Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 D cosponsors

AB 201 — Revises provisions relating to the sealing of certain records. (BDR 3-843)

Last action — (No further action taken.)

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 02, 2025.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

160 added · 177 removed

160 line(s) added, 177 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 21, 2025) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
201 A SSEMBLY BILL N O.
201–Assemblymember Roth CHAPTER..........
201–A SSEMBLYMEMBER ROTH PREFILED FEBRUARY 3, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to the sealing of certain records.
(BDR 3-843) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law provides for the automatic sealing of certain eviction case court bill expands the circumstances under which an eviction case court file related to an action for summary eviction is sealed automatically by providing for the automatic sealing of any such file:
Existing law provides for the automatic sealing of certain eviction case court files relating to an action for summary eviction.
(NRS 40.2545) Section 1 of this bill expands the circumstances under which an eviction case court file related to an sealing of any such file:
circumstances, including, without limitation, upon motion by the tenant, if the court finds that sealing the eviction case court file is in the interests of justice and those interests are not outweighed by the public’s interest in knowing about the contents of the eviction case court file.
Existing law authorizes a court to seal an eviction case court file under certain circumstances, including, without limitation, upon motion by the tenant, if the court finds that sealing the eviction case court file is in the interests of justice and those of the eviction case court file.
(NRS 40.2545) Section 1 provides that the filing of a motion to seal an eviction case court file more than 1 year after the date on which the eviction order is entered creates a rebuttable presumption that sealing the eviExisting law authorizes an occupant locked out of a dwelling by the owner or an authorized representative of the owner to recover possession of the dwelling by filing a verified complaint for reentry in justice court.
(NRS 40.2545) Section 1 provides that the filing of a motion to seal an eviction case court file more than 1 year after the date on which the eviction order is entered creates a rebuttable presumption that sealing the eviction case court file is in the interests of justice.
Under existing law, if an occupant files such a complaint, the court is required to hold a trial and, if the court finds that the lockout was unjustified, issue a writ of restitution to restore - *AB201_R1* – 2 – possession of the dwelling to the occupant.
Existing law authorizes an occupant locked out of a dwelling by the owner or an authorized representative of the owner to recover possession of the dwelling by filing a verified complaint for reentry in justice court.
(NRS 40.416) Section 1.5 of this bill provides for the automatic sealing of the case court file relating to a verified conditions are met.ry if the court finds that the lockout was unjustified and certain THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Under existing law, if an finds that the lockout was unjustified, issue a writ of restitution to restore the court possession of the dwelling to the occupant.
(NRS 40.416) Section 1.5 of this bill provides for the automatic sealing of the case court file relating to a verified complaint for reentry if the court finds that the lockout was unjustified and certain conditions are met.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
In addition to the provisions for the automatic sealing of an eviction case court file pursuant to subsection 1, in any action for summary eviction pursuant to NRS 40.253, 40.254 or 40.2542, the eviction case court file is sealed automatically and not open to inspection:
In addition to the provisions for the automatic sealing of an eviction case court file pursuant to subsection 1, in any action for summary eviction pursuant to NRS 40.253, 40.254 or 40.2542, the - 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – inspection:se court file is sealed automatically and not open to (a) Upon the entry of a court order which dismisses the action for summary eviction;
(a) Upon the entry of a court order which dismisses the action for summary eviction;
(1) Upholds an order which dismisses an action for summary eviction;
(1) Upholds an order which dismisses an action for summary(2) Upholds an order which denies an action for summary eviction;
(2) Upholds an order which denies an action for summary eviction;
- *AB201_R1* – 3 – (a) Upon the filing of a written stipulation by the landlord and the tenant to set aside the order of eviction and seal the eviction case court file;
(a) Upon the filing of a written stipulation by the landlord and the tenant to set aside the order of eviction and seal the eviction case court file;
(1) The eviction should be set aside pursuant to Rule 60 of the Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure;
the Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure;
or (2) Sealing the eviction case court file is in the interests of justice and those interests are not outweighed by the public’s interest in knowing about the contents of the eviction case court file, after considering, without limitation, the following factors:
orrsuant to Rule 60 of (2) Sealing the eviction case court file is in the interests of justice and those interests are not outweighed by the public’s interest in knowing about the contents of the eviction case court file, after considering, without limitation, the following factors:
and (III) The amount of time that has elapsed between the granting of the order of eviction and the filing of the motion to seal the eviction case court file.
and - 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – granting of the order of eviction and the filing of the motion to seal the eviction case court file.
(a) Apply to a notice to surrender which has been filed with a court and which is part of an eviction case court file that has not been sealed pursuant to this section.
court and which is part of an eviction case court file that has not been sealed pursuant to this section.
and - *AB201_R1* – 4 – (2) Ending on the date on which the Governor terminates the emergency described in the Declaration [May 20, 2022].
and (2) Ending on the date on which the Governor terminates the emergency described in the Declaration [May 20, 2022].
(b) “Eviction case court file” means all records relating to an action for summary eviction which are maintained by the court, including, without limitation, records maintained by a justice court or district court, the affidavit of complaint and any other pleadings, proof of service, findings of the court, any order made on motion as provided in Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure , District Court Rules and local rules of practice and all other papers, records, proceedings and evidence, including exhibits and transcript of the testimony.
(b) “Eviction case court file” means all records relating to an including, without limitation, records maintained by a justice court or district court, the affidavit of complaint and any other pleadings, proof of service, findings of the court, any order made on motion as provided in Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, Justice Court Rules of Civil Procedure , District Court Rules and local rules of practice and all other papers, records, proceedings and evidence, including exhibits and transcript of the testimony.
Sec.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – 40.416.5.
1.5.
1.
NRS 40.416 is hereby amended to read as follows:
If the owner of a dwelling or an authorizeds:
40.416 1.
representative of the owner locks an occupant out of the dwelling pursuant to NRS 40.412, the occupant may recover possession of the dwelling as provided in this section.
If the owner of a dwelling or an authorized representative of the owner locks an occupant out of the dwelling pursuant to NRS 40.412, the occupant may recover possession of the dwelling as provided in this section.
If the court finds that an unjustified lockout has occurred, the court [must issue] shall:
If the court finds that an unjustified lockout has occurred, the(a) Issue a writ of restitution, restoring possession of the dwelling to the occupant [.] ;
(a) Issue a writ of restitution, restoring possession of the dwelling to the occupant [.] ;
If the owner of the dwelling or the person on whom a writ of restitution is served fails to immediately comply with the writ or later disobeys the writ, the failure is grounds for contempt of court against the owner or the person on whom the writ was served, under chapter 22 of NRS.
If the owner of the dwelling or the person on whom a writ of restitution is served fails to immediately comply with the writ or later disobeys the writ, the failure is grounds for contempt of court against the owner or the person on whom the writ was served, under cha7.
- *AB201_R1* – 5 – 7.
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
Previous
Latest
or (b) The rights of an owner or occupant in a forcible detainer, unlSec.
or (b) The rights of an owner or occupant in a forcible detainer, unlawful detainer or forcible entry and detainer action.
Sec.
Sec.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 5 – Sec.
H - *AB201_R1*
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (3)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. (No further action taken.)

  2. Vetoed by the Governor. Returned to Assembly with Governor's veto message.

  3. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  4. In Assembly. To enrollment.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 13, Nays: 8.) To Assembly.

  6. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  7. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  8. Read second time.

  9. From committee: Do pass.

  10. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  11. In Senate.

  12. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To Senate.

  13. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 27, Nays: 15.) To printer.

  14. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 202.) Dispensed with reprinting.

  15. From printer. To committee.

  16. Read first time. To printer.

  17. Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Judiciary.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 201?
AB 201 is sponsored by Roth, Erica P. (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 201?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 201?
Track AB 201 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 201

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 201

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →