Establishes provisions governing prescription drugs. (BDR 40-782)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 250 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 250.
You're tracking AB 250
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 250 — Establishes provisions governing prescription drugs. (BDR 40-782)
Last action — (No further action taken.)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo (Republican) on June 05, 2023.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
247 added · 288 removed247 line(s) added, 288 removed.
(ReprintedAssembly withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 24, 2023) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
250250–Assemblywomen ASSEMBLYConsidine Band ILLNAnderson O.CHAPTER..........
250–A SSEMBLYWOMEN C ONSIDINE AND A NDERSON M ARCH 7, 2023 ____________ Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor SUMMARY—Establishes provisions governing prescription drugs.
(BDR 40-782) FISCAL NOTE:
EffEffect on the State:
Yes.No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
requiring certain entities to maintain a registered agent and office in this State;
or (2) seeks reimbursement for a drug subject to a maximum fair price which is delivered, dispensed or administered to a person in this State from seeking reimbursement at a personrateExisting orlaw: entity to maintain a registered agent and an office or base of operations in this State.
Existing law:
(NRS violate:598.0903-598.0999) Section 1 makes it a deceptive trade practice for any person to violate the prohibition on purchasing or seeking reimbursement for a drug at a price higher than the maximum fair price.
(1)Sections the1 prohibitionand on3 purchasingof orthis seekingbill reimbursementprovide forthat a drugperson atwho aviolates -the *AB250_R1*provisions –of 2section –1 priceis highernot thansubject to any criminal such a person is subject only to the maximumvarious faircivil price;enforcement measures, includinging civil penalties, set forth in existing law for engaging in a deceptive trade practice.
or(NRS (2)598.097-598.0999) theExisting requirementlaw toauthorizes maintainany aperson registeredwho agentis anda anvictim office or base of operationsconsumer infraud, thisincluding Statea whendeceptive engagingtrade inpractice, certain activity relating to drugsbring subject to a maximumcivil fairaction. price.
Sections(NRS 141.600) andSection 32 subjectof tothis anybill criminalprovides penaltythat seta forthviolation inof existingsection law1 forconstitutes engagingconsumer infraud, aand deceptivesections trade1 practice,and meaning2 suchauthorize a personvictim isof subjectsuch onlya violation to thebring variousa civil enforcementaction. measures, including civil penalties, set forth in existing law for engaging in a deceptive trade practice.
(NRSEXPLANATION 598.097-598.0999)– ExistingMatter lawin authorizesbolded anyitalics person who is anew; victim of consumer fraud, of this bill provides that a violation of section 1 constitutes consumer fraud, and 2 sections 1 and 2 authorize a victim of such a violation to bring a civil action.
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
and - 82nd Session (2023) – 2 – W HEREAS , In reporting on the findings of the Committee to Conduct an Interim Study Concerning the Costs of Prescription Drugs, LCB Bulletin No.
and W HEREAS , The Nevada Spending and Government Efficiency Commission noted in its final report, “Final Report of the Nevada Spending and Government Efficiency Commission to Governor Jim Gibbons,” published January 7, 2010, that the State of Nevada would realize significant savings on Medicaid, mental health, corrections and other programs if the cost of prescription drugs were better controlled;
and W HEREAS , Excessive costs of prescription drugs contribute significantly to increasing costs of health care and health insurance - *AB250_R1* – 3 – that threaten the ability of residents of this State to obtain affordable health coverage and maintain or achieve good health;
and W HEREAS , To protect residents of this State from the negative effects from excessive costs of prescription drugs, and to protect the safety, health and economic well-being of Nevadans, the Legislature finds that legislation regarding affordable access to prescription - 82nd Session (2023) – 3 – drugs is necessary for residents of this State to achieve and maintain good health;
ExceptA as otherwise provided in subsection 8, a person or entity that purchases a referenced drug in this State shall not pay a price for the referenced drug that, excluding any fee paid to a pharmacy for dispensing the referenced drug, is higher than the maximum fair price for that referenced drug during the price applicability period.
ExceptA as otherwise provided in subsection 8, a person or entity that seeks reimbursement for a referenced drug which is delivered, dispensed or administered to a person in this State shall not seek reimbursement for the referenced drug at a rate which, excluding any fee paid to a pharmacy for dispensing the referenced drug, is higher than the maximum fair price for that referenced drug during the price applicability period.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 8,4, a personviolation orof entitysubsection that1 sells, offers for sale, distributes or delivers2 by any referencedperson drugconstitutes to a persondeceptive ortrade entitypractice in this State or seeks reimbursement for athe referencedpurposes drugof whichNRS is598.0903 delivered, dispensed or administered to a598.0999, personinclusive. in this State shall maintain in this State a registered agent and an office or base of operations.
deceptive trade practice.bsection 1 or 2 constitutes a separate 4.
ExceptA asperson otherwisewho providedviolates inthe subsectionprovisions 5, a violation of subsection 1,1 2 or 32 byis anynot personsubject constitutesto aany deceptivecriminal tradepenalty practiceset forforth thein purposessubsection 3 of NRS 598.0903598.0999. to 598.0999, inclusive.
- *AB250_R1* – 4 – Each such violation of subsection 1 or 2 or sale, offer for sale or distribution or delivery of a quantity of a referenced drug in violation of subsection 3 constitutes a separate deceptive trade practice.
A person whoaggrieved violatesby thea provisionsviolation of subsection 1,1 2 or 32 ismay notbring subjectan toaction anyfor criminalconsumer penaltyfraud setpursuant forthto in subsection 3 of NRS 598.0999.41.600.
A person aggrieved by a violation of subsection 1, 2 or 3 may bring an action for consumer fraud pursuant to NRS 41.600.
7.
8.7.
A provider of health coverage for federal employees, a provider of health coverage that is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 or a Taft-Hartley trust formed pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
§ 186(c)(5):
(a) Is not required to comply with the requirements of this section.
(b) May elect to be subject to the provisions of this section by notifying the Director in writing on or before January 1 of each year in which the plan elects to participate.
9.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 4 – Sec.
(a) An unlawful act as defined in NRS 119.330;
- *AB250_R1* – 5 – 3.
Except as otherwise provided in NRS 598.0974, a person who violates a court order or injunction issued pursuant to the provisions of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, upon a complaint brought by the Commissioner, the Director, the district attorney of any county of this State or the Attorney General shall forfeit and pay to the State General Fund a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each violation.
Show all 52 changed lines (12 more)
3.- 82nd Session (2023) – 5 – natural person, firm, or any officer or managing agent of anyact, a corporation or association who knowingly and willfully engages in a deceptive trade practice:
[A] Except as otherwise provided in section 1 of this act, a natural person, firm, or any officer or managing agent of any corporation or association who knowingly and willfully engages in a deceptive trade practice:
- *AB250_R1* – 6 – (d) For an offense involving a loss of property or services valued at $100,000 or more, is guilty of a category B felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for aay and minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 20 years, and by a fine of not more than $15,000.
If a person violates any provision of NRS 598.0903 to 598.0999, inclusive, 598.100 to 598.2801, inclusive, 598.405 to 598.525, inclusive, 598.741 to 598.787, inclusive, 598.840 to 598.966, inclusive, or 598.9701 to 598.9718, inclusive, fails to comply with a judgment or order of any court in this State concerning a violation of such a provision, or fails to comply with an assurance of discontinuance or other agreement concerning an alleged violation of such a provision, the Commissioner or the district attorney of any county may bring an action in the name of the State of Nevada seeking:
or (b)- If82nd theSession (2023) – 6 – corporation.e defendant is a corporation, dissolution of the corporation. The court may grant or deny the relief sought or may order other appropriate relief.
The court may grant or deny the relief sought or may order other appropriate relief.
6.General pursuant to subsection 4 or 5, process may be served by an employee of the Consumer Affairs Unit of the Department of Business and Industry or an employee of the Attorney General.
In an action brought by the Commissioner or the Attorney General pursuant to subsection 4 or 5, process may be served by an - *AB250_R1* – 7 – employee of the Consumer Affairs Unit of the Department of Business and Industry or an employee of the Attorney General.
The trier of fact shall determine the value of all other property whose value is not readily ascertainable, and may, in making thattythat whose determination, consider all relevant evidence, including evidence of thetheSec. value of the property to its owner.
Sec.
- 82nd Session (2023) – 7 – (a) Upon passage and approval for the purpose of adopting any regulations and performing any other preparatory administrative tasks that are necessary to carry out the provisions of this act;
H~~~~~ 23 - *AB250_R1*82nd Session (2023)
Show all 52 changed rows (12 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
(No further action taken.)
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Senate Amendment No. 644 concurred in. To enrollment. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
In Assembly.
-
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. Preamble adopted, as amended. (Yeas: 13, Nays: 7, Excused: 1.) To Assembly.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 644.) To printer.
-
In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. Preamble adopted. (Yeas: 27, Nays: 15.) To Senate.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 439.) To printer.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To printer.
Sponsors
- Venicia Considine · Primary
- Natha C. Anderson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 65 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Considine, Venicia Democratic
- Anderson, Natha C. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (65)
65 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 65 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 250?
- AB 250 is sponsored by Considine, Venicia (Democratic) and Anderson, Natha C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 250?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 250?
- Track AB 250 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 250
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 250
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →