Nevada 2025 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 432 — Revises provisions relating to privacy. (BDR 11-1020)

Last action — Chapter 505.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 24, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 10, 2025.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

198 added · 254 removed

198 line(s) added, 254 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
EXEMPT (Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 15, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
Senate Bill No.
432 SENATE BILL N O.
432–Committee on Judiciary CHAPTER..........
432–COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY M ARCH 24, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to privacy.
(BDR 11-1020) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
granting courts discretion to close family law proceedings under certain circumstances;
granting courts discretion to close family law proceedings or portions thereof under certain circumstances;
Existing law requires the court in any action for divorce to close a proceeding Supreme Court held that such a statute is unconstitutional because it permits closed court proceedings without the exercise of judicial discretion.
Existing law requires the court in any action for divorce to close a proceeding upon the demand of either party to the action.
(NRS 125.080) In 2024, the Nevada Supreme Court held that such a statute is unconstitutional because it permits closed court proceedings without the exercise of judicial discretion.
Eighth Judicial District Court in and for the County of Clark, 140 Nev.
Eighth P.3d 92 (2024)) Section 6 of this bill repeals this statute.
Adv.
Op.
8, 543 P.3d 92 (2024)) Section 6 of this bill repeals this statute.
(1) establishes that authorizes a court to exercise its discretion and close any such proceeding if the court determines that closure is necessary to serve a compelling interest.
(1) establishes that family law proceedings are presumptively open unless an exception applies;
Section 3 also requires the court to:
and (2) authorizes a court to exercise its discretion and close any such proceeding or portion thereof if the court determines that closure is necessary to serve a when making this determination;
(1) consider certain factors when making this determination;
(2) make certain written findings;
and (2) exclude certain persons from the court or chambers if the proceeding is closed.
and (3) excludectors certain persons from the court or chambers if the proceeding is closed.
Additionally, section 3 provides that an electronic or video record of a private hearing:
Additionally, section 3 provides, with certain exceptions, that a transcript, audio recording or electronic or video record of a closed portion of a hearing or trial:
(1) is confidential and not open to public inspection, exception applies;
(1) is confidential and not open to inspection or copying, except by the parties, their counsel and necessary staff or experts;
and (2) must not be distributed, copied or made publicly an available.
and (2) must not be distributed.
- *SB432_R1* – 2 – Section 4 of this bill governs which court records are accessible to the public in family law proceedings.
Section 4 of this bill governs which court records are accessible to the public in certain court records if the court determines that the sealing or redaction is justified by a compelling interest that outweighs the public interest in access to the court record.
Under section 4, a court is authorized to seal or redact certain court records if the court determines that the sealing or redaction is justified record.
(1) authorizes the court to unseal a court record underurt certain circumstances;
(1) authorizes the court to unseal a court record under certain circumstances;
or displaying in any public manner certain personal identifying information ofposting another person without the consent of the person.
or displaying in any public manner certain personal identifying information of posting another person without the consent of the person.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Upon oral or written motion of either party, upon its own motion or upon the filing of a request to provide electronic coverage of a proceeding, a court may exercise its discretion and close a proceeding if the court determines that closure is necessary to serve a compelling interest.
Upon oral or written motion of either party, upon its own motion or upon the filing of a request to provide electronic coverage of a proceeding, a court may exercise its discretion and that closure is necessary to serve a compelling interest.etermines 3.
3.
(a) The best interests of each child involved in the proceeding;
(a) The presumption set forth in subsection 1;
(b) Whether permitting a third party to observe or record the proceeding creates a substantial risk of violating a federal or state law or regulation or court rule relating to the disclosure of personal identifying information, including, without limitation:
(b) The best interest of each child involved in the proceeding;
(c) Whether permitting a third party to observe or record the proceeding creates a substantial risk of violating a federal or state law or regulation or court rule relating to the disclosure of personal identifying information that cannot be mitigated by sealing court records.
As used in this paragraph, “personal identifying information” includes, without limitation:
and (c) Whether, in the absence of closure, there is a substantial risk that:
and (d) Whether, in the absence of closure, there is a substantial risk that:
(1) A party to the proceeding or child involved in the proceeding may suffer harassment, indignity, embarrassment, - *SB432_R1* – 3 – shame, financial loss, stigmatization, harm to reputation, anxiety, fear or any other physical or emotional harm;
(1) A party to the proceeding or child involved in the proceeding may suffer harassment, indignity, undue embarrassment or any other physical or emotional harm;
or (2) The fundamental right of privacy of any person will be violated.
or violated.
4.
The fundamental right of privacy of any person will be 4.
Show all 89 changed rows (49 more)
Previous
Latest
In addition to any other factors the court considers relevant in determining whether closure is necessary to serve a compelling interest, the court shall consider:
After considering the factors set forth in subsection 3 and any other factors the court considers relevant in determining - 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – whether closure is necessary to serve a compelling interest, the court shall make written findings regarding:
(a) Whether there is a substantial probability that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interest could be harmed;
(a) Whether there is a substantial probability that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interest will be harmed;
and (b) Whether there are alternatives to closure that would adequately protect the compelling interest.
adequately protect the compelling interest;
ande that would (c) Whether the closure is narrowly tailored to protect the compelling interest.
If the court determines that a proceeding should be closed pursuant to subsection 2:
If the court determines that a proceeding or portion thereof should be closed pursuant to subsection 2:
(a) The court shall direct that the proceeding be private;
(a) The court shall direct that the proceeding or portion thereof be closed;
(5) The parents or guardians of the parties;
(5) The guardians of the parties;
and (6) The siblings of the parties.
and (6) Persons who are related within the third degree of consanguinity to the parties.
The court may, upon oral or written motion of either party or on its own motion, exclude the parents, guardians or siblings of either party, or witnesses for either party, from the court or chambers wherein the action is tried.
The court may, upon oral or written motion of either party or on its own motion, exclude any person described in subparagraph (4), (5) or (6) of paragraph (b) of subsection 5 from the7.ourIf the court determines that the interests of justice or best interests of a child would be served, the court may permit a person to remain, observe and hear any relevant portion of a proceeding, notwithstanding any request by a party that the proceeding be closed.
7.
If the court determines that the interests of justice or best interests of a child would be served, the court may permit a person to remain, observe and hear any relevant portion of a proceeding, notwithstanding any request by a party that the proceeding be private.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection or by specific statute, court rule or court order, an electronic or video record of a private hearing is confidential and not open to inspection by any person.
Except as otherwise provided by specific statute, court rule or court order, a transcript, audio recording or electronic or video record of a closed portion of a hearing or trial is confidential and not open to inspection or copying by persons except the parties, the counsel for the parties and such staff and experts as the counsel for the parties deem necessary.
The parties, the counsel for the parties and such staff and experts as the counsel for the parties deem necessary may retain, view and copy an electronic or video record of a private proceeding solely for purposes related to the representation.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 8 or by specific statute, court rule or court order, a person shall not distribute, copy or facilitate the distribution or copying of an electronic or - *SB432_R1* – 4 – video record of a private hearing.
A person with such access shall not distribute or facilitate the distribution of a transcript, audio recording or electronic or video record of any closed portion of a hearing or trial, except as otherwise provided by specific statute, court rule or court order.
A person who violates this subsection shall, upon receiving notice of the violation:
A - 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – person who violates this subsection shall, upon receiving notice of the violation:
and (b) Immediately remove the electronic or video record from public access.
and (b) Immediately remove the transcript, audio recording or ele10.
10.
and (7) Any documents, the copying or distribution of which is prohibited by federal or state law or regulation or court rule.
and prohibited by federal or state law or regulation or court rule.s 2.
2.
4.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 5 – 4.
- *SB432_R1* – 5 – (b) Upon its own motion for good cause shown;
(b) Upon its own motion for good cause shown;
(a) Whether the court record contains information made confidential by federal or state law or regulation or court rule;
(a) Whether the court record contains information made con(b) Whether federal or state law or regulation or court rulee;
(b) Whether federal or state law or regulation or court rule provides that any information in the court record is not a public record;
provides that any information in the court record is not a public record;
(c) Whether the party seeking to unseal the record has demonstrated a legitimate interest in unsealing the record for a purpose related to the representation;
(c) The interests of the party seeking to unseal the record;
(d) Whether unsealing the record would gratify private spite or promote public scandal;
and (d) Whether unsealing the record would create a substantial risk that a party to the proceeding or child involved in the proceeding may suffer harassment, indignity, undue embarrassment or any other physical or emotional harm.
and (e) Whether unsealing the record would create a substantial risk that a party to the proceeding or child involved in the proceeding may suffer harassment, indignity, embarrassment, shame, financial loss, stigmatization, harm to reputation, anxiety, fear or any other physical or emotional harm.
- *SB432_R1* – 6 – TEXT OF REPEALED SECTIONS 125.080 Trial of divorce action may be private.
~~~~~ 25 - 83rd Session (2025)
1.
In any action for divorce, the court shall, upon demand of either party, direct that the trial and issue or issues of fact joined therein be private.
2.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, upon such demand of either party, all persons must be excluded from the court or chambers wherein the action is tried, except:
(a) The officers of the court;
(c) The counsel for the parties;
(d) The witnesses for the parties;
(e) The parents or guardians of the parties;
and (f) The siblings of the parties.
3.
The court may, upon oral or written motion of either party, order a hearing to determine whether to exclude the parents, guardians or siblings of either party, or witnesses for either party, from the court or chambers wherein the action is tried.
If good cause is shown for the exclusion of any such person, the court shall action is tried.
person from the court or chambers wherein the 125.110 What pleadings and papers open to public inspection;
written request of party for sealing.
1.
In any action for divorce, the following papers and pleadings in the action shall be open to public inspection in the clerk’s office:
(a) In case the complaint is not answered by the defendant, the summons, with the affidavit or proof of service;
the complaint with memorandum endorsed thereon that the default of the defendant in not answering was entered, and the judgment;
and in case where summons and the order directing the publication of summons.on of (b) In all other cases, the pleadings, the finding of the court, any order made on motion as provided in Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, and the judgment.
- *SB432_R1* – 7 – 2.
All other papers, records, proceedings and evidence, including exhibits and transcript of the testimony, shall, upon the written request of either party to the action, filed with the clerk, be their attorneys, or when required as evidence in another action orr proceeding.
H - *SB432_R1*
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Chapter 505.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  4. To enrollment.

  5. Assembly Amendment No. 791 concurred in.

  6. In Senate.

  7. From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.

  8. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 791.) To printer.

  9. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  10. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.

  11. From committee: Do pass. Placed on General File.

  12. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To committee.

  13. Notice of eligibility for exemption. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 341.) Taken from General File. Re-referred to Committee on Finance. Exemption effective. To printer.

  14. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File.

  15. From printer. To committee.

  16. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

  • Senate Committee on Judiciary · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Senate Committee on Judiciary

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Assembly (2nd Reprint)

Passed 42 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 27000
Republican 14000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 42000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (42)
Member Party Vote
O’Neill, PK — Yea
Anderson, Natha C. Democratic Yea
Backus, Shea M. Democratic Yea
Brown-May, Tracy Democratic Yea
Carter, Max E., II Democratic Yea
Considine, Venicia Democratic Yea
D'Silva, Reuben Democratic Yea
Dalia, Joe Democratic Yea
Flanagan, Tanya P. Democratic Yea
González, Cecelia Democratic Yea
Goulding, Heather Democratic Yea
Hunt, Linda F. Democratic Yea
Jackson, Jovan A. Democratic Yea
Jauregui, Sandra Democratic Yea
Karris, Venise Democratic Yea
La Rue Hatch, Selena Democratic Yea
Marzola, Elaine H. Democratic Yea
Miller, Brittney M. Democratic Yea
Monroe-Moreno, Daniele Democratic Yea
Moore, Cinthia Zermeño Democratic Yea
Mosca, Erica Democratic Yea
Nadeem, Hanadi Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Duy Democratic Yea
Orentlicher, David Democratic Yea
Roth, Erica P. Democratic Yea
Torres-Fossett, Selena Democratic Yea
Watts, Howard Democratic Yea
Yeager, Steve Democratic Yea
Cole, Lisa K. Republican Yea
DeLong, Rich Republican Yea
Dickman, Jill Republican Yea
Edgeworth, Rebecca Republican Yea
Gallant, Danielle Republican Yea
Gray, Ken Republican Yea
Gurr, Bert K. Republican Yea
Hafen, Gregory T., II Republican Yea
Hansen, Alexis M. Republican Yea
Hardy, Melissa R.. Republican Yea
Hibbetts, Brian Republican Yea
Kasama, Heidi Republican Yea
Koenig, Gregory S. Republican Yea
Yurek, Toby Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Senate (1st Reprint)

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 8000
Democratic 13000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Cannizzaro, Nicole J. Democratic Yea
Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" Democratic Yea
Daly, Skip Democratic Yea
Dondero Loop, Marilyn Democratic Yea
Doñate, Fabian Democratic Yea
Flores, Edgar Democratic Yea
Lange, Roberta Democratic Yea
Neal, Dina Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic Yea
Ohrenschall, James Democratic Yea
Pazina, Julie Democratic Yea
Scheible, Melanie Democratic Yea
Taylor, Angela D. Democratic Yea
Buck, Carrie Ann Republican Yea
Ellison, John Republican Yea
Hansen, Ira Republican Yea
Krasner, Lisa Republican Yea
Rogich, Lori Republican Yea
Steinbeck, John C. Republican Yea
Stone, Jeff Republican Yea
Titus, Robin L. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 432?
SB 432 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Judiciary.
What is the current status of SB 432?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 24, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 432?
Track SB 432 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 432

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 432

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →