Nevada 2023 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly 2 D cosponsors

AJR 5 — Proposes to amend the Nevada Constitution to revise provisions relating to lotteries and the sale of lottery tickets. (BDR C-986)

Last action — In Assembly. To enrollment. Enrolled and delivered to Secretary of State. File No. 27.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

165 added · 175 removed

165 line(s) added, 175 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
A.J.R.
Assembly Joint Resolution No.
5 A SSEMBLY JOINT RESOLUTION N O.
5–Assemblymen C.H.
5–A SSEMBLYMEN C.H.
Miller and Monroe-Moreno FILE NUMBER..........
M ILLER AND M ONROE -MORENO M ARCH 17, 2023 ____________ Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections SUMMARY—Proposes to amend the Nevada Constitution to revise provisions relating to lotteries and the sale of lottery tickets.
(BDR C-986) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Const.
were modeled after provisions in the California Constitution of 1849, which werees also similar to constitutional provisions adopted in several other states.
Art.
(State ex rel.
4, § 24 (1864)) Nevada’s constitutional provisions regarding lotteries were modeled after provisions in the California Constitution of 1849, which were rel.
Ex parte Pierotti, 43 Nev.ate ex 243, 247-52 (1919)) Such constitutional provisions were:
Ex parte Pierotti, 43 Nev.
243, 247-52 (1919)) Such constitutional provisions were:
and (2) intended to protect the public from the harm caused by such chartered lotteries which were prevalent in our Nation’s early history and which were plagued by fraud, corruption, mismanagement and abuse because they 818 (1879);
and (2) intended to protect the public from the harm caused by such chartered lotteries which were prevalent in our Nation’s early history and which were plagued by fraud, corruption, mismanagement and abuse because they were largely unregulated by state governments.
(Stone v.
Mississippi, 101 U.S.
814, (1879);
Ex parte4, Pierotti, 43 Nev.
Ex parte (S.D.
243, 247-52 (1919);
Poppen v.
Walker, 520 N.W.2d 238, 243 (S.D.
III, § 25 (1994)) Under its existing provisions, the Nevada Constitution prohibits the State from operating a lottery and it also prohibits the sale of lottery tickets, but with certain exceptions for charitable lotteries.
III, § 25 (1994)) Under its existing provisions, the Nevada Constitution prohibits the State from authorizing a lottery, it also prohibits the State and its political subdivisions from operating a lottery and it also prohibits the sale of lottery tickets, but with certain exceptions for charitable lotteries.
Specifically, in 1990, Nevada’s voters approved constitutional amendments allowing the Legislature to provide by law for the operation and regulation of charitable lotteries, with certain restrictions, conducted - *AJR5* – 2 – by charitable or nonprofit organizations in the form of raffles or drawings on their own behalf.
Specifically, in 1990, Nevada’s voters approved constitutional amendments allowing the Legislature to provide by law for the operation and regulation of charitable lotteries, with certain restrictions, conducted by charitable or nonprofit organizations in the form of raffles or drawings on their amendments, the Legislature enacted laws providing for comprehensive regulation of charitable lotteries to ensure that those lotteries are operated honestly and free from criminal and corruptive elements and that the proceeds of those lotteries are expended to benefit the activities of charitable or nonprofit organizations in this State.
(Nev.
Const.
Art.
4, § 24) Following the 1990 constitutional amendments, the Legislature enacted laws providing for comprehensive regulation of charitable lotteries to ensure that those lotteries are operated honestly and free expended to benefit the activities of charitable or nonprofit organizations in this State.
However, this joint resolution prohibits the Legislature from document to any person or other entity to operate lotteries or sell lottery tickets, and this joint resolution prohibits political subdivisions of this State from operating lotteries or selling lottery tickets.
However, this joint resolution prohibits the Legislature from enacting laws which grant a special charter or similar organizational or governing document to any person or other entity to operate lotteries or sell lottery tickets, and lotteries or selling lottery tickets.
Finally, this joint resolution ensures that the operation of any charitable lotteries must comply with the existing provisions governing charitable lotteries that were added to the Nevada Constitution by the 1990 constitutional amendments.
Finally, this joint resolution ensures that the operation of any charitable lotteries must comply with the existing provisions governing charitable lotteries that were added to the Nevada Constitution by the constitutional amendments.
by the next Legislature and then approved and ratified by the voters in an electioned before the proposed amendments to the Nevada Constitution become effective.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 2 – If this joint resolution is passed by the 2023 Legislature, it must also be passed before the proposed amendments to the Nevada Constitution become effective.election EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
and W HEREAS , As a result of the well-known and scandalous cases of wrongdoing by chartered lotteries, there was a nationwide backlash against such lotteries and, by 1860, a majority of states had - *AJR5* – 3 – adopted constitutional provisions prohibiting the authorization of lotteries and the sale of lottery tickets, including provisions in the California Constitution of 1849, which stated that “[n]o lottery shall be authorized by this State, nor shall the sale of lottery tickets be allowed.” (Cal.
and W HEREAS , As a result of the well-known and scandalous cases of wrongdoing by chartered lotteries, there was a nationwide backlash against such lotteries and, by 1860, a majority of states had adopted constitutional provisions prohibiting the authorization of lotteries and the sale of lottery tickets, including provisions in the California Constitution of 1849, which stated that “[n]o lottery shall be authorized by this State, nor shall the sale of lottery tickets be allowed.” (Cal.
and W HEREAS , Because the California Constitution of 1849 served as the model for the Nevada Constitution, the delegates to the Nevada State Constitutional Convention of 1864 adopted California’s constitutional provisions regarding lotteries, without additional discussion or debate, so that the Nevada Constitution, as ratified in 1864, stated that “[n]o lottery shall be authorized by this State, nor shall the sale of lottery tickets be allowed.” (Nev.
and W HEREAS , Because the California Constitution of 1849 served as the model for the Nevada Constitution, the delegates to the Nevada State Constitutional Convention of 1864 adopted California’s constitutional provisions regarding lotteries, without additional discussion or debate, so that the Nevada Constitution, as ratified in 1864, stated that “[n]o lottery shall be authorized by this - 82nd Session (2023) – 3 – State, nor shall the sale of lottery tickets be allowed.” (Nev.
Walker, 520 N.W.2d 238, 243 (S.D.
the principal evil which led to their prohibition in statewere constitutions.”), superseded on other grounds by constitutional amendments to S.D.
1994) (“These lotteries were the principal evil which led to their prohibition in state constitutions.”), superseded on other grounds by constitutional amendments to S.D.
and W HEREAS , Amending the Nevada Constitution to prohibit the Legislature from enacting laws which grant a special charter or - *AJR5* – 4 – similar organizational or governing document to any person or other entity to operate lotteries or sell lottery tickets will continue to protect the public from the harm caused by past chartered lotteries;
and W HEREAS , Amending the Nevada Constitution to prohibit the Legislature from enacting laws which grant a special charter or similar organizational or governing document to any person or other entity to operate lotteries or sell lottery tickets will continue to protect the public from the harm caused by past chartered lotteries;
and W HEREAS , Amending the Nevada Constitution to allow the Legislature to provide by law for the operation and regulation of modern lotteries, in addition to charitable lotteries, will ensure that such modern lotteries are operated honestly and free from criminal and corruptive elements and that the proceeds of those lotteries are expended to benefit the general welfare of the residents of this State;
and W HEREAS , Amending the Nevada Constitution to allow the Legislature to provide by law for the operation and regulation of modern lotteries, in addition to charitable lotteries, will ensure that such modern lotteries are operated honestly and free from criminal and corruptive elements and that the proceeds of those lotteries are - 82nd Session (2023) – 4 – expended to benefit the general welfare of the residents of this State;
Show all 43 changed rows (3 more)
Previous
Latest
now, therefore, be it R ESOLVED BY THE A SSEMBLY AND SENATE OF THE STATE OF N EVADA , OINTLY , That Section 24 of Article 4 of the Nevada Constitution be amended to read as follows:
now, therefore, be it R ESOLVED BY THE A SSEMBLY AND S ENATE OF THE S TATE OF N EVADA , OINTLY , That Section 24 of Article 4 of the Nevada Constitution be amended to read as follows:
- *AJR5* – 5 – AndRESOLVEDu, That this resolution becomes effective upon passage.
And be it further R ESOLVED , That this resolution becomes effective upon passage.
H - *AJR5*
~~~~~ 23 - 82nd Session (2023)
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. In Assembly. To enrollment. Enrolled and delivered to Secretary of State. File No. 27.

  2. Resolution read. Passed. Title approved. Preamble adopted. (Yeas: 12, Nays: 8, Excused: 1.) To Assembly.

  3. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  4. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  5. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  6. Taken from Resolution File. Placed on Resolution File for next legislative day.

  7. From committee: Do pass.

  8. In Senate. Resolution read. Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. To committee.

  9. Resolution read. Passed. Title approved. Preamble adopted. (Yeas: 26, Nays: 15, Excused: 1.) To Senate.

  10. From committee: Do pass.

  11. From printer. To committee.

  12. Resolution read. Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 65 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (65)

65 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 65 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AJR 5?
AJR 5 is sponsored by Monroe-Moreno, Daniele (Democratic) and Miller, Brittney M. (Democratic).
What is the current status of AJR 5?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AJR 5?
Track AJR 5 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AJR 5

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AJR 5

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →