Revises provisions governing certain surcharges imposed by a county. (BDR 20-677)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 208 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 208.
You're tracking SB 208
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 208 — Revises provisions governing certain surcharges imposed by a county. (BDR 20-677)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 182.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on May 31, 2025.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
2 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (2 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
221 added · 242 removed221 line(s) added, 242 removed.
(ReprintedSenate withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 15, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
208208–Senators SENATESteinbeck, BILLNStone; O .
208–SENATORSand STEINBECKDoñate ,CHAPTER.......... STONE ;AND D OÑATE FEBRUARY 18, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing certain surcharges imposed by a county.
(BDR 20-677) FISCAL NOTE:
EffEffect on the State:
No.
May have Fiscal Impact.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
LegislativeLegiUnder Counsel’sexisting Digest:federal law, the Federal Communications Commission is required to regulate the use of money collected from surcharges imposed for emergency 911 service to prevent diversion of those fees or charges.
Under existing federal law, the Federal Communications Commission is required to regulate the use of money collected from surcharges imposed for emergency 911 service to prevent diversion of those fees or charges.
§ 615a-1) Existing federal regulations limit the use of revenue from such fees or implementationcharges ofimposed emergencyby 911authorized service;taxing jurisdictions to:
(1) the support and implementation of emergency 911 service;
Existing federal regulations provide certain examples of acceptable uses of such revenue which include, without limitation, the purchase, maintenance or upgrade of buildings or facilities that contain public safety answering points.
(47 C.F.R § 9.23)9.23)ngs or facilities that contain public Existing law authorizes a board of county commissioners to impose a surcharge for the enhancement of the telephone system for reporting an emergency or for the purchase and maintenance of portable event recording devices and vehicular eventeevent recording devices if the board adopts and reviews, at least annually, a 5-year master plan for the enhancement of the telephone system or the purchase and maintenance of such recording devices.
Existing law prescribes an(NRS order244A.7645) ofSection priority3 forof spendingthis thebill: money in the fund for the specified purposes.
the(1) surchargeauthorizes to also be used for paying any costs associated with the construction,revenue maintenancecollected orfroms. operation of the portion of a facility that contains a telephone - *SB208_R1* – 2 – system for reporting an emergency and will be physically occupied by and functionally dedicated to the operation of such a telephone system;
andthe (2)surcharge prescribesto thealso orderbe ofused priority for spendingpaying theany revenuecosts collectedassociated fromwith the surUnderconstruction, existingmaintenance law,or ifoperation of the uncommittedportion balance of such a specialfacility revenuethat fundcontains exceeds a specifiedtelephone monetarysystem thresholdfor atreporting thean endemergency ofand anywill fiscalbe year,physically theoccupied board of county commissioners is required to reduce the amount of the surcharge imposed during the next fiscal year by theand amountfunctionally necessarydedicated to ensure that the unencumberedoperation balance in the fund at the end of the next fiscal year does not exceed monetary threshold for such a specialtelephone revenuesystem; fund of a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently Clark County).
and (2) prescribes the order of priority for spending the revenue collected from the surcharge for that additional purpose.
Under existing law, if the uncommitted balance of such a special revenue fund exceeds a specified monetary threshold at the end of any fiscal year, the board of during the next fiscal year by the amount necessary to ensure that the imposed unencumbered balance in the fund at the end of the next fiscal year does not exceed the specified threshold.
(NRS 244A.7645) Section 3 increases to $15,000,000 this monetary threshold for such a special revenue fund of a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently Clark County).
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
SectionSections 1.1 and 2.
2.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
(2) Possess knowledge concerning telephone systems for reporting emergencies;
andande concerning telephone systems for (3) Are not elected public officers.
- *SB208_R1* – 3 – (a) Consist of not less than five members who:
As used in this paragraph, “incumbent local exchange carrier” has the meaning ascribed to it in 47 U.S.C.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – (c) Subject to the provisions of subparagraph (3) of paragraph (a), include the chief law enforcement officer or his or her designee from each office of the county sheriff, metropolitan police department, police department of an incorporated city within the county and department, division or municipal court of a city or town that employs marshals within the county, as applicable.
city or town 3.
(III) Purchasing, leasing or renting the equipment and software necessary to operate the enhanced telephone system, including, without limitation, equipment and software that identify the number or location from which a call is made;
- *SB208_R1* – 4 – (2) In a county whose population is less than 52,000, to improve the telephone system for reporting an emergency in the county.
(1)- By83rd anSession entity(2025) described– in4 this– subparagraph, costs associated with the acquisition, maintenance, storage of data, upgrade and replacement of equipment and software necessary for the operation of portable event recording devices and vehicular event recording devices or systems that consist of both portable event recording devices and vehicular event recording devices.
(2) Costs for personnel and training associated with maintaining, updating and operating the equipment, hardware and software necessary for portable event recording devices and vehicular event recording devices or systems that consist of both portable event recording devices and vehicular event recording devices.
(a) Paying the costs authorized pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection 3 to adopt and review the 5-year master plan.
-(a) *SB208_R1*of – 5 – (b) If the county performs an analysis or audit described in NRS 244A.7648, paying the costs authorized pursuant to paragraph [(d)] (e) of subsection 3.
(e)- If83rd theSession county(2025) has– imposed5 a– portion of the surcharge for purposes of purchasing and maintaining portable event recording devices and vehicular event recording devices:
(b) The recipient used any portion of the money for a purpose that isi(1) notNotify authorizedthe pursuantboard toof subsectioncounty 3,commissioners theand recipienttheient must:
Show all 53 changed lines (13 more)
(1) Notify the board of county commissioners and the advisory committee;
If the balance in the fund created in a county whose population is 700,000 or more pursuant to subsection 3 which has not been committed for expenditure exceeds $15,000,000 at the end of any fiscal year, the board of county commissioners shall reduce the amount of the surcharge imposed during the next fiscal year by the amount necessary to ensure that the unencumbered balance in the fund at the end of the next fiscal year does not exceed $15,000,000.
If the balance in the fund created in a county whose population is 100,000 or more but less than 700,000 pursuant to - *SB208_R1* – 6 – subsection 3 which has not been committed for expenditure exceeds [$5,000,000] $7,500,000 at the end of any fiscal year, the board of county commissioners shall reduce the amount of the surcharge imposed during the next fiscal year by the amount necessary to - 83rd Session (2025) – 6 – ensure that the unencumbered balance in the fund at the end of the next fiscal year does not exceed [$5,000,000.] $7,500,000.
If the balance in the fund created in a county whose population is 52,000 or more but less than 100,000 pursuant to subsection 3 which has not been committed for expenditure exceeds $1,000,000 at the end of any fiscal year, the board of countycountyeeds commissioners shall reduce the amount of the surcharge imposed during the next fiscal year by the amount necessary to ensure that the unencumbered balance in the fund at the end of the next fiscal year does not exceed $1,000,000.
Sec.Secs.
4.4-7.
5.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
6.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
7.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
H~~~~~ 25 - *SB208_R1*83rd Session (2025)
Show all 53 changed rows (13 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 182.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate. In Senate.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 504.) To printer.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.
Sponsors
- Fabian Doñate · Cosponsor
- Jeff Stone · Primary
- John C. Steinbeck · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 64 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Stone, Jeff Republican
- Steinbeck, John C. Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Doñate, Fabian Democratic
Not signed on (64)
64 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 64 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| OâNeill, PK | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Natha C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Backus, Shea M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Brown-May, Tracy | Democratic | Yea |
| Carter, Max E., II | Democratic | Yea |
| Considine, Venicia | Democratic | Yea |
| D'Silva, Reuben | Democratic | Yea |
| Dalia, Joe | Democratic | Yea |
| Flanagan, Tanya P. | Democratic | Yea |
| González, Cecelia | Democratic | Yea |
| Goulding, Heather | Democratic | Yea |
| Hunt, Linda F. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Jovan A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jauregui, Sandra | Democratic | Yea |
| Karris, Venise | Democratic | Yea |
| La Rue Hatch, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Marzola, Elaine H. | Democratic | Yea |
| Miller, Brittney M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Monroe-Moreno, Daniele | Democratic | Yea |
| Moore, Cinthia Zermeño | Democratic | Yea |
| Mosca, Erica | Democratic | Yea |
| Nadeem, Hanadi | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Duy | Democratic | Yea |
| Orentlicher, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Roth, Erica P. | Democratic | Yea |
| Torres-Fossett, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Watts, Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Yeager, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Cole, Lisa K. | Republican | Yea |
| DeLong, Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Dickman, Jill | Republican | Yea |
| Edgeworth, Rebecca | Republican | Yea |
| Gallant, Danielle | Republican | Yea |
| Gray, Ken | Republican | Yea |
| Gurr, Bert K. | Republican | Yea |
| Hafen, Gregory T., II | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Alexis M. | Republican | Yea |
| Hardy, Melissa R.. | Republican | Yea |
| Hibbetts, Brian | Republican | Yea |
| Kasama, Heidi | Republican | Yea |
| Koenig, Gregory S. | Republican | Yea |
| Yurek, Toby | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannizzaro, Nicole J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" | Democratic | Yea |
| Daly, Skip | Democratic | Yea |
| Dondero Loop, Marilyn | Democratic | Yea |
| Doñate, Fabian | Democratic | Yea |
| Flores, Edgar | Democratic | Yea |
| Lange, Roberta | Democratic | Yea |
| Neal, Dina | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Rochelle T. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ohrenschall, James | Democratic | Yea |
| Pazina, Julie | Democratic | Yea |
| Scheible, Melanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Taylor, Angela D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Buck, Carrie Ann | Republican | Yea |
| Ellison, John | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Ira | Republican | Yea |
| Krasner, Lisa | Republican | Yea |
| Rogich, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Steinbeck, John C. | Republican | Yea |
| Stone, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Titus, Robin L. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 208?
- SB 208 is sponsored by Doñate, Fabian (Democratic), Stone, Jeff (Republican), and Steinbeck, John C. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 208?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 208?
- Track SB 208 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 208
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 208
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →