SB 447 — Revises provisions relating to public works. (BDR 28-968)
Last action — Vetoed by the Governor. (Return to 84th Session.)
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 10, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
37 added · 59 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill 447 adds provisions allowing parties to seek a specific court order called an alternate writ of mandamus if a public body fails to award a contract in compliance with existing public procurement laws. Additionally, it permits the court to award attorney’s fees and costs to those who successfully bring such a case. These changes are important because they provide clearer avenues for contractors to hold public entities accountable, ensuring that contracts are awarded fairly and legally, which can ultimately improve the efficiency and integrity of public works projects.
(ReprintedSenate withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 17, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
447447–Committee SENATEon BILLGovernment NOAffairs .CHAPTER..........
447–COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS M ARCH 24, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to public works.
(BDR 28-968) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
authorizing an action seeking an alternate writ of mandamus to require a public body to award certain contracts and authorizing a court to award attorney’s fees and costs to a party that prevails on asuch an alternate writ of mandamusmandamus; to enforce certain provisions relating to public works;
revising certain provisions relating to an alternate writ of mandamus filed by a contractor on a public work to compel performance of certain required duties of a public body;
(Chapter 338 of NRS) Section 12 of this bill authorizes a courtparty tofound awarddistrict reasonablecourt attorney’sagainst feesa andpublic costsbody to aobtain partyan thatalternate prevails on a writ of manUndermandamuson existingin law,requiring a contractor on a public work who believes the public body has failed to performaward certaina requiredcontract dutiespursuant may apply to the districtprovisions court of thechapter county in which the public work is located for an alternate writ of mandamusNRS toif: require the public body to perform the required duty.
Existing(1) lawthe also provides that a public body isattempts authorized to includeaward certain provisionscontracts governingin thecompliance 338.630)with Sectioncertain 1.5provisions of thislaw billrelating provides that the court is authorized to awardRSpublic reasonableprocurement; attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party on an alternate writ of mandamus, regardless of whether there is a provision in the contract governing the payment of such fees and costs.
-and *SB447_R1*(2) –the work to be performed pursuant to the contract is not directly related to the Section 2 –also THEauthorizes PEOPLEa OFdistrict THEcourt STATEto OFaward NEVADA,reasonable REPRESENTEDattorney’s INfees SENATEand ANDcosts ASSEMBLY,to DOa ENACTparty ASthat FOLLOWS:prevails on such an alternate writ of mandamus.
SectionEXPLANATION 1.– Matter in bolded italics is new;
Chaptermatter 338between ofbrackets NRS[omitted material] is herebymaterial amended by adding thereto a new section to readbe asomitted. follows:
prevailingTHE partyPEOPLE onOF aTHE writSTATE ofOF mandamusNEVADA, filedREPRESENTED inIN aSENATE courtAND oftoASSEMBLY, theDO competentENACT jurisdictionAS toFOLLOWS: enforce the provisions of this chapter.
Sec.Sections 1 and 1.5.
1.5.(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
NRS 338.630 is hereby amended to read as follows:
338.630 1.
A contractor who believes that the public body has failed to perform a duty to:
(a) Make a payment;
(b) Provide written notice of any withholding;
or (c) Provide information upon request relating to any payment with respect to a contract which has not been fully performed, pursuant to one or more of the provisions of NRS 338.515 to 338.535, inclusive, in a timely manner may apply to the district court of the county in which the public work or a part thereof is located for an alternate writ of mandamus pursuant to NRS 34.150 to 34.310, inclusive, to require the public body to perform the duty required pursuant to such a provision.
TheChapter provisions338 of thisNRS sectionis dohereby notamended preventby aadding publicthereto body from including a provisionnew governingsection theto paymentread ofas attorney’sfollows: fees and costs in a contract into which it enters with a contractor for a public work.
The1. court may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party on an alternate writ of mandamus filed pursuant to subsection 1, regardless of whether there is a provision in the contract governing the payment of such fees and costs.
HA -party *SB447_R1*found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have legal standing may bring an action against a public body in district court to obtain an alternate writ of mandamus requiring the public body to award a contract pursuant to the applicable provisions of this chapter if:
(a) The public body attempts to award a contract in compliance with chapter 332 or 333 of NRS, as described in subsection 1 of NRS 338.011;
and (b) The work to be performed pursuant to the contract is not directly related to the normal operation of the public body or the normal maintenance of its property.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – 2.
The district court may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party in an action filed pursuant to subsection 1.
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Vetoed by the Governor. (Return to 84th Session.)
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
Assembly Amendment No. 737 concurred in. To enrollment.
-
From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 27, Nays: 15.) To Senate. In Senate.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 737.) To printer.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To Assembly.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 16, Nays: 5.) To printer.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 483.) Reprinting dispensed with. Placed on General File.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.
Sponsors
- Senate Committee on Government Affairs · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on · 19 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee on Government Affairs
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| OâNeill, PK | — | Nay |
| Anderson, Natha C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Backus, Shea M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Brown-May, Tracy | Democratic | Yea |
| Carter, Max E., II | Democratic | Yea |
| Considine, Venicia | Democratic | Yea |
| D'Silva, Reuben | Democratic | Yea |
| Dalia, Joe | Democratic | Yea |
| Flanagan, Tanya P. | Democratic | Yea |
| González, Cecelia | Democratic | Yea |
| Goulding, Heather | Democratic | Yea |
| Hunt, Linda F. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Jovan A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jauregui, Sandra | Democratic | Yea |
| Karris, Venise | Democratic | Yea |
| La Rue Hatch, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Marzola, Elaine H. | Democratic | Yea |
| Miller, Brittney M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Monroe-Moreno, Daniele | Democratic | Yea |
| Moore, Cinthia Zermeño | Democratic | Yea |
| Mosca, Erica | Democratic | Yea |
| Nadeem, Hanadi | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Duy | Democratic | Yea |
| Orentlicher, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Roth, Erica P. | Democratic | Yea |
| Torres-Fossett, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Watts, Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Yeager, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Cole, Lisa K. | Republican | Nay |
| DeLong, Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Dickman, Jill | Republican | Nay |
| Edgeworth, Rebecca | Republican | Nay |
| Gallant, Danielle | Republican | Nay |
| Gray, Ken | Republican | Nay |
| Gurr, Bert K. | Republican | Nay |
| Hafen, Gregory T., II | Republican | Nay |
| Hansen, Alexis M. | Republican | Nay |
| Hardy, Melissa R.. | Republican | Nay |
| Hibbetts, Brian | Republican | Nay |
| Kasama, Heidi | Republican | Nay |
| Koenig, Gregory S. | Republican | Nay |
| Yurek, Toby | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannizzaro, Nicole J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" | Democratic | Yea |
| Daly, Skip | Democratic | Yea |
| Dondero Loop, Marilyn | Democratic | Yea |
| Doñate, Fabian | Democratic | Yea |
| Flores, Edgar | Democratic | Yea |
| Lange, Roberta | Democratic | Yea |
| Neal, Dina | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Rochelle T. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ohrenschall, James | Democratic | Yea |
| Pazina, Julie | Democratic | Yea |
| Scheible, Melanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Taylor, Angela D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Buck, Carrie Ann | Republican | Nay |
| Ellison, John | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Ira | Republican | Nay |
| Krasner, Lisa | Republican | Nay |
| Rogich, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Steinbeck, John C. | Republican | Nay |
| Stone, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Titus, Robin L. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 447?
- SB 447 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Government Affairs.
- What is the current status of SB 447?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 447?
- Track SB 447 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 447
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 447
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →