S1676 — Requires that nuisance wildlife control operators disclose to the client that euthanasia may be used to resolve a wildlife related problem
Last action — In Assembly Committee
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Requires that nuisance wildlife control operators disclose to the client, in writing, that euthanasia may be used to resolve a wildlife related problem.
Bill Text
- Full text View text Current
Action History
-
REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
-
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
-
PASSED SENATE
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.258
-
REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
-
RETURNED TO SENATE
-
DIED IN ASSEMBLY
-
REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
-
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
-
PASSED SENATE
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.766
-
REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Sponsors
- James Skoufis · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 218 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (218)
218 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 218 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 45 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (63)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 10% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anthony H. Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Brian Kavanagh | — | Yea |
| Dan Stec | — | Nay |
| José M. Serrano | — | Yea |
| Michelle Hinchey | — | Yea |
| Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | — | Yea |
| Patricia Fahy | — | Yea |
| Pete Harckham | — | Yea |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Siela Bynoe | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 14 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 43 | 14 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 23% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (62)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anthony H. Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Brad Hoylman-Sigal | — | Yea |
| Brian Kavanagh | — | Yea |
| Dan Stec | — | Nay |
| José M. Serrano | — | Yea |
| Michelle Hinchey | — | Yea |
| Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | — | Yea |
| Patricia Fahy | — | Yea |
| Pete Harckham | — | Yea |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Siela Bynoe | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anthony H. Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Brad Hoylman-Sigal | — | Yea |
| Brian Kavanagh | — | Yea |
| Dan Stec | — | Nay |
| José M. Serrano | — | Yea |
| Michelle Hinchey | — | Yea |
| Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | — | Yea |
| Patricia Fahy | — | Yea |
| Pete Harckham | — | Yea |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Siela Bynoe | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S1676 do?
- Requires that nuisance wildlife control operators disclose to the client, in writing, that euthanasia may be used to resolve a wildlife related problem.
- Who sponsors S1676?
- S1676 is sponsored by James Skoufis.
- What is the current status of S1676?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S1676?
- Track S1676 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S1676
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S1676
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →