relative to eliminating the waiting period before eligibility to receive unemployment benefits.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 226 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 226.
You're tracking SB 226
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 226 — relative to eliminating the waiting period before eligibility to receive unemployment benefits.
Last action — Inexpedient to Legislate, MA, VV === BILL KILLED ===; 03/16/2017; SJ 9
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 226 on the official New Hampshire source →Action History
-
Inexpedient to Legislate, MA, VV === BILL KILLED ===; 03/16/2017; SJ 9
-
Sen. Sanborn Moved Inexpedient to Legislate; 03/16/2017; SJ 9
-
Ought to Pass: RC 11Y-12N, MF; 03/16/2017; SJ 9
-
Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 03/16/2017; SC 14
-
Hearing: 03/07/2017, Room 100, SH, 01:15 pm; SC 11
-
Introduced 01/19/2017 and Referred to Commerce; SJ 5
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 415 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (415)
415 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 415 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 48% | 52% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (23)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bette R Lasky | — | Yea |
| Bob J. Giuda | — | Nay |
| Chuck W Morse | — | Nay |
| Dan Feltes | — | Yea |
| Donna M. Soucy | — | Yea |
| Gary L. Daniels | — | Nay |
| Harold F. French | — | Yea |
| Jay Kahn | — | Yea |
| Jeb Bradley | — | Nay |
| Jeff Woodburn | — | Yea |
| John Reagan | — | Nay |
| Kevin A. Avard | — | Nay |
| Laurie J. Sanborn | — | Nay |
| Lou D'Allesandro | — | Yea |
| Martha Fuller Clark | — | Yea |
| Martha S. Hennessey | — | Yea |
| William Gannon | — | Nay |
| David Watters | Democrat | Yea |
| Daniel Innis | Republican | Yea |
| James Gray | Republican | Nay |
| Regina Birdsell | Republican | Nay |
| Ruth Ward | Republican | Nay |
| Sharon Carson | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What is the current status of SB 226?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 226?
- Track SB 226 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 226
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 226
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →