Revises provisions relating to juvenile justice. (BDR 5-791)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 230 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 230.
You're tracking AB 230
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 230 — Revises provisions relating to juvenile justice. (BDR 5-791)
Last action — Chapter 515.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 10, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
30 sponsors
8 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (15 D · 4 R) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
160 added · 211 removed160 line(s) added, 211 removed.
EXEMPTAssembly (ReprintedBill withNo. amendments adopted on April 14, 2021) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
230230–Assemblymen AC.H. SSEMBLY B ILLN O.
230–ASSEMBLYMENMiller, C.H.Torres, Nguyen, Flores, Considine;
MAnderson, ILLER,Bilbray-Axelrod, TORRES,Cohen, NDuran, GUYENGonzález, ,Hansen, FLORESHardy, ,Kasama, CONSIDINEKrasner, ;Martinez, Marzola, Monroe-Moreno, O’Neill, Orentlicher, Summers-Armstrong, Thomas, Watts, Wheeler and Yeager Joint Sponsors:
ASenators NDERSONOhrenschall, ,Neal, BSpearman; ILBRAY- A XELROD , OHEN , DURAN , GONZÁLEZ , HANSEN, HARDY , K ASAMA , K RASNER, M ARTINEZ , M ARZOLA , M ONROE - M ORENO , O’N EIL, O RENTLICHER, SUMMERS - A RMSTRONG , THOMAS , WATTS, WHEELER AND YEAGER M ARCH 10, 2021 ____________ JOINTSPONSORS :
ENATORSDenis, OHRENSCHALLDonate ,and EALD. , PEARMAN ;
DENIS,Harris DONATECHAPTER.......... AND D.
HARRIS ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to juvenile justice.
(BDR 5-791) FISCAL NOTE:
EEffect on the State:
Yes.:
May have Fiscal Impact.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
requiring the Legislative Committee on Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice to conduct an interim study concerning the need for and cost of infrastructure for housing certain youthful offenders;
Existing law provides that the juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction over a child who is alleged to have committed an act designated as a delinquent act, unless the child is alleged to have committed an offense for which the juvenile court may certify the child for criminal proceedings as an adult and the juvenile court certifies andthe afterchild for criminal proceedings as an adult upon a fullmotion investigation.by the district attorney related conditions are not considered delinquent acts and are therefore excluded- from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court such as:
(NRS(1) 62B.330,murder 62B.390) Certain offenses with age-rney related conditions are not considered delinquent acts and areattempted thereforemurder; excluded from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court such as:
(1) murder and attempted - *AB230_R1* – 2 – murder;
(4) certain felonies resulting in death or substantial bodily harm on the property of a school, at an felonies;activity sponsored by a school or on a school bus;
and(5) (6) any other offensecategory if,A beforeand theB offense was committed, the person previously had been convicted of a criminal offense.
(NRS 62B.330) Section 2 ofoferson this bill eliminates the exclusions of:
and (2) an offense or attempted offense involving the use or threatened use of a firearm from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, thereby retaining such offenses under the jurUnderjurisdiction existingof law, the juvenile courtcourt. is required to certify a child for criminal proceedings as an adult upon a motion by the district attorney and after a full investigation if the child:
Under existing law, the juvenile court is required to certify a child for criminal investigation if the child:
(NRS 62B.390) theseSection offenses4 andof providesthis insteadbill foreliminates the discretionarymandatory certification of a child foror criminal proceedings as an adult for allthese offenses overand whichprovides instead for the juvenilediscretionary courtcertification hasof a child for exclusive jurisdiction.
Sectionan 7.5adult offor thisall billoffenses requiresover which the Legislativejuvenile Committeecourt onhas Child- Welfare81st andSession Juvenile(2021) Justice– to2 conduct– aEXPLANATION study– duringMatter thein 2021-2022bolded interimitalics concerningis thenew; need for and cost of infrastructure for housing certain youthful offenders.
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
(b)(c) ViolatesCommits anyan ruleact ordesignated regulationa havingcriminal offense pursuant to the forcelaws of law;the State of Nevada.
or (c) Commits an act designated a criminal offense pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada.
(a) Murder or attempted murder and any other related offense arising out of the same facts as the murder or attempted murder, - *AB230_R1* – 3 – regardless of the nature of the related offense, if the person was 16 years of age or older when the murder or attempted murder was committed.
(c) An offense or attempted offense involving the use or threatened use of a firearm and any other related offense arising out of the same facts as the offense or attempted offense involving thetheut use or threatened use of a firearm, regardless of the nature of the related offense, if:
(1)- The81st personSession was(2021) 16– years3 of– age or older when the offense or attempted offense involving the use or threatened use of a firearm was committed;
and (2) The person intended to create a great risk of death or substantial bodily harm to more than one person by means of a weapon,hazardous deviceto orthe courselives of actionmore thatthan wouldone normallyperson.ormally be hazardous[(e)] to(c) A category A or B felony and any other related offense arising out of the livessame facts as the category A or B felony, regardless of morethe nature of the related offense, if the person was at least 16 years of age but less than one18 person.years of age when the offense was committed, and:
[(e)] (c) A category A or B felony and any other related offense arising out of the same facts as the category A or B felony, regardless of the nature of the related offense, if the person was at least 16 years of age but less than 18 years of age when the offense was committed, and:
or - *AB230_R1* – 4 – (2) The person is not identified by law enforcement as having committed the offense until the person reaches 21 years of age.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.62B.390 N1.
4.
NRS 62B.390 is hereby amended to read as follows:
62B.390 1.
or (b)- Is81st chargedSession with(2021) murder– or4 attempted– murder and was 13 years of age or older when the murder or attempted murder was committed.
The juvenile court shall not certify a child for criminal proceedings as an adult pursuant to subsection 2 if the juvenile court specificallyspe(a) findsThe bychild clearis developmentally or mentally incompetent to understand the situation and convincingthe evidenceproceedings that:of the court or to aid the child’s attorney in those proceedings;
Show all 65 changed lines (25 more)
(a) The child is developmentally or mentally incompetent to understand the situation and the proceedings of the court or to aid the child’s attorney in those proceedings;
4.] If a child is certified for criminal proceedings as an adult pursuant to subsection 1 , [or 2,] the juvenile court shall also certify the child for criminal proceedings as an adult for any other related - *AB230_R1* – 5 – offense arising out of the same facts as the offense for which the child was certified, regardless of the nature of the related offense.
(a)jurisdiction Theover court to which the child;e case has been transferred has original jurisdiction(b) overThe child may petition for transfer of the child;case back to the juvenile court only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances;
(b) The child may petition for transfer of the case back to the juvenile court only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances;
Sec.Secs.
5.5-7 and 7.5.
(Deleted by amendment.) - 81st Session (2021) – 5 – Sec.
6.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
7.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
7.5.
1.
The Legislative Committee on Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice created by NRS 218E.705 shall conduct a study during the 2021-2022 interim concerning the need for and cost of infrastructure associated with housing juveniles awaiting certification for criminal proceedings as an adult in this State.
The study must include, without limitation, a review of:
(a) The current placement of juveniles awaiting certification for criminal proceedings as an adult;
(b) The current placement of juveniles excluded from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to NRS 62B.330;
(c) The cost associated with the current placement of juveniles awaiting certification for criminal proceedings as an adult;
(d) The costs associated with housing all current juveniles excluded from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to NRS 62B.330;
(e) The costs associated with placing all juveniles subject to potential transfer to the criminal justice system in a facility for juveniles;
and (f) The facilities, services and programs available for juveniles subject to transfer to the criminal justice system.
2.
Not later than October 1, 2022, the Committee shall prepare a report of its findings and any recommendations for legislation to the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau.
Sec.
H~~~~~ 21 - *AB230_R1*81st Session (2021)
Show all 65 changed rows (25 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill eliminates certain exclusions that prevent juvenile courts from having jurisdiction over specific offenses, allowing them to retain jurisdiction over sexual assault and firearm-related offenses.
-
NRS 62B.330
Sexual assault or attempted sexual assault involving the use or threatened use of force or violence against the victim and any other related offense arising out of the same facts as the sexual assault or attempted sexual assault, regardless of the nature of the related offense, if: (1) The person was 16 years of age or older when the sexual assault or attempted sexual assault was committed; and (2) Before the sexual assault or attempted sexual assault was committed, the person previously had been adjudicated delinquent for an act that would have been a felony if committed by an adult.The bill removes the exclusion of sexual assault from juvenile court jurisdiction.
-
NRS 62B.330
An offense or attempted offense involving the use or threatened use of a firearm, regardless of the nature of the related offense, if: (1) The person was 16 years of age or older when the offense or attempted offense involving the use or threatened use of a firearm was committed; and (2) Before the offense or attempted offense involving the use or threatened use of a firearm was committed, the person previously had been adjudicated delinquent for an act that would have been a felony if committed by an adult.The bill also removes the exclusion of firearm-related offenses from juvenile court jurisdiction.
-
NRS 62B.390
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2 and NRS 62B.400, upon a motion by the district attorney and after a full investigation, the juvenile court shall certify a child for proper criminal proceedings as an adult to any court that would have jurisdiction to try the offense if committed by an adult, if the child: (a) Is charged with: (1) A sexual assault involving the use or threatened use of force or violence against the victim; or (2) An offense or attempted offense involving the use or threatened use of a firearm; and (b) Was 16 years of age or older at the time the child allegedly committed the offense.→ The juvenile court may certify a child for proper criminal proceedings as an adult to any court that would have jurisdiction to try the offense if committed by an adult, if the child: (a) Is charged with an offense that would have been a felony if committed by an adult and was 14 years of age or older at the time the child allegedly committed the offense.The bill changes mandatory certification for certain offenses to discretionary certification.
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Chapter 515.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly. In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
From committee: Do pass. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time.
-
From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. To Senate. In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Finance. To committee.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on General File. Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 781.) Dispensed with reprinting. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 41, Nays: None, Excused: 1.) To printer.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To committee.
-
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 143.) Rereferred to Committee on Ways and Means. Exemption effective. To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Taken from Second Reading File. Placed on Second Reading File for next legislative day.
-
Notice of eligibility for exemption.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Selena Torres-Fossett · Primary
- Rochelle T. Nguyen · Primary
- Edgar Flores · Primary
- Venicia Considine · Primary
- James Ohrenschall · Primary
- Dina Neal · Primary
- Natha C. Anderson · Cosponsor
- Cecelia González · Cosponsor
- Alexis M. Hansen · Cosponsor
- Melissa R.. Hardy · Cosponsor
- Heidi Kasama · Cosponsor
- Lisa Krasner · Cosponsor
- Susie Martinez · Cosponsor
- Elaine H. Marzola · Cosponsor
- Daniele Monroe-Moreno · Cosponsor
- Philip P.K. OâNeill · Cosponsor
- David Orentlicher · Cosponsor
- Clara Thomas · Cosponsor
- Howard Watts · Cosponsor
- Steve Yeager · Cosponsor
- Moises Denis · Cosponsor
- Fabian Doñate · Cosponsor
- Brittney M. Miller · Primary
- Dallas Harris · Cosponsor
- Jim Wheeler · Cosponsor
- Shondra Summers-Armstrong · Cosponsor
- Bea Duran · Cosponsor
- Lesley Cohen · Cosponsor
- Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod · Cosponsor
- Pat Spearman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →8 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 37 not signed on
Sponsors (8)
- Torres-Fossett, Selena Democratic
- Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic
- Flores, Edgar Democratic
- Considine, Venicia Democratic
- Ohrenschall, James Democratic
- Neal, Dina Democratic
- Miller, Brittney M. Democratic
- Pat Spearman
Co-sponsors (22)
- Anderson, Natha C. Democratic
- González, Cecelia Democratic
- Hansen, Alexis M. Republican
- Hardy, Melissa R.. Republican
- Kasama, Heidi Republican
- Krasner, Lisa Republican
- Susie Martinez
- Marzola, Elaine H. Democratic
- Monroe-Moreno, Daniele Democratic
- Philip P.K. OâNeill
- Orentlicher, David Democratic
- Clara Thomas
- Watts, Howard Democratic
- Yeager, Steve Democratic
- Moises Denis
- Doñate, Fabian Democratic
- Harris, Dallas
- Jim Wheeler
- Summers-Armstrong, Shondra
- Duran, Bea
- Cohen, Lesley
- Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod
Not signed on (37)
37 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 37 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 230?
- AB 230 is sponsored by Torres-Fossett, Selena (Democratic), Nguyen, Rochelle T. (Democratic), Flores, Edgar (Democratic), Considine, Venicia (Democratic), Ohrenschall, James (Democratic), Neal, Dina (Democratic), Anderson, Natha C. (Democratic), González, Cecelia (Democratic), Hansen, Alexis M. (Republican), Hardy, Melissa R.. (Republican), Kasama, Heidi (Republican), Krasner, Lisa (Republican), Susie Martinez, Marzola, Elaine H. (Democratic), Monroe-Moreno, Daniele (Democratic), Philip P.K. OâNeill, Orentlicher, David (Democratic), Clara Thomas, Watts, Howard (Democratic), Yeager, Steve (Democratic), Moises Denis, Doñate, Fabian (Democratic), Miller, Brittney M. (Democratic), Harris, Dallas, Jim Wheeler, Summers-Armstrong, Shondra, Duran, Bea, Cohen, Lesley, Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod, and Pat Spearman.
- What is the current status of AB 230?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 10, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 230?
- Track AB 230 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 230
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 230
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →