Nevada 2021 Regular Session Status: Enacted 7 D cosponsors

AB 132 — Establishes provisions relating to custodial interrogations of children. (BDR 5-783)

Last action — Chapter 508.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2021. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 62% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    3 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

37 added · 56 removed

37 line(s) added, 56 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 16, 2021) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
132 A SSEMBLY B ILL NO .
132–Assemblymen Flores, Torres, González;
132–A SSEMBLYMEN FLORES , T ORRES , GONZÁLEZ ;
Anderson, Brown-May, Considine, Duran, Martinez, Summers-Armstrong and Thomas Joint Sponsor:
ANDERSON , BROWN -MAY , CONSIDINE , DURAN , MARTINEZ, SUMMERS -ARMSTRONG AND T HOMAS FEBRUARY 15, 2021 ____________ JOINT SPONSOR :
Senator Donate CHAPTER..........
SENATOR DONATE ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Establishes provisions relating to custodial interrogations of children.
(BDR 5-783) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
LegThis bill requires a peace officer or probation officer who takes a child into custody to make certain disclosures to the child concerning his or her constitutional rights relating to custodial interrogations before initiating a custodial interrogation.
This bill requires a peace officer or probation officer who takes a child into custody to make certain disclosures to the child concerning his or her constitutional rights relating to custodial interrogations before initiating a custodial interrogation.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
- *AB132_R1* – 2 – (b) If you choose to talk to me, whatever you tell me I can tell a judge in court.
(b) If you choose to talk to me, whatever you tell me I can tell a judge in court.
(c) You have the right to have your parent with you while you talk to me.
(c) You have the right to have your parent or guardian with you while you talk to me.
If your family cannot pay for a lawyer, you will get a free lawyer.
If your family cannot or will not pay for a lawyer, you will get a free lawyer.
Do you understand what I have told you? (f) Do you want to talk to me? (a) “Custodial interrogation” means an interrogation of a child while the child is in custody.
Do you understand what I have told you? (f) Do you want to talk to me? 2.
(b) “Interrogation” means questioning which is initiated by a peace officer or probation officer or any words or actions on the part of a peace officer or probation officer, other than those which are ordinarily attendant to confinement or detention, that the peace officer or probation officer should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the child who is being questioned.
As used in this section, “custodial interrogation” means any interrogation of a person who is required to be advised of his or her rights pursuant to Miranda v.
Sec.
Arizona, 384 U.S.
2.
436 (1966).
- 81st Session (2021) – 2 – Secs.
2-4.
3.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
4.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
H - *AB132_R1*
~~~~~ 21 - 81st Session (2021)
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Chapter 508.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  4. Senate Amendment No. 677 concurred in. To enrollment.

  5. In Assembly.

  6. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 20, Nays: None, Excused: 1.) To Assembly.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 677.) To printer.

  8. In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  9. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.

  10. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 314.) To printer.

  11. From printer. To committee.

  12. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 56 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (56)

56 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 56 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 132?
AB 132 is sponsored by Flores, Edgar (Democratic), Torres-Fossett, Selena (Democratic), González, Cecelia (Democratic), Anderson, Natha C. (Democratic), Brown-May, Tracy (Democratic), Considine, Venicia (Democratic), Susie Martinez, Clara Thomas, Doñate, Fabian (Democratic), Summers-Armstrong, Shondra, and Duran, Bea.
What is the current status of AB 132?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 132?
Track AB 132 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 132

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 132

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →