S955 — Relates to the use of smart access systems and the information that may be gathered from such systems
Last action — In Senate Committee
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill limits data collection from smart access systems regarding tenants and guests.
This legislation aims to impose restrictions on the information gathered from smart access systems used by lessees and guests. It seeks to protect the privacy of individuals associated with these systems.
What this means for you
- Families: This means that the personal information of family members using smart access systems should be better protected.
Summary
Relates to limitations on the use of smart access systems; restricts information that may be gathered on lessees, tenants, owners or guests.
Bill Text
- Full text View text Current
Action History
-
COMMITTED TO RULES
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.1322
-
REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO INTERNET AND TECHNOLOGY
-
REFERRED TO HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
-
RETURNED TO SENATE
-
DIED IN ASSEMBLY
-
REFERRED TO HOUSING
-
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
-
PASSED SENATE
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.928
-
REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO INTERNET AND TECHNOLOGY
-
REFERRED TO HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Sponsors
- Brian Kavanagh · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 218 not signed on · 20 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (218)
218 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 218 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Gounardes | — | Yea |
| Dan Stec | — | Nay |
| Jeremy Zellner | — | Yea |
| Kevin S. Parker | — | Yea |
| Kristen Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Walczyk | — | Nay |
| Michelle Hinchey | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brian Kavanagh | — | Yea |
| Cordell Cleare | — | Yea |
| Gustavo Rivera | — | Yea |
| Jabari Brisport | — | Yea |
| Jack M. Martins | — | Nay |
| Jeremy Zellner | — | Yea |
| Julia Salazar | — | Yea |
| Mark Walczyk | — | Nay |
| Pamela Helming | — | Nay |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Robert Jackson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 20 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 37 | 20 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 32% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (62)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Gounardes | — | Yea |
| Dan Stec | — | Nay |
| Kevin S. Parker | — | Yea |
| Kristen Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Walczyk | — | Nay |
| Michelle Hinchey | — | Yea |
| Sean Ryan | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brian Kavanagh | — | Yea |
| Cordell Cleare | — | Yea |
| Gustavo Rivera | — | Yea |
| Jabari Brisport | — | Yea |
| Jack M. Martins | — | Nay |
| Julia Salazar | — | Yea |
| Mark Walczyk | — | Nay |
| Pamela Helming | — | Nay |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Robert Jackson | — | Yea |
| Sean Ryan | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S955 do?
- Relates to limitations on the use of smart access systems; restricts information that may be gathered on lessees, tenants, owners or guests.
- Who sponsors S955?
- S955 is sponsored by Brian Kavanagh.
- What is the current status of S955?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S955?
- Track S955 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S955
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S955
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →