Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 369 — Revises provisions governing certain orders for protection against domestic violence. (BDR 3-824)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 251.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 06, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 03, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 52% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

114 added · 126 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of Assembly Bill No. 369 updates the rules for enforcing protective orders against domestic violence from other states. It now allows law enforcement officers to consider additional types of evidence, such as hard copies or digital images of the orders and statements from the individuals involved. Importantly, if an officer cannot verify that the person named in the order has received it, they are required to give them notice and a chance to comply before taking enforcement action. This change aims to ensure that due process is respected while still protecting victims of domestic violence.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 21, 2025) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
369 A SSEMBLY B ILLN O.
369–Assemblymember Backus CHAPTER..........
369–A SSEMBLYMEMBER B ACKUS M ARCH 6, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing certain orders for protection against domestic violence.
(BDR 3-824) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
LegExisting law provides that an order for protection against domestic violence issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe within the United States is valid and must be accorded full faith and credit and enforced by the courts of this State as if it were issued by a court in this State.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
In enforcing such an order, a law enforcement officer is required to make an arrest for a violation of the order in the same manner that an officer would make an arrest for a violation of a temporary or the order is not authentic on its face.
Existing law provides that an order for protection against domestic violence issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe within the United States is valid and must be accorded full faith and credit and enforced by the courts of this State as if it were issued by a court in this State.
In enforcing such an order, a law enforcementhat officer is authorized to rely on certain evidence.
In enforcing such an order, a law same manner that an officer would make an arrest for a violation of a temporary orthe extended order issued by a court of this State unless it is apparent to the officer that the order is not authentic on its face.
In enforcing such an order, a law enforcement officer is authorized to rely on certain evidence.
(1) a hard copy or digital image of an order for protection against domestic violence that has been provided to the officer;
(1) a has been provided to the officer;
and (2) any statement by the person against whom the order is being enforced.
and (2) any statement by the person against whomat the order is being enforced.
This bill also creates a process for a law enforcement violence is issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe within the United States but the officer cannot confirm that the respondent has been notified or served with the order, to provide notice, attempt service and give reasonable opportunity for compliance before enforcing the order.
This bill also creates a process for a law enforcement officer of this State, when an otherwise valid order for protection against domestic violence is issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe within the United States but the officer cannot confirm that the respondent has been notified or served with the order, to provide notice, attempt service and give reasonable opportunity for compliance before enforcing the order.
- *AB369_R1* – 2 – THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
and (b) The adverse party was given reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard before the order was issued or, in the case of an ex parte order, the adverse party was given reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard within the time required by the laws of the issuing state, territory or tribe and, in any event, within a reasonable time after the order was issued.
and (b) The adverse party was given reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard before the order was issued or, in the case of - 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – an opportunity to be heard within the time required by the laws ofnd the issuing state, territory or tribe and, in any event, within a reasonable time after the order was issued.
or (b) A counter or cross-petition or other pleading was filed and the court did not make a specific finding of domestic violence by both parties, the court shall refuse to enforce the order against the applicant and may determine whether to issue its own temporary or extended ord3..
or (b) A counter or cross-petition or other pleading was filed and the court did not make a specific finding of domestic violence by both parties, the court shall refuse to enforce the order against the applicant and may determine whether to issue its own temporary or extended order.
A law enforcement officer shall enforce an order for protection against domestic violence issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe and shall make an arrest for a violation thereof in the same manner that a law enforcement officer would make an arrest for a violation of a temporary or extended order issued by a court of this State unless it is apparent to the officer that the order is not authentic on its face.
3.
A law enforcement officer shall enforce an order for protection against domestic violence issued by the court of another thereof in the same manner that a law enforcement officer would violation make an arrest for a violation of a temporary or extended order issued by a court of this State unless it is apparent to the officer that the order is not authentic on its face.
and (c) Information indicating that the court which issued the order had legal authority to issue the order as evidenced by a certified copy of the order, a file-stamped copy of the order, an authorized - *AB369_R1* – 3 – signature or stamp of the court which issued the order or another indication of the authority of the court which issued the order.
and (c) Information indicating that the court which issued the order had legal authority to issue the order as evidenced by a certified copy of the order, a file-stamped copy of the order, an authorized signature or stamp of the court which issued the order or another indication of the authority of the court which issued the order.
In enforcing an order for protection against domestic violence issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe or arresting a person for a violation of such an order, a law enforcement officer may rely upon:
In enforcing an order for protection against domestic or arresting a person for a violation of such an order, a lawndian tribe enforcement officer may rely upon:
(c) Oral or written confirmation from a law enforcement agency or court in the jurisdiction in which the order for protection against domestic violence was issued that the order is valid and effective;
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – (c) Oral or written confirmation from a law enforcement agency or court in the jurisdiction in which the order for protection against domestic violence was issued that the order is valid and effective;
If a law enforcement officer of this State determines that an otherwise valid order for protection against domestic violence was issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe within the United States but cannot confirm that the respondent has been notified or served with the order, the officer shall:
If a law enforcement officer of this State determines that an otherwise valid order for protection against domestic violence within the United States but cannot confirm that the respondentribe has been notified or served with the order, the officer shall:
- *AB369_R1* – 4 – [6.] 8.
[6.] 8.
A court or law enforcement officer who enforces an order for protection against domestic violence issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe based upon a reasonable belief that the order is valid or who refuses to enforce such an order based upon a reasonable belief that the order is not valid and the employer criminal liability for any action taken or not taken based on that belief.
A court or law enforcement officer who enforces an order for protection against domestic violence issued by the court of another state, territory or Indian tribe based upon a reasonable belief that the order is valid or who refuses to enforce such an order based upon a reasonable belief that the order is not valid and the employer of such a law enforcement officer are immune from civil and criminal liability for any action taken or not taken based on that belief.
H - *AB369_R1*
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 251.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. Senate Amendment No. 607 concurred in. To enrollment.

  4. In Assembly.

  5. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To Assembly.

  6. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To printer.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 607.) Reprinting dispensed with.

  8. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  9. In Senate.

  10. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.

  11. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  12. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  13. Read second time.

  14. From committee: Do pass.

  15. From printer. To committee.

  16. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 369?
AB 369 is sponsored by Backus, Shea M. (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 369?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 06, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 369?
Track AB 369 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 369

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 369

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →