SB 315 — Authorizes the Department of Transportation to enter into a progressive design-build contract for a certain project. (BDR S-626)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 86.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 10, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on May 28, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
407 added · 434 removed407 line(s) added, 434 removed.
(ReprintedSenate withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 17, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
315315–Senator SENATEDaly BILLCHAPTER.......... N O.
315–SENATOR D ALY M ARCH 10, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure SUMMARY—Authorizes the Department of Transportation to enter into a progressive design-build contract for a certain project.
(BDR S-626) FISCAL NOTE:
EffEffect on the State:
Yes.No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
(NRS 408.3875-408.3888) Section 8 of this bill authorizes the Department to enter into one or more progressive design-build contracts for the preconstruction, final design and construction of the project consisting of improvements to Interstate 80 EastsignEast between Vista Boulevard in Sparks, Nevada and USA Parkway (State Route 439) inadvertise Storeya County,solicitation Nevada.for the project on its Internet website.
Section 9 of this bill requires the Department to advertise a solicitation for the project on its Internet website.
Section 10 prescribes the procedure for the review of submissions and the selection of an forapplicant. preconstruction services with a progressive design-build team.ter into a contract If the Department enters into a progressive design-build contract with a progressive design-build team pursuant to section 10, section 11 of this bill authorizes the Department, after the progressive design-build team has progressed in the design for project, or any portion thereof, in a sufficient manner to determine the cost of the final design and construction of the project, to enter into negotiations complete final design and construction of the project, or any portion thereof.
Section 10 authorizes the Department to negotiate to enter into a contract for preconstruction services with a progressive design-build team.
If the Department enters into a progressive design-build contract with a progressive design-build team pursuant to section 10, section 11 of this bill authorizes the Department, after the progressive design-build team has progressed the cost of the final design and construction of the project, to enter into negotiations with the progressive design-build team for a contract or a contract amendment to complete final design and construction of the project, or any portion thereof.
(1) enter into a separate contract with a qualified person who was a member of the progressive design-build team to complete the - *SB315_R1* – 2 – design of the project, or portion thereof;
Section 12 of this bill prescribes the requirements 12.5for ofa thisprogressive billdesign-build prescribescontract theentered requirementsinto forpursuant ato contractsection with11. a design1.
Section professional for the provision of services for the project.t with a design Section 13 of the bill provides for the confidentiality of certain information and documents concerning the project.
Section 1314 of thethis bill providesauthorizes forthe Department to employ a registered architect or licensed professional engineer as a consultant to assist the confidentialityDepartment ofin certainoverseeing informationthe preconstruction and documentsconstruction concerningof the project.
SectionSections 142-7 of this bill authorizesdefine therelevant Departmentterms tofor employthis abill. registered architect or licensed professional engineer as a consultant to project.
Sections- 2-783rd ofSession this(2025) bill– define2 relevant– termsEXPLANATION for– thisMatter bill.nin ofbolded theitalics THEis PEOPLEnew; OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
(a) The environmental review process;
Enters into one or more contracts for the services of a subcontractor, supplier or independent contractor on the project or is - *SB315_R1* – 3 – responsible for making payments to subcontractors, suppliers or independent contractors on the project.
“Progressive design-build” means a procurement method in which the Department selects a progressive design-build team, in one or more steps, to enter into a contract with thetheuild Department to perform preconstruction services that may progress to the completion of the final design and construction of the project, - 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – or a portion thereof, upon negotiation and approval by the Department of a price and other terms and conditions.
1.contractor or a general building contractor pursuant to chapter 624g of NRS.
At least one person who is licensed as a general engineering contractor or a general building contractor pursuant to chapter 624 of NRS.
The Department shall advertise a solicitation for a progressive design-build team for the project on the Internet website of the2.e Department.DA solicitation advertised pursuant to subsection 1 must include, without limitation:
2.
A solicitation advertised pursuant to subsection 1 must include, without limitation:
- *SB315_R1* – 4 – (e) The date by which proposals in a one-step procurement process, or a statement of qualifications in a two-step procurement process, must be submitted to the Department;
- 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – (g) A statement setting forth the requirement that the members of the progressive design-build team possess the licenses and certificates necessary to carry out their respective functions in this State;
(h) A list of the factors and relative weight assigned to each factor that the Department will use to evaluate the progressiveprogressivech design-build teams who submit their proposals or qualifications for the project;
(b) Evidence of the ability of the applicant to obtain such insurance as may be required by law, including, without limitation, evidence of the ability of any member of the progressive design- build team who is licensed as a professional engineer pursuant to chapter 625 of NRS to obtain professional liability insurance in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 in the aggregate;
(1) Found liable for breach of contract with respect to a previous project, other than a breach of contract for a legitimate - *SB315_R1* – 5 – cause, during the 5 years immediately preceding the date on which the solicitation was advertised pursuant to section 9 of this act;
3.- 83rd Session (2025) – 5 – (a) The factors that the Department will use to qualify a progressive design-build team, including, without limitation, the relative weight to be assigned to each factor.
The qualification requirements must set forth:
(a) The factors that the Department will use to qualify a progressive design-build team, including, without limitation, the relative weight to be assigned to each factor.
(1)applicant;The The professional qualifications and experience of the applicant;(2) The performance history of the members of the progressive design-build team concerning other recent, similar projects completed by those members, if any;
(2) The performance history of the members of the progressive design-build team concerning other recent, similar projects completed by those members, if any;
(b)Department.date The date by which the proposals must be submitted to the Department.(c) The requirement that the proposal comply with the provisions of NRS 338.141.
Show all 74 changed lines (34 more)
(c) The requirement that the proposal comply with the provisions of NRS 338.141.
The Department may evaluate submissions based solely upon the information provided in the statement of - *SB315_R1* – 6 – qualifications or proposals of each applicant.
After review of the submissions, the Department may interview some or all of the - 83rd Session (2025) – 6 – applicants to further evaluate which applicant offers the best value for the project.
For each request for qualifications or proposals, the Department shall rank the applicants and generate a final list of eligible applicants that participated in the request for qualifications or proposals before entering into negotiations for one or moremorefications contracts to which the request for qualifications or proposals applies.
If applicants are required to submit cost information with their proposals for the preconstruction phase of the project, the evaluation must be on a pass or fail basis or based on not more than 20 percent of the scoring, as the Department deems appropriate.
9.provide sufficient information to determine which eligible applicant has offered the best value to the public, the Department may enter into negotiations with that applicant concerning contract terms and award a contract for preconstruction services to that applicant.
If the submissions in response to a request for proposals provide sufficient information to determine which eligible applicant has offered the best value to the public, the Department may enter into negotiations with that applicant concerning contract terms and award a contract for preconstruction services to that applicant.
If the Department is unable to negotiate a contract with the highest ranked applicant determined by the Department to be fair and reasonable, - *SB315_R1*83rd Session (2025) – 7 – the Department may terminate or suspend negotiations with the highest ranked applicant.
The Department may undertake negotiations with the next highest ranked applicant in sequence until an agreement is reached or until a determination is made by the DepartmentDepSec. to reject all applicants.
Sec.
1.1.rejecIf the Department enters into a progressive design-build contract with a progressive design-build team pursuant to section 10 of this act, the Department may, after the progressive design-build team has progressed in the design for project, or any portion thereof, in a sufficient manner to determine the cost of the final design and construction of the project, enter into negotiations with the progressive design-build team for a contract or a contract amendment to complete final design and construction of the project, or any portion thereof.
If the Department enters into a progressive design-build contract with a progressive design-build team pursuant to section 10 of this act, the Department may, after the progressive design-build team has progressed in the design for project, or any portion thereof, in a sufficient manner to determine the cost of the final design and construction of the project, enter into negotiations with the progressive design-build team for a contract or a contract amendment to complete final design and construction of the project, or any portion thereof.
or (b) May undertake a new procurement and award the contract for the project pursuant to the provisions of NRS 408.327 to 408.387, inclusive, or 408.3875 to 408.3888, inclusive.
(1) An amount that is the maximum amount that the Department will pay for the performance of all the work required by the contract, excluding any amount related to costs that may be incurred- as83rd aSession result(2025) of– unexpected8 conditions– change orders as authorized by the contract;s or occurrences or change(2) ordersAn asamount authorizedthat is the maximum amount that the Department will pay for the performance of the professional services required by the contract;
- *SB315_R1* – 8 – (2) An amount that is the maximum amount that the Department will pay for the performance of the professional services required by the contract;
(a) Assume overall responsibility for ensuring that the design and construction of the project is completed in a satisfactory manner;
andandction of the project is completed in a satisfactory (b) Use the workforce of the prime contractor on the progressive design-build team to construct at least 30 percent of the project.
(3) The terms of any penalty that will be imposed upon the prime contractor if the prime contractor fails to pay the design professional within the specific period set forth in the contract pursuantpursua(4) That the prevailing party in an action to subparagraphenforce (1).the contract is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
(4) That the prevailing party in an action to enforce the contract is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
(c) May set forth the terms by which the design professional agrees to name the prime contractor, at the cost of the prime contractor,- as83rd anSession additional(2025) insured– in9 an– insurance policy held by the design professional, if the policy allows such an addition.addition.d by (d) Must not require the design professional to defend, indemnify or hold harmless the prime contractor or the employees, officers or agents of that prime contractor from any liability, damage, loss, claim, action or proceeding caused by the negligence, errors, omissions, recklessness or intentional misconduct of the employees, officers or agents of the prime contractor.
(d)(e) MustMay not require the design professional to defend, indemnify orand hold harmless the prime contractorcontractor, orand the employees, officers orand agents of thatthe prime contractor from any liability,liabilities, -damages, *SB315_R1*losses, –claims, 9actions –or damage,proceedings, loss,including, claim,without actionlimitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, to the extent that such liabilities, damages, losses, claims, actions or proceedingproceedings are caused by the negligence, errors, omissions, recklessness or intentional misconduct of the design professional or the employees or agents of the design professional in the performance of the con(f) Must not require the design professional to defend the prime contractor and the employees, officers orand agents of the prime contractor.contractor with respect to the liabilities, damages, losses, claims, actions or proceedings caused by the negligence, errors, omissions, recklessness or intentional misconduct of the design professional or the employees or agents of the design professional which are based upon or arising out of the professional services of the design professional.
(e) May require the design professional to indemnify and hold harmless the prime contractor, and the employees, officers and agents of the prime contractor from any liabilities, damages, losses, claims, actions or proceedings, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, to the extent that such liabilities, damages, losses, claims, actions or proceedings are caused by the negligence, errors, omissions, recklessness or intentional misconduct of the design professional or the employees or agents of the design professional in the performance of the contract.
(f) Must not require the design professional to defend the prime contractor and the employees, officers and agents of the prime contractor with respect to the liabilities, damages, losses, claims, actions or proceedings caused by the negligence, errors, omissions, recklessness or intentional misconduct of the design professional or the employees or agents of the design professional which are based upon or arising out of the professional services of the design professional.
(g) May require the design professional to defend the prime contractor and the employees, officers and agents of the prime contractor with respect to the liabilities, damages, losses, claims, actions or proceedings caused by the negligence, errors, omissions,omissions,, recklessness or intentional misconduct of the design professional or the employees or agents of the design professional which are not based upon or arising out of the professional services of the design professional.
3.- 83rd Session (2025) – 10 – (a) “Agent” means a person who is directly involved in and acting on behalf of the prime contractor or the design professional, as applicable, in furtherance of the contract or the project.
As used in this section:
(a) “Agent” means a person who is directly involved in and acting on behalf of the prime contractor or the design professional, as applicable, in furtherance of the contract or the project.
- *SB315_R1* – 10 – Sec.
3.otherwise make public, financial or proprietary information submitted by a progressive design-build team.
The Department shall not release to a third party, or otherwise make public, financial or proprietary information submitted by a progressive design-build team.
(3) Any information provided to the Department during negotiation of a contract or contract amendment for the final design and construction of the project pursuant to section 11 of this act.
The Department may employ a person who holds a certificate of registration to practice architecture pursuant to chapter 623 of NRS or is licensed as a professional engineer pursuant to chapter 625 of NRS as a consultant to assist the Department in overseeing the preconstruction and construction of the project.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 11 – 1.
H~~~~~ 25 - *SB315_R1*83rd Session (2025)
Show all 74 changed rows (34 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 86.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate. In Senate.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To Assembly.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 20, Nays: None, Absent: 1.) To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 119.) Reprinting dispensed with. Placed on General File.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure. To printer.
Sponsors
- Skip Daly · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Daly, Skip Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| OâNeill, PK | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Natha C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Backus, Shea M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Brown-May, Tracy | Democratic | Yea |
| Carter, Max E., II | Democratic | Yea |
| Considine, Venicia | Democratic | Yea |
| D'Silva, Reuben | Democratic | Yea |
| Dalia, Joe | Democratic | Yea |
| Flanagan, Tanya P. | Democratic | Yea |
| González, Cecelia | Democratic | Yea |
| Goulding, Heather | Democratic | Yea |
| Hunt, Linda F. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Jovan A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jauregui, Sandra | Democratic | Yea |
| Karris, Venise | Democratic | Yea |
| La Rue Hatch, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Marzola, Elaine H. | Democratic | Yea |
| Miller, Brittney M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Monroe-Moreno, Daniele | Democratic | Yea |
| Moore, Cinthia Zermeño | Democratic | Yea |
| Mosca, Erica | Democratic | Yea |
| Nadeem, Hanadi | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Duy | Democratic | Yea |
| Orentlicher, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Roth, Erica P. | Democratic | Yea |
| Torres-Fossett, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Watts, Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Yeager, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Cole, Lisa K. | Republican | Yea |
| DeLong, Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Dickman, Jill | Republican | Yea |
| Edgeworth, Rebecca | Republican | Yea |
| Gallant, Danielle | Republican | Yea |
| Gray, Ken | Republican | Yea |
| Gurr, Bert K. | Republican | Yea |
| Hafen, Gregory T., II | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Alexis M. | Republican | Yea |
| Hardy, Melissa R.. | Republican | Yea |
| Hibbetts, Brian | Republican | Yea |
| Kasama, Heidi | Republican | Yea |
| Koenig, Gregory S. | Republican | Yea |
| Yurek, Toby | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannizzaro, Nicole J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" | Democratic | Yea |
| Daly, Skip | Democratic | Yea |
| Dondero Loop, Marilyn | Democratic | Yea |
| Doñate, Fabian | Democratic | Yea |
| Flores, Edgar | Democratic | Yea |
| Lange, Roberta | Democratic | Yea |
| Neal, Dina | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Rochelle T. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ohrenschall, James | Democratic | Yea |
| Pazina, Julie | Democratic | Yea |
| Scheible, Melanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Taylor, Angela D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Buck, Carrie Ann | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ellison, John | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Ira | Republican | Yea |
| Krasner, Lisa | Republican | Yea |
| Rogich, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Steinbeck, John C. | Republican | Yea |
| Stone, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Titus, Robin L. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 315?
- SB 315 is sponsored by Daly, Skip (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 315?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 10, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 315?
- Track SB 315 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 315
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 315
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →