SB 99 — Authorizes, under certain circumstances, certain governing bodies of a city or county to impose linkage fees on certain developers. (BDR 22-373)
Last action — Vetoed by the Governor. Returned to Senate with Governor's veto message.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 02, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
144 added · 162 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill No. 99 allows certain city or county governing bodies to impose a "linkage fee" on developers to help fund expenses related to affordable housing. This is a significant change because it gives local governments a new tool to generate revenue specifically aimed at addressing the community's need for affordable housing. By doing so, it aims to enhance the availability of affordable housing options and ensure that new developments contribute to housing solutions.
(ReprintedSenate withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 16, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
9999–Committee SENATEon BILLGovernment NOAffairs .CHAPTER..........
99–COMMITTEE ON G OVERNMENT AFFAIRS (ON B EHALF OF THE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE R EVIEW AND OVERSIGHT OF THE TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING A GENCY AND THE M ARLETTE L AKE W ATER SYSTEM ) PREFILED ANUARY 16, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Authorizes, under certain circumstances, certain governing bodies of a city or county to impose linkage fees on certain developers.
(BDR 22-373) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law authorizes the governing body of a city or county to regulate and restrict the improvement of land, taking into account the availability of and need for affordable housing in the community.
(NRS 278.020) Existing law further requires theof governingaffordable bodieshousing ofwhen certainimplementing citiesa andmaster countiesplan; to:
(1)(2) ensureadopt ancertain adequatemeasurespply supplyto ofmaintain and develop affordable housing whento implementingcarry aout the housing plan required in the master plan;
(2)and adopt(3) report certain measuresinformation relating to maintain and develop affordable housing to carrycertain outentities. the housing plan required in the master plan;
and(NRS (3)278.230, report278.235, certain278.237) informationExisting relatinglaw toalso affordableauthorizes housing the governing body of a city or county to adopt zoning regulations that, in relevant part, ensure the development of an adequate supply of affordable housing in the community.
(NRS 278.250) Existing law creates the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency as part of the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact and sets forth certain provisions regarding thethee -Tahoe *SB99_R1* – 2 – governance of the Lake Tahoe region by the Agency, including provisions relating to the creation, review and amendment of a regional plan.
(NRS 277.200) Section 1 of this bill authorizes, under certain circumstances, the governing body of a city or county which is located within any region governed by a regional planning agency created by interstate compact (currently the Lake Tahoe region) to impose a linkage fee if the regional plan adopted by such a regional planning agency calls for the development of affordable housing in the region and identifies the use of linkage fees and deed restrictions as tools for the development of affordable housing on the:
(2) construction of any addition to existingany residential units whichif arethe 750value squareof feetthe orremodeling more;is estimated to be more thanof $100,000.
and (3) remodeling of any residential units if the value of the remodeling is estimated to be more than $100,000.
(1) requires such fees to be used for the purpose of paying certain fees to assist in the development of affordable housing units of a certain size which must be not more than 1,000 square feet per unit and subject to a deed restriction that requires the units to be sold or rented as affordable housing;
Section 3 of this bill applies certain provisions relating to judicial relief from or review of any final action,- decisions83rd orSession order(2025) – 2 – arises from the provisions of asection governing1.g body to an action or proceeding which arisesEXPLANATION from– theMatter provisionsin ofbolded sectionitalics 1.is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, if, in any region of this State for which there has been created by interstate compact a regional planning agency, the regional plan adopted by the regional planning agency calls for the development ofofpted by affordable housing in the region and identifies the use of linkage fees and deed restrictions as tools for the development of such affordable housing, the governing body of a city or county located within the region that is governed by the regional planning agency may impose a linkage fee on the:
or (c) Remodeling of any existing residential units if the value of the remodeling is estimated to be more than $100,000, - *SB99_R1* – 3 – to assist in the development of affordable housing that the governing body determines will be necessary as a result of the development, construction or remodeling, as applicable.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – (1) Costs for utility hookups;
A governing body may not impose a linkage fee pursuant to subsection(a) 1Development onof the:residential units for affordable housing;
(a) Development of residential units for affordable housing;
- *SB99_R1* – 4 – 2.
A petitioner or cross-petitioner who is seeking judicial review must serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities withinwit3. 40 days after an action is commenced.
3.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – 7.
In any region of this State for which there has been created by interstate compact a regional planning agency, the powers conferred by NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, andandncy, the section 1 of this act, are subordinate to the powers of such regional planning agency, and may be exercised only to the extent that their exercise does not conflict with any ordinance or plan adopted by such regional planning agency.
Upon the adoption by a regional planning agency created by interstate compact of any regional plan or interim plan, any plan adopted pursuant to NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, and section 1 of this act, shall cease to be effective as to the territory embraced in such regional or interim plan.
H~~~~~ 25 - *SB99_R1*83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Vetoed by the Governor. Returned to Senate with Governor's veto message.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 27, Nays: 15.) To Senate. In Senate.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 14, Nays: 6, Absent: 1.) To Assembly.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 489.) To printer.
-
Read first time. To committee.
-
From printer.
-
Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.
Sponsors
- Senate Committee on Government Affairs · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on · 20 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee on Government Affairs
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| OâNeill, PK | — | Nay |
| Anderson, Natha C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Backus, Shea M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Brown-May, Tracy | Democratic | Yea |
| Carter, Max E., II | Democratic | Yea |
| Considine, Venicia | Democratic | Yea |
| D'Silva, Reuben | Democratic | Yea |
| Dalia, Joe | Democratic | Yea |
| Flanagan, Tanya P. | Democratic | Yea |
| González, Cecelia | Democratic | Yea |
| Goulding, Heather | Democratic | Yea |
| Hunt, Linda F. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Jovan A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jauregui, Sandra | Democratic | Yea |
| Karris, Venise | Democratic | Yea |
| La Rue Hatch, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Marzola, Elaine H. | Democratic | Yea |
| Miller, Brittney M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Monroe-Moreno, Daniele | Democratic | Yea |
| Moore, Cinthia Zermeño | Democratic | Yea |
| Mosca, Erica | Democratic | Yea |
| Nadeem, Hanadi | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Duy | Democratic | Yea |
| Orentlicher, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Roth, Erica P. | Democratic | Yea |
| Torres-Fossett, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Watts, Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Yeager, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Cole, Lisa K. | Republican | Nay |
| DeLong, Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Dickman, Jill | Republican | Nay |
| Edgeworth, Rebecca | Republican | Nay |
| Gallant, Danielle | Republican | Nay |
| Gray, Ken | Republican | Nay |
| Gurr, Bert K. | Republican | Nay |
| Hafen, Gregory T., II | Republican | Nay |
| Hansen, Alexis M. | Republican | Nay |
| Hardy, Melissa R.. | Republican | Nay |
| Hibbetts, Brian | Republican | Nay |
| Kasama, Heidi | Republican | Nay |
| Koenig, Gregory S. | Republican | Nay |
| Yurek, Toby | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 29% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannizzaro, Nicole J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" | Democratic | Yea |
| Daly, Skip | Democratic | Yea |
| Dondero Loop, Marilyn | Democratic | Yea |
| Doñate, Fabian | Democratic | Yea |
| Flores, Edgar | Democratic | Yea |
| Lange, Roberta | Democratic | Yea |
| Neal, Dina | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Rochelle T. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ohrenschall, James | Democratic | Yea |
| Pazina, Julie | Democratic | Yea |
| Scheible, Melanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Taylor, Angela D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Buck, Carrie Ann | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ellison, John | Republican | Nay |
| Hansen, Ira | Republican | Nay |
| Krasner, Lisa | Republican | Nay |
| Rogich, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Steinbeck, John C. | Republican | Nay |
| Stone, Jeff | Republican | Nay |
| Titus, Robin L. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 99?
- SB 99 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Government Affairs.
- What is the current status of SB 99?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 99?
- Track SB 99 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 99
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 99
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →