California 2023-2024 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 125 — Transportation budget trailer bill.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 54, Statutes of 2023.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Gavin Newsom (Democratic) on July 10, 2023.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law establishes the Transportation Agency, which consists of various departments and state entities, including the California Transportation Commission and the Department of Transportation. Under existing law, the agency is under the supervision of an executive officer known as the Secretary of Transportation, who is required to develop and report to the Governor on legislative, budgetary, and administrative programs to accomplish comprehensive, long-range, and coordinated planning and policy formulation in the matters of public interest related to the agency. Existing law provides for the funding of public transit, including under the Mills-Alquist-Deddeh Act, also known as the Transportation Development Act. This bill would require the agency, on or before January 1, 2024, to establish and convene the Transit Transformation Task Force to include representatives from the department, various local agencies, academic institutions, nongovernmental organizations, and other stakeholders. The bill would require the task force to solicit and develop a structured, coordinated process for engagement of all parties to develop policy recommendations to grow transit ridership and improve the transit experience for all users of those services. The bill would require the agency, in consultation with the task force, to prepare and submit a report of findings and policy recommendations based on the task force's efforts to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature on or before October 31, 2025. The bill would require the report to include a detailed analysis of specified issues and recommendations on specified topics, including, among others, reforming the Transportation Development Act. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2028. (2) Existing law establishes the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program to fund transformative capital improvements that will modernize California's intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems and bus and ferry transit systems to achieve certain policy objectives. Existing law requires the Transportation Agency to evaluate applications for funding under the program and to approve a multiyear program of projects, as specified, and requires the California Transportation Commission to allocate funding to applicants pursuant to the program of projects approved by the agency. This bill would require that moneys appropriated in the annual Budget Act from the General Fund to the Transportation Agency for purposes of the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program be distributed pursuant to a population-based formula to regional transportation planning agencies instead of through a program of projects, as specified. The bill would authorize a regional transportation planning agency, subject to compliance with the requirements described below, to use those moneys to fund transit operating expenses within its jurisdiction and for the transformative capital improvements authorized under the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program, as specified. The bill would establish the Zero-Emission Transit Capital Program under the administration of the Transportation Agency and would require funds appropriated under the program to be allocated to regional transportation planning agencies pursuant to a population-based formula and another formula based on transit operator revenues within the jurisdiction of those regional transportation planning agencies, as specified. The bill would authorize a regional transportation planning agency, subject to the requirements described below, to fund zero-emission transit equipment and transit operating expenditures, as specified. The bill would require the Transportation Agency to develop and administer an accountability program to govern the distribution of funds made available to the Transportation Agency for the Zero-Emission Transit Capital Program and the General Fund component of the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program described above. The bill would require the Transportation Agency to adopt guidelines governing the distribution of these funding sources in consultation with specified local agencies. Under the accountability program, the bill would require a regional transportation planning agency to comply with certain requirements, including submitting a regional short-term financial plan to the Transportation Agency for approval, in order to receive moneys from these funding sources during specified fiscal years, as provided. The bill also would require the Transportation Agency to support the transit goals of the accountability program by, among other things, working with the Department of Transportation and each region to identify service improvements that could further grow ridership at the regional and interregional levels. The bill would, as part of the accountability program, require a regional transportation planning agency to submit a long-term financial plan to the Transportation Agency by June 26, 2026, as prescribed. The bill would make a regional transportation planning agency ineligible to receive a grant under the above-described existing Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program in the 2026–27 fiscal year, or any subsequent fiscal years, unless the Transportation Agency approves the long-term financial plan. The bill would make all these provisions subject to an appropriation of funds for these purposes in the Budget Act of 2023, 2024, 2025, or 2026. (3) Existing law requires the California Transportation Commission to advise and assist the Secretary of Transportation and the Legislature in formulating and evaluating state policies and plans for transportation programs in the state. Existing law requires the commission to organize itself into committees and requires commission members to receive a compensation of $100 per day, but not to exceed $800 for any commission business authorized by the commission during any month, when a majority of the commission approves the compensation by a recorded vote, plus the necessary expenses incurred by the member in the performance of the member's duties. Existing law also establishes advisory committees to the commission, including the Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee and the Technical Advisory Committee on Aeronautics. This bill would require those members of advisory committees to the commission who are not members of the commission to receive a per diem of $100 for each day actually spent in the discharge of authorized advisory committee duties. The bill would also require those advisory committee members to be reimbursed for traveling and other expenses necessarily incurred in the performance of advisory committee duties. (4) Existing law provides for the allocation of various revenues under the Transportation Development Act, to transit operators that meet specified requirements, including, as applicable, requirements related to operating costs, fare box ratios, and revenues, as specified. Existing law exempts those entities, for the 2019–20 to 2022–23 fiscal years, inclusive, as provided, from penalties or other provisions that would reduce the amount of revenues allocated as a result of failing to meet those requirements. This bill would extend those entities' exemptions through the 2025–26 fiscal year, as specified. (5) The Vehicle License Fee Law, in addition to any other fee imposed on a vehicle by that law or by the Vehicle Code, imposes a transportation improvement fee on each vehicle and requires a portion of the revenues attributable to the fee to be transferred to the Public Transportation Account for the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates those funds to the Controller under a program commonly known as the State of Good Repair Program for allocation to transit agencies pursuant to specified formulas. Existing law restricts the expenditure of moneys under this program to (A) transit capital projects or services to maintain or repair a transit operator's existing transit vehicle fleet or existing transit facilities; (B) the design, acquisition, and construction of new vehicles or facilities that improve existing transit services; or (C) transit services that complement local efforts for repair and improvement of local transportation infrastructure. Existing law authorizes the recipient transit agency to instead expend funds apportioned for the 2019–20 to 2022–23 fiscal years, inclusive, under the program on any operating or capital expenses to maintain transit service levels if the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes a specified declaration. Existing law requires the Controller to allocate a specified portion of this funding for the 2019–20 to 2022–23 fiscal years, inclusive, to recipient transit agencies pursuant to specified individual operator ratios, as prescribed. This bill would extend the authorization of a recipient transit agency to additionally expend funds apportioned through the 2025–26 fiscal year under the program on any operating or capital expenses to maintain transit service levels if the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes that specified declaration. By expanding the purposes for which continuously appropriated funds may be used, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would require the Controller to instead allocate a specified portion of that funding for the 2019–20 to 2025–26 fiscal years, inclusive, pursuant to specified individual operator ratios, as prescribed. (6) Existing law requires the transfer of a specified portion of the sales tax on diesel fuel, in addition to various other revenues, to the Public Transportation Account, a trust fund in the State Transportation Fund. Existing law requires funds in the account to be allocated for various public transportation and transportation planning purposes, with specified revenues in the account to be allocated by the Controller to specified local transportation agencies for public transportation purposes, pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates a specified portion of the revenues attributable to the sales tax on diesel fuel and various other revenues to the Controller for allocation to each local transportation agency by formulas based 50% on population and 50% on transit operator revenues. Existing law requires each State Transit Assistance Program-eligible operator within the jurisdiction of the allocating local transportation agency to receive a proportional share of the revenue-based program funds based on the qualifying revenues of that operator, as defined. Existing law, for the 2020–21 to the 2022–23 fiscal years, inclusive, requires the Controller to calculate and publish the allocation of transit operator revenue-based funds made pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program based on the same individual operator ratios published by the Controller in a specified transmittal memo, and authorizes the Controller to revise that transmittal memo, as specified. This bill would require, for the 2023–24 to 2025–26 fiscal years, inclusive, the Controller to calculate and publish the allocation of transit operator revenue-based funds made pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program based on the same individual operator ratios published by the Controller in a specified transmittal memo, and would authorize the Controller to revise that transmittal memo, as specified. (7) Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with full possession and control of the state highway system and associated property. Existing law provides for cooperative agreements between the department and public entities for the performance of work by the department and those entities and apportionment of associated expenses. This bill would prohibit the department from charging any self-help counties with countywide sales tax measures dedicated to transportation improvements more than 10% for administration indirect cost recovery and would require the department to charge those self-help counties for functional overhead. (8) Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles to establish a pilot program to evaluate the use of optional mobile or digital alternatives to driver's licenses and identification cards, subject to certain requirements, including, but not limited to, the voluntary participation of persons in the program and a limitation on the percentage of licensed drivers who can participate in the program. Existing law requires the department, in developing and implementing the use of digital driver's licenses and identification cards, to ensure the protection of personal information and include specified security features that protect against unauthorized access to information. This bill would expand the percentage of licensed drivers who can participate in the program from 0.5% to 5%. (9) Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to improve and maintain the state highways. This bill would appropriate $5,802,000 to the department to support statewide efforts addressing homelessness within the state highway system right-of-way. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2026, to submit a report to the fiscal committees of the Legislature and the Legislative Analyst's Office summarizing the outcomes associated with the activities undertaken by its encampment coordinators. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 54, Statutes of 2023.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 32. Noes 7. Page 1772.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 61. Noes 17. Page 2406.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Amendments by Assembly Member Davies tabled on motion by Assembly Member Reyes. (Ayes 58. Noes 18. Page 2405.)

  8. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Withdrawn from committee.

  10. (Ayes 56. Noes 17. Page 2370.)

  11. Assembly Rules Suspended.

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  13. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 8. Page 493.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. Ordered to second reading.

  18. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 357.)

  19. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  20. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 18.

  21. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 21 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 32 Yea · 7 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10100
Democratic 21100
Republican 1501
Total 32701
% of votes cast 80%18%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Roth — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Newman — Yea
Min — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 58 Yea · 18 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 43004
Unaffiliated 15500
Republican 01300
Total 581804
% of votes cast 73%23%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Ting — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Wood — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Essayli — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Vince Fong — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Not Voting
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Not Voting
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Not Voting
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Not Voting
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Nay
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 61 Yea · 17 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 46001
Unaffiliated 15500
Republican 01201
Total 611702
% of votes cast 76%21%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Ting — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Wood — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Essayli — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Vince Fong — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Boerner, Tasha Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Yea
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Not Voting
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Nay
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Not Voting
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 29 Yea · 8 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10100
Democratic 18103
Republican 1600
Total 29803
% of votes cast 73%20%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Roth — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Newman — Yea
Min — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Not Voting
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Not Voting
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 125 do?
(1) Existing law establishes the Transportation Agency, which consists of various departments and state entities, including the California Transportation Commission and the Department of Transportation. Under existing law, the agency is under the supervision of an executive officer known as the Secretary of Transportation, who is required to develop and report to the Governor on legislative, budgetary, and administrative programs to accomplish comprehensive, long-range, and coordinated planning and policy formulation in the matters of public interest related to the agency. Existing law provides for the funding of public transit, including under the Mills-Alquist-Deddeh Act, also known as the Transportation Development Act. This bill would require the agency, on or before January 1, 2024, to establish and convene the Transit Transformation Task Force to include representatives from the department, various local agencies, academic institutions, nongovernmental organizations, and other stakeholders. The bill would require the task force to solicit and develop a structured, coordinated process for engagement of all parties to develop policy recommendations to grow transit ridership and improve the transit experience for all users of those services. The bill would require the agency, in consultation with the task force, to prepare and submit a report of findings and policy recommendations based on the task force's efforts to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature on or before October 31, 2025. The bill would require the report to include a detailed analysis of specified issues and recommendations on specified topics, including, among others, reforming the Transportation Development Act. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2028. (2) Existing law establishes the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program to fund transformative capital improvements that will modernize California's intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems and bus and ferry transit systems to achieve certain policy objectives. Existing law requires the Transportation Agency to evaluate applications for funding under the program and to approve a multiyear program of projects, as specified, and requires the California Transportation Commission to allocate funding to applicants pursuant to the program of projects approved by the agency. This bill would require that moneys appropriated in the annual Budget Act from the General Fund to the Transportation Agency for purposes of the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program be distributed pursuant to a population-based formula to regional transportation planning agencies instead of through a program of projects, as specified. The bill would authorize a regional transportation planning agency, subject to compliance with the requirements described below, to use those moneys to fund transit operating expenses within its jurisdiction and for the transformative capital improvements authorized under the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program, as specified. The bill would establish the Zero-Emission Transit Capital Program under the administration of the Transportation Agency and would require funds appropriated under the program to be allocated to regional transportation planning agencies pursuant to a population-based formula and another formula based on transit operator revenues within the jurisdiction of those regional transportation planning agencies, as specified. The bill would authorize a regional transportation planning agency, subject to the requirements described below, to fund zero-emission transit equipment and transit operating expenditures, as specified. The bill would require the Transportation Agency to develop and administer an accountability program to govern the distribution of funds made available to the Transportation Agency for the Zero-Emission Transit Capital Program and the General Fund component of the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program described above. The bill would require the Transportation Agency to adopt guidelines governing the distribution of these funding sources in consultation with specified local agencies. Under the accountability program, the bill would require a regional transportation planning agency to comply with certain requirements, including submitting a regional short-term financial plan to the Transportation Agency for approval, in order to receive moneys from these funding sources during specified fiscal years, as provided. The bill also would require the Transportation Agency to support the transit goals of the accountability program by, among other things, working with the Department of Transportation and each region to identify service improvements that could further grow ridership at the regional and interregional levels. The bill would, as part of the accountability program, require a regional transportation planning agency to submit a long-term financial plan to the Transportation Agency by June 26, 2026, as prescribed. The bill would make a regional transportation planning agency ineligible to receive a grant under the above-described existing Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program in the 2026–27 fiscal year, or any subsequent fiscal years, unless the Transportation Agency approves the long-term financial plan. The bill would make all these provisions subject to an appropriation of funds for these purposes in the Budget Act of 2023, 2024, 2025, or 2026. (3) Existing law requires the California Transportation Commission to advise and assist the Secretary of Transportation and the Legislature in formulating and evaluating state policies and plans for transportation programs in the state. Existing law requires the commission to organize itself into committees and requires commission members to receive a compensation of $100 per day, but not to exceed $800 for any commission business authorized by the commission during any month, when a majority of the commission approves the compensation by a recorded vote, plus the necessary expenses incurred by the member in the performance of the member's duties. Existing law also establishes advisory committees to the commission, including the Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee and the Technical Advisory Committee on Aeronautics. This bill would require those members of advisory committees to the commission who are not members of the commission to receive a per diem of $100 for each day actually spent in the discharge of authorized advisory committee duties. The bill would also require those advisory committee members to be reimbursed for traveling and other expenses necessarily incurred in the performance of advisory committee duties. (4) Existing law provides for the allocation of various revenues under the Transportation Development Act, to transit operators that meet specified requirements, including, as applicable, requirements related to operating costs, fare box ratios, and revenues, as specified. Existing law exempts those entities, for the 2019–20 to 2022–23 fiscal years, inclusive, as provided, from penalties or other provisions that would reduce the amount of revenues allocated as a result of failing to meet those requirements. This bill would extend those entities' exemptions through the 2025–26 fiscal year, as specified. (5) The Vehicle License Fee Law, in addition to any other fee imposed on a vehicle by that law or by the Vehicle Code, imposes a transportation improvement fee on each vehicle and requires a portion of the revenues attributable to the fee to be transferred to the Public Transportation Account for the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates those funds to the Controller under a program commonly known as the State of Good Repair Program for allocation to transit agencies pursuant to specified formulas. Existing law restricts the expenditure of moneys under this program to (A) transit capital projects or services to maintain or repair a transit operator's existing transit vehicle fleet or existing transit facilities; (B) the design, acquisition, and construction of new vehicles or facilities that improve existing transit services; or (C) transit services that complement local efforts for repair and improvement of local transportation infrastructure. Existing law authorizes the recipient transit agency to instead expend funds apportioned for the 2019–20 to 2022–23 fiscal years, inclusive, under the program on any operating or capital expenses to maintain transit service levels if the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes a specified declaration. Existing law requires the Controller to allocate a specified portion of this funding for the 2019–20 to 2022–23 fiscal years, inclusive, to recipient transit agencies pursuant to specified individual operator ratios, as prescribed. This bill would extend the authorization of a recipient transit agency to additionally expend funds apportioned through the 2025–26 fiscal year under the program on any operating or capital expenses to maintain transit service levels if the governing board of the recipient transit agency makes that specified declaration. By expanding the purposes for which continuously appropriated funds may be used, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would require the Controller to instead allocate a specified portion of that funding for the 2019–20 to 2025–26 fiscal years, inclusive, pursuant to specified individual operator ratios, as prescribed. (6) Existing law requires the transfer of a specified portion of the sales tax on diesel fuel, in addition to various other revenues, to the Public Transportation Account, a trust fund in the State Transportation Fund. Existing law requires funds in the account to be allocated for various public transportation and transportation planning purposes, with specified revenues in the account to be allocated by the Controller to specified local transportation agencies for public transportation purposes, pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program. Existing law continuously appropriates a specified portion of the revenues attributable to the sales tax on diesel fuel and various other revenues to the Controller for allocation to each local transportation agency by formulas based 50% on population and 50% on transit operator revenues. Existing law requires each State Transit Assistance Program-eligible operator within the jurisdiction of the allocating local transportation agency to receive a proportional share of the revenue-based program funds based on the qualifying revenues of that operator, as defined. Existing law, for the 2020–21 to the 2022–23 fiscal years, inclusive, requires the Controller to calculate and publish the allocation of transit operator revenue-based funds made pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program based on the same individual operator ratios published by the Controller in a specified transmittal memo, and authorizes the Controller to revise that transmittal memo, as specified. This bill would require, for the 2023–24 to 2025–26 fiscal years, inclusive, the Controller to calculate and publish the allocation of transit operator revenue-based funds made pursuant to the State Transit Assistance Program based on the same individual operator ratios published by the Controller in a specified transmittal memo, and would authorize the Controller to revise that transmittal memo, as specified. (7) Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with full possession and control of the state highway system and associated property. Existing law provides for cooperative agreements between the department and public entities for the performance of work by the department and those entities and apportionment of associated expenses. This bill would prohibit the department from charging any self-help counties with countywide sales tax measures dedicated to transportation improvements more than 10% for administration indirect cost recovery and would require the department to charge those self-help counties for functional overhead. (8) Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles to establish a pilot program to evaluate the use of optional mobile or digital alternatives to driver's licenses and identification cards, subject to certain requirements, including, but not limited to, the voluntary participation of persons in the program and a limitation on the percentage of licensed drivers who can participate in the program. Existing law requires the department, in developing and implementing the use of digital driver's licenses and identification cards, to ensure the protection of personal information and include specified security features that protect against unauthorized access to information. This bill would expand the percentage of licensed drivers who can participate in the program from 0.5% to 5%. (9) Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to improve and maintain the state highways. This bill would appropriate $5,802,000 to the department to support statewide efforts addressing homelessness within the state highway system right-of-way. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2026, to submit a report to the fiscal committees of the Legislature and the Legislative Analyst's Office summarizing the outcomes associated with the activities undertaken by its encampment coordinators. (10) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors SB 125?
SB 125 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 125?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 18, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 125?
Track SB 125 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 125

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 125

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →