Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

SB 116 — Revises provisions relating to the compensation of elected county officers. (BDR 20-92)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 80.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on May 28, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

520 added · 483 removed

520 line(s) added, 483 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 21, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
Senate Bill No.
116 SENATE B ILLN O.
116–Senator Daly CHAPTER..........
116–SENATOR DALY PREFILED JANUARY 27, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to the compensation of elected county officers.
(BDR 20-92) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
(OTTREQUESTED BAFFECTELOCALGOVERNMENT)0) ~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
LegiExisting law sets forth the annual compensation to be paid to county commissioners and certain elected county officers, including district attorneys, sheriffs, county clerks, county assessors, county recorders, county treasurers and public administrators.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
Existing law sets forth the annual compensation to be paid to county sheriffs, county clerks, county assessors, county recorders, county treasurers and public administrators.
(1) Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as an amount based on a certain calculation using the base salary that was in effect for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 or 3 percent higher than the highest salary of an employee whichever is higher;
(1) Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as an amount based on a certain calculation using the base salary that was in effect for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 or 3 percent higher than the highest salary of an employee under the supervision of the elected officer that was in effect on January 1, 2025, whichever is higher;
Section 1 also authorizes a board of county commissioners to provide, on an annual basis or as the board of county commissioners deems appropriate, a 2 percent cost-of-living increase to the base salary of each elected county officer.
Section also authorizes a board of county commissioners to provide, on an annual basis or increase to the base salary of each elected county officer.
Existing law further authorizes the board of county commissioners to determine resources of the county are not available to pay the increased salaries in that fiscal year.
percent cost-of-living Existing law further authorizes the board of county commissioners to determine not to pay the increased salary for all elected county officers if the financial resources of the county are not available to pay the increased salaries in that fiscal year.
(NRS 245.043) If the board of county commissioners determines not to pay the increased salary for all elected county officers, including county - *SB116_R1* – 2 – commissioners, section 1 requires that any reduction in salary be applied to all elected county officers using a calculation that is equally proportional for each elected county officer or using the same reduction calculation applied to any other employee or group of employees of the county, whichever is lower.
(NRS 245.043) If the board of county commissioners determines not to pay the increased salary for all elected county officers, including county commissioners, section 1 requires that any reduction in salary be applied to all elected county officers using a calculation that is equally proportional for each elected county officer or using the same reduction calculation applied to any other employee or group of employees of the county, whichever is lower.
and (2) provides that for the 5 fiscalnty years following Fiscal Year 2025-2026, each county commissioner is entitled to an increase in the amount of his or her annual salary of 3 percent per fiscal year.
and (2) provides that for the 5 fiscalunty years following Fiscal Year 2025-2026, each county commissioner is entitled to an increase in the amount of his or her annual salary of 3 percent per fiscal year.
(NRS 245.0435, and 4 of this bill replace references to the classifications to apply the exception to a county whose population is less than 3,000 (currently Esmeralda and Eureka Counties).
(NRS 245.0435, 252.060) Section 1 eliminates the table and related classifications and sections 2 and 4 of this bill replace references to the classifications to apply the exception to a county whose population is less than 3,000 (currently Esmeralda and Eureka Counties).
Sections 3 and 5-10 of this bill make conforming changes to account for the change in how compensation for elected county officers is determined in section 1.
Sections 3 and 5-10 of this bill make conforming changes to account for the chanSection 11 of this bill authorizes the Joint Interim Standing Committee onn 1.
Section 11 of this bill authorizes the Joint Interim Standing Committee on concerning county commissions.ertain issues during the 2025-2026 interim THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Government Affairs to review certain issues during the 2025-2026 interim concerning county commissions.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Except as otherwise provided in [subsection 5 and by any special law, the] this section, each elected [officers] officer of [the counties] a county of this State [are] is entitled to receive [,] for [the appropriate fiscal year,] Fiscal Year 2025-2026, an annual [salaries] salary in the base [amounts specified in the following table commencing on July 1 of the fiscal year.] amount as determined pursuant to subsection 3 or an amount that is calculated to be 3 percent more than the salary of the employee under the supervision of the elected officer who has the highest salary of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer, as determined by the salaries of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer on January 1, 2025, whichever is higher.
Except as otherwise provided in [subsection 5 and by any special law, the] this section, each elected [officers] officer of [the counties] a county of this State [are] is entitled to receive [,] for [the salary in the base [amounts specified in the following tablesalaries] commencing on July 1 of the fiscal year.] amount as determined pursuant to subsection 3 or an amount that is calculated to be 3 percent more than the salary of the employee under the supervision of the elected officer who has the highest salary of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer, as determined by the salaries of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer on January 1, 2025, whichever is higher.
For each fiscal year thereafter, the annual salary of an elected officer is the base salary for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as adjusted pursuant to subsection 4 or an amount that is calculated to be 3 percent more than the salary of the employee under the supervision of the - *SB116_R1* – 3 – elected officer who has the highest salary of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer, as determined by the salaries of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer on July 1 of that fiscal year that have been approved by the board of county commissioners, whichever is higher.
For each fiscal year thereafter, the annual salary of an elected officer is the base salary for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as adjusted pursuant to subsection 4 or an amount that is calculated to be 3 percent more than the salary of the employee under the supervision of the elected officer who has the highest salary of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer, as determined by the salaries of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer on July 1 of that fiscal year that have been approved by the board of county commissioners, whichever is higher.
For the purposes of this subsection, approval of a salary by a board of county commissioners includes, without limitation, the approval of a salary or pay increase where the board of county commissioners:
board of county commissioners includes, without limitation, the approval of a salary or pay increase where the board of county commissioners:
(a) Was informed that the salary or pay increase would increase the salary of an elected officer;
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – (a) Was informed that the salary or pay increase would increase the salary of an elected officer;
and - *SB116_R1* – 4 – (c) Decrease when a person who is elected and has a base salary which is more than 3 percent more than the salary of the employee under the supervision of the elected officer who has the highest salary of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer.
and (c) Decrease when a person who is elected and has a base salary which is more than 3 percent more than the salary of the employee under the supervision of the elected officer who has the highest salary of all employees under the supervision of the elected officer.
7 [ANNUAL SALARIES 9 District County County County County Public Class County Attorney Sheriff Clerk Assessor Recorder Treasurer Administrator 1 Clark FY 2015-2016 $187,563 $161,692 $109,757 $109,757 $109,757 $109,757 $109,757 FY 2016-2017 193,190 166,543 113,050 113,050 113,050 113,050 113,050 FY 2017-2018 198,986 171,540 116,441 116,441 116,441 116,441 116,441 FY 2018-2019 204,955 176,685 119,934 119,934 119,934 119,934 119,934 2 Washoe FY 2015-2016 165,573 133,234 100,610 100,610 100,610 100,610 100,610 FY 2016-2017 170,540 137,231 103,629 103,629 103,629 103,629 103,629 FY 2017-2018 175,656 141,348 106,738 106,738 106,738 106,738 106,738 FY 2018-2019 180,926 145,588 109,940 109,940 109,940 109,940 109,940 3 Carson City FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Churchill FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Douglas FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Elko FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Humboldt FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Lyon FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Nye FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- - *SB116_R1* – 5 – District County County County County Public Class County Attorney Sheriff Clerk Assessor Recorder Treasurer Administrator 4 FY 2017-2018 $126,112 $104,570 $83,061 $83,061 $83,061 $83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- 4 Lander FY 2015-2016 112,268 88,711 65,305 65,305 65,305 65,305 -------- FY 2016-2017 115,636 91,372 67,264 67,264 67,264 67,264 -------- FY 2017-2018 119,105 94,113 69,282 69,282 69,282 69,282 -------- FY 2018-2019 122,678 96,937 71,361 71,361 71,361 71,361 -------- Storey FY 2015-2016 112,268 88,711 65,305 65,305 65,305 65,305 -------- FY 2016-2017 115,636 91,372 67,264 67,264 67,264 67,264 -------- FY 2017-2018 119,105 94,113 69,282 69,282 69,282 69,282 -------- FY 2018-2019 122,678 96,937 71,361 71,361 71,361 71,361 -------- White Pine FY 2015-2016 112,268 88,711 65,305 65,305 65,305 65,305 -------- FY 2016-2017 115,636 91,372 67,264 67,264 67,264 67,264 -------- FY 2017-2018 119,105 94,113 69,282 69,282 69,282 69,282 -------- FY 2018-2019 122,678 96,937 71,361 71,361 71,361 71,361 -------- 5 Eureka FY 2015-2016 99,060 70,968 58,537 58,537 58,537 58,537 -------- FY 2016-2017 102,033 73,097 60,293 60,293 60,293 60,293 -------- FY 2017-2018 105,093 75,290 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 -------- FY 2018-2019 108,246 77,549 63,965 63,965 63,965 63,965 -------- Lincoln FY 2015-2016 99,060 70,968 58,537 58,537 58,537 58,537 -------- FY 2016-2017 102,033 73,097 60,293 60,293 60,293 60,293 -------- FY 2017-2018 105,093 75,290 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 -------- FY 2018-2019 108,246 77,549 63,965 63,965 63,965 63,965 -------- Mineral FY 2015-2016 99,060 70,968 58,537 58,537 58,537 58,537 -------- FY 2016-2017 102,033 73,097 60,293 60,293 60,293 60,293 -------- FY 2017-2018 105,093 75,290 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 -------- FY 2018-2019 108,246 77,549 63,965 63,965 63,965 63,965 -------- Pershing FY 2015-2016 99,060 70,968 58,537 58,537 58,537 58,537 -------- FY 2016-2017 102,033 73,097 60,293 60,293 60,293 60,293 -------- FY 2017-2018 105,093 75,290 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 -------- FY 2018-2019 108,246 77,549 63,965 63,965 63,965 63,965 -------- 6 Esmeralda FY 2015-2016 78,657 63,083 51,220 51,220 51,220 -------- -------- FY 2016-2017 81,017 64,976 52,756 52,756 52,756 -------- -------- FY 2017-2018 83,447 66,926 54,339 54,339 54,339 -------- -------- FY 2018-2019 85,951 68,933 55,969 55,969 55,969 -------- -------- Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, the annual salaries set forth in this subsection for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 are effective for that fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter.
[ANNUAL SALARIES District County County County County Public Class County Attorney Sheriff Clerk AssessorRecorder Treasurer Administrator Clark FY 2015-2016$187,563$161,692 $109,757 $109,757$109,757 $109,757$109,757 FY 2016-2017 193,190 166,543 113,050 113,050 113,050 113,050 113,050 FY 2017-2018 198,986 171,540 116,441 116,441 116,441 116,441 116,441 - 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – District County County County County Public Class County Attorney Sheriff Clerk Assessor Recorder Treasurer Administrator FY 2018-2019 $204,955 $176,685 $119,934 $119,934 $119,934 $119,934 $119,934 Washoe FY 2015-2016 165,573 133,234 100,610 100,610 100,610 100,610 100,610 FY 2016-2017 170,540 137,231 103,629 103,629 103,629 103,629 103,629 FY 2017-2018 175,656 141,348 106,738 106,738 106,738 106,738 106,738 FY 2018-2019 180,926 145,588 109,940 109,940 109,940 109,940 109,940 Carson City FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Churchill FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Douglas FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Elko FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Humboldt FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Lyon FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Nye FY 2015-2016 118,872 98,567 78,293 78,293 78,293 78,293 -------- FY 2016-2017 122,438 101,524 80,642 80,642 80,642 80,642 -------- FY 2017-2018 126,112 104,570 83,061 83,061 83,061 83,061 -------- FY 2018-2019 129,895 107,707 85,553 85,553 85,553 85,553 -------- Lander FY 2015-2016 112,268 88,711 65,305 65,305 65,305 65,305 -------- FY 2016-2017 115,636 91,372 67,264 67,264 67,264 67,264 -------- FY 2017-2018 119,105 94,113 69,282 69,282 69,282 69,282 -------- FY 2018-2019 122,678 96,937 71,361 71,361 71,361 71,361 -------- Storey FY 2015-2016 112,268 88,711 65,305 65,305 65,305 65,305 -------- FY 2016-2017 115,636 91,372 67,264 67,264 67,264 67,264 -------- FY 2017-2018 119,105 94,113 69,282 69,282 69,282 69,282 -------- - 83rd Session (2025) – 5 – District County County County County Public Class County Attorney Sheriff Clerk Assessor Recorder Treasurer Administrator FY 2018-2019 $122,678 $96,937 $71,361 $71,361 $71,361 $71,361 -------- White Pine FY 2015-2016 112,268 88,711 65,305 65,305 65,305 65,305 -------- FY 2016-2017 115,636 91,372 67,264 67,264 67,264 67,264 -------- FY 2017-2018 119,105 94,113 69,282 69,282 69,282 69,282 -------- FY 2018-2019 122,678 96,937 71,361 71,361 71,361 71,361 -------- Eureka FY 2015-2016 99,060 70,968 58,537 58,537 58,537 58,537 -------- FY 2016-2017 102,033 73,097 60,293 60,293 60,293 60,293 -------- FY 2017-2018 105,093 75,290 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 -------- FY 2018-2019 108,246 77,549 63,965 63,965 63,965 63,965 -------- Lincoln FY 2015-2016 99,060 70,968 58,537 58,537 58,537 58,537 -------- FY 2016-2017 102,033 73,097 60,293 60,293 60,293 60,293 -------- FY 2017-2018 105,093 75,290 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 -------- FY 2018-2019 108,246 77,549 63,965 63,965 63,965 63,965 -------- Mineral FY 2015-2016 99,060 70,968 58,537 58,537 58,537 58,537 -------- FY 2016-2017 102,033 73,097 60,293 60,293 60,293 60,293 -------- FY 2017-2018 105,093 75,290 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 -------- FY 2018-2019 108,246 77,549 63,965 63,965 63,965 63,965 -------- Pershing FY 2015-2016 99,060 70,968 58,537 58,537 58,537 58,537 -------- FY 2016-2017 102,033 73,097 60,293 60,293 60,293 60,293 -------- FY 2017-2018 105,093 75,290 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 -------- FY 2018-2019 108,246 77,549 63,965 63,965 63,965 63,965 -------- Esmeralda FY 2015-2016 78,657 63,083 51,220 51,220 51,220 -------- -------- FY 2016-2017 81,017 64,976 52,756 52,756 52,756 -------- -------- FY 2017-2018 83,447 66,926 54,339 54,339 54,339 -------- -------- FY 2018-2019 85,951 68,933 55,969 55,969 55,969 -------- -------- Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, the annual salaries set forth in this subsection for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 are effective for that fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter.
- *SB116_R1* – 6 – (a) For [Fiscal Year 2015-2016, 103.00 percent;] Clark County, $121,000;
(a) For [Fiscal Year 2015-2016, 103.00 percent;] Clark County, $121,000;
(d) For [Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and each fiscal year thereafter, 112.551 percent,] Churchill County and Humboldt County, $36,000;
- 83rd Session (2025) – 6 – 112.551 percent,] Churchill County and Humboldt County,thereafter, $36,000;
Any elected officer or county commissioner who is entitled to a salary pursuant to [subsection 2 or 3] this section may elect not to receive any part of the salary to which he or she is entitled pursuant to [subsection 2 or 3, as applicable.
Any elected officer or county commissioner who is entitled to a salary pursuant to [subsection 2 or 3] this section may elect not to receive any part of the salary to which he or she is ent5.] this section.
5.] this section.
[subsection 2 or 3, as applicable.
[starting with the first fiscal year in which increased salaries were not paid because sufficient financial resources were not available.] (b) An elected [county] officer or county commissioner is not entitled to any retroactive payment of the salary increase for any previous fiscal year in which increased annual salaries were not paid.
[starting with the first fiscal year in which increased salaries were not paid because sufficient financial resources were not available.] (b) An elected [county] officer or county commissioner is not entitled to any retroactive payment of the salary increase for any paid.ous fiscal year in which increased annual salaries were not 9.
9.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, if a board of county commissioners determines not to pay increased salaries pursuant to subsection 8, the board of county commissioners may pay each elected officer and county commissioner a reduced salary.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, if a board of county commissioners determines not to pay increased salaries pursuant to subsection 8, the board of county commissioners may - *SB116_R1* – 7 – pay each elected officer and county commissioner a reduced salary.
Any reduction in salary must be applied to all elected officers and county commissioners using a calculation that is equally proportional or using the same reduction calculation - 83rd Session (2025) – 7 – applied to any other employee or group of employees of the county, whichever is lower.
Any reduction in salary must be applied to all elected officers and county commissioners using a calculation that is equally proportional or using the same reduction calculation applied to any other employee or group of employees of the county, whichever is lower.
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 252.060, the district attorneys in counties [of classes 1 to 5, inclusive, as classified in the table of annual salaries,] whose population is 3,000 or more shall not engage in the private practice of law.
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 252.060, classified in the table of annual salaries,] whose population is 3,000 or more shall not engage in the private practice of law.
On and after July 1, 1973, if an elected county officer has served in his or her office for more than 4 years, the officer is entitled to an additional salary of 2 percent of his or her base salary [for the appropriate fiscal year as provided in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043 or his or her annual salary set pursuant to subsection 3 of] as determined pursuant to NRS 245.043 [, as applicable,] for each full calendar year the officer has served in his or her office.
On and after July 1, 1973, if an elected county officer has served in his or her office for more than 4 years, the officer is entitled to an additional salary of 2 percent of his or her base salary [for the appropriate fiscal year as provided in subsection of NRS 245.043 or his or her annual salary set pursuant to subsection 3 of] as determined pursuant to NRS 245.043 [, as applicable,] for each full calendar year the officer has served in his or her office.
(a) Must be calculated on July 1 of each year by multiplying 2 percent of the base salary [for the appropriate fiscal year as provided in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043 or the annual salary set pursuant to subsection 3 of] as determined pursuant to NRS 245.043 [, as applicable,] by the number of full calendar years the elected county officer has served in his or her office;
percent of the base salary [for the appropriate fiscal year as provided in subsection 2 of NRS 245.043 or the annual salary set pursuant to subsection 3 of] as determined pursuant to NRS 245.043 [, as applicable,] by the number of full calendar years the elected county officer has served in his or her office;
Show all 78 changed rows (38 more)
Previous
Latest
- *SB116_R1* – 8 – 4.
Service on the Board of Supervisors of Carson City for the initial term which began on July 1, 1969, and ended on the first Monday of January, 1973, shall be deemed to constitute 4 full calendar years of service for the purposes of this section.
Sec.
Service on the Board of Supervisors of Carson City for the initial term which began on July 1, 1969, and ended on the first - 83rd Session (2025) – 8 – calendar years of service for the purposes of this section.ll Sec.
4.
A person appointed as an interim or permanent replacement for the district attorney pursuant to this section must be appointed at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the board of county commissioners following the event giving rise to the appointment.
A person appointed as an interim or permanent replacement the first regularly scheduled meeting of the board of countyppointed at commissioners following the event giving rise to the appointment.
(2) If he or she is appointed pursuant to subsection 2, serve for the duration of the disability of the district attorney or, if the district attorney resigns or is removed from office, for not more than 60 days after the resignation or removal or until a permanent replacement is appointed, whichever occurs first.
(2) If he or she is appointed pursuant to subsection 2, serve for the duration of the disability of the district attorney or, if the district attorney resigns or is removed from office, for not more than replacement is appointed, whichever occurs first.
(c) May engage in the private practice of law for not more than 60 days after his or her appointment, to the extent permitted by NRS 245.0435.
a permanent (c) May engage in the private practice of law for not more than days after his or her appointment, to the extent permitted by NRS 245.0435.
- *SB116_R1* – 9 – 5.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 9 – permanent replacement for the district attorney, the length of service of the appointee and the election of a successor.
The provisions of NRS 245.170 govern the appointment of a permanent replacement for the district attorney, the length of service of the appointee and the election of a successor.
(d) Shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by ordinance or by the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes which apply to a mayor or to the chair of a board of county commissioners.
(d) Shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed which apply to a mayor or to the chair of a board of countys commissioners.
2.
The Clerk shall:
(c) Enter in the journal the results of the vote of the Board upon the passage of ordinances or of any resolution - *SB116_R1* – 10 – appropriating money, abolishing licenses, or increasing or decreasing the rates of licenses.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 10 – upon the passage of ordinances or of any resolution of the Board appropriating money, abolishing licenses, or increasing or decreasing the rates of licenses.
The provisions of chapter 247 of NRS apply to the Clerk while acting in that capacity, except that all deputy recorders other than the two provided for in section 2.330 must be appointed pursuant to and as governed by the regulations for the Merit Personnel System.
The provisions of chapter of NRS apply to the Clerk while acting in that capacity, except that all deputy recorders other than the two provided for in section 2.330 must be appointed pursuant to and as governed by the regulations for the Merit Personnel System.
3.
amount specified in] as determined pursuant to NRSn the 245.043.
The Clerk is entitled to an annual salary [in the amount specified in] as determined pursuant to NRS 245.043.
2.
The Treasurer shall:
The Board of Supervisors shall review the policy at least once each year at a public hearing at which public comment is accepted.
The Board of Supervisors - 83rd Session (2025) – 11 – shall review the policy at least once each year at a public hearing at which public comment is accepted.
The Treasurer is entitled to an annual salary [in the amount specified in] as determined pursuant to - *SB116_R1* – 11 – NRS 245.043.
The Treasurer is entitled to an annual salary [in the amount specified in] as determined pursuant to business or occupation that creates a conflict of interest between his or her personal interest in the business or occupation and his or her official duties.
The Treasurer shall not engage in any other business or occupation that creates a conflict of interest between his or her personal interest in the business or occupation and his or her official duties.
The Assessor shall not engage in any other business or occupation that creates a conflict of interest between his or her personal interest in the business or occupation and his or her official duties.
The Assessor shall not engage in any other business or occupation that creates a conflict of interest between his or her official duties.t in the business or occupation and his or Sec.
Sec.
(1) The Board;
- 83rd Session (2025) – 12 – (2) The provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes, which apply to county sheriffs.
or (2) The provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes,  which apply to county sheriffs.
The Sheriff is not answerable upon his or her official bond for the conduct of deputies appointed pursuant to the - *SB116_R1* – 12 – provisions of this Charter, but the Board may require of such deputies such bonds as it may deem proper.
The Sheriff is not answerable upon his or her official bond for the conduct of deputies appointed pursuant to the provisions of this Charter, but the Board may require of such deputies such bonds as it may deem proper.
Sec.
3.070 District Attorney:
Duties;
salary.
The District Attorney is entitled to an annual salary [in the amount specified in] as determined pursuant to NRS 245.043.
The District Attorney is entitled to an annual salary NRS 245.043.nt specified in] as determined pursuant to 5.
5.
(a) Whether county commissioners should serve full-time without having any other employment or part-time with the authorization for additional employment;
- 83rd Session (2025) – 13 – without having any other employment or part-time with thee authorization for additional employment;
If the Joint Interim Standing Committee on Government Affairs reviews the issues relating to county commissioners described in subsection 1, the Committee shall include any findings - *SB116_R1* – 13 – and recommendations for proposed legislation in the report that is required pursuant to subsection 4 of NRS 218E.330.
If the Joint Interim Standing Committee on Government Affairs reviews the issues relating to county commissioners described in subsection 1, the Committee shall include any findings and recommendations for proposed legislation in the report that is required pursuant to subsection 4 of NRS 218E.330.
The provisions of NRS 354.599 do not apply to any provisions of this act.a local government that are related to the Sec.
The provisions of NRS 354.599 do not apply to any additional expenses of a local government that are related to the provisions of this act.
Sec.
H - *SB116_R1*
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 80.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 32, Nays: 9, Excused: 1.) To Senate. In Senate. To enrollment.

  4. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  5. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  6. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  7. Read second time.

  8. From committee: Do pass.

  9. To Assembly. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.

  10. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint.

  11. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 19, Nays: 2.) To printer.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 488.) Reprinting dispensed with.

  13. Notice of eligibility for exemption.

  14. Read first time. To committee.

  15. From printer.

  16. Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on · 10 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Assembly (1st Reprint)

Passed 32 Yea · 9 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 22401
Republican 10400
Unaffiliated 0100
Total 32901
% of votes cast 76%21%0%2%
How each member voted (42)
Member Party Vote
O’Neill, PK — Nay
Anderson, Natha C. Democratic Yea
Backus, Shea M. Democratic Yea
Brown-May, Tracy Democratic Yea
Carter, Max E., II Democratic Yea
Considine, Venicia Democratic Yea
D'Silva, Reuben Democratic Yea
Dalia, Joe Democratic Yea
Flanagan, Tanya P. Democratic Not Voting
González, Cecelia Democratic Nay
Goulding, Heather Democratic Yea
Hunt, Linda F. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Jovan A. Democratic Yea
Jauregui, Sandra Democratic Yea
Karris, Venise Democratic Yea
La Rue Hatch, Selena Democratic Nay
Marzola, Elaine H. Democratic Yea
Miller, Brittney M. Democratic Nay
Monroe-Moreno, Daniele Democratic Yea
Moore, Cinthia Zermeño Democratic Yea
Mosca, Erica Democratic Yea
Nadeem, Hanadi Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Duy Democratic Nay
Orentlicher, David Democratic Yea
Roth, Erica P. Democratic Yea
Torres-Fossett, Selena Democratic Yea
Watts, Howard Democratic Yea
Yeager, Steve Democratic Yea
Cole, Lisa K. Republican Yea
DeLong, Rich Republican Yea
Dickman, Jill Republican Nay
Edgeworth, Rebecca Republican Yea
Gallant, Danielle Republican Nay
Gray, Ken Republican Nay
Gurr, Bert K. Republican Yea
Hafen, Gregory T., II Republican Nay
Hansen, Alexis M. Republican Yea
Hardy, Melissa R.. Republican Yea
Hibbetts, Brian Republican Yea
Kasama, Heidi Republican Yea
Koenig, Gregory S. Republican Yea
Yurek, Toby Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Senate (1st Reprint)

Passed 19 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 6200
Democratic 13000
Total 19200
% of votes cast 90%10%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Cannizzaro, Nicole J. Democratic Yea
Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" Democratic Yea
Daly, Skip Democratic Yea
Dondero Loop, Marilyn Democratic Yea
Doñate, Fabian Democratic Yea
Flores, Edgar Democratic Yea
Lange, Roberta Democratic Yea
Neal, Dina Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic Yea
Ohrenschall, James Democratic Yea
Pazina, Julie Democratic Yea
Scheible, Melanie Democratic Yea
Taylor, Angela D. Democratic Yea
Buck, Carrie Ann Republican Nay
Ellison, John Republican Yea
Hansen, Ira Republican Yea
Krasner, Lisa Republican Yea
Rogich, Lori Republican Yea
Steinbeck, John C. Republican Yea
Stone, Jeff Republican Yea
Titus, Robin L. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 116?
SB 116 is sponsored by Daly, Skip (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 116?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 116?
Track SB 116 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 116

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 116

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →