Sentencing: dismissal of enhancements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 328 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 328.
You're tracking AB 328
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 328 — Sentencing: dismissal of enhancements.
Last action — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law generally authorizes a court to dismiss an action or to strike or dismiss an enhancement in the furtherance of justice. Existing law requires a court to dismiss an enhancement if it is in the furtherance of justice to do so, except if dismissal of that enhancement is prohibited by any initiative statute. This bill would also prohibit a court from dismissing specified firearms-related enhancements. Existing law requires a person who personally uses a firearm to commit certain specified felonies to be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years, or for 20 years if the person discharged the firearm, or for 25 years to life if the person discharged the firearm and proximately caused great bodily injury or death. Existing law authorizes a court, in the interest of justice and at the time of sentencing or resentencing, to strike or dismiss an enhancement otherwise required to be imposed by that law. This bill would prohibit a court from striking an allegation or a finding that would make a crime punishable pursuant to those enhancement provisions, except that a court could strike or dismiss an enhancement when the person did not personally use or discharge the firearm or when the firearm was unloaded.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 01/30/23 - Introduced Current pdf January 30, 2023
- AB328 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Reconsideration refused.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 2.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Essayli · Primary
- Juan Alanis · Cosponsor
- Phillip Chen · Cosponsor
- Megan Dahle · Cosponsor
- Laurie Davies · Cosponsor
- Heath Flora · Cosponsor
- James Gallagher · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- Joe Patterson · Cosponsor
- Waldron · Cosponsor
- Dahle · Cosponsor
- Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh · Cosponsor
- Kelly Seyarto · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 108 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Essayli
Co-sponsors (13)
- Alanis, Juan Republican
- Chen, Phillip Republican
- Dahle, Megan Republican
- Davies, Laurie Republican
- Flora, Heath Republican
- Gallagher, James Republican
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Mathis
- Patterson, Joe Republican
- Waldron
- Dahle
- Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican
- Seyarto, Kelly Republican
Not signed on (108)
108 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 108 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 25% | 13% | 0% | 63% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ortega, Liz | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Zbur, Rick Chavez | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Alanis, Juan | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 25% | 75% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan, Isaac G. | Democratic | Nay |
| Ortega, Liz | Democratic | Nay |
| Zbur, Rick Chavez | Democratic | Nay |
| Alanis, Juan | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 328 do?
- Existing law generally authorizes a court to dismiss an action or to strike or dismiss an enhancement in the furtherance of justice. Existing law requires a court to dismiss an enhancement if it is in the furtherance of justice to do so, except if dismissal of that enhancement is prohibited by any initiative statute. This bill would also prohibit a court from dismissing specified firearms-related enhancements. Existing law requires a person who personally uses a firearm to commit certain specified felonies to be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years, or for 20 years if the person discharged the firearm, or for 25 years to life if the person discharged the firearm and proximately caused great bodily injury or death. Existing law authorizes a court, in the interest of justice and at the time of sentencing or resentencing, to strike or dismiss an enhancement otherwise required to be imposed by that law. This bill would prohibit a court from striking an allegation or a finding that would make a crime punishable pursuant to those enhancement provisions, except that a court could strike or dismiss an enhancement when the person did not personally use or discharge the firearm or when the firearm was unloaded.
- Who sponsors AB 328?
- AB 328 is sponsored by Essayli, Alanis, Juan (Republican), Chen, Phillip (Republican), Dahle, Megan (Republican), Davies, Laurie (Republican), Flora, Heath (Republican), Gallagher, James (Republican), Lackey, Tom (Republican), Mathis, Patterson, Joe (Republican), Waldron, Dahle, Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie (Republican), and Seyarto, Kelly (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 328?
- This bill died with 2023-2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 328?
- Track AB 328 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 328
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 328
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →