An Act amending the act of June 2, 1915 (P.L.736, No.338), known as the Workers' Compensation Act, in liabi...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 18 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 18.
You're tracking HB 18
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 18 — An Act amending the act of June 2, 1915 (P.L.736, No.338), known as the Workers' Compensation Act, in liability and compensation, further providing for prescription drugs and the treatment of work-related injuries; and, in procedure, further providing for peer review.
Last action — Re-referred to RULES
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
87 added · 222 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 18 introduces a new requirement for the department to select a nationally recognized, evidence-based prescription drug formulary specifically for managing medications related to work-related injuries. This formulary will help ensure that prescribed drugs are appropriate in terms of type, dosage, and duration, promoting better treatment practices. Additionally, the bill now mandates a public comment period of at least 30 days but no more than 90 days for community input on this formulary selection, allowing for public engagement in important health decisions. These changes aim to improve the safety and effectiveness of treatments for injured workers.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
463 PRINTER'STHE NO.GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
2014 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL Session of No.
HARRIS, HEFFLEY, MILLARD, TOPPER,SIMMONS IRVIN, SAYLOR AND GILLEN,TOPPER, FEBRUARY 13, 2017 ASREFERRED REPORTEDTO FROM COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND INDUSTRY, HOUSEFEBRUARY OF13, REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, JUNE 14, 2017 AN ACT AmendingAmereenacted the act of June 2, 1915 (P.L.736, No.338), entitled, as <-- reenacted and amended, "An act defining the liability of ananas employer to pay damages for injuries received by an employe schedulein the course of compensation;employment;
establishing an elective schedule of compensation;
Section 306(f.1)(3)(vi) of the act of June 2, 1915 <-- (P.L.736, No.338), known as the Workers' Compensation Act, is amended by adding a provision and paragraph (6) is amended by adding a subclause to read:
SECTION 1.
SECTION 306(F.1)(6)(II) OF THE ACT OF JUNE 2, <-- 1915 (P.L.736, NO.338), KNOWN AS THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT, IS AMENDED, PARAGRAPH (3)(VI) IS AMENDED BY ADDING A SUBCLAUSE AND PARAGRAPH (6) IS AMENDED BY ADDING A SUBPARAGRAPH TO READ:
(I) Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this provisionprovision, SUBCLAUSE, the department shall solicit public <-- comments regarding the selection of a prescription drug formulary under this provision.
<--The DURINGdepartment THEshall PUBLICpublish COMMENTnotice PERIOD,of THEthe DEPARTMENTpublic SHALLcomment CONDUCTperiod <--in ATthe LEASTPennsylvania ONEBulletin. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SELECTION OF A DRUG FORMULARY.
The(II) departmentWithin shallthirty publish(30) noticedays after close of the public comment period ANDunder PUBLICsubprovision HEARINGS(I), the department shall publish notice of its selection of a prescription drug formulary in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
<--The (II)prescription Withindrug formulary shall take effect thirty (30) days after close of the publicpublication commentrequired periodby underthis subprovisionsubprovision. (I), the department shall publish notice of its selection of a THE prescription drug <-- formulary SELECTED in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
(III) The <--department prescriptionshall drugensure formularythat shallthe takecurrent effectprescription thirtydrug (30)formulary ONEis <--available HUNDREDthrough EIGHTYits (180)publicly daysaccessible afterInternet thewebsite publicationfor requiredreference by thisphysicians subprovision.and the general public.
(III)(IV) INThe SELECTINGprescription Aof NATIONALLYdrugs RECOGNIZED,that EVIDENCE-BASEDis <--not PRESCRIPTIONconsistent DRUGwith FORMULARYor FORrecommended ADOPTION,by THEthe DEPARTMENTprescription SHALLdrug CONSIDERformulary THEselected FOLLOWINGby FACTORS:the department shall not be considered reasonable and necessary for the purposes of paragraph (6).
20170HB0018PN2014* * * (6) Except in those cases in which a workers' compensation judge asks for an opinion from peer review under section 420, 20170HB0018PN0463 - 2 - (A)disputes WHETHERas THEto FORMULARYreasonableness FOCUSESor ONnecessity MEDICALof TREATMENTtreatment SPECIFICby TOa WORKERS'health COMPENSATION.care provider shall be resolved in accordance with the following provisions:
(B)* WHETHER* THE* BASIS(v) FORThe THEdepartment FORMULARYshall ISapprove READILYonly APPARENTthose ANDutilization PUBLICLYreview AVAILABLE.organizations that it determines have obtained certification as a utilization review entity under section 2151 of the Insurance Company Law of 1921.
(C) WHETHER THE FORMULARY INCLUDES MEASURES TO AID IN MANAGEMENT OF OPIOID MEDICATIONS.
(D) WHETHER THE FORMULARY APPROPRIATELY LIMITS BOTH DURATION AND DOSAGE OF PRESCRIPTIONS.
(E) THE COST OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FORMULARY.
(IV) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ANNUALLY REVIEW UPDATES ISSUED BY THE FORMULARY PUBLISHER TO THE SELECTED FORMULARY AND BY NOVEMBER 1 EACH YEAR SHALL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING THE UPDATES PROPOSED FOR ADOPTION BY PUBLISHING NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED UPDATES AND A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD IN THE PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN.
THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR UPDATES TO THE ADOPTED FORMULARY SHALL BE AT LEAST TWENTY (20) DAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS.
WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PUBLISH NOTICE OF THE ADOPTED UPDATES IN THE PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN.
THE PUBLISHED UPDATES SHALL TAKE EFFECT THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE PUBLICATION REQUIRED BY THIS SUBPROVISION.
(III) (V) The department shall ensure that the current <-- prescription drug formulary is available through its publicly accessible Internet website for reference by physicians and the general public.
(IV) (VI) The PRESCRIPTION OF DRUGS THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH <-- OR RECOMMENDED BY THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG FORMULARY SHALL BE CONSIDERED REASONABLE AND NECESSARY FOR THE PURPOSES OF PARAGRAPH (6).
EXCEPT IN CASES OF MEDICAL NECESSITY UNDER SUBPROVISION (VII), THE prescription of drugs that is not 20170HB0018PN2014 - 3 - consistent with or recommended by the prescription drug formulary selected by the department shall not be considered reasonable and necessary for the purposes of paragraph (6).
(VII) THE PRESCRIPTION OF DRUGS THAT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH <-- OR RECOMMENDED BY THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG FORMULARY MAY ONLY BE CONSIDERED REASONABLE AND NECESSARY FOR THE PURPOSES OF PARAGRAPH (6) IF THE TREATING HEALTH CARE PROVIDER HAS SUBMITTED DOCUMENTATION OF MEDICAL NECESSITY, INCLUDING EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE REASON FOR THE EXCEPTION, TO THE INSURER OR SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL PRESCRIPTION.
THE DOCUMENTATION OF MEDICAL NECESSITY SHALL BE ON A FORM PRESCRIBED BY THE DEPARTMENT.
(VIII) WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) CALENDAR MONTHS FOLLOWING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG FORMULARY SELECTED UNDER THIS SUBCLAUSE, THE PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATINGS BUREAU SHALL CALCULATE THE SAVINGS ACHIEVED THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG FORMULARY.
FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THIS CALCULATION, THE AMOUNT OF SAVINGS SHALL BE USED TO PROVIDE AN IMMEDIATE REDUCTION IN RATES, EQUAL TO THE SAVINGS, APPLICABLE TO EMPLOYERS' WORKERS' COMPENSATION POLICIES.
* * * (6) Except in those cases in which a workers' compensation judge asks for an opinion from peer review under section 420, disputes as to reasonableness or necessity of treatment by a health care provider shall be resolved in accordance with the following provisions:
* * * (II) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ASSIGN A REQUEST FOR UTILIZATION <-- REVIEW TO A UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION AT RANDOM.
THE 20170HB0018PN2014 - 4 - UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION SHALL ISSUE A WRITTEN REPORT OF ITS FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WITHIN THE TIME FRAME REQUIRED BY THE NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED ACCREDITATION STANDARDS ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT UNDER SUBPARAGRAPH (V).
IN NO CASE SHALL THE REPORT OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS BE ISSUED MORE THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE RECEIPT OF A REQUEST.
* * * (v) The department shall approve only those utilization review organizations that it determines have obtained certification as a utilization review entity under section 2151 <-- of the Insurance Company Law of 1921.
OR ACCREDITATION BY A <-- NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION WITH CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION STANDARDS APPROPRIATE FOR RESOLVING UTILIZATION ISSUES FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS.
THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY:
(A) WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS CLAUSE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PUBLISH NOTICE IN THE PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN OF THE SPECIFIC NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION THAT WILL BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO BE APPROVED AS A UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION.
(B) UPON PUBLICATION UNDER SUBCLAUSE (A), AN ENTITY WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION MAY NOT ENGAGE IN UTILIZATION REVIEW UNDER THIS ACT, EXCEPT THAT AN ENTITY APPROVED AS A UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION BY THE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS CLAUSE MAY CONTINUE TO ENGAGE IN UTILIZATION REVIEW FOR UP TO EIGHTEEN (18) CALENDAR MONTHS AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE UNDER SUBCLAUSE (A).
IF THE DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THAT AN ENTITY APPROVED AS A UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION BY THE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS CLAUSE IS ACTIVELY ATTEMPTING TO ACHIEVE 20170HB0018PN2014 - 5 - THE SELECTED CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION, THE ENTITY SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR REAUTHORIZATION DURING THE EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERIOD.
Show all 58 changed lines (18 more)
A UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION SHALL ADHERE TO THE REVIEW STANDARDS OF THE SELECTED NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION ORGANIZATION FOR ALL UTILIZATION REVIEW WHERE THE DATE OF THE INJURY IS AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18) CALENDAR MONTHS AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE UNDER SUBCLAUSE (A).
(C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ENTER AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SELECTED NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION ORGANIZATION TO PROVIDE FOR THE CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION PROCESS FOR UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS AND EMPLOYES OF UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS, INCLUDING THE COSTS OF ANY AUDITS REQUIRED FOR THE CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION PROCESS.
THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE REASONABLE ATTEMPTS TO NEGOTIATE A REDUCTION OF THE COST OF THE CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION PROCESS.
AN ENTITY APPROVED AS A UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION BY THE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS CLAUSE, INCLUDING A SURVIVING ASSOCIATION THAT RESULTS FROM THE MERGER OF TWO OR MORE UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 15 PA.C.S.
CH.
3 SUBCH.
C (RELATING TO MERGER), SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE INITIAL CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION PROCESS AT NO COST TO THE ENTITY.
AFTER JANUARY 1, 2020, AN ENTITY APPROVED AS A UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCESS TO RENEW ITS CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION AT NO COST TO THE ENTITY.
AN ENTITY FOR WHICH THE DEPARTMENT HAS INCURRED COSTS UNDER THIS SUBCLAUSE SHALL REIMBURSE THE DEPARTMENT FOR ITS COSTS RELATED TO THE MOST RECENT CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION FOR THE ENTITY, IF THE ENTITY DOES NOT SUCCESSFULLY OBTAIN THE INITIAL 20170HB0018PN2014 - 6 - OR RENEWAL CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION.
THE ACTUAL AMOUNT OF THE COST TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR THE CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION PROCESS UNDER THIS SUBCLAUSE, NOT TO EXCEED ONE MILLION FIVE-HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,500,000) ANNUALLY, SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE DEPARTMENT FROM THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION FUND.
(D) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CONDUCT OUTREACH TO ALL ENTITIES APPROVED AS UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATIONS BY THE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS CLAUSE.
THE OUTREACH SHALL INCLUDE PROVIDING EACH ENTITY WITH NOTICE OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CLAUSE, GUIDANCE ON HOW THIS CLAUSE WILL BE ENFORCED BY THE DEPARTMENT AND INFORMATION ON HOW THE ENTITY MAY PARTICIPATE IN THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OR ACCREDITATION PROCESS AT NO COST UNDER SUBCLAUSE (C).
The workers' compensation judge when necessary or appropriate or upon request of a party in order to rule on requests for review filed under section 306(f.1), or under other provisions of this act, may ask for an opinion from peer review about the reasonableness or necessity 20170HB0018PN2014 - 7 - [or frequency] of treatment under section 306(f.1).
The peer review report or the peer report of any physician, surgeon, or expert appointed by the department or by a workers' compensation judge, including the report of a peer review organization, shall be filed with the board or workers' compensation judge, as the case may be, and shall be a part of the record and open to 20170HB0018PN0463 - 3 - inspection as such.
SECTIONSection 3.
WITHIN EIGHT MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS <-- ACT, THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY SHALL PROPOSE REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE AMENDMENT OR ADDITION OF SECTION 306(F.1)(3)(VI)(J) AND (6)(II) AND (V) OF THE ACT.
Section 3 4.
<--20170HB0018PN0463 20170HB0018PN2014 - 84 -
Show all 58 changed rows (18 more)
Action History
-
Re-referred to RULES
-
Reported with request to re-refer to RULES
-
Re-committed to HUMAN SERVICES
-
Re-reported as committed
-
Re-committed to RULES
-
First consideration
-
PN 2014 Reported as amended
-
PN 0463 Referred to LABOR AND INDUSTRY
Sponsors
- Rich Irvin · Cosponsor
- A. Harris · Cosponsor
- Mark M. Gillen · Cosponsor
- Doyle Heffley · Cosponsor
- Millard · Cosponsor
- Mustio · Cosponsor
- Saylor · Cosponsor
- Jesse Topper · Cosponsor
- Milou Mackenzie · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 244 not signed on · 39 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Milou Mackenzie Republican Voted No
Co-sponsors (8)
- Rich Irvin Republican Voted No
- A. Harris
- Mark M. Gillen Republican Voted No
- Doyle Heffley Republican Voted No
- Millard
- Mustio
- Saylor
- Jesse Topper Republican Voted No
Not signed on (244)
244 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 244 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 62 | 51 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 102 | 94 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 46% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (203)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ELLIS | — | Nay |
| BARRAR | — | Yea |
| BLOOM | — | Nay |
| BOBACK | — | Yea |
| CHARLTON | — | Yea |
| CHRISTIANA | — | Nay |
| CORBIN | — | Nay |
| CORR | — | Nay |
| COX | — | Nay |
| DIGIROLAMO | — | Yea |
| DOWLING | — | Nay |
| DUNBAR | — | Nay |
| ENGLISH | — | Yea |
| EVANKOVICH | — | Nay |
| EVERETT | — | Nay |
| E GABLER | — | Not Voting |
| GILLESPIE | — | Nay |
| GODSHALL | — | Nay |
| HAHN | — | Nay |
| HARPER | — | Yea |
| HARRIS, A. | — | Nay |
| HELM | — | Nay |
| HENNESSEY | — | Yea |
| HICKERNELL | — | Nay |
| HILL | — | Nay |
| JOZWIAK | — | Yea |
| KAMPF | — | Nay |
| KAUFER | — | Yea |
| KELLER, F. | — | Nay |
| KELLER, M.K. | — | Nay |
| KNOWLES | — | Nay |
| LEWIS | — | Yea |
| E MAHER | — | Not Voting |
| MARSHALL | — | Nay |
| MARSICO | — | Nay |
| MASSER | — | Nay |
| E MCGINNIS | — | Not Voting |
| METCALFE | — | Nay |
| MICCARELLI | — | Yea |
| MILLARD | — | Yea |
| E MILNE | — | Not Voting |
| MURT | — | Nay |
| MUSTIO | — | Nay |
| NELSON | — | Nay |
| NESBIT | — | Nay |
| O'NEILL | — | Nay |
| OBERLANDER | — | Nay |
| PEIFER | — | Yea |
| PETRI | — | Yea |
| PYLE | — | Nay |
| E QUIGLEY | — | Not Voting |
| QUINN, C. | — | Nay |
| QUINN, M. | — | Nay |
| REED | — | Nay |
| REESE | — | Nay |
| ROE | — | Nay |
| RYAN | — | Nay |
| SACCONE | — | Nay |
| SANKEY | — | Nay |
| SANTORA | — | Yea |
| SAYLOR | — | Nay |
| E SCHEMEL | — | Not Voting |
| SIMMONS | — | Yea |
| SONNEY | — | Nay |
| STEPHENS | — | Nay |
| TALLMAN | — | Nay |
| TAYLOR | — | Yea |
| TOBASH | — | Nay |
| TOEPEL | — | Nay |
| TOOHIL | — | Yea |
| WARD | — | Nay |
| WATSON | — | Nay |
| WHEELAND | — | Nay |
| BARBIN | — | Yea |
| BOYLE | — | Yea |
| BROWN, V. | — | Yea |
| BULLOCK | — | Yea |
| CALTAGIRONE | — | Yea |
| CRUZ | — | Yea |
| DEAN | — | Yea |
| DELISSIO | — | Yea |
| DELUCA | — | Yea |
| DERMODY | — | Yea |
| DONATUCCI | — | Yea |
| DRISCOLL | — | Yea |
| EVANS | — | Yea |
| E FABRIZIO | — | Not Voting |
| FITZGERALD | — | Yea |
| GAINEY | — | Yea |
| GALLOWAY | — | Yea |
| GOODMAN | — | Yea |
| HAGGERTY | — | Yea |
| HANNA | — | Yea |
| KAVULICH | — | Yea |
| KELLER, W. | — | Yea |
| KINSEY | — | Yea |
| KIRKLAND | — | Yea |
| KORTZ | — | Yea |
| LONGIETTI | — | Yea |
| MCCARTER | — | Yea |
| MULLERY | — | Yea |
| NEUMAN | — | Yea |
| O'BRIEN | — | Yea |
| PETRARCA | — | Yea |
| RAVENSTAHL | — | Yea |
| READSHAW | — | Yea |
| ROEBUCK | — | Yea |
| ROZZI | — | Yea |
| SAINATO | — | Yea |
| SIMS | — | Yea |
| SNYDER | — | Yea |
| STURLA | — | Yea |
| THOMAS | — | Yea |
| VAZQUEZ | — | Yea |
| WHEATLEY | — | Yea |
| YOUNGBLOOD | — | Yea |
| TURZAI | — | Nay |
| Dan Miller | — | Yea |
| Matthew Gergely | — | Yea |
| Seth Grove | — | Nay |
| Andre D. Carroll | Democratic | Yea |
| Anita Astorino Kulik | Democratic | Yea |
| Brandon J. Markosek | Democratic | Yea |
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher M. Rabb | Democratic | Yea |
| Dan Frankel | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel J. Deasy | Democratic | Yea |
| Ed Neilson | Democratic | Yea |
| Eddie Day Pashinski | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Greg Vitali | Democratic | Yea |
| Jared G. Solomon | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Dawkins | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jeanne McNeill | Democratic | Yea |
| Joanna E. McClinton | Democratic | Yea |
| Jordan A. Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Leanne Krueger | Democratic | Yea |
| Marty Flynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary Jo Daley | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew D. Bradford | Democratic | Yea |
| Maureen E. Madden | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael H. Schlossberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Morgan Cephas | Democratic | Yea |
| Nathan Davidson | Democratic | Yea |
| Patrick J. Harkins | Democratic | Yea |
| Patty Kim | Democratic | Yea |
| Perry S. Warren | Democratic | Yea |
| Peter Schweyer | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert F. Matzie | Democratic | Yea |
| Robert Freeman | Democratic | Yea |
| Ryan A. Bizzarro | Democratic | Yea |
| Scott Conklin | Democratic | Yea |
| Steve Samuelson | Democratic | Yea |
| Tim Briggs | Democratic | Yea |
| Tina M. Davis | Democratic | Yea |
| Aaron Bernstine | Republican | Nay |
| Brad Roae | Republican | Nay |
| Brett R. Miller | Republican | Nay |
| Bryan Cutler | Republican | Nay |
| Bud Cook | Republican | Nay |
| Carl Walker Metzgar | Republican | Nay |
| Craig T. Staats | Republican | Nay |
| Cris Dush | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Moul | Republican | Nay |
| David H. Zimmerman | Republican | Nay |
| David M. Maloney | Republican | Nay |
| Dawn W. Keefer | Republican | Nay |
| Doyle Heffley | Republican | Nay |
| Frank A. Farry | Republican | Nay |
| Gary W. Day | Republican | Nay |
| Greg Rothman | Republican | Nay |
| Jack Rader | Republican | Yea |
| Jamie Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| Jason Ortitay | Republican | Nay |
| Jesse Topper | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Emrick | Republican | Nay |
| John A. Lawrence | Republican | Nay |
| Jonathan Fritz | Republican | Nay |
| Kate A. Klunk | Republican | Nay |
| Kathy L. Rapp | Republican | Nay |
| Keith J. Greiner | Republican | Nay |
| Kerry A. Benninghoff | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Schlegel Culver | Republican | Nay |
| Mark M. Gillen | Republican | Nay |
| Martin T. Causer | Republican | Nay |
| Martina A. White | Republican | Yea |
| Milou Mackenzie | Republican | Nay |
| Mindy Fee | Republican | Nay |
| Parke Wentling | Republican | Nay |
| R. Lee James | Republican | Nay |
| Rich Irvin | Republican | Nay |
| Rob W. Kauffman | Republican | Nay |
| Rosemary M. Brown | Republican | Nay |
| Russ Diamond | Republican | Nay |
| Ryan Warner | Republican | Nay |
| Sheryl M. Delozier | Republican | Nay |
| Steven C. Mentzer | Republican | Nay |
| Thomas L. Mehaffie | Republican | Nay |
| Tina Pickett | Republican | Yea |
| Zachary Mako | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 18?
- HB 18 is sponsored by Rich Irvin (Republican), A. Harris, Mark M. Gillen (Republican), Doyle Heffley (Republican), Millard, Mustio, Saylor, Jesse Topper (Republican), and Milou Mackenzie (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 18?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 18?
- Track HB 18 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 18
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 18
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →