ownership through an affiliated or associated nonprofit benefit corporation, provided it meets specified conditions. Under existing law, one such condition for these applications is that a proponent of a development project requires in contracts with construction contractors, and certified to the local government, that certain standards are met, including requirements for contractors and subcontractors for portions of the development that are not a public work. This bill would require all contractors and subcontractors for portions of such developments that are not a public work to register with the Department of Industrial Relations, as specified. (8) Existing law authorizes a person aggrieved by an order, decision, or award made and filed by the appeals board or a workers' compensation judge under certain workers' compensation provisions to petition the appeals board for reconsideration. Existing law deems a petition for reconsideration to have been denied by the appeals board unless that petition is acted upon within 60 days from the date of filing. This bill, until July 1, 2026, would instead deem a petition for reconsideration to have been denied by the appeals board unless it is acted upon by the appeals board within 60 days from the date a trial judge transmits a case to the appeals board. The bill would require a trial judge, when it transmits a case to the appeals board, to provide notice to the parties of the case and the appeals board, as specified. (9) Existing law establishes within the Workforce Services Branch of the Employment Development Department the Community Economic Resilience Fund Program, to build an equitable and sustainable economic recovery from the impacts of COVID-19 on California's industries, workers, and communities, and to provide for the durability of that recovery by fostering long-term economic resilience in the overall transition to a carbon-neutral economy. Existing law requires the implementation grants under the program to be structured to provide a small initial tranche of funding for economic diversification pilots with demonstrable high road elements in those regions already engaged in economic recovery and transition planning. Existing law requires the grants to be awarded on a rolling and competitive basis, with the majority of funds to be used to provide economic development grants, through June 30, 2025. Existing law requires grant recipients to demonstrate a plan to fully spend or obligate all funds received by December 31, 2025, and to pay all obligations by December 31, 2026. This bill would, instead, require the majority of funds to be used to provide economic development grants through June 30, 2028. The bill would require grant recipients to demonstrate a plan to fully spend or obligate all funds received by June 30, 2028, and to pay all obligations by June 30, 2030. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 52, Statutes of 2024.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 61. Noes 11.).

  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended.

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 7. Page 4772.).

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (June 26).

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  14. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 14. Page 864.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Withdrawn from committee.

  20. Assembly Rule 96 suspended. (Ayes 61. Noes 17. Page 732.)

  21. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee February 9.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 19 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 61 Yea · 11 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 44003
Unaffiliated 15202
Republican 2902
Total 611107
% of votes cast 77%14%0%9%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Ting — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Wood — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Essayli — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Not Voting
Mathis — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Not Voting
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Not Voting
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Not Voting
Wallis, Greg Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 13 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 10000
Unaffiliated 3101
Republican 0301
Total 13402
% of votes cast 68%21%0%11%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Skinner — Yea
Newman — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Eggman — Not Voting
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 31 Yea · 7 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9101
Democratic 21100
Republican 1501
Total 31702
% of votes cast 78%18%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Roth — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Newman — Yea
Min — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Portantino — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 60 Yea · 14 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 45001
Unaffiliated 15303
Republican 01102
Total 601406
% of votes cast 75%18%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Wood — Yea
Low — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Essayli — Nay
Maienschein — Not Voting
Waldron — Not Voting
Mathis — Not Voting
Holden — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Boerner Horvath — Yea
Ting — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Vince Fong — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Not Voting
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Nay
Chen, Phillip Republican Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 171 do?
(1) Existing law, the State Civil Service Act, regulates employment with the state and vests in the Department of Human Resources all powers, duties, and authorities necessary to operate the state civil service system in accordance with Article VII of the California Constitution, the Government Code, the merit principle, and applicable rules duly adopted by the State Personnel Board. Former law required that, unless otherwise provided by law, the salaries of state officers be paid monthly out of the General Fund. Existing law, operative July 10, 2023, requires the salaries of state officers and employees to be paid out of the General Fund, or another recognized state fund that funds a respective employee's position, on a uniform payroll cycle established by the department. Various provisions of existing law, relating to conflicts with memorandums of understanding, pay and benefits provisions relating to military service, travel reimbursement claims, salary classification, workweek groups, sick leave, nonindustrial disability leave, and layoffs, are inconsistent with the implementation of a uniform payroll cycle that is not monthly. This bill would revise those various provisions to accommodate the implementation of a uniform payroll cycle that is not monthly. (2) Existing law governing state employment procedures authorizes an appointing power, to prevent the stoppage of public business when an emergency arises, or because work will be of limited duration not exceeding 60 working days, to make emergency appointments without utilizing persons on employment lists and, if necessary, without regard to existing classes. This bill, until December 1, 2026, would authorize the Department of Industrial Relations to make emergency appointments that exceed 60 working days, subject to specified constitutional limits. The bill would require the department to report its usage of this emergency appointment authority to the Director of the Department of Human Resources and to take other related actions with the Department of Human Resources and the State Personnel Board, in coordination with applicable collective bargaining organizations, to develop a process to streamline the hiring of positions, as prescribed. The bill would further require the Department of Industrial Relations to provide quarterly reports to specified legislative committees concerning the positions filled. The bill would repeal these provision on January 1, 2027, and would include related legislative findings. (3) Existing law generally grants public employees the right to join employee organizations and to be represented by those organizations in their employment relations. Existing law requires specified public employers to provide exclusive employee representatives access to new employee orientations, as prescribed. Existing law, until June 30, 2025, provides that if a public employer has not conducted an inperson new employee orientation within 30 days of a newly hired employee's start date, and the new employee is working in person, the exclusive representative is entitled to schedule an inperson meeting at the worksite during employment hours, during which newly hired employees have the opportunity to attend and are required to be relieved of other duties for purposes of attending. Existing law further requires the exclusive representative, during this meeting, to be permitted to communicate directly with newly hired employees in the applicable bargaining unit for up to 30 minutes on paid time, subject to various other conditions. This bill would extend the operation of the above provisions until June 30, 2027. (4) Existing law requires the Controller to operate a uniform state payroll system for all state agencies, except the California Exposition and State Fair and the University of California, in conformance with the accounting system for all state agencies supervised by the Department of Finance. This bill would require, on and after January 1, 2025, that payments to employees made through the uniform state payroll system for master payroll paid on June 30 of each year be issue dated on July 1, provided that employees, in any event, be paid promptly. The bill would require that these payments be considered payables incurred in the fiscal year in which the payment is issue dated, except as specified. (5) The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) creates the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) for the purpose of providing pension and benefits to state employees and their beneficiaries and prescribes the rights and duties of employers participating in the system. Under PERL, benefits are funded by investment income and employer and employee contributions, which are deposited into the Public Employees' Retirement Fund, a continuously appropriated trust fund administered by the system's board of administration. PERL prescribes methods for the calculation and payment of the state employer contribution for its employees who are PERS members. PERL provides for an annual adjustment of the state's contribution in the budget and quarterly appropriations to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund from the General Fund and other funds that are responsible for payment of the employer contribution. Existing law makes additional General Fund appropriations to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund for the 2020–21, 2021–22, 2022–23, and 2023–24 fiscal years. Supplemental payments connected with appropriations for those fiscal years are to be apportioned to the state employee member categories generally, as directed by the Department of Finance, and to specified state employee member categories, including to the state miscellaneous member category, the industrial member category, the state safety member category, and the state peace officer/firefighter member category. The California Constitution establishes the Budget Stabilization Account in the General Fund and requires the Controller, in each fiscal year, to transfer from the General Fund to the Budget Stabilization Account amounts that include a sum equal to 1.5% of the estimated amount of General Fund revenues for that fiscal year. These provisions further require, until the 2029–30 fiscal year, that the Legislature appropriate a percentage of these moneys, the amount of which is generated pursuant to specified calculations, for certain obligations and purposes, including addressing unfunded liabilities for state-level pension plans. This bill would appropriate $337,000,000 from the General Fund for the purposes identified in the constitutional provisions described above, to supplement the state's appropriation to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund. The bill would specify that this appropriation represents a portion of the amount identified in a specific provision of the Budget Act of 2024. The bill would require the Department of Finance to provide the Controller with a schedule establishing the timing of specific transfers. The bill would require the supplemental payment to the Public Employees' Retirement Fund to be apportioned to specified state employee member categories, not to exceed $180,098,000 to the state miscellaneous member category, $9,125,000 to the state industrial member category, $21,167,000 to the state safety member category, and $126,610,000 to the state peace officer/firefighter member category. The bill would require the appropriation described above to be applied to the unfunded state liabilities for the state employee member categories that are in excess of the base amounts for the 2024–25 fiscal year. (6) Existing law requires that, except as specified, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages be paid to workers employed on public works and imposes misdemeanor penalties for a willful violation of this requirement. Existing law defines "public works" for the purposes of regulating public works contracts as, among other things, construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under contract and paid for, in whole or in part, out of public funds. Existing law generally requires a contractor or subcontractor to be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or engage in the performance of any public work contract. Existing law requires a contractor or subcontractor to meet specific conditions to qualify for this registration, including that a contractor or subcontractor pay an initial application fee and an annual renewal fee set by the Director of Industrial Relations. Existing law authorizes the department to establish and adjust annual registration and renewal fees up to $800 by publishing the fees on the department's internet website. Existing law imposes misdemeanor penalties for a willful violation of those provisions. This bill would, among other things, specifically exempt the establishment and adjustment of those fees from the Administrative Procedure Act. (7) Existing law requires projects or developments undertaken pursuant to the Middle Class Housing Act of 2022, the Affordable Housing and High Road Job Act of 2022, the Affordable Housing on Faith and Higher Education Lands Act of 2023, and housing development approvals, as specified, to be subject to specified prevailing wage or skilled and trained workforce requirements. Existing law authorizes a development proponent to submit an application for a development subject to a streamlined, ministerial approval process when certain conditions are met. Existing law also outlines the requirements for a housing development project application when the development is on land owned on or before January 1, 2024, by an independent institution of higher education or a religious institution, including ownership through an affiliated or associated nonprofit benefit corporation, provided it meets specified conditions. Under existing law, one such condition for these applications is that a proponent of a development project requires in contracts with construction contractors, and certified to the local government, that certain standards are met, including requirements for contractors and subcontractors for portions of the development that are not a public work. This bill would require all contractors and subcontractors for portions of such developments that are not a public work to register with the Department of Industrial Relations, as specified. (8) Existing law authorizes a person aggrieved by an order, decision, or award made and filed by the appeals board or a workers' compensation judge under certain workers' compensation provisions to petition the appeals board for reconsideration. Existing law deems a petition for reconsideration to have been denied by the appeals board unless that petition is acted upon within 60 days from the date of filing. This bill, until July 1, 2026, would instead deem a petition for reconsideration to have been denied by the appeals board unless it is acted upon by the appeals board within 60 days from the date a trial judge transmits a case to the appeals board. The bill would require a trial judge, when it transmits a case to the appeals board, to provide notice to the parties of the case and the appeals board, as specified. (9) Existing law establishes within the Workforce Services Branch of the Employment Development Department the Community Economic Resilience Fund Program, to build an equitable and sustainable economic recovery from the impacts of COVID-19 on California's industries, workers, and communities, and to provide for the durability of that recovery by fostering long-term economic resilience in the overall transition to a carbon-neutral economy. Existing law requires the implementation grants under the program to be structured to provide a small initial tranche of funding for economic diversification pilots with demonstrable high road elements in those regions already engaged in economic recovery and transition planning. Existing law requires the grants to be awarded on a rolling and competitive basis, with the majority of funds to be used to provide economic development grants, through June 30, 2025. Existing law requires grant recipients to demonstrate a plan to fully spend or obligate all funds received by December 31, 2025, and to pay all obligations by December 31, 2026. This bill would, instead, require the majority of funds to be used to provide economic development grants through June 30, 2028. The bill would require grant recipients to demonstrate a plan to fully spend or obligate all funds received by June 30, 2028, and to pay all obligations by June 30, 2030. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 171?
AB 171 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 171?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 171?
Track AB 171 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 171

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 171

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →