S647 — Expands use of videoconferencing to purely advisory bodies
Last action — In Senate Committee
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill expands videoconferencing access for advisory bodies.
This legislation allows purely advisory bodies to conduct meetings via videoconferencing. This change aims to increase accessibility and participation in these meetings.
Summary
Expands use of videoconferencing to purely advisory bodies.
Bill Text
- Full text View text Current
Action History
-
COMMITTED TO RULES
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.525
-
REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
-
COMMITTED TO RULES
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.243
-
REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
Sponsors
- James Skoufis · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 218 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (218)
218 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 218 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cordell Cleare | — | Yea |
| Erik Bottcher | — | Yea |
| James Skoufis | — | Yea |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Siela Bynoe | — | Yea |
| Stephen T. Chan | — | Nay |
| Thomas F. O'Mara | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brad Hoylman-Sigal | — | Yea |
| Cordell Cleare | — | Yea |
| James Skoufis | — | Yea |
| Rachel May | — | Yea |
| Siela Bynoe | — | Yea |
| Stephen T. Chan | — | Yea |
| Thomas F. O'Mara | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S647 do?
- Expands use of videoconferencing to purely advisory bodies.
- Who sponsors S647?
- S647 is sponsored by James Skoufis.
- What is the current status of S647?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S647?
- Track S647 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S647
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S647
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →