Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 298 — Revises provisions relating to peace officers. (BDR 23-1031)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 395.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 06, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 09, 2025.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

97 added · 54 removed

97 line(s) added, 54 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 15, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
Senate Bill No.
298 SENATE BILL NO .
298–Committee on Government Affairs CHAPTER..........
298–COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS M ARCH 6, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to peace officers.
(BDR 23-1031) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
prohibiting a law enforcement agency from denying an increase in seniority or compensation to a peace officer under certain circumstances;
and (2) provides certain protections to 289.057, 289.060, 289.080, 289.085, 289.092, 289.820, 289.824) Existing law20, defines “punitive action” as any action which may lead to dismissal, demotion, suspension, reduction in salary, written reprimand or transfer of a peace officer for purposes of punishment.
and (2) provides certain protections to peace officers when punitive action may be imposed against them.
(NRS 289.020, 289.057, 289.060, 289.080, 289.085, 289.092, 289.820, 289.824) Existing law suspension, reduction in salary, written reprimand or transfer of a peace officer for purposes of punishment.
Existing law authorizes a law enforcement agency to conduct an investigation of a peace officer in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has exceptions, including any investigation which concerns alleged criminal activities, prohibits a law enforcement agency from suspending a peace officer without pay during or pursuant to an investigation until all investigations relating to the matter have concluded.
(NRS 289.057, 289.090) Section 3 of this bill adds to this prohibition the denial of an increase in seniority or compensation, subject to certain exceptions.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
- *SB298_R1* – 2 – 2.
2.
3.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – 3.
“Law enforcement agency” means any agency, office, bureau, department, unit or division created by any statute, ord(a) Has a duty to enforce the law;
“Law enforcement agency” means any agency, office, bureau, department, unit or division created by any statute, ordinance or rule which:
and (b) Employs any person upon whom some or all of the powers of a peace officer are conferred pursuant to NRS 289.150 to 289.360, inclusive.
(a) Has a duty to enforce the law;
and of a peace officer are conferred pursuant to NRS 289.150 tors 289.360, inclusive.
H - *SB298_R1*
Sec.
3.
NRS 289.057 is hereby amended to read as follows:
289.057 1.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an investigation of a peace officer may be conducted in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has engaged in activities which could result in punitive action.
Any such investigation of a peace officer must be commenced by the law enforcement agency within a reasonable period of time after the date of the filing of the complaint or allegation with the law enforcement investigation pursuant to this subsection if the complaint or allegation is filed with the law enforcement agency more than 5 years after the activities of the peace officer occurred.
2.
Except as otherwise provided in a collective bargaining agreement, a law enforcement agency shall not [suspend] :
(a) Suspend a peace officer without pay ;
or (b) Deny an increase in seniority or compensation, unless an investigation may lead to dismissal or demotion,  during or pursuant to an investigation conducted pursuant to this section until all investigations relating to the matter have concluded.
3.
After the conclusion of the investigation:
(a) If the investigation causes a law enforcement agency to impose punitive action against the peace officer who was the subject of the investigation and the peace officer has received notice of the imposition of the punitive action, the peace officer or a - 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – representative authorized by the peace officer may, except as otherwise prohibited by federal or state law, review any administrative or investigative file maintained by the law enforcement agency relating to the investigation, including any rec(b) If, pursuant to a policy of a law enforcement agency or a labor agreement, the record of the investigation or the imposition of punitive action is subject to being removed from any administrative file relating to the peace officer maintained by the law enforcement agency, the law enforcement agency shall not, except as otherwise required by federal or state law, keep or make a record of the investigation or the imposition of punitive action after the record is required to be removed from the administrative file.
4.
A law enforcement agency may reassign a peace officer temporarily or permanently without his or her consent during or pursuant to an investigation conducted pursuant to this section or when there is a hearing relating to such an investigation that is pending.
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 395.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. Assembly Amendment No. 733 concurred in. To enrollment.

  4. From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 28, Nays: 14.) To Senate. In Senate.

  5. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 733.) To printer.

  6. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  7. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 14, Nays: 7.) To Assembly.

  8. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 509.) To printer.

  9. From printer. To committee.

  10. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.

Sponsors

  • Senate Committee on Government Affairs · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on · 20 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Senate Committee on Government Affairs

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Assembly (2nd Reprint)

Passed 28 Yea · 14 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 27000
Republican 11300
Unaffiliated 0100
Total 281400
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (42)
Member Party Vote
O’Neill, PK — Nay
Anderson, Natha C. Democratic Yea
Backus, Shea M. Democratic Yea
Brown-May, Tracy Democratic Yea
Carter, Max E., II Democratic Yea
Considine, Venicia Democratic Yea
D'Silva, Reuben Democratic Yea
Dalia, Joe Democratic Yea
Flanagan, Tanya P. Democratic Yea
González, Cecelia Democratic Yea
Goulding, Heather Democratic Yea
Hunt, Linda F. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Jovan A. Democratic Yea
Jauregui, Sandra Democratic Yea
Karris, Venise Democratic Yea
La Rue Hatch, Selena Democratic Yea
Marzola, Elaine H. Democratic Yea
Miller, Brittney M. Democratic Yea
Monroe-Moreno, Daniele Democratic Yea
Moore, Cinthia Zermeño Democratic Yea
Mosca, Erica Democratic Yea
Nadeem, Hanadi Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Duy Democratic Yea
Orentlicher, David Democratic Yea
Roth, Erica P. Democratic Yea
Torres-Fossett, Selena Democratic Yea
Watts, Howard Democratic Yea
Yeager, Steve Democratic Yea
Cole, Lisa K. Republican Nay
DeLong, Rich Republican Nay
Dickman, Jill Republican Nay
Edgeworth, Rebecca Republican Nay
Gallant, Danielle Republican Yea
Gray, Ken Republican Nay
Gurr, Bert K. Republican Nay
Hafen, Gregory T., II Republican Nay
Hansen, Alexis M. Republican Nay
Hardy, Melissa R.. Republican Nay
Hibbetts, Brian Republican Nay
Kasama, Heidi Republican Nay
Koenig, Gregory S. Republican Nay
Yurek, Toby Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Senate (1st Reprint)

Passed 14 Yea · 7 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1700
Democratic 13000
Total 14700
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Cannizzaro, Nicole J. Democratic Yea
Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" Democratic Yea
Daly, Skip Democratic Yea
Dondero Loop, Marilyn Democratic Yea
Doñate, Fabian Democratic Yea
Flores, Edgar Democratic Yea
Lange, Roberta Democratic Yea
Neal, Dina Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic Yea
Ohrenschall, James Democratic Yea
Pazina, Julie Democratic Yea
Scheible, Melanie Democratic Yea
Taylor, Angela D. Democratic Yea
Buck, Carrie Ann Republican Nay
Ellison, John Republican Nay
Hansen, Ira Republican Nay
Krasner, Lisa Republican Nay
Rogich, Lori Republican Yea
Steinbeck, John C. Republican Nay
Stone, Jeff Republican Nay
Titus, Robin L. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 298?
SB 298 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Government Affairs.
What is the current status of SB 298?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 06, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 298?
Track SB 298 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 298

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 298

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →