S663 — Removes the requirement of the state liquor authority to have not more than two members of the authority belong to the same political party
Last action — In Senate Committee
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill removes the political party membership limit for the state liquor authority.
This legislation eliminates the requirement that no more than two members of the state liquor authority belong to the same political party. This change could allow for more flexible political representation within the authority.
Summary
Removes the requirement of the state liquor authority to have not more than two members of the authority belong to the same political party.
Bill Text
- Full text View text Current
Action History
-
COMMITTED TO RULES
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.526
-
REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
-
COMMITTED TO RULES
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.550
-
REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
Sponsors
- James Skoufis · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 218 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (218)
218 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 218 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cordell Cleare | — | Yea |
| Erik Bottcher | — | Yea |
| James Skoufis | — | Yea |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Siela Bynoe | — | Yea |
| Stephen T. Chan | — | Yea |
| Thomas F. O'Mara | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brad Hoylman-Sigal | — | Yea |
| Cordell Cleare | — | Yea |
| James Skoufis | — | Yea |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Siela Bynoe | — | Yea |
| Stephen T. Chan | — | Nay |
| Thomas F. O'Mara | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S663 do?
- Removes the requirement of the state liquor authority to have not more than two members of the authority belong to the same political party.
- Who sponsors S663?
- S663 is sponsored by James Skoufis.
- What is the current status of S663?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S663?
- Track S663 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S663
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S663
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →