Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: To Executive 17 D cosponsors

AB 480 — Revises provisions relating to discrimination in housing. (BDR 10-1101)

Last action — (No further action taken.)

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 02, 2025.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

96 added · 108 removed

Plain-language change summary

Assembly Bill No. 480 has been updated to include "disparate impact" standards in Nevada's Fair Housing Law. This means that housing practices can be considered discriminatory even if there was no intentional bias, as long as they lead to negative effects on specific groups. By adopting this standard, the bill strengthens protections against housing discrimination based on various criteria, including sexual orientation and gender identity. This change is significant because it enhances the ability of individuals to address and challenge unfair housing practices.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 14, 2025) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
480 A SSEMBLY BILL NO .
480–Assemblymembers Yeager, Monroe- Moreno, Jauregui, Considine;
480–ASSEMBLYMEMBERS Y EAGER , MONROE - M ORENO , JAUREGUI , CONSIDINE ;
Brown-May, Dalia, González, La Rue Hatch, Marzola, Miller, Moore, Nadeem, Orentlicher and Roth Joint Sponsors:
BROWN -M AY, D ALIA, GONZÁLEZ , A R UE H ATCH , MARZOLA , M ILLER, MOORE , NADEEM , RENTLICHER AND ROTH M ARCH 19, 2025 ____________ JOINT SPONSORS :
Senators Cannizzaro, Dondero Loop and Nguyen CHAPTER..........
ENATORS CANNIZZARO , D ONDERO LOOP AND NGUYEN ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to discrimination in housing.
(BDR 10-1101) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
LegExisting federal law prohibits certain discriminatory practices relating to housing based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin.
LegiExisting federal law prohibits certain discriminatory practices relating to housing based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin.
§ 100.500) This is commonly known as the “diThe Nevada Fair Housing Law:
§ 100.500) This is commonly known as the “disparate impact standard.” basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, ancestry, familial status or sex;
(1) prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, ancestry, familial status or sex;
(NRS 118.010-118.120) This bill adopts the disSection 1 of this bill provides that liability may be established for a discriminatory housing practice if:
(NRS 118.010-118.120) This bill adopts the disparate impact standard for purposes of the Nevada Fair Housing Law.
(1) the practice was motivated by a discriminatory intent;
Section 1 of this bill provides that liability may be established for a discriminatory intent;
or (2) with certain exceptions, the practice was not motivated - *AB480_R1* – 2 – by a discriminatory intent but the practice actually or predictably results in a discriminatory effect on a group of persons or creates, increases, reinforces or perpetuates segregated housing patterns because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, for a discriminatory housing practice based on the disparate impact standard if,ability based on evidence that is not hypothetical or speculative:
or (2) with certain exceptions, the practice was not motivated by a discriminatory intent but the practice actually or predictably results in a discriminatory effect on a group of persons or creates, increases, reinforces or perpetuates segregated housing patterns because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, ancestry, familial status or sex.
(1) the practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent;
Section 1 further provides that there is no liability for a discriminatory housing practice based on the disparate impact standard if, based on evidence that is not hypothetical or speculative:
(1) the practice is interests of the respondent;
Section 1 also provides that the complainant must establish that a challenged practice caused or proof, the respondent has the burden of proving that the challenged practice isen of necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent.
Section 1 also provides that the complainant must establish that a challenged practice caused or predictably will cause a discriminatory effect.
If the respondent meets his or her burden of proof, the complainant may still prevail upon proving that the substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
If the claimant meets such burden of proof, the respondent has the burden of proving that the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent.
Nevada Fair Housing Law.l makes a conforming change to include section 1 in the Section 3 of this bill applies the definitions in existing law relating to discrimination in housing to the provisions of section 1.
If the respondent meets his or her burden of proof, the nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – Nevada Fair Housing Law.l makes a conforming change to include section 1 in the Section 3 of this bill applies the definitions in existing law relating to discrimination in housing to the provisions of section 1.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
- *AB480_R1* – 3 – 3.
3.
If the complainant meets such burden of proof, the respondent has the burden of proving that the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent.
If the complainant meets such burden of proof, the respondent has the burden of proving that the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests of the complainant may still prevail upon proving that the substantial,the legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
If the respondent meets his or her burden of proof, the complainant may still prevail upon proving that the substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
(a) “Complainant” means a person by whom, or on whose behalf:
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – (a) “Complainant” means a person by whom, or on whose behalf:
or (2) An action is commenced pursuant to NRS 118.120.
or (b) “Respondent” means a person against whom:
(b) “Respondent” means a person against whom:
118.120.
H - *AB480_R1*
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. (No further action taken.)

  2. Vetoed by the Governor. Returned to Assembly with Governor's veto message.

  3. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  4. In Assembly. To enrollment.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 13, Nays: 8.) To Assembly.

  6. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  7. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  8. Read second time.

  9. From committee: Do pass.

  10. In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  11. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 30, Nays: 12.) To Senate.

  12. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  13. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  14. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  15. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  16. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  17. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 207.) To printer.

  18. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

  19. From printer. To committee.

  20. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 50 not signed on

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (13)

Not signed on (50)

50 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 50 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 480?
AB 480 is sponsored by Marzola, Elaine H. (Democratic), Nguyen, Rochelle T. (Democratic), Dondero Loop, Marilyn (Democratic), Cannizzaro, Nicole J. (Democratic), Roth, Erica P. (Democratic), Orentlicher, David (Democratic), Nadeem, Hanadi (Democratic), Miller, Brittney M. (Democratic), La Rue Hatch, Selena (Democratic), González, Cecelia (Democratic), Dalia, Joe (Democratic), Brown-May, Tracy (Democratic), Considine, Venicia (Democratic), Jauregui, Sandra (Democratic), Monroe-Moreno, Daniele (Democratic), Yeager, Steve (Democratic), and Moore, Cinthia Zermeño (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 480?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 480?
Track AB 480 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 480

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 480

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →