Nevada 2023 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 247 — Revises provisions relating to regional planning. (BDR 22-684)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 120.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 09, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on May 31, 2023.

Prognosis

Advancing 50% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

524 added · 634 removed

524 line(s) added, 634 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
S.B.
Senate Bill No.
247 SENATE BILL N O.
247–Committee on Government Affairs CHAPTER..........
247–COMMITTEE ON G OVERNMENT A FFAIRS M ARCH 9, 2023 ____________ Referred to Committee on Government Affairs SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to regional planning.
(BDR 22-684) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law requires the board of county commissioners and the city council of more (currently only Clark County) to establish a regional planning coalition by0 or cooperative agreement.
Existing law requires the board of county commissioners and the city council of each of at least the three largest cities in a county whose population is 700,000 or cooperative agreement.
(NRS 278.02514) Section 2 of this bill provides instead that such board of county commissioners and city councils may establish a regional planning coalition by cooperative agreement.
(NRS 278.02514) Section 2 of this bill provides insteadby that such board of county commissioners and city councils may establish a regional planning coalition by cooperative agreement.
Existing law requires the regional planning coalition in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to develop a development of such plan.
Existing law requires the regional planning coalition in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to develop a comprehensive regional policy plan and sets forth certain requirements for the development of such plan.
Existing law requires a planning commission or governing body that is required to prepare and adopt a master plan to develop and include in that plan an aboveground utility plan, which must, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County), conform with the comprehensive regional utility plan must conform with the comprehensive regional policy plan if theound regional planning coalition develops a comprehensive regional policy plan.
Existing law requires a planning commission or governing body that is required aboveground utility plan, which must, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County), conform with the comprehensive regional policy plan.
- *SB247* – 2 – population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to study and develop methods to provide incentives for certain types of development.
(NRS 278.165) Section 13 of this bill provides that the aboveground utility plan must conform with the comprehensive regional policy plan if the regional planning coalition develops a comprehensive regional policy plan.
(NRS 278.02535) Section 4 of this bill provides that these provisions apply if the regional planning coalition is established.
Existing law requires the regional planning coalition in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to study and develop methods to provide incentives for certain types of development.
Existing law authorizes the regional planning coalition in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to:
(NRS 278.02535) Section 4 of this bill provides that these provisions apply if the regional planning coalExisting law authorizes the regional planning coalition in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to:
(3) make recommendations regarding the annexation, boundaries and other matters that arise between jurisdictions;
(3) make recommendations regarding the disposal of federal land;
(4) establish methods for resolving issues related to annexation, boundaries and other matters that arise between jurisdictions;
(8) review, consider and make recommendations regarding applications to the Federal Government and applications for certain federal assistance;
(8) review, consider and make applications for certain federal assistance;
Existing law requires, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more or public utility that is located in whole or in part within the region to, at least every 5 years, submit to the regional planning coalition for its review all master plans, facilities plans and other similar plans.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 2 – Existing law requires, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) each governing body, regional agency, state agency or public utility that is located in whole or in part within the region to, at least every years, submit to the regional planning coalition for its review all master plans, facilities plans and other similar plans.
(NRS 278.02549) Section 6 of this bill provides instead that if the regional planning coalition is established, the coalition may require each governing body that is located in whole or in part within the region to submit to the coalition for its review all master plans, facilities plans and other similar plans.
(NRS 278.02549) Section 6 of this bill provides instead that if the regional planning coalition is established, the coalition region to submit to the coalition for its review all master plans, facilities plans and other similar plans.
Existing law prohibits, with certain exceptions, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County), a governing body, regional agency, from adopting a master plan, facilities plan or other similar plan, or an amendmentn thereto, after March 1, 2001, unless the regional planning coalition has been afforded an opportunity to make recommendations regarding the plan or amendment.
Existing law prohibits, with certain exceptions, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County), a governing body, regional agency, state agency or public utility that is located in whole or in part within the region from adopting a master plan, facilities plan or other similar plan, or an amendment thereto, after March 1, 2001, unless the regional planning coalition has been afforded an opportunity to make recommendations regarding the plan or amendment.
population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to annually prepare, adopt and submit a budget to the local governments in the region.
Existing law requires the regional planning coalition in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to annually prepare, Section 8 of this bill provides that this requirement applies if the regional planning coalition is established.
(NRS 278.02563) Section 8 of this bill provides that this requirement applies if the regional planning coalition is established.
Existing law requires, at least every 5 years, the regional planning coalition in a review plans of public entities for conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan and sets forth a procedure if the coalition determines that the plans of public entities are in conformance or nonconformance.
Existing law requires, at least every 5 years, the regional planning coalition in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County) to review plans of public entities for conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan and sets forth a procedure if the coalition determines that the plans of public entities are in conformance or nonconformance.
(NRS 278.02577) Section 10 of this bill provides instead that the regional planning coalition reviews such plans if the coalition has been established.
(NRS 278.02577) Section of this bill provides instead that the regional planning coalition reviews such plans if the coalition has been established.
Section 10 further eliminates the - *SB247* – 3 – existing procedures for the regional planning coalition to review such plans and instead authorizes a coalition to establish policies, rules and procedures to carry out the review of such plans.
Section 10 further eliminates the existing procedures for the regional planning coalition to review such plans and instead authorizes a coalition to establish policies, rules and procedures to carry out the review of such plans.
Existing law requires, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County), the regional transportation commission, regional other to ensure that certain plans, policies and programs are consistent to thech greatest extent possible.
Existing law requires, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more planning coalition and the local air pollution control board to consult with each other to ensure that certain plans, policies and programs are consistent to the greatest extent possible.
Section 11 of this bill provides that if a regional and programs are consistent to the extent practicable with the plans, policies andicies programs adopted by the local air pollution control board and the regional transportation commission in the county in which it is located.
Section 11 of this bill provides that if a regional planning coalition is established, the coalition shall ensure that such plans, policies and programs are consistent to the extent practicable with the plans, policies and - 82nd Session (2023) – 3 – programs adopted by the local air pollution control board and the regional transportation commission in the county in which it is located.
Existing law requires, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County), the governing body of a city or county to establish an analysis of the cost to construct infrastructure in an area which is undeveloped land and which is likely to become developed.
(currently only Clark County), the governing body of a city or county to establish an analysis of the cost to construct infrastructure in an area which is undeveloped land and which is likely to become developed.
(NRS 278.02591) Section 12 of this analysis to the regional planning coalition for review and information.of the Existing law requires, in a county whose population is 700,000 or more (currently only Clark County):
(NRS 278.02591) Section 12 of this bill eliminates the requirement that the governing body provide copies of the analysis to the regional planning coalition for review and information.
(currently only Clark County):
(NRS 278.02587) Section 15 of this bill THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
(NRS 278.02587) Section 15 of this bill EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
and - *SB247* – 4 – (b) Conduct hearings to solicit public comment on the consistency of the plan, policy or program with:
and (b) Conduct hearings to solicit public comment on the consistency of the plan, policy or program with:
(a) “Local] , “local air pollution control board” means a board that establishes a program for the control of air pollution pursuant to NRS 445B.500.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 4 – (a) “Local] , “local air pollution control board” means a board that establishes a program for the control of air pollution pursuant to NRS 445B.500.
[(b) “Regional planning coalition” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 278.0172.] Sec.
[(b) “Regional planning coalition” has the meaning ascribed to it in Sec.
2.
2..01NRS 278.02514 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Show all 141 changed rows (101 more)
Previous
Latest
NRS 278.02514 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2) Population, including, without limitation, standardized projections for population growth in the region.
projections for population growth in the region.tion, standardized (3) Land use and development, including, without limitation, a map of land use plans that have been adopted by local governmental entities within the region, and that the plan addresses, if applicable:
(3) Land use and development, including, without limitation, a map of land use plans that have been adopted by local governmental entities within the region, and that the plan addresses, if applicable:
and - *SB247* – 5 – (II) The coordination and compatibility of land uses with each military installation in the region, taking into account the location, purpose and stated mission of the military installation.
and (II) The coordination and compatibility of land uses with each military installation in the region, taking into account the location, purpose and stated mission of the military installation.
(7) Strategies to promote and encourage:
- 82nd Session (2023) – 5 – (7) Strategies to promote and encourage:
and (III) Development in areas in which public services are available.
and available.(III) Development in areas in which public services are 3.
3.
(b) Mixed-use development, transit-oriented development, the development of a brownfield site and development which minimizes the negative impact on the environment.
development of a brownfield site and development which minimizes the negative impact on the environment.
- *SB247* – 6 – 2.
2.
Sec.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 6 – Sec.
(b) Recommend measures to increase the efficiency of governmental entities and services.
governmental entities and services.se the efficiency of (c) Make recommendations regarding the disposal of federal land.
(c) Make recommendations regarding the disposal of federal land.
(i) Designate allowable future land uses for each part of the county, including, without limitation, the identification of each category of land use in which the construction and operation of a public school is permissible.
county, including, without limitation, the identification of each category of land use in which the construction and operation of a public school is permissible.
[The] If established pursuant to NRS 278.02514, the regional planning coalition [shall] may establish a definition for the - *SB247* – 7 – term “project of regional significance.” In establishing the definition, the regional planning coalition [shall] may consider:
[The] If established pursuant to NRS 278.02514, the regional planning coalition [shall] may establish a definition for the term “project of regional significance.” In establishing the definition, the regional planning coalition [shall] may consider:
and (b) That a project may have regional significance for several reasons, including, without limitation, the potential impact that the project may have on historic, archaeological, paleontological, cultural, scenic and natural resources, public facilities, including, without limitation, schools, and public services within the region.
and - 82nd Session (2023) – 7 – (b) That a project may have regional significance for several reasons, including, without limitation, the potential impact that the project may have on historic, archaeological, paleontological, cultural, scenic and natural resources, public facilities, including, witSec.
Sec.
6.mitNRS 278.02549 is hereby amended to read as follows:on.
6.
NRS 278.02549 is hereby amended to read as follows:
and (b) The master plans, facilities plans and other similar plans of a city or county which have been certified by the regional planning coalition pursuant to subsection 4 of NRS 278.02577 as being in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan.] , if applicable.
and (b) The master plans, facilities plans and other similar plans of a city or county which have been certified by the regional planning coalition pursuant to subsection 4 of NRS 278.02577 as being in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plaSec.
Sec.
7.f aNRS 278.02556 is hereby amended to read as follows:
7.
NRS 278.02556 is hereby amended to read as follows:
A governing body [, regional agency, state agency or - *SB247* – 8 – public utility] may adopt an amendment to a land use plan described in NRS 278.160 without affording the regional planning coalition the opportunity to make recommendations regarding the amendment.
A governing body [, regional agency, state agency or public utility] may adopt an amendment to a land use plan described in NRS 278.160 without affording the regional planning coalition - 82nd Session (2023) – 8 – the opportunity to make recommendations regarding the amendment.
278.02563 [The] If established pursuant to NRS 278.02514, the regional planning coalition shall, on or before July 1 of each year, prepare and adopt a budget for the immediately succeeding fiscal year and shall submit that budget to each of the local governments within the region as a recommendation for funding.
278.02563 [The] If established pursuant to NRS 278.02514, year, prepare and adopt a budget for the immediately succeedingach fiscal year and shall submit that budget to each of the local governments within the region as a recommendation for funding.
[If the] The regional planning coalition [determines that a plan reviewed pursuant to subsection 1 is not in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan, the regional planning coalition shall return the plan to the submitting entity accompanied by recommendations regarding the manner in which the submitting entity may bring the plan into substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan.
[If the] The regional planning coalition [determines that a plan reviewed pursuant to subsection 1 is not in substantial regional planning coalition shall return the plan to the submitting entity accompanied by recommendations regarding the manner in which the submitting entity may bring the plan into substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan.
- *SB247* – 9 – 4.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 9 – 4.
If the regional planning coalition determines that all the plans that a city or county is required to submit pursuant to NRS 278.02549 are in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan, the regional planning coalition shall issue to the city or county a certificate or other indicia of that determination.
If the regional planning coalition determines that all the plans that a city or county is required to submit pursuant to NRS 278.02549 are in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan, the regional planning coalition shall issue to Upon receipt of such a certificate or other indicia, the city or county, until the next time the regional planning coalition reviews the plans of the city or county pursuant to subsection 1, is entitled to establish its own] may establish policies , rules and procedures [with respect to regional planning, to the extent that those policies and procedures do not conflict with federal or state law.] to carry out the review of master plans, facilities plans and other similar plans.
Upon receipt of such a certificate or other indicia, the city or county, until the next time the regional planning coalition reviews the plans of the city or county pursuant to subsection 1, is entitled to establish its own] may establish policies , rules and procedures [with respect to regional planning, to the extent that those policies and procedures do not conflict with federal or state law.] to carry out the review of master plans, facilities plans and other similar plans.
The regional planning coalition may, within the limits of legislative appropriations and other available money, provide grants to a city or county [if the regional planning coalition has issued to the city or county a certificate or other indicia pursuant to subsection 4 of the determination of the regional planning coalition that all the plans that the city or county is required to submit pursuant to NRS 278.02549 are in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan.] if the master plan, facilities plan or other similar plan of the city or county, as applicable, is in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan developed pursuant to NRS 278.02528, if any.
The regional planning coalition may, within the limits of legislative appropriations and other available money, provide grants to a city or county [if the regional planning coalition has issued to the city or county a certificate or other indicia pursuant to subsection of the determination of the regional planning coalition that all the plans that the city or county is required to submit pursuant to NRS 278.02549 are in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan.] if the master plan, facilities plan or other similar plan of the city or county, as applicable, is in substantial conformance with the comprehensive regional policy plan developed pursuant to NRS 278.02528, if any.
NRS 278.02584 is hereby amended to read as follows:
NRS 278.02584 is hereby amended to read as fol278.02584 1.
278.02584 1.
2.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 10 – 2.
- *SB247* – 10 – (a) Consult] consult with the local air pollution control board and the regional transportation commission .
(a) Consult] consult with the local air pollution control board and the regional transportation commission .
and (b) Conduct hearings to solicit public comment on the consistency of the plan, policy or program with:
and consistency of the plan, policy or program with:t on the (1) The plans, policies and programs adopted or proposed to be adopted by the local air pollution control board and the regional transportation commission;
(1) The plans, policies and programs adopted or proposed to be adopted by the local air pollution control board and the regional transportation commission;
(3) Division of State Lands of the State Department of Conservation and Natural Resources;
Conservation and Natural Resources;
and (4) Department of Transportation.
andhe State Department of (4) Department of Transportation.
2.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 11 – that is undeveloped land must include, without limitation:
The analysis of the cost to construct infrastructure in an area that is undeveloped land must include, without limitation:
in an area (a) A precise description of the area, either in the form of a legal description or by reference to roadways, lakes and waterways, railroads or similar landmarks, and township, county or city boundaries;
(a) A precise description of the area, either in the form of a legal description or by reference to roadways, lakes and waterways, - *SB247* – 11 – railroads or similar landmarks, and township, county or city boundaries;
(2) A plan to meet the anticipated needs of the area for police and fire protection, parks, roads, regional transportation and flood control facilities when the land becomes fully developed;
and fire protection, parks, roads, regional transportation and floode control facilities when the land becomes fully developed;
278.165 1.
required to prepare and adopt a master plan pursuant to thehat is provisions of this chapter shall develop and include in that plan an aboveground utility plan as described in subsection 2.
A planning commission or governing body that is required to prepare and adopt a master plan pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall develop and include in that plan an aboveground utility plan as described in subsection 2.
and (b) In a county whose population is 100,000 or more but less than 700,000, conform with the comprehensive regional plan developed pursuant to NRS 278.0272.
and - 82nd Session (2023) – 12 – than 700,000, conform with the comprehensive regional plan less developed pursuant to NRS 278.0272.
- *SB247* – 12 – (b) Be consistent with any transmission plan prepared by the Office of Energy;
(b) Be consistent with any transmission plan prepared by the Office of Energy;
and (d) Be consistent with any resource management plan prepared by the Bureau of Land Management applicable to the jurisdiction of the planning commission or governing body, including, without limitation, by ensuring that the aboveground utility plan developed by the planning commission or governing body provides for connectivity between any noncontiguous transmission corridors identified in the plan prepared by the Bureau of Land Management.
and (d) Be consistent with any resource management plan prepared by the Bureau of Land Management applicable to the jurisdiction of the planning commission or governing body, including, without limitation, by ensuring that the aboveground utility plan developed by the planning commission or governing body provides for identified in the plan prepared by the Bureau of Land Management.
Sec.
445B.503 NRS1.
14.
In addition to the duties set forth in NRSs:
NRS 445B.503 is hereby amended to read as follows:
445B.500, the local air pollution control board in a county whose population is 700,000 or more shall cooperate with [the regional planning coalition and] the regional transportation commission in the county in which it is located to:
445B.503 1.
In addition to the duties set forth in NRS 445B.500, the local air pollution control board in a county whose population is 700,000 or more shall cooperate with [the regional planning coalition and] the regional transportation commission in the county in which it is located to:
(b) Establish and carry out a program of integrated, long-range planning that conserves the economic, financial and natural resources of the region and supports a common vision of desired future conditions.
(b) Establish and carry out a program of integrated, long-range planning that conserves the economic, financial and natural - 82nd Session (2023) – 13 – resources of the region and supports a common vision of desired future conditions.
(a) Consult] consult with [the regional planning coalition and] the regional transportation commission .
the regional transportation commission .
and (b) Conduct hearings to solicit public comment on the consistency of the plan, policy or program with:
andning coalition and] (b) Conduct hearings to solicit public comment on the consistency of the plan, policy or program with:
- *SB247* – 13 – (1) The plans, policies and programs adopted or proposed to be adopted by the regional planning coalition and the regional transportation commission;
(1) The plans, policies and programs adopted or proposed to be adopted by the regional planning coalition and the regional transportation commission;
and (2) Plans for capital improvements that have been prepared purs3.ntAs used in this section:
and (2) Plans for capital improvements that have been prepared pursuant to NRS 278.0226.] 3.
As used in this section:
TEXT OF REPEALED SECTION 278.02587 Bus turnouts:
~~~~~ 23 - 82nd Session (2023)
Designation of locations for and funding of construction by regional transportation commission;
construction pursuant to interlocal or cooperative agreement;
technical advisory committee.
1.
Not later than December 31, 2009:
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, the commission shall designate 10 locations in the county that are owned by the State or by local governments and at which a bus turnout must be constructed pursuant to this section;
and (b) For each location designated pursuant to paragraph (a), the commission and the State or the local government that owns the location shall execute an interlocal or cooperative agreement that authorizes the construction of a bus turnout at the location.
2.
For each location designated pursuant to subsection 1, the commission and the State or the local government that owns the location shall ensure that a bus turnout is constructed not later than December 31, 2012.
3.
Not later than December 31, 2011:
commission shall designate 15 locations in the county that are owned by the State or by local governments and at which a bus turnout must be constructed pursuant to this section;
and (b) For each location designated pursuant to paragraph (a), the commission and the State or the local government that owns the - *SB247* – 14 – location shall execute an interlocal or cooperative agreement that authorizes the construction of a bus turnout at the location.
4.
For each location designated pursuant to subsection 3, the commission and the State or the local government that owns the location shall ensure that a bus turnout is constructed not later than December 31, 2014.
5.
The commission shall fund the construction of a bus turnout built pursuant to this section.
6.
When determining the locations to be designated pursuant to subsection 1 or 3, the commission shall consider, without limitation:
(a) The amount of traffic congestion at the location during hours of (b) The extent of improvements to the location that would need to be completed before the bus turnout could be constructed;
(c) The proximity of the location to an intersection;
(d) The frequency with which buses receive and discharge passengers at the location;
(e) The number of bus passengers regularly using the bus stop at the location;
(f) The general need for a bus turnout at the location;
and (g) Any obstacle that may prevent the completion of the construction of a bus turnout by the date set forth in subsection 2 or 4, as applicable.
7.
The commission shall not designate more than three or by the same local government.
1 or 3 that are owned by the State 8.
The commission shall establish a technical advisory committee which shall:
(a) As soon as practicable after the locations have been designated pursuant to subsection 3 and before the development of construction plans for the bus turnouts, meet with all utility companies and franchise holders whose utilities or facilities may be impacted by a bus turnout constructed pursuant to that subsection.
Such meetings may include visits to the designated locations.
(b) Work in a cooperative manner with the affected utilities and franchise holders to minimize the total cost for the placement or relocation of the affected utility or facility.
(a) “Bus” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 484A.030.
(b) “Bus turnout” means a fixed area that is:
(1) Adjacent or appurtenant to, or within reasonable proximity of, a public highway;
and (2) To be occupied exclusively by buses in receiving or discharging passengers.
- *SB247* – 15 – (c) “Commission” means the regional transportation commission created and organized pursuant to chapter 277A of NRS in a county whose population is 700,000 or more.
(d) “Local government” means any political subdivision of the airport authority, fire protection district, irrigation district, school district, hospital district or other special district which performs a governmental function and which is located within the jurisdiction of the commission.
(e) “Location” means a parcel of real property which:
(1) Is owned by the State or by a local government;
(3) Contains a bench, shelter or transit stop for passengers of public transportation.
(f) “Public highway” means any street, road, alley, thoroughfare, way or place of any kind used by the public or open to the use of the public as a matter of right for the purpose of vehicular traffic.
H - *SB247*
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 120.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. In Senate. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 35, Nays: 7.) To Senate.

  5. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  6. Read second time.

  7. From committee: Do pass.

  8. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To committee.

  9. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.

  10. Read second time.

  11. From committee: Do pass. Placed on Second Reading File.

  12. From printer. To committee.

  13. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer.

Sponsors

  • Senate Committee on Government Affairs · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Senate Committee on Government Affairs

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 247?
SB 247 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Government Affairs.
What is the current status of SB 247?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 09, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 247?
Track SB 247 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 247

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 247

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →