South Dakota 2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee 2 R cosponsors

HB 1092 — revise certain requirements regarding municipal annexation resolutions.

Last action — Local Government Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 1. H.J. 219

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read HB 1092 on the official South Dakota source →

Action History

  1. Local Government Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 1. H.J. 219

  2. Local Government Motion to amend, Passed Amendment 1092ca

  3. Scheduled for hearing

  4. Deferred by Chair

  5. Scheduled for hearing

  6. First read in House and referred to House Local Government H.J. 76

Sponsors

  • Tim Reed · Primary
  • Greg Jamison · Primary
  • Kennedy · Primary
  • Cronin · Primary
  • Peters · Primary
  • McCleerey · Primary
  • Ahlers · Primary
  • Langer · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 97 not signed on

Sponsors (8)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (97)

97 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 97 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Deferred to the 41st legislative day - 2018

Passed 12 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 6000
Unaffiliated 5100
Democratic 1000
Total 12100
% of votes cast 92%8%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
McCleerey — Nay
Conzet — Yea
Tulson — Yea
Turbiville — Yea
York — Yea
Kettwig — Yea
Jamie Smith Democratic Yea
Ernie Otten Republican Yea
Greg Jamison Republican Yea
Kyle Schoenfish Republican Yea
Lana Greenfield Republican Yea
Sam Marty Republican Yea
Tim Reed Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Municipal Government Newspapers Notice and Publication
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1092?
HB 1092 is sponsored by Tim Reed (Republican), Greg Jamison (Republican), Kennedy, Cronin, Peters, McCleerey, Ahlers, and Langer.
What is the current status of HB 1092?
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 1092?
Track HB 1092 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1092

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 1092

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →