Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 11 — Revises provisions relating to the payment of extended unemployment benefits. (BDR 53-306)

Last action — Chapter 35.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced October 30, 2024. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on May 26, 2025.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

271 added · 294 removed

271 line(s) added, 294 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
S.B.
Senate Bill No.
11 SENATE BILL NO .
11–Committee on Commerce and Labor CHAPTER..........
11–COMMITTEE ON C OMMERCE AND L ABOR (ON BEHALF OF THE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY D IVISION OF THED EPARTMENT OF E MPLOYMENT , TRAINING AND REHABILITATION ) P REFILED OCTOBER 30, 2024 ____________ Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to the payment of extended unemployment benefits.
(BDR 53-306) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
The Unemployment Compensation Law, in general, makes persons who have become unemployed and comply with certain requirements eligible for benefits from the Unemployment Compensation Fund in an amount based on the person’s previous wages for employment.
become unemployed and comply with certain requirements eligible for benefits from the Unemployment Compensation Fund in an amount based on the person’s previous wages for employment.
(Chapter 612 of NRS) Existing law provides for the payment of extended unemployment benefits to a person who has exhausted his requirements during an extended benefit period.
(Chapter 612 of NRS) Existing law provides for the payment of extended unemployment benefits to a person who has exhausted his or her regular unemployment benefits and who meets certain eligibility requirements during an extended benefit period.
99-177, as amended) While certain federal payments relating to unemployment compensation are exempt from sequestration, federal payments to a state for the federal share of extended unemployment benefits are not weekly payment of extended unemployment benefits for any week of state to reduce each unemployment during any period in which federal payments to the state are reduced under a sequestration order by a percentage not to exceed the percentage by which the federal payment to the state is to be reduced for the week as a result of the order.
99-177, as amended) While certain federal payments payments to a state for the federal share of extended unemployment benefits are not exempt.
§ 906(i)(2)) - *SB11* – 2 – Section 2 of this bill requires that the weekly extended benefit amount payable to a person be reduced for any week during a period in which federal payments to this State are reduced as a result of sequestration by a percentage equal to the percentage of the reduction in the federal payment.
§ 906(i)(1)) Existing federal law authorizes a state to reduce each weekly payment of extended unemployment benefits for any week of unemployment during any period in which federal payments to the state are reduced under a sequestration order by a percentage not to exceed the percentage by which the federal payment to the state is to be reduced for the week as a result of the order.
(2 U.S.C.
§ 906(i)(2)) Section 2 of this bill requires that the weekly extended benefit amount payable to a person be reduced for any week during a period in which federal payments to this State are reduced as a result of sequestration by a percentage equal to the percentage of the reduction in the federal payment.
The guidance specifies that a state which provides for appeal the calculation of the amounts.
The guidance specifies that a state which provides for such reductions is required to provide notice to a claimant and an opportunity to appeal the calculation of the amounts.
Dept.
DeptSection 2 requires the Administrator of the Employment Security Division of the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation to provide a notice containing certain information to any person whose weekly extended benefit amount has been reduced as a result of sequestration.
of Labor UIPL 7-24 (2024)) Section 2 requires the Administrator of the Employment Security Division of the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation to provide a notice amount has been reduced as a result of sequestration.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
“Extended benefit period” means a period which begins with the third week after a week for which there is a Nevada “on” indicator and ends with the third week after the first week for which there is a Nevada “off” indicator or the 13th consecutive week after it began, except that no extended benefit period may begin by reason of a Nevada “on” indicator before the 14th week following the end of a prior extended benefit period which was in effect for Nevada, unless federal law authorizes an extended benefit period to begin before the 14th week following the end of a prior extended benefit period.
“Extended benefit period” means a period which begins with the third week after a week for which there is a Nevada “on” indicator and ends with the third week after the first week for which there is a Nevada “off” indicator or the 13th consecutive week after it began, except that no extended benefit period may begin by reason of a Nevada “on” indicator before the 14th week following the end of a prior extended benefit period which was in effect for Nevada, unless federal law authorizes an extended benefit period to benefit period.e 14th week following the end of a prior extended 2.
2.
- *SB11* – 3 – (1) Equaled or exceeded 120 percent of the average of those rates for the corresponding 13-week period ending in each of the preceding 2 calendar years and equaled or exceeded 5 percent;
(1) Equaled or exceeded 120 percent of the average of those rates for the corresponding 13-week period ending in each of the preceding 2 calendar years and equaled or exceeded 5 percent;
(1) Equaled or exceeded 6.5 percent;
(2) Equaled or exceeded 110 percent of the average rate for the corresponding 3-month period ending in either of the 2 preceding calendar years.
and (2) Equaled or exceeded 110 percent of the average rate for the corresponding 3-month period ending in either of the 2 preceding calendar years.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – 3.
3.
There is a “Nevada ‘off’ indicator” for a week if the Administrator determines, in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Labor, that for the period consisting of that week and the immediately preceding 12 weeks, the rate of insured une(a) Was less than 120 percent of the average of those rates for the corresponding 13-week period ending in each of the preceding 2 calendar years;
There is a “Nevada ‘off’ indicator” for a week if the Administrator determines, in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Labor, that for the period consisting of that week and the immediately preceding 12 weeks, the rate of insured unemployment in Nevada (not seasonally adjusted):
(a) Was less than 120 percent of the average of those rates for the corresponding 13-week period ending in each of the preceding 2 calendar years;
§§ 8501 et seq.) payable to a - *SB11* – 4 – person under the provisions of NRS 612.377 to 612.3786, inclusive, for the weeks of unemployment in the person’s eligibility period.
§§ 8501 et seq.) payable to a for the weeks of unemployment in the person’s eligibility period., 7.
7.
9.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – of unemployment in the person’s eligibility period:t to any week (a) Has received, before that week, all of the regular, seasonal or nonseasonal benefits that were available to him or her under this chapter or any other state law (including augmented weekly benefits for dependents and benefits payable to federal civilian employees and ex-servicemen or ex-servicewomen under 5 U.S.C.
“Exhaustee” means a person who, with respect to any week of unemployment in the person’s eligibility period:
(a) Has received, before that week, all of the regular, seasonal or nonseasonal benefits that were available to him or her under this chapter or any other state law (including augmented weekly benefits for dependents and benefits payable to federal civilian employees and ex-servicemen or ex-servicewomen under 5 U.S.C.
or (b) His or her benefit year having expired before that week, has no, or insufficient, wages on the basis of which the person could establish a new benefit year which would include that week, and has no right to unemployment benefits or allowances, as the case may be, under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C.
or (b) His or her benefit year having expired before that week, has no, or insufficient, wages on the basis of which the person could establish a new benefit year which would include that week, case may be, under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45the U.S.C.
- *SB11* – 5 – 10.
10.
612.3776 [The] 1.
612.3776 [The] extended benefit amount payable to a person for a week of total unemployment in the person’s eligibility period is:
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, the weekly extended benefit amount payable to a person for a week of total unemployment in the person’s eligibility period is:
If the amount computed in accordance with this [subsection] paragraph is not a multiple of $1 it must be computed to the next lower multiple of $1.
If the amount - 83rd Session (2025) – 5 – computed in accordance with this [subsection] paragraph is not a multiple of $1 it must be computed to the next lower multiple of $1.
For any week during a period in which federal payments made to this State pursuant to section 204 of the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, Public Law 91-373, as amended, are reduced pursuant to an order issued pursuant to section 254 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, Public Law 99-177, as amended, the weekly extended benefit amount payable to a person for a week of total unemployment in the person’s eligibility period must be reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage of the reduction in the federal payment.
For any week during a period in which federal payments made to this State pursuant to section 204 of the Federal-State 91-373, as amended, are reduced pursuant to an order issued pursuant to section 254 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, Public Law 99-177, as amended, the weekly extended benefit amount payable to a person for a week of total unemployment in the person’s eligibility period must be reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage of the reduction in the federal payment.
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
Previous
Latest
and (d) State that an appeal of the reduction itself, which is required by sequestration pursuant to the order issued pursuant to section 254 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, Public Law 99-177, as amended, will not succeed, as such a reduction is mandated by federal law.
and (d) State that an appeal of the reduction itself, which is required by sequestration pursuant to the order issued pursuant to Control Act of 1985, Public Law 99-177, as amended, will not succeed, as such a reduction is mandated by federal law.
- *SB11* – 6 – 4.
4.
(a) Fifty percent of the basic benefits which were payable to him or her in the benefit year.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 6 – or her in the benefit year.
In weeks beginning in a high unemployment period on or after March 18, 2020, and ending on or before the week ending 3 weeks before the last week for which full federal sharing is authorized by section 4105(a) of Public Law No.
In weeks beginning in a high unemployment period on or after March 18, 2020, and ending on or before the week ending 3 weeks before the last week for which full federal sharing is occur during a period of time specified by the Governor in awhich proclamation issued pursuant to subsection [4,] 5, the total extended benefit amount payable to any eligible person for the person’s applicable benefit year is the lesser of the following amounts:
116-127, or which occur during a period of time specified by the Governor in a proclamation issued pursuant to subsection [4,] 5, the total extended benefit amount payable to any eligible person for the person’s applicable benefit year is the lesser of the following amounts:
(c) Forty-six times the person’s average weekly benefit amount which was payable to him or her under this chapter for a week of total unemployment in the applicable benefit year, reduced by the - *SB11* – 7 – basic benefits which were payable to him or her in the benefit year.
(c) Forty-six times the person’s average weekly benefit amount which was payable to him or her under this chapter for a week of total unemployment in the applicable benefit year, reduced by the If the amount computed is not a multiple of $1, it must be computed.
If the amount computed is not a multiple of $1, it must be computed to the next lower multiple of $1.
to the next lower multiple of $1.
99-177, as amended, the total extended benefit amount payable to an eligible person for the person’s applicable benefit year pursuant to subsection 1 must be reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate of the reductions made to his or her weekly extended benefit amounts pursuant to subsection 2 of NRS 612.3776.
99-177, as amended, the total extended benefit amount payable to an eligible person for - 83rd Session (2025) – 7 – the person’s applicable benefit year pursuant to subsection 1 must be reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate of the reductions made to his or her weekly extended benefit amounts pursuant to subsection 2 of NRS 612.3776.
4.
benefit period, the remaining balance of extended benefits that the person would, but for this subsection, be entitled to receive in that period, with respect to weeks of unemployment beginning after the end of the benefit year, must be reduced by the product of the number of weeks for which the person received any amounts as trade readjustment allowances pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
If the benefit year of any person ends within an extended benefit period, the remaining balance of extended benefits that the person would, but for this subsection, be entitled to receive in that period, with respect to weeks of unemployment beginning after the end of the benefit year, must be reduced by the product of the number of weeks for which the person received any amounts as trade readjustment allowances pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
H - *SB11*
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Chapter 35.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate. In Senate. To enrollment.

  5. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  6. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  7. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  8. Read second time.

  9. From committee: Do pass.

  10. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To committee.

  11. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.

  12. From committee: Do pass. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time.

  13. Read first time. To committee.

  14. From printer.

  15. Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To printer.

Sponsors

  • Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 42 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 27000
Republican 14000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 42000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (42)
Member Party Vote
O’Neill, PK — Yea
Anderson, Natha C. Democratic Yea
Backus, Shea M. Democratic Yea
Brown-May, Tracy Democratic Yea
Carter, Max E., II Democratic Yea
Considine, Venicia Democratic Yea
D'Silva, Reuben Democratic Yea
Dalia, Joe Democratic Yea
Flanagan, Tanya P. Democratic Yea
González, Cecelia Democratic Yea
Goulding, Heather Democratic Yea
Hunt, Linda F. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Jovan A. Democratic Yea
Jauregui, Sandra Democratic Yea
Karris, Venise Democratic Yea
La Rue Hatch, Selena Democratic Yea
Marzola, Elaine H. Democratic Yea
Miller, Brittney M. Democratic Yea
Monroe-Moreno, Daniele Democratic Yea
Moore, Cinthia Zermeño Democratic Yea
Mosca, Erica Democratic Yea
Nadeem, Hanadi Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Duy Democratic Yea
Orentlicher, David Democratic Yea
Roth, Erica P. Democratic Yea
Torres-Fossett, Selena Democratic Yea
Watts, Howard Democratic Yea
Yeager, Steve Democratic Yea
Cole, Lisa K. Republican Yea
DeLong, Rich Republican Yea
Dickman, Jill Republican Yea
Edgeworth, Rebecca Republican Yea
Gallant, Danielle Republican Yea
Gray, Ken Republican Yea
Gurr, Bert K. Republican Yea
Hafen, Gregory T., II Republican Yea
Hansen, Alexis M. Republican Yea
Hardy, Melissa R.. Republican Yea
Hibbetts, Brian Republican Yea
Kasama, Heidi Republican Yea
Koenig, Gregory S. Republican Yea
Yurek, Toby Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Senate (As Introduced)

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 8000
Democratic 13000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Cannizzaro, Nicole J. Democratic Yea
Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" Democratic Yea
Daly, Skip Democratic Yea
Dondero Loop, Marilyn Democratic Yea
Doñate, Fabian Democratic Yea
Flores, Edgar Democratic Yea
Lange, Roberta Democratic Yea
Neal, Dina Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic Yea
Ohrenschall, James Democratic Yea
Pazina, Julie Democratic Yea
Scheible, Melanie Democratic Yea
Taylor, Angela D. Democratic Yea
Buck, Carrie Ann Republican Yea
Ellison, John Republican Yea
Hansen, Ira Republican Yea
Krasner, Lisa Republican Yea
Rogich, Lori Republican Yea
Steinbeck, John C. Republican Yea
Stone, Jeff Republican Yea
Titus, Robin L. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 11?
SB 11 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor.
What is the current status of SB 11?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced October 30, 2024. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 11?
Track SB 11 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 11

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 11

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →