Nevada 2023 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 6 R · 5 D cosponsors

SB 129 — Revises provisions relating to certain civil actions involving sexual assault. (BDR 2-573)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 112.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 09, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on May 31, 2023.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    7 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (6 R · 5 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

132 added · 147 removed

132 line(s) added, 147 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
S.B.
Senate Bill No.
129 SENATE B ILLN O.
129–Senators Krasner, Spearman, Seevers Gansert, Buck, Titus;
129–SENATORS KRASNER , PEARMAN , SEEVERS G ANSERT , BUCK , ITUS;
Dondero Loop, Hansen, D.
AND SCHEIBLE F EBRUARY 9, 2023 ____________ JOINT SPONSORS :
Harris, Lange, Ohrenschall, Pazina, Scheible and Stone Joint Sponsors:
ASSEMBLYWOMEN B ILBRAY -AXELROD , THOMAS ;AND K ASAMA ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to certain civil actions involving sexual assault.
Assemblywomen Bilbray-Axelrod, Thomas;
(BDR 2-573) FISCAL NOTE:
and Kasama CHAPTER..........
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
In general, existing law requires a civil action to recover damages for injuries arising from the wrongful act of another person to be commenced within 2 years after the date on which the wrongful act occurred.
In general, existing law requires a civil action to recover damages for injuries after the date on which the wrongful act occurred.
(NRS 11.190) Existing law exempts certain civil actions from this requirement, including a civil action to recover damages for sexual abuse or sexual exploitation, if the sexual abuse or exploitation occurred when the plaintiff was less than 18 years of age.
(NRS 11.190) Existing lawrs exempts certain civil actions from this requirement, including a civil action to recover damages for sexual abuse or sexual exploitation, if the sexual abuse or exploitation occurred when the plaintiff was less than 18 years of age.
For purposes Therefore, under existing law, a civil action to recover damages for a sexual assault that occurred when the plaintiff was less than 18 years of age may be commenced at any time after the sexual assault occurred.
For purposes of this exemption, existing law defines sexual abuse to include sexual assault.
Therefore, under existing law, a civil action to recover damages for a sexual assault at any time after the sexual assault occurred.
age or older may be commenced at any time Section 3 of this bill provides that the changes in this bill apply retroactively to any act constituting sexual assault that occurred when the plaintiff was 18 years of age or older for which a person would be liable, even if the statute of limitations - *SB129* – 2 – that was in effect at the time of the act has expired, which means that a civil action that would otherwise be time-barred by the former statute of limitations is revived by this bill.
age or older may be commenced at any time Section 3 of this bill provides that the changes in this bill apply retroactively to any act constituting sexual assault that occurred when the plaintiff was 18 years of age or older for which a person would be liable, even if the statute of limitations that was in effect at the time of the act has expired, which means that a civil action that would otherwise be time-barred by the former statute of limitations is revived by this bill.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
In such an action, if the alleged injury to the plaintiff is the result of a series of two or more acts constituting sexual assault, the plaintiff is not required to identify which specific act in the series of acts caused the alleged injury.
In such an - 82nd Session (2023) – 2 – action, if the alleged injury to the plaintiff is the result of a series of two or more acts constituting sexual assault, the plaintiff is not required to identify which specific act in the series of acts caused the alleged injury.
ascribed to it in NRS 200.366.n, “sexual assault” has the meaning Sec.
As used in this section, “sexual assault” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 200.366.
Sec.
2.
(d) Except as otherwise provided in NRS 11.245, an action against a person alleged to have committed a deceptive trade practice in violation of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, but the cause of action shall be deemed to accrue when the aggrieved party discovers, or by the exercise of due diligence should have discovered, the facts constituting the deceptive trade practice.
(d) Except as otherwise provided in NRS 11.245, an action against a person alleged to have committed a deceptive trade the cause of action shall be deemed to accrue when the aggrievedt party discovers, or by the exercise of due diligence should have discovered, the facts constituting the deceptive trade practice.
- *SB129* – 3 – 3.
3.
(c) An action for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, including actions for specific recovery thereof, but in all cases where the subject of the action is a domestic animal usually included in the term “livestock,” which has a recorded mark or brand upon it at the time of its loss, and which strays or is stolen from the true owner without the owner’s fault, the statute does not begin to run against an action for the recovery of the animal until the owner has actual knowledge of such facts as would put a reasonable person upon inquiry as to the possession thereof by the defendant.
(c) An action for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, including actions for specific recovery thereof, but in all cases where the subject of the action is a domestic animal usually included in the term “livestock,” which has a recorded mark or brand upon it - 82nd Session (2023) – 3 – owner without the owner’s fault, the statute does not begin to runue against an action for the recovery of the animal until the owner has actual knowledge of such facts as would put a reasonable person upon inquiry as to the possession thereof by the defendant.
(a) An action against a sheriff, coroner or constable upon liability incurred by acting in his or her official capacity and in virtue of his or her office, or by the omission of an official duty, including the nonpayment of money collected upon an execution.
liability incurred by acting in his or her official capacity and in virtue of his or her office, or by the omission of an official duty, including the nonpayment of money collected upon an execution.
The provisions of this paragraph relating to an action to - *SB129* – 4 – recover damages for injuries to a person apply only to causes of action which accrue after March 20, 1951.
The provisions of this paragraph relating to an action to recover damages for injuries to a person apply only to causes of act(f) An action to recover damages under NRS 41.740.
(f) An action to recover damages under NRS 41.740.
paid to the officer under protest, or seized by the officer in his or her official capacity, as a collector of taxes, and which, it is claimed, ought to be refunded.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 4 – (b) An action against an officer, or officer de facto for money paid to the officer under protest, or seized by the officer in his or her official capacity, as a collector of taxes, and which, it is claimed, ought to be refunded.
retroactively to any act constituting sexual assault as defined inapply section 1 of this act that occurred before the effective date of this act, regardless of any statute of limitations that was in effect at the time the act constituting sexual assault occurred, including, without limitation, any civil action that would have been barred by the statute of limitations that was in effect before the effective date of this act.
3.
The amendatory provisions of this act apply retroactively to any act constituting sexual assault as defined in section 1 of this act that occurred before the effective date of this act, regardless of any statute of limitations that was in effect at the time the act constituting sexual assault occurred, including, without limitation, any civil action that would have been barred by the statute of limitations that was in effect before the effective date of this act.
Sec.
H - *SB129*
~~~~~ 23 - 82nd Session (2023)
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 112.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. In Senate. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.

  5. Read second time.

  6. From committee: Do pass.

  7. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 20, Nays: None, Excused: 1.) To Assembly.

  9. Read second time.

  10. Taken from Second Reading File. Placed on Second Reading File for next legislative day.

  11. From committee: Do pass.

  12. From printer. To committee.

  13. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

7 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 51 not signed on

Sponsors (7)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (51)

51 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 51 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 129?
SB 129 is sponsored by Krasner, Lisa (Republican), Heidi Seevers O'Gara, Buck, Carrie Ann (Republican), Titus, Robin L. (Republican), Clara Thomas, Dondero Loop, Marilyn (Democratic), Hansen, Ira (Republican), Lange, Roberta (Democratic), Ohrenschall, James (Democratic), Pazina, Julie (Democratic), Scheible, Melanie (Democratic), Stone, Jeff (Republican), Kasama, Heidi (Republican), Harris, Dallas, Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod, and Pat Spearman.
What is the current status of SB 129?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 09, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 129?
Track SB 129 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 129

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 129

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →