SB 321 — Revises provisions relating to public utilities. (BDR 58-1078)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 197.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on May 31, 2025.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
42 added · 49 removed42 line(s) added, 49 removed.
S.B.Senate Bill No.
321321–Senator SENATENguyen BCHAPTER.......... ILLN O.
321–SENATOR NGUYEN M ARCH 11, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to public utilities.
(BDR 58-1078) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law provides that a person who violates regulations adopted by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada in conformity with the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, 49 U.S.C.
§§ 60101 et seq., is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $200,000 for each violation for each day that the violation persists, up to a Existing federal law and regulations establish corresponding civil penalties relating to pipeline safety violations, the amounts of which are required to be adjusted each year to account for inflation and currently may not exceed $272,926 for each violation for each day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,000,000$2,729,245 for any related series of violations.
(NRS 704.595) Existing federal law and regulations establish corresponding civil penalties relating year to account for inflation and currently may not exceed $272,926 for eachted each violation for each day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,729,245 for any related series of violations.
§ 190.223(a)) This bill revises the amount of the civil penalty to align with the amount that may be charged for the corresponding civil penalties under federal law.
amount that may Existing law also provides that the amount of the civil penalty may be deducted thesefrom provisions.any sum owed to the person by the State.
to(NRS the704.595) personThis bybill theremoves State.these provisions.
(NRSEXPLANATION 704.595)– ThisMatter billin removesbolded THEitalics PEOPLEis OFnew; THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Any person who violates any provision of any regulation adopted by the Commission in conformity with the - *SB321* – 2 – Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended, 49 U.S.C.
§§ 60101 et seq., or with a federal regulation adopted pursuant thereto, is subject to a civil penalty in an amount that may not [to exceed $200,000 for each violation for each day that the violation persists, but the maximum civil penalty must not exceed $2,000,000 for any related series of violations.
Unless compromised, the amount of any such civil penalty must be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.] be greater than the monetary amount of the corresponding civil penalty for the applicable violation pursuant to 46 U.S.C.
§ 60122(a), including any adjustments made to the civil penalty pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adj2.tmAnyAdjustment civilAct penaltyImprovements mayAct beof compromised2015, byPub. the Commission.
InL. determining the amount of the penalty, or the amount agreed upon in compromise, the appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the business of the person charged, the gravity of the violation, and the good faith of the person charged in attempting to achieve compliance, after notification of a violation, must be considered.
114-74.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – In determining the amount of the penalty, or the amount agreed.
upon in compromise, the appropriateness of the penalty to the size of the business of the person charged, the gravity of the violation, and the good faith of the person charged in attempting to achieve compliance, after notification of a violation, must be considered.
H~~~~~ 25 - *SB321*83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Compared against the Nevada Revised Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill revises the civil penalty provisions for violations of regulations by removing specific penalty amounts and the provision allowing deductions from sums owed to violators by the State.
-
NRS 704.595
$200,000 for each violation for each day that the violation persists, but the maximum civil penalty must not exceed $2,000,000 for any related series of violations. Unless compromised, the amount of any such civil penalty must be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.It eliminates the fixed penalty amounts and caps previously specified.
-
NRS 704.595
when finally determined, or the amount agreed upon in compromise, may be deducted from any sum owing by the State to the person charged or→ may be recovered in a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction.It removes the provision that allowed civil penalties to be deducted from owed sums to violators.
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 197.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate. In Senate.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure. To committee.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure. To printer.
Sponsors
- Rochelle T. Nguyen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| OâNeill, PK | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Natha C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Backus, Shea M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Brown-May, Tracy | Democratic | Yea |
| Carter, Max E., II | Democratic | Yea |
| Considine, Venicia | Democratic | Yea |
| D'Silva, Reuben | Democratic | Yea |
| Dalia, Joe | Democratic | Yea |
| Flanagan, Tanya P. | Democratic | Yea |
| González, Cecelia | Democratic | Yea |
| Goulding, Heather | Democratic | Yea |
| Hunt, Linda F. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Jovan A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jauregui, Sandra | Democratic | Yea |
| Karris, Venise | Democratic | Yea |
| La Rue Hatch, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Marzola, Elaine H. | Democratic | Yea |
| Miller, Brittney M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Monroe-Moreno, Daniele | Democratic | Yea |
| Moore, Cinthia Zermeño | Democratic | Yea |
| Mosca, Erica | Democratic | Yea |
| Nadeem, Hanadi | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Duy | Democratic | Yea |
| Orentlicher, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Roth, Erica P. | Democratic | Yea |
| Torres-Fossett, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Watts, Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Yeager, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Cole, Lisa K. | Republican | Yea |
| DeLong, Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Dickman, Jill | Republican | Yea |
| Edgeworth, Rebecca | Republican | Yea |
| Gallant, Danielle | Republican | Yea |
| Gray, Ken | Republican | Yea |
| Gurr, Bert K. | Republican | Yea |
| Hafen, Gregory T., II | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Alexis M. | Republican | Yea |
| Hardy, Melissa R.. | Republican | Yea |
| Hibbetts, Brian | Republican | Yea |
| Kasama, Heidi | Republican | Yea |
| Koenig, Gregory S. | Republican | Yea |
| Yurek, Toby | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannizzaro, Nicole J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" | Democratic | Yea |
| Daly, Skip | Democratic | Yea |
| Dondero Loop, Marilyn | Democratic | Yea |
| Doñate, Fabian | Democratic | Yea |
| Flores, Edgar | Democratic | Yea |
| Lange, Roberta | Democratic | Yea |
| Neal, Dina | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Rochelle T. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ohrenschall, James | Democratic | Yea |
| Pazina, Julie | Democratic | Yea |
| Scheible, Melanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Taylor, Angela D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Buck, Carrie Ann | Republican | Yea |
| Ellison, John | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Ira | Republican | Yea |
| Krasner, Lisa | Republican | Yea |
| Rogich, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Steinbeck, John C. | Republican | Yea |
| Stone, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Titus, Robin L. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 321?
- SB 321 is sponsored by Nguyen, Rochelle T. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 321?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 321?
- Track SB 321 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 321
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 321
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →