California 2023-2024, Special Session 1 Status: Enacted

SB 2 — Energy: transportation fuels: supply and pricing: maximum gross gasoline refining margin.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1, Statutes of 2023-24 First Extraordinary Session.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 05, 2022. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Gavin Newsom (Democratic) on March 28, 2023.

Prognosis

Advancing 54% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Mixed recorded votes

    6 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law requires operators of refineries in the state that produce gasoline meeting California specifications, within 30 days of the end of each calendar month, to submit a report to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission containing certain information regarding its refining activities related to the production of gasoline in that month, including the gross gasoline refining margin of gasoline sold in that month. Existing law requires the commission within 45 days of the end of each calendar month to post certain information on its internet website. This bill would authorize the commission to set a maximum gross gasoline refining margin, as provided. The bill would require the commission, if the commission establishes the maximum gross gasoline refining margin, to establish a penalty for exceeding the maximum gross gasoline refining margin, as provided. The bill would authorize the commission to petition the court to enjoin a refiner from exceeding the maximum gross gasoline refining margin. The bill would also authorize the commission to impose an administrative civil penalty on a refiner for exceeding the maximum gross gasoline refining margin, as provided. The bill would require the commission to consider a refiner's request for an exemption from the maximum gross gasoline refining margin, as provided. The bill would require a refiner seeking an exemption to file a statement under the penalty of perjury setting forth the facts that form the basis for the request for exemption. By requiring the statement to be filed under the penalty of perjury, the bill would expand the scope of the crime of perjury, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the penalties collected to be deposited into the Price Gouging Penalty Fund, which the bill would create in the State Treasury. The bill would require moneys in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be used to address any consequences of price gouging on Californians. The bill would require the California State Auditor, no later than March 1, 2033, to complete an audit and performance review of the maximum gross gasoline refining margin and penalty, if set by the commission. The bill would require the California State Auditor to make a determination in a report to the Legislature and the commission, by no later than June 1, 2033, as to whether the maximum gross gasoline refining margin and penalty is achieving the intended goal to reduce gasoline price spikes and stabilize the gasoline fuel supply market. If the California State Auditor concludes that the maximum gross gasoline refining margin and penalty should be terminated, the bill would require the commission, within 180 days after the issuance of the report, to cease implementing the maximum gross gasoline refining margin and penalty, except as provided. This bill would require the commission, in cooperation with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, to submit a report to the Legislature, on or before March 1 of each year, that includes a review of the price of gasoline in California and its impact on state revenues for the previous calendar year, as provided. The bill would authorize the department to request from any person certain records required to be maintained and any records in the person's possession, custody, or control that the department deems necessary to facilitate the report or to assist the commission. This bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2024, and every 3 years thereafter, to submit an assessment to the Governor and the Legislature that, among other things, identifies methods to ensure a reliable supply of affordable and safe transportation fuels in California, as provided. The bill would require the commission to use reasonable means necessary and available to seek and obtain information from any sources for purposes of preparing the assessment and would authorize the commission to impose a civil penalty if a person fails to timely provide information necessary for preparing the assessment. The bill would require the commission and the State Air Resources Board, on or before December 31, 2024, and taking into account the assessment, to prepare a Transportation Fuels Transition Plan, as provided. This bill would establish the Division of Petroleum Market Oversight in the commission that is led by a director appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation. The bill would specify that the division operates with authority independent of the commission's authority. The bill would specify the duties of the division, including, among other duties, the duty to provide guidance and recommendations to the Governor and the commission on any issues related to transportation fuels pricing and transportation decarbonization in California. The bill would establish the Independent Consumer Fuels Advisory Committee, consisting of specified members, within the commission, and would require the committee to advise the commission and the division. This bill would require operators of refineries to report additional information, including the net gasoline refining margin per barrel of gasoline sold in that month. The bill would require the commission to post on its internet website certain information related to the net gasoline refining margin. Existing law requires major oil producers, refiners, marketers, oil transporters, and oil storers to annually submit certain information to the commission, as provided. This bill would revise and recast the above reporting requirement to, among other things, require pipeline operators and operators of ports through which refined gasoline is imported to annually report their capacities for all pipelines and ports used to transport refined gasoline, require all importers of refined products and renewable fuels via marine vessel to submit reports to the commission, as specified, require nonrefiners that commercially trade in gasoline, gasoline blending components, diesel fuel, or renewable fuel inventory to submit weekly reports to the commission, as provided, require refiners and nonrefiners that consummate spot market transactions to submit a daily report to the commission containing certain information for each transaction occurring in the preceding day, as provided, and require refiners to report maintenance activities, both planned and unplanned, to the commission, as provided. Existing law subjects a person who fails to provide information to the commission after being notified of the failure to civil penalties in specified amounts. This bill would increase the amount of civil penalties that may be imposed. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1, Statutes of 2023-24 First Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Ordered to the Senate.

  6. (Ayes 56. Noes 16. Page 54.)

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 58. Noes 19. Page 53.)

  8. Amendments by Assembly Member Joe Patterson tabled on motion by Assembly Member Reyes. (Ayes 59. Noes 19. Page 53.)

  9. Read second time.

  10. (Ayes 60. Noes 18. Page 51.)

  11. Assembly Rules suspended.

  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (March 27).

  13. Referred to Com. on U.& E.

  14. Joint Rule 37.4 suspended. (Ayes 59. Noes 16. Page 44.)

  15. Article IV Section 8(b) of the Constitution Invoked.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 23.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  18. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 23.)

  19. Senate Rules suspended

  20. Joint Rule 37.4 suspended. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 23.)

  21. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 24.) (March 23).

  22. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 2. Page 20.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Set for hearing March 23 in APPR pending receipt.

  24. Set for hearing March 22.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.

  26. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  27. Introduced. Read first time. Referred to Com. on RLS.

Sponsors

  • Skinner · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 26 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Skinner

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 58 Yea · 19 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 42103
Unaffiliated 16500
Republican 01300
Total 581903
% of votes cast 73%24%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Boerner Horvath — Yea
Ting — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Wood — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Essayli — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Vince Fong — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Nay
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Not Voting
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Not Voting
Ramos, James C. Democratic Not Voting
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Yea
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Nay
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 6000
Unaffiliated 5200
Republican 0200
Total 11400
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Ting — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Holden — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 59 Yea · 19 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 43102
Unaffiliated 16500
Republican 01300
Total 591902
% of votes cast 74%24%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Villapudua — Yea
Boerner Horvath — Yea
Ting — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Low — Yea
Wood — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Essayli — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Luz Rivas — Yea
Vince Fong — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Addis, Dawn Democratic Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Alvarez, David Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bains, Jasmeet Democratic Nay
Bauer-Kahan, Rebecca Democratic Yea
Bennett, Steve Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Bryan, Isaac G. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Carrillo, Juan Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Connolly, Damon Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Haney, Matt Democratic Yea
Hart, Gregg Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Lee, Alex Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
McKinnor, Tina Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Ortega, Liz Democratic Not Voting
Pacheco, Blanca Democratic Yea
Papan, Diane Democratic Yea
Pellerin, Gail Democratic Yea
Petrie-Norris, Cottie Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Ramos, James C. Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Rivas, Robert Democratic Yea
Rubio, Blanca E. Democratic Yea
Schiavo, Pilar Democratic Yea
Soria, Esmeralda Democratic Not Voting
Valencia, Avelino Democratic Yea
Ward, Christopher M. Democratic Yea
Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah Democratic Yea
Wicks, Buffy Democratic Yea
Wilson, Lori D. Democratic Yea
Zbur, Rick Chavez Democratic Yea
Alanis, Juan Republican Nay
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Davies, Laurie Republican Nay
Dixon, Diane Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Hoover, Josh Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay
Sanchez, Kate Republican Nay
Ta, Tri Republican Nay
Wallis, Greg Republican Nay

Official roll call →

2nd Reading

Passed 30 Yea · 8 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Democratic 20101
Republican 0700
Total 30802
% of votes cast 75%20%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Roth — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Newman — Yea
Min — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Archuleta, Bob Democratic Yea
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Blakespear, Catherine S. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Cortese, Dave Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
Hurtado, Melissa Democratic Yea
Laird, John Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Menjivar, Caroline Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Smallwood-Cuevas, Lola Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Umberg, Thomas J. Democratic Yea
Wahab, Aisha Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea
Alvarado-Gil, Marie Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie Republican Nay
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 2 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 7001
Unaffiliated 6001
Republican 0201
Total 13203
% of votes cast 72%11%0%17%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Min — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Newman — Yea
Wilk — Not Voting
Ashby, Angelique V. Democratic Yea
Becker, Josh Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Durazo, Maria Elena Democratic Yea
Gonzalez, Lena A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Rubio, Susan Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Not Voting
Seyarto, Kelly Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 2 do?
Existing law requires operators of refineries in the state that produce gasoline meeting California specifications, within 30 days of the end of each calendar month, to submit a report to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission containing certain information regarding its refining activities related to the production of gasoline in that month, including the gross gasoline refining margin of gasoline sold in that month. Existing law requires the commission within 45 days of the end of each calendar month to post certain information on its internet website. This bill would authorize the commission to set a maximum gross gasoline refining margin, as provided. The bill would require the commission, if the commission establishes the maximum gross gasoline refining margin, to establish a penalty for exceeding the maximum gross gasoline refining margin, as provided. The bill would authorize the commission to petition the court to enjoin a refiner from exceeding the maximum gross gasoline refining margin. The bill would also authorize the commission to impose an administrative civil penalty on a refiner for exceeding the maximum gross gasoline refining margin, as provided. The bill would require the commission to consider a refiner's request for an exemption from the maximum gross gasoline refining margin, as provided. The bill would require a refiner seeking an exemption to file a statement under the penalty of perjury setting forth the facts that form the basis for the request for exemption. By requiring the statement to be filed under the penalty of perjury, the bill would expand the scope of the crime of perjury, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the penalties collected to be deposited into the Price Gouging Penalty Fund, which the bill would create in the State Treasury. The bill would require moneys in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be used to address any consequences of price gouging on Californians. The bill would require the California State Auditor, no later than March 1, 2033, to complete an audit and performance review of the maximum gross gasoline refining margin and penalty, if set by the commission. The bill would require the California State Auditor to make a determination in a report to the Legislature and the commission, by no later than June 1, 2033, as to whether the maximum gross gasoline refining margin and penalty is achieving the intended goal to reduce gasoline price spikes and stabilize the gasoline fuel supply market. If the California State Auditor concludes that the maximum gross gasoline refining margin and penalty should be terminated, the bill would require the commission, within 180 days after the issuance of the report, to cease implementing the maximum gross gasoline refining margin and penalty, except as provided. This bill would require the commission, in cooperation with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, to submit a report to the Legislature, on or before March 1 of each year, that includes a review of the price of gasoline in California and its impact on state revenues for the previous calendar year, as provided. The bill would authorize the department to request from any person certain records required to be maintained and any records in the person's possession, custody, or control that the department deems necessary to facilitate the report or to assist the commission. This bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2024, and every 3 years thereafter, to submit an assessment to the Governor and the Legislature that, among other things, identifies methods to ensure a reliable supply of affordable and safe transportation fuels in California, as provided. The bill would require the commission to use reasonable means necessary and available to seek and obtain information from any sources for purposes of preparing the assessment and would authorize the commission to impose a civil penalty if a person fails to timely provide information necessary for preparing the assessment. The bill would require the commission and the State Air Resources Board, on or before December 31, 2024, and taking into account the assessment, to prepare a Transportation Fuels Transition Plan, as provided. This bill would establish the Division of Petroleum Market Oversight in the commission that is led by a director appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation. The bill would specify that the division operates with authority independent of the commission's authority. The bill would specify the duties of the division, including, among other duties, the duty to provide guidance and recommendations to the Governor and the commission on any issues related to transportation fuels pricing and transportation decarbonization in California. The bill would establish the Independent Consumer Fuels Advisory Committee, consisting of specified members, within the commission, and would require the committee to advise the commission and the division. This bill would require operators of refineries to report additional information, including the net gasoline refining margin per barrel of gasoline sold in that month. The bill would require the commission to post on its internet website certain information related to the net gasoline refining margin. Existing law requires major oil producers, refiners, marketers, oil transporters, and oil storers to annually submit certain information to the commission, as provided. This bill would revise and recast the above reporting requirement to, among other things, require pipeline operators and operators of ports through which refined gasoline is imported to annually report their capacities for all pipelines and ports used to transport refined gasoline, require all importers of refined products and renewable fuels via marine vessel to submit reports to the commission, as specified, require nonrefiners that commercially trade in gasoline, gasoline blending components, diesel fuel, or renewable fuel inventory to submit weekly reports to the commission, as provided, require refiners and nonrefiners that consummate spot market transactions to submit a daily report to the commission containing certain information for each transaction occurring in the preceding day, as provided, and require refiners to report maintenance activities, both planned and unplanned, to the commission, as provided. Existing law subjects a person who fails to provide information to the commission after being notified of the failure to civil penalties in specified amounts. This bill would increase the amount of civil penalties that may be imposed. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 2?
SB 2 is sponsored by Skinner.
What is the current status of SB 2?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 05, 2022. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 2?
Track SB 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 2

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →