AB 480 — Revises provisions relating to discrimination in housing. (BDR 10-1101)
Last action — (No further action taken.)
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 02, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
96 added · 108 removedPlain-language change summary
Assembly Bill No. 480 has been updated to include "disparate impact" standards in Nevada's Fair Housing Law. This means that housing practices can be considered discriminatory even if there was no intentional bias, as long as they lead to negative effects on specific groups. By adopting this standard, the bill strengthens protections against housing discrimination based on various criteria, including sexual orientation and gender identity. This change is significant because it enhances the ability of individuals to address and challenge unfair housing practices.
(ReprintedAssembly withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 14, 2025) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
480480–Assemblymembers AYeager, SSEMBLYMonroe- BILLMoreno, NOJauregui, .Considine;
480–ASSEMBLYMEMBERSBrown-May, YDalia, EAGERGonzález, ,La MONROERue -Hatch, MMarzola, ORENOMiller, ,Moore, JAUREGUINadeem, ,Orentlicher CONSIDINEand ;Roth Joint Sponsors:
BROWNSenators -MCannizzaro, AY,Dondero DLoop ALIA,and GONZÁLEZNguyen ,CHAPTER.......... A R UE H ATCH , MARZOLA , M ILLER, MOORE , NADEEM , RENTLICHER AND ROTH M ARCH 19, 2025 ____________ JOINT SPONSORS :
ENATORS CANNIZZARO , D ONDERO LOOP AND NGUYEN ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to discrimination in housing.
(BDR 10-1101) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
LegExistingLegiExisting federal law prohibits certain discriminatory practices relating to housing based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin.
§ 100.500) This is commonly known as the “diThe“disparate Nevadaimpact Fairstandard.” Housingbasis Law:of race, religious creed, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, ancestry, familial status or sex;
(1) prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, ancestry, familial status or sex;
(NRS 118.010-118.120) This bill adopts the disSectiondisparate 1impact ofstandard thisfor billpurposes providesof thatthe liabilityNevada mayFair beHousing establishedLaw. for a discriminatory housing practice if:
(1)Section the1 practiceof wasthis motivatedbill byprovides that liability may be established for a discriminatory intent;
or (2) with certain exceptions, the practice was not motivated - *AB480_R1* – 2 – by a discriminatory intent but the practice actually or predictably results in a discriminatory effect on a group of persons or creates, increases, reinforces or perpetuates segregated housing patterns because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, forancestry, afamilial discriminatorystatus housing practice based on the disparate impact standard if,ability based on evidence that is not hypothetical or speculative:sex.
(1)Section the1 practicefurther isprovides necessarythat tothere achieveis oneno orliability morefor substantial,a legitimatediscriminatory andhousing nondiscriminatorypractice interestsbased ofon the respondent;disparate impact standard if, based on evidence that is not hypothetical or speculative:
(1) the practice is interests of the respondent;
Section 1 also provides that the complainant must establish that a challenged practice caused or proof,predictably thewill respondentcause hasa thediscriminatory burdeneffect. of proving that the challenged practice isen of necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent.
If the respondentclaimant meets hissuch or her burden of proof, the complainantrespondent mayhas stillthe prevailburden uponof proving that the substantial,challenged legitimatepractice andis nondiscriminatorynecessary intereststo supportingachieve theone challengedor practicemore couldsubstantial, belegitimate servedand bynondiscriminatory anotherinterests practiceof thatthe hasrespondent. a less discriminatory effect.
NevadaIf Fairthe Housingrespondent Law.lmeets makeshis aor conformingher changeburden toof includeproof, section 1 in the Sectionnondiscriminatory 3interests ofsupporting this bill applies the definitionschallenged inpractice existingcould lawbe relatingserved toby discriminationanother inpractice housingthat tohas thea provisionsless ofdiscriminatory sectioneffect. 1.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – Nevada Fair Housing Law.l makes a conforming change to include section 1 in the Section 3 of this bill applies the definitions in existing law relating to discrimination in housing to the provisions of section 1.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
- *AB480_R1* – 3 – 3.
If the complainant meets such burden of proof, the respondent has the burden of proving that the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent.complainant may still prevail upon proving that the substantial,the legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
If the respondent meets his or her burden of proof, the complainant may still prevail upon proving that the substantial, legitimate and nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – (a) “Complainant” means a person by whom, or on whose behalf:
or (2)(b) An“Respondent” actionmeans isa commencedperson pursuantagainst towhom: NRS 118.120.
(b)118.120. “Respondent” means a person against whom:
H~~~~~ 25 - *AB480_R1*83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
(No further action taken.)
-
Vetoed by the Governor. Returned to Assembly with Governor's veto message.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 13, Nays: 8.) To Assembly.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 30, Nays: 12.) To Senate.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 207.) To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Elaine H. Marzola · Cosponsor
- Rochelle T. Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Marilyn Dondero Loop · Cosponsor
- Nicole J. Cannizzaro · Cosponsor
- Erica P. Roth · Cosponsor
- David Orentlicher · Cosponsor
- Hanadi Nadeem · Cosponsor
- Brittney M. Miller · Cosponsor
- Selena La Rue Hatch · Cosponsor
- Cecelia González · Cosponsor
- Joe Dalia · Cosponsor
- Tracy Brown-May · Cosponsor
- Venicia Considine · Primary
- Sandra Jauregui · Primary
- Daniele Monroe-Moreno · Primary
- Steve Yeager · Primary
- Cinthia Zermeño Moore · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 50 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Considine, Venicia Democratic
- Jauregui, Sandra Democratic
- Monroe-Moreno, Daniele Democratic
- Yeager, Steve Democratic
Co-sponsors (13)
- Marzola, Elaine H. Democratic
- Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic
- Dondero Loop, Marilyn Democratic
- Cannizzaro, Nicole J. Democratic
- Roth, Erica P. Democratic
- Orentlicher, David Democratic
- Nadeem, Hanadi Democratic
- Miller, Brittney M. Democratic
- La Rue Hatch, Selena Democratic
- González, Cecelia Democratic
- Dalia, Joe Democratic
- Brown-May, Tracy Democratic
- Moore, Cinthia Zermeño Democratic
Not signed on (50)
50 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 50 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 480?
- AB 480 is sponsored by Marzola, Elaine H. (Democratic), Nguyen, Rochelle T. (Democratic), Dondero Loop, Marilyn (Democratic), Cannizzaro, Nicole J. (Democratic), Roth, Erica P. (Democratic), Orentlicher, David (Democratic), Nadeem, Hanadi (Democratic), Miller, Brittney M. (Democratic), La Rue Hatch, Selena (Democratic), González, Cecelia (Democratic), Dalia, Joe (Democratic), Brown-May, Tracy (Democratic), Considine, Venicia (Democratic), Jauregui, Sandra (Democratic), Monroe-Moreno, Daniele (Democratic), Yeager, Steve (Democratic), and Moore, Cinthia Zermeño (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 480?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 480?
- Track AB 480 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 480
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 480
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →