SB 465 — Revises provisions relating to certain criminal defendants. (BDR 14-1119)
Last action — Chapter 511.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 05, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 10, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
162 added · 179 removedPlain-language change summary
The modifications to Senate Bill No. 465 include changes to the evaluation process for criminal defendants deemed incompetent. The requirement for three evaluators has been reduced to two, but if those two disagree on the defendant's competence, a third evaluator must be appointed. Additionally, the bill removes the ability for courts to authorize the involuntary administration of medication as part of a commitment order, now requiring that a separate court order be sought for such administration. These changes aim to streamline the evaluation process while ensuring proper legal oversight regarding medication.
EXEMPTSenate (ReprintedBill withNo. amendments adopted on May 29, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
465465–Committee SENATEon BILLNFinance OCHAPTER.......... .
465–COMMITTEE ON F INANCE (O NB EHALF OF THE OFFICE OF FINANCE IN THE OFFICE OF THE G OVERNOR ) M AY 5, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to certain criminal defendants.
(BDR 14-1119) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
(NRS 178.400) Under existing law, if the courtjudge findsis arequired to commit the defendant incompetentto the custody of the Administrator ofthe the Division of Public and certainBehavioral otherHealth requirementsof arethe met:Department of Health and Human Services or the Administrator’s designee for detention and treatment at a secure facility of the Division;
(1)and the(2) judge is required to commit the defendant tomust thebe custodyheld ofin thesuch Administratorcustody ofuntil the Division of Public and Behavioral Health of the Department of Health and Human Services or the Administrator’s designee for detention and treatment at a secure court orders the defendant’s release or until the defendant is returned for trial orheor judgment.
(NRS 178.425) Existing law requires the Administrator of the Division or the Administrator’s designee to periodically evaluate each such defendant and report certain information relating to the competence of the defendant to the court that ordered the defendant committed.
(NRS 178.455) In general, section 4 of this bill revises this procedure by reducing the number of evaluators the Administrator or designee is required to appoint to evaluate the competence of the defendant from three evaluators to two evaluators.
However, if those two evaluators disagreetdisagree from concerning the competence of the defendant, section 4 requires the Administrator or designee to appoint a third evaluator to evaluate the defendant.defeUnder existing law, a court is authorized to include the involuntary administration of medication in an order committing a defendant to the custody of the Division.
-(NRS *SB465_R1*178.425) –Section 23 – Under existing law, a court is authorized to include the involuntary administration of medicationthis inbill anremoves orderthis committingauthorization aand defendant to the custody of instead requires the prosecuting attorney to seek a separate court order for thedthe involuntary administration of psychiatric medication.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
SectionSections 1.1 and 2.
2.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
If the court finds the defendant incompetent, and dangerous to himself or herself or to society and that commitment is required for a determination of the defendant’s ability to receive treatment to competency and to attain competence, the judge shall order the sheriff to convey the defendant forthwith, together with a copy of the complaint, the commitment and the physicians’ - 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – certificate, if any, into the custody of the Administrator or the Administrator’s designee for detention and treatment at a division facility that is secure.
[The] If the treating psychiatrist of the defendant determines that psychiatric medication is necessary to restore the defendant to competency and the defendant refuses to take such medication voluntarily, the prosecuting attorney maymayto seek an order [may include] for the involuntary administration of psychiatric medication [if appropriate for treatment] to [competency.] the defendant.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, proceedings against the defendant must be suspended until the Administrator or - *SB465_R1* – 3 – the Administrator’s designee or, if the defendant is charged with a misdemeanor, the judge finds the defendant capable of standing trial or opposing pronouncement of judgment as provided in NRS 178.400.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – (b) The State has a compelling interest in bringing charges again;
and (c) The period, equal to the maximum time allowed by law for commencing a criminal action for the crime with which the defendantoffense.t was charged, has not lapsed since the date of the alleged offense. The prosecuting attorney must give notice of an application made pursuant to this subsection to the attorney for the defendant not less than 24 hours before the hearing on the application.
The prosecuting attorney must give notice of an application made pursuant to this subsection to the attorney for the defendant not less than 24 hours before the hearing on the application.
[The] One such appointee must be a member of the treatment team.tea2.
2.If the appointees who conduct the evaluations required by subsection 1 disagree concerning whether the defendant has the present ability to understand the nature of the offense charged and the nature and purpose of the court proceedings or to aid and assist his or her counsel during the court proceedings, the Administrator or the Administrator’s designee shall [also] appoint a third evaluator [who] to evaluate the defendant.
If the appointees who conduct the evaluations required by subsection 1 disagree concerning whether the defendant has the - *SB465_R1* – 4 – present ability to understand the nature of the offense charged and the nature and purpose of the court proceedings or to aid and assist his or her counsel during the court proceedings, the Administrator or the Administrator’s designee shall [also] appoint a third evaluator [who] to evaluate the defendant.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – 4.
[(a)] (1) Understand the nature of the offense charged;
[4.]misdemeanor, 6.the judge shall, upon receipt of the report set forth in NRS 178.450 from the Administrator or the Administrator’s designee:
In(a) theSend case of a personcopy charged with or convicted of a misdemeanor, the judgereport shall,by uponthe receiptAdministrator ofor the reportAdministrator’s setdesignee forthto inthe NRSprosecuting 178.450attorney fromand theto Administrator or the Administrator’sdefendant’s designee:counsel;
- *SB465_R1* – 5 – (a) Send a copy of the report by the Administrator or the Administrator’s designee to the prosecuting attorney and to the defendant’s counsel;
and (c) Within 10 days after the hearing, if any, or 10 days after the report is sent if no hearing is requested, enter a finding of competence or incompetence in the manner set forth in subsection 4 of Sec.NRS 178.460.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 5 – Sec.
H~~~~~ 25 - *SB465_R1*83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Chapter 511.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From committee: Do pass. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 901.) To printer.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Senate Committee on Finance · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee on Finance
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| OâNeill, PK | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Natha C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Backus, Shea M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Brown-May, Tracy | Democratic | Yea |
| Carter, Max E., II | Democratic | Yea |
| Considine, Venicia | Democratic | Yea |
| D'Silva, Reuben | Democratic | Yea |
| Dalia, Joe | Democratic | Yea |
| Flanagan, Tanya P. | Democratic | Yea |
| González, Cecelia | Democratic | Yea |
| Goulding, Heather | Democratic | Yea |
| Hunt, Linda F. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Jovan A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jauregui, Sandra | Democratic | Yea |
| Karris, Venise | Democratic | Yea |
| La Rue Hatch, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Marzola, Elaine H. | Democratic | Yea |
| Miller, Brittney M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Monroe-Moreno, Daniele | Democratic | Yea |
| Moore, Cinthia Zermeño | Democratic | Yea |
| Mosca, Erica | Democratic | Yea |
| Nadeem, Hanadi | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Duy | Democratic | Yea |
| Orentlicher, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Roth, Erica P. | Democratic | Yea |
| Torres-Fossett, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Watts, Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Yeager, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Cole, Lisa K. | Republican | Yea |
| DeLong, Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Dickman, Jill | Republican | Yea |
| Edgeworth, Rebecca | Republican | Yea |
| Gallant, Danielle | Republican | Yea |
| Gray, Ken | Republican | Yea |
| Gurr, Bert K. | Republican | Yea |
| Hafen, Gregory T., II | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Alexis M. | Republican | Yea |
| Hardy, Melissa R.. | Republican | Yea |
| Hibbetts, Brian | Republican | Yea |
| Kasama, Heidi | Republican | Yea |
| Koenig, Gregory S. | Republican | Yea |
| Yurek, Toby | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannizzaro, Nicole J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" | Democratic | Yea |
| Daly, Skip | Democratic | Yea |
| Dondero Loop, Marilyn | Democratic | Yea |
| Doñate, Fabian | Democratic | Yea |
| Flores, Edgar | Democratic | Yea |
| Lange, Roberta | Democratic | Yea |
| Neal, Dina | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Rochelle T. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ohrenschall, James | Democratic | Yea |
| Pazina, Julie | Democratic | Yea |
| Scheible, Melanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Taylor, Angela D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Buck, Carrie Ann | Republican | Yea |
| Ellison, John | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Ira | Republican | Yea |
| Krasner, Lisa | Republican | Yea |
| Rogich, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Steinbeck, John C. | Republican | Yea |
| Stone, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Titus, Robin L. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 465?
- SB 465 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Finance.
- What is the current status of SB 465?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 05, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 465?
- Track SB 465 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 465
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 465
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →