SB 7 — Makes various changes relating to certain orders for protection where the adverse party is a child under 18 years of age. (BDR 1-391)
Last action — Chapter 143.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 18, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
314 added · 220 removed314 line(s) added, 220 removed.
(ReprintedSenate withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 13, 2021) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
77–Committee SENATEon BILLJudiciary NOCHAPTER.......... .
7–COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY (ON BEHALF OF THE N EVADA SUPREME C OURT ) PREFILED N OVEMBER 18, 2020 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Makes various changes to the jurisdiction of certain courts relating to certain orders for protection where the adverse party is a child under 18 years of age.
(BDR 1-391) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
establishing procedures relating to orders declaring that the basis no longer exists for certain orders for protection be transmitted to the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History if the adverse party is a child under 18 years of age;
Existing law authorizes the issuance of orders for protection against domestic violence,stalking, harassmentaggravated instalking theor workplace,harassment. high-risk behavior, sexual assault, and 33.500-33.670, 200.378, 200.591) Existing law also provides that:
(NRS 33.017-33.100, 33.200-33.360, 33.500-33.670, 200.378, 200.591) Existing law also provides that:
and (2) the justice court has exclusive jurisdiction over actions for the issuance of orders for protection against harassment in the workplace, high-risk behavior, sexual assault, and stalking, aggSectionaggrSection 1 of this bill provides that if an order for protection against domestic violence, harassment in the workplace, high-risk behavior, sexual assault, or stalking, aggravated stalking or harassment is sought against a child who is under 18 years of age, the district court has exclusive jurisdiction over any action relating to the issuance or dissolution of the order.
However, section 1 provides that the juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction over any action in which it is alleged that a - *SB7_R1* – 2 – child who is the adverse party to any such order has committed a delinquent act by violating a condition of the order.
courts that have SectionIf 3 of this bill provides that the changes in this bill apply to an order for protection against domestic violence, harassment in the workplace, high-risk behavior, sexual assault,assault or stalking, aggravated stalking or harassment that is issued onagainst ora afterchild Octoberunder 1,18 2021,years andof aage courtand thatinformation issuedconcerning suchthe an order beforefor protectedprotection byis transmitted to the order,Central andRepository allfor proceedingsNevada relatingRecords toof Criminal History, section 2.7 of this bill authorizes the order.subjectchild to orpetition THEa PEOPLEcourt OFfor THEan STATEorder OFdeclaring NEVADA,that REPRESENTEDthe INbasis SENATEno ANDlonger ASSEMBLY,exists DOfor ENACTthe ASinformation FOLLOWS:to be transmitted to the Central Repository.
Section 2.7 also establishes petitioned information from the Central Repository.
Finally, section 2.7 establishes procedures relating to the circumstances under which the Central Repository fails to comply with the order to remove the petitioned information.
Section 2.3 of this bill makes a conforming change relating to the petition for and the issuance of an order declaring that the basis no longer exists for an order for protection against high-risk behavior.
- 81st Session (2021) – 2 – Section 3 of this bill provides that the changes in this bill apply to an order for behavior, sexual assault, or stalking, aggravated stalking or harassment that is issued on or after October 1, 2021, and a court that issued such an order before October 1, 2021, retains jurisdiction over the order, all persons subject to or protected by the order, and all proceedings relating to the order.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
The district court may,shall at its discretion, appoint counsel for a child who is the adverse party against whom an order listed in subsection 1 is sought.sought upon:
(a) The issuance of any ex parte or temporary order listed in subsection 1;
or (b) Notice of an adversarial hearing on an application for an order listed in subsection 1.
The juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction over any action in which it is alleged that a child who is the adverse party in - 81st Session (2021) – 3 – an order listed in subsection 1 has committed a delinquent act by violating a condition set forth in the order.
If the district court issues an order listed in subsection 1 and the adverse party reaches the age of 18 years while the order - *SB7_R1* – 3 – is still in effect, the order remains effective against the adverse party until the order expires or is dissolved by the district court.
The district court shall automatically seal all records related to the application for, consideration of,of and issuance of an order listed in subsection 1 as provided in NRS 62H.140 upon the dissolution or expiration of the order or when the adverse party reaches the age of 2118 years.years, whichever is earlier, unless, at such a time, the order is still in effect, in which case the records must be automatically sealed by the district court upon the expiration or dissolution of the order.
(b) In actions for damages for injury to the person, or for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, or for injury to real property where no issue is raised by the verified answer of the defendant involving the title to or boundaries of the real property, if the damagedam(c) claimedExcept doesas otherwise provided in paragraph (l), in actions for a fine, penalty or forfeiture not exceedexceeding $15,000.$15,000, given by statute or the ordinance of a county, city or town, where no issue is raised by the answer involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, toll or municipal fine.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (l), in actions for a fine, penalty or forfeiture not exceeding $15,000, given by statute or the ordinance of a county, city or town, where no issue is raised by the answer involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, toll or municipal fine.
- 81st Session (2021) – 4 – (g) Of actions for the possession of lands and tenements where the relation of landlord and tenant exists, when damages claimed do not exceed $15,000 or when no damages are claimed.
(h) Of actions when the possession of lands and tenements has been unlawfully or fraudulently obtained or withheld, when damages claimed do not exceed $15,000 or when no damages are claimed.
- *SB7_R1* – 4 – (j) Of actions for the enforcement of mechanics’ liens, where the amount of the lien sought to be enforced, exclusive of interest, does not exceed $15,000.
[or] (3) If a district court issues a written order to the justice court requiring that further proceedings relating to the action for thethece court issuance of the order for protection be conducted before the district court [.] ;
[or] - 81st Session (2021) – 5 – (3) If a district court issues a written order to the justice court requiring that further proceedings relating to the action for the issuance of the order for protection be conducted before the district court [.] ;
or (4)sought Whereis under 18 years of age.ty against whom the order is (o) In an action for the issuance of a temporary or extended order for protection against harassment in the workplace pursuant to NRS 33.200 to 33.360, inclusive [.] , where the adverse party against whom the order is sought is under 18 years of age.age or older.
(o)(p) In ansmall actionclaims foractions under the issuanceprovisions of achapter temporary73 or extended order for protection against harassment in the workplace pursuant to NRS 33.200 to 33.360, inclusive [.] , where the adverse party against whom the order is sought is 18 years of ageNRS. or older.
- *SB7_R1* – 5 – (p) In small claims actions under the provisions of chapter 73 of NRS.
2.civil actions, other than for forcible entry or detainer, in which the title of real property or mining claims or questions affecting the boundaries of land are involved.
Show all 90 changed lines (50 more)
The jurisdiction conferred by this section does not extend to civil actions, other than for forcible entry or detainer, in which the title of real property or mining claims or questions affecting the boundaries of land are involved.
- 81st Session (2021) – 6 – 5.
In the case of any arrest made by a member of the Nevada Highway Patrol, the jurisdiction of the justices of the peace extends to the limits of their respective counties and to the limits of all counties which have common boundaries with their respective counties.cou6.iesEach justice court has jurisdiction of any violation of a regulation governing vehicular traffic on an airport within the township in which the court is established.
6.
Each justice court has jurisdiction of any violation of a regulation governing vehicular traffic on an airport within the township in which the court is established.
2.3.
NRS 33.650 is hereby amended to read as follows:
33.650 1.
Any time that a court issues an ex parte or extended order or renews an extended order and any time that a person serves such an order or receives any information or takes any other action pursuant to NRS 33.500 to 33.670, inclusive, the person shall, by the end of the next business day:
(a) Cause to be transmitted, in the manner prescribed by the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History, any information required by the Central Repository in a manner which ensures that the information is received by the Central Repository;
and (b) Transmit a copy of the order to the Attorney General.
2.
If the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History receives any information described in subsection 1, the adverse party may petition the court for an order declaring that the basis for the information transmitted no longer exists.
TheA amendatorypetition provisionsbrought ofpursuant thisto act:subsection 2 must be filed in the court which issued the ex parte or extended order.
4.
The court shall grant the petition and issue the order parte or extended order no longer exists.nds that the basis for the ex 5.
The court, upon granting the petition and entering an order pursuant to this section, shall cause, on a form prescribed by the Department of Public Safety, a record of the order to be transmitted to the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History.
6.
Within 5 business days after receiving a record of an order transmitted pursuant to subsection 5, the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History shall take reasonable steps to ensure that the information concerning the adverse party is removed from the Central Repository.
7.
If the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History fails to remove the information as provided in subsection 6, the adverse party may bring an action to compel the removal of the information.
If the adverse party prevails in the action, the court - 81st Session (2021) – 7 – may award the adverse party reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in bringing the action.
8.
If a petition brought pursuant to subsection 2 is denied, the adverse party may petition for a rehearing not sooner than 2 years aft9.
thIf an adverse party to the ex parte or extended order is a child under the age of 18 years, the provisions of section 2.7 of this act govern petitions for and the issuance of orders declaring that the basis for an ex parte or extended order no longer exists.
Sec.
2.7.
Chapter 62H of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:
Upon the submission of information relating to any of the following orders for protection where the adverse party is a child under the age of 18 years to the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History, the adverse party may petition a court for an order declaring that the basis no longer exists for such information to be transmitted to the Central Repository:
(a) A temporary or extended order for protection against domestic violence pursuant to NRS 33.017 to 33.100, inclusive.
(b) A temporary or extended order for protection against harassment in the workplace pursuant to NRS 33.200 to 33.360, inclusive.
(c) An ex parte or extended order for protection against high- risk behavior pursuant to NRS 33.500 to 33.670, inclusive.
(d) A temporary or extended order for protection against sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.378.
(e) A temporary or extended order for protection against NRS 200.591.gravated stalking or harassment pursuant to 2.
A petition brought pursuant to subsection 1 must be filed in the court which issued the order for protection.
3.
The court shall grant the petition and issue the order described in subsection 1 if the court finds that the basis for the order for protection no longer exists.
4.
The court, upon granting the petition and entering an order pursuant to this section, shall cause, on a form prescribed by the Department of Public Safety, a record of the order to be transmitted to the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History.
5.
Within 5 business days after receiving a record of an order transmitted pursuant to subsection 4, the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History shall take reasonable steps to - 81st Session (2021) – 8 – ensure that the information concerning the adverse party is removed from the Central Repository.
6.
If the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History fails to remove the information as provided in subsection 5, the adverse party may bring an action to compel the removal of the information.
If the adverse party prevails in the action, the court may award the adverse party reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in bringing the action.
7.
If a petition brought pursuant to subsection 1 is denied, the adverse party may petition for a rehearing not sooner than 2 years after the date of the denial of the petition.
1.c.
- *SB7_R1* – 6 – 2.
Do not apply to an order for protection against domestic violence, harassment in the workplace, high-risk behavior, sexual assault, or stalking, aggravated stalking or harassment that is issued before October 1, 2021, and a court that issued such an order before October 1, 2021, retains jurisdiction over the order, all persons subject to or protected by the order, and all proceedings relating to the order, regardless of whether the proceedings are conductedtingconducted to before, on or after October 1, 2021.
H~~~~~ 21 - *SB7_R1*81st Session (2021)
Show all 90 changed rows (50 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Chapter 143.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
In Senate. Assembly Amendment No. 669 concurred in. To enrollment.
-
From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 41, Nays: None, Not voting: 1.) To Senate.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 669.) To printer.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 25.) To printer.
-
Read first time. To committee.
-
From printer.
-
Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Senate Committee on Judiciary · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee on Judiciary
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 7?
- SB 7 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Judiciary.
- What is the current status of SB 7?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 18, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 7?
- Track SB 7 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 7
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 7
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →