Pennsylvania 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 1 R · 1 D cosponsors

SB 113 — An Act amending Title 20 (Decedents, Estates and Fiduciaries) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in incapacitated persons, providing for communication, visitation and interaction with other persons and for notice to immediate family of certain events.

Last action — Referred to JUDICIARY

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

175 added · 208 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill SB 113 clarify the rights of incapacitated individuals regarding communication and visitation. The term "immediate family" has been replaced with "closest relatives," emphasizing broader family relationships in the context of legal notifications. Additionally, a new requirement has been added that guardians must comply with any existing protective orders designed to safeguard the incapacitated person, regardless of when the order was issued. This change is significant because it strengthens the protection of vulnerable individuals while ensuring that their rights to maintain connections with loved ones are upheld.

→
Previous
Latest
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
PRINTER'S NO.
87 PRINTER'S NO.
87 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
987 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
113 2017 INTRODUCED BY EICHELBERGER, SABATINA, BARTOLOTTA, RESCHENTHALER, VULAKOVICH, COSTA, MENSCH, RAFFERTY AND BREWSTER, JANUARY 13, 2017 REFERRED TO JUDICIARY, JANUARY 13, 2017 AN ACT Amending Title 20 (Decedents, Estates and Fiduciaries) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in incapacitated persons, providing for communication, visitation and interaction with other persons and for notice to closest relatives of certain events.
113 2017 INTRODUCED BY EICHELBERGER, SABATINA, BARTOLOTTA, RESCHENTHALER, VULAKOVICH, COSTA, MENSCH, RAFFERTY AND BREWSTER, JANUARY 13, 2017 AS AMENDED ON SECOND CONSIDERATION, JUNE 20, 2017 AN ACT Amending Title 20 (Decedents, Estates and Fiduciaries) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in incapacitated persons, providing for communication, visitation and interaction with other persons and for notice to closest relatives IMMEDIATE <-- FAMILY of certain events.
Notice to closest relatives IMMEDIATE FAMILY of certain <-- events.
Notice to closest relatives of certain events.
(3) A GUARDIAN SHALL COMPLY WITH A PROTECTIVE ORDER THAT <-- REMAINS IN EFFECT TO PROTECT THE INCAPACITATED PERSON FROM OTHER PERSONS, EVEN IF ISSUED PRIOR TO THE APPOINTMENT OF THE GUARDIAN.
(1) THE EXISTENCE OF A PRIOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OR WHETHER <-- A PROTECTIVE ORDER IS BEING SOUGHT TO PROTECT THE INCAPACITATED PERSON FROM THE PERSON SEEKING ACCESS TO THE INCAPACITATED PERSON;
(1) whether a protective order has been issued to protect the incapacitated person from the person seeking access to the incapacitated person;
(1) (2) whether a protective order has been issued to <-- protect the incapacitated person from the person seeking access to the incapacitated person;
(2) whether abuse, neglect or financial exploitation of the incapacitated person by the person seeking access to the incapacitated person has occurred or is likely to occur;
(2) (3) whether abuse, neglect or financial exploitation <-- of the incapacitated person by the person seeking access to 20170SB0113PN0987 - 2 - the incapacitated person has occurred or is likely to occur;
(3) documented intention of the incapacitated person to reject communication, visitation or interaction with specific persons;
(3) (4) documented intention of the incapacitated person <-- to reject communication, visitation or interaction with specific persons;
or (4) any other factors deemed relevant by the court.
or (4) (5) any other factors deemed relevant by the court.
(c) Court order for restrictions.-- (1) A court may order restrictions placed on the communications, visitations or interactions a person may have with an incapacitated person upon a showing of good cause by 20170SB0113PN0087 - 2 - the guardian.
<-- (c) Court order for restrictions.-- (1) A court may order restrictions placed on the communications, visitations or interactions a person may have with an incapacitated person upon a showing of good cause by the guardian.
(3) Prior to issuing an order under this subsection, the 20170SB0113PN0987 - 3 - court shall consider the following:
(3) Prior to issuing an order under this subsection, the court shall consider the following:
(ii) requiring that communication, visitation or interaction between the incapacitated person and the other person be supervised;
(ii) requiring that communication, visitation or interaction between the incapacitated person and the 20170SB0113PN0087 - 3 - other person be supervised;
(2) Notwithstanding actions available to the court under 20170SB0113PN0987 - 4 - paragraph (1), a guardian who is found to be knowingly isolating an incapacitated person and who has violated subsection (a) or an order issued under subsection (c) shall be subject to discharge and replacement as provided by law.
(2) Notwithstanding actions available to the court under paragraph (1), a guardian who is found to be knowingly isolating an incapacitated person and who has violated subsection (a) or an order issued under subsection (c) shall be subject to discharge and replacement as provided by law.
The court, in its discretion, may order mediation to be conducted between the parties and the incapacitated person prior to the hearing.
The court, in its discretion, may order mediation 20170SB0113PN0087 - 4 - to be conducted between the parties and the incapacitated person prior to the hearing.
(5) Nothing in this subsection may be construed to 20170SB0113PN0987 - 5 - affect the incapacitated person's right to appear and be heard in the proceedings.
(5) Nothing in this subsection may be construed to affect the incapacitated person's right to appear and be heard in the proceedings.
(f) Costs and reasonable attorney fees.-- <-- (1) The court, in its discretion, may award the prevailing party in an action brought under this section court costs and reasonable attorney fees, provided that an award of court costs and reasonable attorney fees may not be paid out of the incapacitated person's estate.
(f) Costs and reasonable attorney fees.-- (1) The court, in its discretion, may award the prevailing party in an action brought under this section court costs and reasonable attorney fees, provided that an award of court costs and reasonable attorney fees may not be paid out of the incapacitated person's estate.
(2) The court, upon petition or upon its own initiative, may impose upon a guardian who is found to be knowingly isolating an incapacitated person and who has violated subsection (a) or an order issued under subsection (c) an appropriate sanction, including an order to pay court costs and reasonable attorney fees of the other party or parties, provided that no sanction may be paid out of the incapacitated person's estate.
(2) The court, upon petition or upon its own initiative, 20170SB0113PN0087 - 5 - may impose upon a guardian who is found to be knowingly isolating an incapacitated person and who has violated subsection (a) or an order issued under subsection (c) an appropriate sanction, including an order to pay court costs and reasonable attorney fees of the other party or parties, provided that no sanction may be paid out of the incapacitated person's estate.
(F) SANCTIONS.--IF A GUARDIAN HAS VIOLATED A COURT ORDER <-- ISSUED UNDER THIS SUBCHAPTER, THE COURT MAY:
(1) REQUIRE THE GUARDIAN TO GRANT A PERSON ACCESS OR PROVIDE NOTICE;
(2) RESTRICT OR REDUCE A GUARDIAN'S RIGHT TO COMPENSATION, IF ANY;
(3) MODIFY THE GUARDIAN'S DUTIES;
OR (4) REMOVE THE GUARDIAN.
Notice to closest relatives IMMEDIATE FAMILY of certain <-- events.
Notice to closest relatives of certain events.
(a) General rule.--A guardian shall promptly notify an incapacitated person's closest relatives IMMEDIATE FAMILY and <-- any person designated by the incapacitated person to be notified, along with the appropriate contact information, upon 20170SB0113PN0987 - 6 - the guardian's knowledge that:
(a) General rule.--A guardian shall promptly notify an incapacitated person's closest relatives and any person designated by the incapacitated person to be notified, along with the appropriate contact information, upon the guardian's knowledge that:
(1) the incapacitated person's PERMANENT residence has <-- changed;
(1) the incapacitated person's residence has changed;
(b) Exception.-- (1) A guardian shall not be required to provide notice in accordance with subsection (a) if:
(b) Exception.-- (1) A guardian shall not be required to provide notice 20170SB0113PN0087 - 6 - in accordance with subsection (a) if:
20170SB0113PN0987 - 7 - (C) NOTIFICATIONS.-- <-- (1) THE REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE NOTICE UNDER SUBSECTION (A) MAY BE SATISFIED BY PROVIDING NOTICE TO ALL PERSONS DESIGNATED BY THE INCAPACITATED PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED AND TO THE INCAPACITATED PERSON'S SPOUSE, IF THE SPOUSE IS NOT THE GUARDIAN.
(2) IF THE INCAPACITATED PERSON HAS NO SPOUSE, OR THE SPOUSE IS ACTING AS GUARDIAN, NOTICE SHALL BE SENT TO EACH OF THE INCAPACITATED PERSON'S CHILDREN, IF ANY.
(3) IF THE INCAPACITATED PERSON HAS NO SPOUSE OR SURVIVING CHILDREN, NOTIFICATION MAY BE SENT TO A BROTHER, SISTER, GRANDCHILD OR OTHER PERSON DESIGNATED BY THE INCAPACITATED PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED, IF ANY.
20170SB0113PN0987 - 8 -
20170SB0113PN0087 - 7 -
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Referred to JUDICIARY

  2. Third consideration and final passage

  3. Re-reported as committed

  4. Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS

  5. PN 0987 Second consideration, with amendments

  6. Removed from table

  7. Laid on the table

  8. First consideration

  9. Reported as committed

  10. PN 0087 Referred to JUDICIARY

Sponsors

  • Camera Bartolotta · Cosponsor
  • Brewster · Cosponsor
  • Rafferty · Cosponsor
  • Eichelberger · Primary
  • Mensch · Cosponsor
  • Reschenthaler · Cosponsor
  • Sabatina · Cosponsor
  • Vulakovich · Cosponsor
  • Jay Costa · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 244 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Eichelberger

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (244)

244 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 244 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

FINAL PASSAGE

Passed 49 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 13000
Unaffiliated 28001
Democratic 8000
Total 49001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (50)
Member Party Vote
ALLOWAY — Yea
AUMENT — Yea
BLAKE — Yea
BREWSTER — Yea
BROWNE — Yea
CORMAN — Yea
DINNIMAN — Yea
DISANTO — Yea
EICHELBERGER — Yea
FARNESE — Yea
FOLMER — Yea
GORDNER — Yea
GREENLEAF — Yea
KILLION — Yea
LEACH — Yea
MCGARRIGLE — Yea
MCILHINNEY — Yea
MENSCH — Yea
RAFFERTY — Yea
REGAN — Yea
RESCHENTHALER — Yea
SABATINA — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
SCAVELLO — Yea
VULAKOVICH — Yea
WAGNER — Not Voting
WARD — Yea
WILLIAMS — Yea
YUDICHAK — Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Yea
Christine M. Tartaglione Democratic Yea
Jay Costa Democratic Yea
Judith L. Schwank Democratic Yea
Lisa M. Boscola Democratic Yea
Sharif Street Democratic Yea
Vincent J. Hughes Democratic Yea
Wayne D. Fontana Democratic Yea
Camera Bartolotta Republican Yea
Daniel Laughlin Republican Yea
David G. Argall Republican Yea
Elder A. Vogel Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Kathleen C. Tomlinson Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea
Martina A. White Republican Yea
Michele Brooks Republican Yea
Patrick J. Stefano Republican Yea
Scott E. Hutchinson Republican Yea
Scott Martin Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 26 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 6000
Unaffiliated 14000
Democratic 6000
Total 26000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (26)
Member Party Vote
BLAKE — Yea
BREWSTER — Yea
EICHELBERGER — Yea
GREENLEAF — Yea
KILLION — Yea
LEACH — Yea
MENSCH — Yea
SCAVELLO — Yea
VULAKOVICH — Yea
WAGNER — Yea
WARD — Yea
BROWNE — Yea
CORMAN — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Yea
Christine M. Tartaglione Democratic Yea
Jay Costa Democratic Yea
Judith L. Schwank Democratic Yea
Sharif Street Democratic Yea
Vincent J. Hughes Democratic Yea
David G. Argall Republican Yea
Elder A. Vogel Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea
Scott Martin Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Democratic 2000
Republican 2000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
ALLOWAY — Yea
EICHELBERGER — Yea
FARNESE — Yea
GORDNER — Yea
LEACH — Yea
RAFFERTY — Yea
RESCHENTHALER — Yea
SABATINA — Yea
VULAKOVICH — Yea
GREENLEAF — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Yea
Lisa M. Boscola Democratic Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 113?
SB 113 is sponsored by Camera Bartolotta (Republican), Brewster, Rafferty, Eichelberger, Mensch, Reschenthaler, Sabatina, Vulakovich, and Jay Costa (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 113?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 113?
Track SB 113 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 113

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 113

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →