S464 — Limits the admissibility of evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression against such defendant in a criminal proceeding
Last action — Assembly Floor Calendar
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Establishes an assumption of the inadmissibility of evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression against such defendant in a criminal proceeding; requires the proffering party to affirmatively prove that the evidence is admissible by clear and convincing evidence.
Bill Text
- Full text View text Current
Action History
-
ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.24
-
SUBSTITUTED FOR A123
-
REFERRED TO CODES
-
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
-
PASSED SENATE
-
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
-
2ND REPORT CAL.
-
1ST REPORT CAL.175
-
REFERRED TO CODES
Sponsors
- Brad Hoylman-Sigal · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 218 not signed on · 23 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (218)
218 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 218 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 23 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 38 | 23 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 37% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (63)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 15% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Gounardes | — | Yea |
| Anthony H. Palumbo | — | Nay |
| Brian Kavanagh | — | Yea |
| Dean Murray | — | Yea |
| Jabari Brisport | — | Yea |
| Jamaal Bailey | — | Yea |
| Jeremy Cooney | — | Yea |
| Julia Salazar | — | Yea |
| Luis R. Sepúlveda | — | Yea |
| Patrick M. Gallivan | — | Not Voting |
| Roxanne J. Persaud | — | Yea |
| Thomas F. O'Mara | — | Nay |
| Zellnor Myrie | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S464 do?
- Establishes an assumption of the inadmissibility of evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression against such defendant in a criminal proceeding; requires the proffering party to affirmatively prove that the evidence is admissible by clear and convincing evidence.
- Who sponsors S464?
- S464 is sponsored by Brad Hoylman-Sigal.
- What is the current status of S464?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S464?
- Track S464 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S464
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S464
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →