Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 99 — Authorizes, under certain circumstances, certain governing bodies of a city or county to impose linkage fees on certain developers. (BDR 22-373)

Last action — Vetoed by the Governor. Returned to Senate with Governor's veto message.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 02, 2025.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

144 added · 162 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Senate Bill No. 99 allows certain city or county governing bodies to impose a "linkage fee" on developers to help fund expenses related to affordable housing. This is a significant change because it gives local governments a new tool to generate revenue specifically aimed at addressing the community's need for affordable housing. By doing so, it aims to enhance the availability of affordable housing options and ensure that new developments contribute to housing solutions.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 16, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
Senate Bill No.
99 SENATE BILL NO .
99–Committee on Government Affairs CHAPTER..........
99–COMMITTEE ON G OVERNMENT AFFAIRS (ON B EHALF OF THE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE R EVIEW AND OVERSIGHT OF THE TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING A GENCY AND THE M ARLETTE L AKE W ATER SYSTEM ) PREFILED ANUARY 16, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Authorizes, under certain circumstances, certain governing bodies of a city or county to impose linkage fees on certain developers.
(BDR 22-373) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
restrict the improvement of land, taking into account the availability of and need for affordable housing in the community.
Existing law authorizes the governing body of a city or county to regulate and restrict the improvement of land, taking into account the availability of and need for affordable housing in the community.
(NRS 278.020) Existing law further requires the governing bodies of certain cities and counties to:
(NRS 278.020) Existing law further requires of affordable housing when implementing a master plan;
(1) ensure an adequate supply of affordable housing when implementing a master plan;
(2) adopt certain measurespply to maintain and develop affordable housing to carry out the housing plan required in the master plan;
(2) adopt certain measures to maintain and develop affordable housing to carry out the housing plan required in the master plan;
and (3) report certain information relating to affordable housing to certain entities.
and (3) report certain information relating to affordable housing the governing body of a city or county to adopt zoning regulations that, in relevant part, ensure the development of an adequate supply of affordable housing in the community.
(NRS 278.230, 278.235, 278.237) Existing law also authorizes the governing body of a city or county to adopt zoning regulations that, in relevant part, ensure the development of an adequate supply of affordable housing in the community.
(NRS 278.250) Existing law creates the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency as part of the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact and sets forth certain provisions regarding the - *SB99_R1* – 2 – governance of the Lake Tahoe region by the Agency, including provisions relating to the creation, review and amendment of a regional plan.
(NRS 278.250) Regional Planning Compact and sets forth certain provisions regarding thee Tahoe governance of the Lake Tahoe region by the Agency, including provisions relating to the creation, review and amendment of a regional plan.
(NRS 277.200) Section 1 of this bill authorizes, under certain circumstances, the governing body of a city or county which is located within any region governed by a regional planning agency created by interstate compact (currently the Lake Tahoe region) to agency calls for the development of affordable housing in the region and identifies the use of linkage fees and deed restrictions as tools for the development of affordable housing on the:
(NRS 277.200) Section 1 of this bill authorizes, under certain circumstances, the governing body of a city or county which is located within any region governed by a regional planning agency created by interstate compact (currently the Lake Tahoe region) to impose a linkage fee if the regional plan adopted by such a regional planning agency calls for the development of affordable housing in the region and identifies the use of linkage fees and deed restrictions as tools for the development of affordable housing on the:
(2) construction of any addition to existing residential units which are 750 square feet or more;
(2) construction of any addition to any residential units if the value of the remodeling is estimated to be more thanof $100,000.
and (3) remodeling of any residential units if the value of the remodeling is estimated to be more than $100,000.
(1) requires such fees to be used for the purpose of certain size which must be not more than 1,000 square feet per unit and subject to a deed restriction that requires the units to be sold or rented as affordable housing;
(1) requires such fees to be used for the purpose of paying certain fees to assist in the development of affordable housing units of a certain size which must be not more than 1,000 square feet per unit and subject to a deed restriction that requires the units to be sold or rented as affordable housing;
Section 3 of this bill applies certain provisions relating to judicial relief from or review of any final action, decisions or order of a governing body to an action or proceeding which arises from the provisions of section 1.
Section 3 of this bill applies certain provisions relating to judicial relief from or review of any final - 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – arises from the provisions of section 1.g body to an action or proceeding which EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, if, in any region of this State for which there has been created by interstate compact a regional planning agency, the regional plan adopted by the regional planning agency calls for the development of affordable housing in the region and identifies the use of linkage fees and deed restrictions as tools for the development of such affordable housing, the governing body of a city or county located within the region that is governed by the regional planning agency may impose a linkage fee on the:
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, if, in any region of this State for which there has been created by interstate the regional planning agency calls for the development ofpted by affordable housing in the region and identifies the use of linkage fees and deed restrictions as tools for the development of such affordable housing, the governing body of a city or county located within the region that is governed by the regional planning agency may impose a linkage fee on the:
or (c) Remodeling of any existing residential units if the value of the remodeling is estimated to be more than $100,000, - *SB99_R1* – 3 – to assist in the development of affordable housing that the governing body determines will be necessary as a result of the development, construction or remodeling, as applicable.
or (c) Remodeling of any existing residential units if the value of the remodeling is estimated to be more than $100,000, to assist in the development of affordable housing that the governing body determines will be necessary as a result of the development, construction or remodeling, as applicable.
(1) Costs for utility hookups;
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – (1) Costs for utility hookups;
A governing body may not impose a linkage fee pursuant to subsection 1 on the:
A governing body may not impose a linkage fee pursuant to (a) Development of residential units for affordable housing;
(a) Development of residential units for affordable housing;
- *SB99_R1* – 4 – 2.
2.
A petitioner or cross-petitioner who is seeking judicial review must serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities within 40 days after an action is commenced.
A petitioner or cross-petitioner who is seeking judicial review must serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities wit3.
3.
7.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – 7.
In any region of this State for which there has been created by interstate compact a regional planning agency, the powers conferred by NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, and section 1 of this act, are subordinate to the powers of such regional planning agency, and may be exercised only to the extent that their exercise does not conflict with any ordinance or plan adopted by such regional planning agency.
In any region of this State for which there has powers conferred by NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, andncy, the section 1 of this act, are subordinate to the powers of such regional planning agency, and may be exercised only to the extent that their exercise does not conflict with any ordinance or plan adopted by such regional planning agency.
Upon the adoption by a regional planning agency created by interstate compact of any regional plan or interim plan, any plan adopted pursuant to NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, and section 1 of this act, shall cease to be effective as to the territory embraced in such regional or interim plan.
Upon the adoption by a regional planning agency created by interstate compact of any regional plan or interim plan, any plan adopted pursuant to NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, and section of this act, shall cease to be effective as to the territory embraced in such regional or interim plan.
H - *SB99_R1*
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Vetoed by the Governor. Returned to Senate with Governor's veto message.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 27, Nays: 15.) To Senate. In Senate.

  5. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  6. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  7. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  8. Read second time.

  9. From committee: Do pass.

  10. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.

  11. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 14, Nays: 6, Absent: 1.) To Assembly.

  12. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  13. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 489.) To printer.

  14. Read first time. To committee.

  15. From printer.

  16. Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.

Sponsors

  • Senate Committee on Government Affairs · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on · 20 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Senate Committee on Government Affairs

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Assembly (1st Reprint)

Passed 27 Yea · 15 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 27000
Republican 01400
Unaffiliated 0100
Total 271500
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (42)
Member Party Vote
O’Neill, PK — Nay
Anderson, Natha C. Democratic Yea
Backus, Shea M. Democratic Yea
Brown-May, Tracy Democratic Yea
Carter, Max E., II Democratic Yea
Considine, Venicia Democratic Yea
D'Silva, Reuben Democratic Yea
Dalia, Joe Democratic Yea
Flanagan, Tanya P. Democratic Yea
González, Cecelia Democratic Yea
Goulding, Heather Democratic Yea
Hunt, Linda F. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Jovan A. Democratic Yea
Jauregui, Sandra Democratic Yea
Karris, Venise Democratic Yea
La Rue Hatch, Selena Democratic Yea
Marzola, Elaine H. Democratic Yea
Miller, Brittney M. Democratic Yea
Monroe-Moreno, Daniele Democratic Yea
Moore, Cinthia Zermeño Democratic Yea
Mosca, Erica Democratic Yea
Nadeem, Hanadi Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Duy Democratic Yea
Orentlicher, David Democratic Yea
Roth, Erica P. Democratic Yea
Torres-Fossett, Selena Democratic Yea
Watts, Howard Democratic Yea
Yeager, Steve Democratic Yea
Cole, Lisa K. Republican Nay
DeLong, Rich Republican Nay
Dickman, Jill Republican Nay
Edgeworth, Rebecca Republican Nay
Gallant, Danielle Republican Nay
Gray, Ken Republican Nay
Gurr, Bert K. Republican Nay
Hafen, Gregory T., II Republican Nay
Hansen, Alexis M. Republican Nay
Hardy, Melissa R.. Republican Nay
Hibbetts, Brian Republican Nay
Kasama, Heidi Republican Nay
Koenig, Gregory S. Republican Nay
Yurek, Toby Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Senate (1st Reprint)

Passed 14 Yea · 6 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1601
Democratic 13000
Total 14601
% of votes cast 67%29%0%5%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Cannizzaro, Nicole J. Democratic Yea
Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" Democratic Yea
Daly, Skip Democratic Yea
Dondero Loop, Marilyn Democratic Yea
Doñate, Fabian Democratic Yea
Flores, Edgar Democratic Yea
Lange, Roberta Democratic Yea
Neal, Dina Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic Yea
Ohrenschall, James Democratic Yea
Pazina, Julie Democratic Yea
Scheible, Melanie Democratic Yea
Taylor, Angela D. Democratic Yea
Buck, Carrie Ann Republican Not Voting
Ellison, John Republican Nay
Hansen, Ira Republican Nay
Krasner, Lisa Republican Nay
Rogich, Lori Republican Yea
Steinbeck, John C. Republican Nay
Stone, Jeff Republican Nay
Titus, Robin L. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 99?
SB 99 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Government Affairs.
What is the current status of SB 99?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 99?
Track SB 99 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 99

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 99

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →