Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 D cosponsors

AB 392 — Revises provisions relating to interlocal agreements and contracts with tribal governments. (BDR 22-1059)

Last action — Vetoed by the Governor.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 05, 2025.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

94 added · 103 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of Assembly Bill No. 392 clarifies that tribal governments can engage in joint agreements with county governments without having to waive their sovereign immunity. This change ensures that tribal entities are protected while collaborating with local agencies, which could lead to better cooperation on various projects and services. Moreover, it also stipulates that any agreements made can be terminated by the county with 90 days' notice under certain conditions. Overall, these amendments aim to foster stronger partnerships between local governments and tribal authorities.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 15, 2025) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
392 ASSEMBLY B ILLN O.
392–Assemblymember Carter CHAPTER..........
392–A SSEMBLYMEMBER C ARTER M ARCH 11, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to interlocal agreements and contracts with tribal governments.
(BDR 22-1059) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
into a joint or cooperative agreement with any other public agency of this State,er another state, the Federal Government or an Indian tribe, group of tribes, organized segment of a tribe or any organization representing such tribal entities to exercise any power, privilege or authority capable of being exercised by such a public agency.
The Interlocal Cooperation Act authorizes a public agency of this State to enter into a joint or cooperative agreement with any other public agency of this State, segment of a tribe or any organization representing such tribal entities to exercise any power, privilege or authority capable of being exercised by such a public agency.
(NRS 277.100, 277.110) Existing law also authorizes one or more such public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies tribal government wishes to enter into a joint or cooperative agreement or contract with the governing body of a county or agency thereof for the performance of any service, activity or undertaking, the governing body of the county, on behalf of the county or agency thereof, may engage in discussions in good faith with the tribal government.
(NRS 277.100, 277.110) Existing law also authorizes one or more such public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies are authorized to perform.
(NRS 277.180) Section 1 of this bill provides that, if a tribal government wishes to enter into a joint or cooperative agreement or contract service, activity or undertaking, the governing body of the county, on behalf of the county or agency thereof, may engage in discussions in good faith with the tribal government.
(1) does not require the tribal government to waive sovereign agreement with 90 days’ advance notice to the tribal government under certaine circumstances.
(1) does not require the tribal government to waive sovereign immunity;
Sections 2 and 3 of this bill add the provisions of section 1 to the Interlocal Cooperation Act and purpose of the Act.
and (2) authorizes the governing body of the county to terminate the circumstances.
- *AB392_R1* – 2 – Section 4 of this bill applies the definitions in the Interlocal Cooperation Act relating to the Act to the provisions of section 1.
90 days’ advance notice to the tribal government under certain Sections 2 and 3 of this bill add the provisions of section 1 to the Interlocal Cooperation Act and purpose of the Act.
Section 4 of this bill applies the definitions in the Interlocal Cooperation Act relating to the Act to the provisions of section 1.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
If a tribal government wishes to enter into an agreement for joint or cooperative action or contract with the governing body of a county or agency thereof, pursuant to the provisions of this section and NRS 277.080 to 277.180, inclusive, within which tribal land of the tribal government is located, partially or wholly, for the performance of any governmental service, activity or undertaking which the tribal government, county or agency thereof is authorized by law to perform, the governing body of the county may, on behalf of the county or agency thereof, engage in discussions in good faith with the tribal government for the performance of such services.
If a tribal government wishes to enter into an agreement for joint or cooperative action or contract with the governing body of a county or agency thereof, pursuant to the provisions of this section and NRS 277.080 to 277.180, inclusive, within which tribal land of the tribal government is located, partially or wholly, for the performance of any governmental service, activity or undertaking which the tribal government, county or agency thereof is - 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – authorized by law to perform, the governing body of the county may, on behalf of the county or agency thereof, engage in discussions in good faith with the tribal government for the performance of such services.
2.
into an agreement or contract pursuant to the provisions of thiss section and NRS 277.080 to 277.180, inclusive, such an agreement must be a conditional interlocal agreement which:
If the governing body of a county or agency thereof enters into an agreement or contract pursuant to the provisions of this section and NRS 277.080 to 277.180, inclusive, such an agreement must be a conditional interlocal agreement which:
3.
does not include any water authority, water district or watery reclamation district.
4.
- *AB392_R1* – 3 – (b) “Tribal government” means the governing body of an Indian tribe, group of tribes, organized segment of a tribe or any organization representing two or more such entities.
(b) “Tribal government” means the governing body of an Indian tribe, group of tribes, organized segment of a tribe or any organization representing two or more such entities.
277.090 It is the purpose of NRS 277.080 to 277.180, inclusive, and section 1 of this act to permit local governments to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other local governments on a basis of mutual and pursuant to forms of governmental organization which will bester accord with geographic, economic, population and other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities.
277.090 It is the purpose of NRS 277.080 to 277.180, inclusive, and section 1 of this act to permit local governments to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to - 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – cooperate with other local governments on a basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide services and facilities in a manner and pursuant to forms of governmental organization which will best accord with geographic, economic, population and other factors infSec.
Sec.
4.g thNRS 277.100 is hereby amended to read as follows:
4.
NRS 277.100 is hereby amended to read as follows:
H - *AB392_R1*
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Vetoed by the Governor.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. Senate Amendment No. 603 concurred in. To enrollment.

  4. In Assembly.

  5. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. To Assembly.

  6. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 18, Nays: 3.) To printer.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 603.) Reprinting dispensed with.

  8. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.

  9. In Senate.

  10. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.

  11. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  12. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 233.) To printer.

  13. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

  14. From printer. To committee.

  15. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 392?
AB 392 is sponsored by Carter, Max E., II (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 392?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 392?
Track AB 392 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 392

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 392

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →