Revises provisions relating to privacy. (BDR 11-1020)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 432 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 432.
You're tracking SB 432
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 432 — Revises provisions relating to privacy. (BDR 11-1020)
Last action — Chapter 505.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 24, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 10, 2025.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
198 added · 254 removed198 line(s) added, 254 removed.
EXEMPTSenate (ReprintedBill withNo. amendments adopted on April 15, 2025) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
432432–Committee SENATEon BILLJudiciary NCHAPTER.......... O.
432–COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY M ARCH 24, 2025 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to privacy.
(BDR 11-1020) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
granting courts discretion to close family law proceedings or portions thereof under certain circumstances;
Existing law requires the court in any action for divorce to close a proceeding Supremeupon Courtthe helddemand thatof sucheither aparty statuteto is unconstitutional because it permits closed court proceedings without the exerciseaction. of judicial discretion.
(NRS 125.080) In 2024, the Nevada Supreme Court held that such a statute is unconstitutional because it permits closed court proceedings without the exercise of judicial discretion.
Eighth JudicialP.3d District92 Court(2024)) inSection and6 forof thethis Countybill ofrepeals Clark,this 140statute. Nev.
Adv.
Op.
8, 543 P.3d 92 (2024)) Section 6 of this bill repeals this statute.
(1) establishes that authorizesfamily alaw courtproceedings toare exercisepresumptively itsopen discretionunless andan closeexception anyapplies; such proceeding if the court determines that closure is necessary to serve a compelling interest.
Sectionand 3(2) alsoauthorizes requiresa court to exercise its discretion and close any such proceeding or portion thereof if the court to:determines that closure is necessary to serve a when making this determination;
(1)(2) considermake certain factorswritten whenfindings; making this determination;
and (2)(3) excludeexcludectors certain persons from the court or chambers if the proceeding is closed.
Additionally, section 3 providesprovides, with certain exceptions, that ana transcript, audio recording or electronic or video record of a privateclosed hearing:portion of a hearing or trial:
(1) is confidential and not open to publicinspection inspection,or exceptioncopying, applies;except by the parties, their counsel and necessary staff or experts;
and (2) must not be distributed,distributed. copied or made publicly an available.
- *SB432_R1* – 2 – Section 4 of this bill governs which court records are accessible to the public in familycertain lawcourt proceedings.records if the court determines that the sealing or redaction is justified by a compelling interest that outweighs the public interest in access to the court record.
Under section 4, a court is authorized to seal or redact certain court records if the court determines that the sealing or redaction is justified record.
(1) authorizes the court to unseal a court record underurtunder certain circumstances;
or displaying in any public manner certain personal identifying information ofpostingof posting another person without the consent of the person.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 2 – EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Upon oral or written motion of either party, upon its own motion or upon the filing of a request to provide electronic coverage of a proceeding, a court may exercise its discretion and close a proceeding if the court determines that closure is necessary to serve a compelling interest.interest.etermines 3.
3.
(a) The bestpresumption interestsset offorth each child involved in thesubsection proceeding;1;
(b) WhetherThe permittingbest ainterest third party to observe or record the proceeding creates a substantial risk of violatingeach achild federalinvolved orin state law or regulation or court rule relating to the disclosureproceeding; of personal identifying information, including, without limitation:
(c) Whether permitting a third party to observe or record the proceeding creates a substantial risk of violating a federal or state law or regulation or court rule relating to the disclosure of personal identifying information that cannot be mitigated by sealing court records.
As used in this paragraph, “personal identifying information” includes, without limitation:
and (c)(d) Whether, in the absence of closure, there is a substantial risk that:
(1) A party to the proceeding or child involved in the proceeding may suffer harassment, indignity, embarrassment,undue -embarrassment *SB432_R1* – 3 – shame, financial loss, stigmatization, harm to reputation, anxiety, fear or any other physical or emotional harm;
or (2) The fundamental right of privacy of any person will be violated.
The fundamental right of privacy of any person will be 4.
Show all 89 changed lines (49 more)
InAfter additionconsidering tothe factors set forth in subsection 3 and any other factors the court considers relevant in determining - 83rd Session (2025) – 3 – whether closure is necessary to serve a compelling interest, the court shall consider:make written findings regarding:
(a) Whether there is a substantial probability that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interest couldwill be harmed;
and (b) Whether there are alternatives to closure that would adequately protect the compelling interest.interest;
ande that would (c) Whether the closure is narrowly tailored to protect the compelling interest.
If the court determines that a proceeding or portion thereof should be closed pursuant to subsection 2:
(a) The court shall direct that the proceeding or portion thereof be private;closed;
(5) The parents or guardians of the parties;
and (6) ThePersons siblingswho are related within the third degree of consanguinity to the parties.
The court may, upon oral or written motion of either party or on its own motion, exclude theany parents,person guardiansdescribed in subparagraph (4), (5) or siblings(6) of eitherparagraph party,(b) of subsection 5 from the7.ourIf the court determines that the interests of justice or witnessesbest forinterests eitherof party,a fromchild would be served, the court ormay chamberspermit whereina person to remain, observe and hear any relevant portion of a proceeding, notwithstanding any request by a party that the actionproceeding isbe tried.closed.
7.
If the court determines that the interests of justice or best interests of a child would be served, the court may permit a person to remain, observe and hear any relevant portion of a proceeding, notwithstanding any request by a party that the proceeding be private.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection or by specific statute, court rule or court order, ana transcript, audio recording or electronic or video record of a privateclosed portion of a hearing or trial is confidential and not open to inspection or copying by anypersons person.except the parties, the counsel for the parties and such staff and experts as the counsel for the parties deem necessary.
The parties, the counsel for the parties and such staff and experts as the counsel for the parties deem necessary may retain, view and copy an electronic or video record of a private proceeding solely for purposes related to the representation.
ExceptA asperson otherwisewith providedsuch inaccess subsectionshall 8not distribute or byfacilitate specificthe statute,distribution courtof rule or court order, a persontranscript, shallaudio notrecording distribute,or copyelectronic or facilitatevideo therecord distributionof orany copyingclosed portion of ana electronichearing or -trial, *SB432_R1*except –as 4otherwise –provided videoby recordspecific ofstatute, acourt privaterule hearing.or court order.
A - 83rd Session (2025) – 4 – person who violates this subsection shall, upon receiving notice of the violation:
and (b) Immediately remove the electronictranscript, oraudio videorecording recordor fromele10. public access.
10.
and (7) Any documents, the copying or distribution of which is prohibited by federal or state law or regulation or court rule.rule.s 2.
2.
- 83rd Session (2025) – 5 – 4.
- *SB432_R1* – 5 – (b) Upon its own motion for good cause shown;
(a) Whether the court record contains information made confidentialcon(b) byWhether federal or state law or regulation or court rule;rulee;
(b) Whether federal or state law or regulation or court rule provides that any information in the court record is not a public record;
(c) WhetherThe interests of the party seeking to unseal the recordrecord; has demonstrated a legitimate interest in unsealing the record for a purpose related to the representation;
and (d) Whether unsealing the record would gratifycreate privatea spitesubstantial risk that a party to the proceeding or promotechild publicinvolved scandal;in the proceeding may suffer harassment, indignity, undue embarrassment or any other physical or emotional harm.
and (e) Whether unsealing the record would create a substantial risk that a party to the proceeding or child involved in the proceeding may suffer harassment, indignity, embarrassment, shame, financial loss, stigmatization, harm to reputation, anxiety, fear or any other physical or emotional harm.
-~~~~~ *SB432_R1*25 –- 683rd –Session TEXT(2025) OF REPEALED SECTIONS 125.080 Trial of divorce action may be private.
1.
In any action for divorce, the court shall, upon demand of either party, direct that the trial and issue or issues of fact joined therein be private.
2.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, upon such demand of either party, all persons must be excluded from the court or chambers wherein the action is tried, except:
(a) The officers of the court;
(c) The counsel for the parties;
(d) The witnesses for the parties;
(e) The parents or guardians of the parties;
and (f) The siblings of the parties.
3.
The court may, upon oral or written motion of either party, order a hearing to determine whether to exclude the parents, guardians or siblings of either party, or witnesses for either party, from the court or chambers wherein the action is tried.
If good cause is shown for the exclusion of any such person, the court shall action is tried.
person from the court or chambers wherein the 125.110 What pleadings and papers open to public inspection;
written request of party for sealing.
1.
In any action for divorce, the following papers and pleadings in the action shall be open to public inspection in the clerk’s office:
(a) In case the complaint is not answered by the defendant, the summons, with the affidavit or proof of service;
the complaint with memorandum endorsed thereon that the default of the defendant in not answering was entered, and the judgment;
and in case where summons and the order directing the publication of summons.on of (b) In all other cases, the pleadings, the finding of the court, any order made on motion as provided in Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, and the judgment.
- *SB432_R1* – 7 – 2.
All other papers, records, proceedings and evidence, including exhibits and transcript of the testimony, shall, upon the written request of either party to the action, filed with the clerk, be their attorneys, or when required as evidence in another action orr proceeding.
H - *SB432_R1*
Show all 89 changed rows (49 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Chapter 505.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
To enrollment.
-
Assembly Amendment No. 791 concurred in.
-
In Senate.
-
From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 791.) To printer.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.
-
From committee: Do pass. Placed on General File.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To committee.
-
Notice of eligibility for exemption. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 341.) Taken from General File. Re-referred to Committee on Finance. Exemption effective. To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Senate Committee on Judiciary · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee on Judiciary
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| OâNeill, PK | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Natha C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Backus, Shea M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Brown-May, Tracy | Democratic | Yea |
| Carter, Max E., II | Democratic | Yea |
| Considine, Venicia | Democratic | Yea |
| D'Silva, Reuben | Democratic | Yea |
| Dalia, Joe | Democratic | Yea |
| Flanagan, Tanya P. | Democratic | Yea |
| González, Cecelia | Democratic | Yea |
| Goulding, Heather | Democratic | Yea |
| Hunt, Linda F. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Jovan A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Jauregui, Sandra | Democratic | Yea |
| Karris, Venise | Democratic | Yea |
| La Rue Hatch, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Marzola, Elaine H. | Democratic | Yea |
| Miller, Brittney M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Monroe-Moreno, Daniele | Democratic | Yea |
| Moore, Cinthia Zermeño | Democratic | Yea |
| Mosca, Erica | Democratic | Yea |
| Nadeem, Hanadi | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Duy | Democratic | Yea |
| Orentlicher, David | Democratic | Yea |
| Roth, Erica P. | Democratic | Yea |
| Torres-Fossett, Selena | Democratic | Yea |
| Watts, Howard | Democratic | Yea |
| Yeager, Steve | Democratic | Yea |
| Cole, Lisa K. | Republican | Yea |
| DeLong, Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Dickman, Jill | Republican | Yea |
| Edgeworth, Rebecca | Republican | Yea |
| Gallant, Danielle | Republican | Yea |
| Gray, Ken | Republican | Yea |
| Gurr, Bert K. | Republican | Yea |
| Hafen, Gregory T., II | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Alexis M. | Republican | Yea |
| Hardy, Melissa R.. | Republican | Yea |
| Hibbetts, Brian | Republican | Yea |
| Kasama, Heidi | Republican | Yea |
| Koenig, Gregory S. | Republican | Yea |
| Yurek, Toby | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannizzaro, Nicole J. | Democratic | Yea |
| Cruz-Crawford, Michelee "Shelly" | Democratic | Yea |
| Daly, Skip | Democratic | Yea |
| Dondero Loop, Marilyn | Democratic | Yea |
| Doñate, Fabian | Democratic | Yea |
| Flores, Edgar | Democratic | Yea |
| Lange, Roberta | Democratic | Yea |
| Neal, Dina | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Rochelle T. | Democratic | Yea |
| Ohrenschall, James | Democratic | Yea |
| Pazina, Julie | Democratic | Yea |
| Scheible, Melanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Taylor, Angela D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Buck, Carrie Ann | Republican | Yea |
| Ellison, John | Republican | Yea |
| Hansen, Ira | Republican | Yea |
| Krasner, Lisa | Republican | Yea |
| Rogich, Lori | Republican | Yea |
| Steinbeck, John C. | Republican | Yea |
| Stone, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Titus, Robin L. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 432?
- SB 432 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Judiciary.
- What is the current status of SB 432?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 24, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 432?
- Track SB 432 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 432
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 432
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →