SB 81 — Revises provisions governing regional planning. (BDR S-536)
Last action — Vetoed by the Governor. (Return to 83rd Session)
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 16, 2023.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
161 added · 164 removed161 line(s) added, 164 removed.
(ReprintedSenate withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 17, 2023) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
8181–Senator SDaly ENATECHAPTER.......... B ILLN O.
81–SENATOR D ALY PREFILED JANUARY 26, 2023 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing regional planning.
(BDR S-536) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
requiring such representatives to prepare certain joint reports during that period;
Existing law requires Carson City, Douglas County, Lyon County, Storey County and Washoe County, in consultation with any cities within each such county, to each prepare a report for submission to each Legislator who represents any portion of one of these counties at the end of each calendar year between July 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022.
Each report must identify certain issues relating to the orderly management of growth in those counties and make recommendations regarding such issues.
Specifically, this bill requires, on or before December 1 of each calendar year during the period between July 1, 2023, and December 1, 2026, Carson City, Douglas County, Lyon County, Storey County and Washoe County, in consultation with any cities within each such county, to meet to discuss and identify the positive and negative issues relating to growth in the region that are impacting any such county and prepare a joint report that:
Each joint report must set forth recommendations that are intended to resolve any negative impact on such issues which have been identified in the joint report.
Additionally,January this1, bill2027, requirescertain duringLegislators theand periodother betweenrepresentatives Januaryof 1,each 2024,county andandnd city in the region to meet jointly at least twice during each calendar year during the - *SB81_R1* – 2 – period to identify and discuss the positive and negative issues relating to the orderly management of growth in the region.
On or before December 31 of each calendar year during the period, county managers or certain other designees are required to mustaralsojaddressgcomprehensivelyalleofsthesprepare issuesidentifieandinta joint regional report recommendationsof made in the reportsissues preparedidentified. by the counties and cities.
The joint regional report must also address comprehensively all of the issues identified and recommendations made in the reports prepared by the counties and cities.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 2 – EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
(b) As part of one of the fastest-growing [state] states in the nation, the population of this region has increased rapidly in recent years, especially as a result of the location of substantialsubs(c) This increased population and economic development projectsactivity inhas had a significant impact on resources beyond the region.boundaries of individual political subdivisions, affecting the region in such areas as transportation, land use development and public services and facilities.
(c)(d) ThisThe increased populationdemand andfrom economic development activity has hadplaced a significant impactamount onof resourcesstress beyondon the boundariesI-80 ofcommercial individualcorridor politicalwithin subdivisions,Lyon, affectingStorey theand regionWashoe inCounties, suchnecessitating areasa asstrong transportation,focus landto useprotect developmentresidents and publicvisitors servicesas andwell facilities.as the economic vitality of the region.
(d)(e) Because of the unique conditions in the region, a general law cannot be made applicable and necessitates this special act to require discussion and planning for the orderly management of growth in the region in a collaborative and structured manner by the counties and cities in the region for the well-being of the residents as well as the long-term economic development of the region.
On or before December [31] 1 of each calendar year during the period between July 1, [2019,] 2023, and December [31, 2022,] 1, 2026, each county in the region, in consultation with any cities within each such county, shall meet to discuss and identify the positive and negative issues relating to growth in the region that are impacting any county in the region and prepare and submit to each any Legislator who represents any portion of the [county] region a [separate] joint report that:
- 82nd Session (2023) – 3 – (a) Identifies [issues] each positive or negative issue relating to the orderly management of growth in the region - *SB81_R1* – 3 – that is impacting any county, including cities within [the] any county [, and] in the region, including, without limitation,limitat(1) issuesConservation, inincluding, without limitation, the followinguse areas:and protection of natural resources [;] , architectural conservation and preservation planning;
(1) Conservation, including, without limitation, the use and protection of natural resources;
(4) Transportation;Transportation [;] , including, without limitation, the I-80 corridor and surrounding arterials;
(b) [Makes] Set forth recommendations [regarding] that are intended to resolve any negative impact on those issues [.] that are identified in the joint report.
In preparing the joint report required by subsection 2, each county in the region and any city within such a county may consult with and solicit input concerning issues relating to the orderly management of growth in the county, city or region from any state agency, including, without limitation, the Department of Transportation and the Office of Economic Development, and from other entities in the county, including, without limitation, [the] school [district] districts and any town, airport authority, regional transportation commission, water authority, military base, flood control agency, public safety agency or Indian colony or tribe in the county.
Such input may include, without limitation, any I-80 corridor planning reports prepared by the Department of Transportation.
During the period between January 1, [2020,] 2024, and [December 1, 2023,] January 1, 2027, two members, one from the majority political party and one from the minority political party, of the Senate whose legislative districts include any area within the region and designated by the Majority Leader of the Senate, two members, one from the majority political party and one from the minority political party, of the Assembly whose legislative districts include any area- within82nd theSession region(2023) and– designated4 by– the Speaker of the Assembly, the county manager of each county in the region or his or her designee, or if a county manager is not appointed pursuant to NRS 244.125, a person designated by the board of county commissioners of the county, and the city manager of each city in the region or his or her designee or, if the city does not have a city manager, a person designated by the governing body of the city, shall meet jointly at least twice - *SB81_R1* – 4 – during each calendar year in that period to identify and discuss the positive and negative issues relating to the orderly management of growth in the region, including, without limitation, the issues identified and any recommendations made in the joint reports prepared pursuant to subsection 2.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, on or before December [1] 31 of each calendar year during the period between January 1, [2020,] 2024, and [December 1, 2023, the counties in the region, in consultation with the cities in the region,] January 1, 2027, the county managers or their designees described in subsection 4 shall prepare a joint regional report of the issues identified during the meetings held pursuant to subsection 4 during that calendar year and any recommendations made relating to those issues .
[The] Each joint report that must be submitted [on or before December 1, 2023,] pursuant to this subsection must address comprehensively all the issues identified and recommendations made by the counties and cities in the [region during the period between January 1, 2020, and December 1, 2023, relating to thetheetween orderly management of growth in the region.] joint report prepared by the counties and cities pursuant to subsection 2.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 5 – Sec.
H~~~~~ 23 - *SB81_R1*82nd Session (2023)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
3 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Vetoed by the Governor. (Return to 83rd Session)
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
Assembly Amendment No. 583 concurred in. To enrollment.
-
In Senate.
-
From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 28, Nays: 14.) To Senate.
-
Amendment No. 605 placed on Chief Clerk's desk. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 583.) To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 13, Nays: 8.) To Assembly.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 156.) To printer.
-
Read first time. To committee.
-
From printer.
-
Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.
Sponsors
- Skip Daly · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Daly, Skip Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 81?
- SB 81 is sponsored by Daly, Skip (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 81?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 81?
- Track SB 81 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 81
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 81
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →