AB 219 — Revises provisions governing the sealing of criminal records. (BDR 14-137)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 403.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 09, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
5 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
475 added · 497 removed475 line(s) added, 497 removed.
EXEMPTAssembly (ReprintedBill withNo. amendments adopted on April 16, 2021) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
219219–Assemblymen AYeager, SSEMBLYNguyen, BILLC.H. NO .
219–ASSEMBLYMENMiller, YKrasner, EAGERO’Neill; , NGUYEN , C.H.
MBilbray-Axelrod, ILLER,Cohen, KRASNERGonzález, ,Hardy, O’NEILL;Marzola and Orentlicher CHAPTER..........
BILBRAY -A XELROD , COHEN , G ONZÁLEZ , HARDY , M ARZOLA AND O RENTLICHER M ARCH 9, 2021 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing the sealing of criminal records.
(BDR 14-137) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
May have Fiscal Impact.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law creates a comprehensive system for the sealing of criminal records.
(NRS 179.2445) This bill requires a court to seal the criminal records of a petitioner under certain circumstances and records.riousmakes various other changes to provisions governing the sealing of criminal Sectionrecords. 1 of this bill requires a court and the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History to seal the criminal records of a person upon receipt of a certified copy of the unconditional pardon of the person from the State Board of Pardons Commissioners.
IfSection 1 of this bill requires a court and the recipientCentral Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History to seal the pardoncriminal filesrecords of a petitionperson toupon sealreceipt hisof ora certified copy of the unconditional pardon of the person from the State Board of her criminal records, section 1 requires the court to grant the petition withoutwithoutis or review by the prosecuting attorney or agency so long as the charges that were parExistingpardoned laware authorizes a court to order the sealingsame ofas criminal records if a person convicted in the courtcharges submitsrequested a petition and the prosecuting attorney stipulates to thebe sealingsealed. of the records.
Existing law authorizes a court to order the sealing of criminal records if a person convicted in the court submits a petition and the prosecuting attorney stipulates to the sealing of the records.
(NRS 179.245, 179.247) Sections 3 and 4 ofrequire: this bill require a court to grant the sealing of the criminal the records;
or(1) (2)a allhearing statutoryon requirements are met and the prosecutingpetition agencygto ofbe -held *AB219_R1*to –determine 2if – does not stipulate to the sealing of the records or doesthe notprosecuting fileagency anfiles objectiona towritten theobjection; sealing of the records.
Sectionsand 3(2) andthealing 4petition require:to be granted unless an objecting party presents certain evidence.
(1)Section a2.5 hearingof onthis thebill petitionmakes to be held to determine if the criminal records should be sealed if the prosecuting agency files a writtenconforming objection;change.
andExisting (2)law theauthorizes petitiona person to bepetition granteda ifcourt noto objectingseal partyall attendsrecords therelating hearing.to an arrest if:
an arrest if:
(2) a charge wasingwas to filed against the person but later dismissed;
If the prosecuting attorney does not stipulate to the sealing of the records, existing law requires a hearing179.255) toSection be5 conductedof tothis determinebill: if the records should be sealed.
(NRS(1) 179.255)requires Sectiona 5court to grant a petition to seal all records relating to an arrest if the prosecuting agency stipulates to sealing the records or if there is no evidence that further action will be taken against the person and the person was acquitted of thisthe bill:crime;
(1) requires a court to grant a petition to seal all records or if there is no evidence that further action will be taken against the person and the person was acquitted of the crime;
(1) that a hearing be conducted whenif athe court has not otherwise ordered the sealing of the records or the prosecuting agency files a written objection to a petition to seal the - 81st Session (2021) – 2 – records of the arrest;
and (2) the court to seal the records of the objectingarrest partypursuant attendsto thepresents hearing.certain evidence.
Section 6 of this bill authorizes a person to appeal the denial of a petition to seal a record.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
If a person receives a pardon from the State Board of Pardons Commissioners, the person may submit a written petition, accompanied by proof of the pardon, to any court in which thetheon, person was convicted for the sealing of all records of criminal history in its possession and in the possession of any agency of criminal justice relating to the charges for which the person received the pardon.
- *AB219_R1* – 3 – 3.
- 81st Session (2021) – 3 – 179.2445 1.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2,ws:
upon the filing of a petition for the sealing of records pursuant to NRS 179.245, 179.247, 179.255, 179.259 or 179.2595, there is a rebuttable presumption that the records should be sealed if the applicant satisfies all statutory requirements for the sealing of the records.
2.
The presumption set forth in subsection 1 does not apply to a defendant who is given a dishonorable discharge from probation pursuant to NRS 176A.850 and applies to the court for the sealing of records relating to the conviction.
(a) A category A felony, a crime of violence pursuant to NRS 200.408 or residential burglary pursuant to NRS 205.060 after 10 years from the date of release from actual custody or discharge from parole or probation, whichever occurs later;
(e) A violation of NRS 422.540 to 422.570, inclusive, a violation of NRS 484C.110 or 484C.120 other than a felony, or a battery which constitutes domestic violence pursuant to NRS 33.018 other than a felony, after 7 years from the date of release from actual custody or from the date when the person is no longer under a suspended sentence, whichever occurs later;
Show all 91 changed lines (51 more)
(f) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (e), if the offense is punished as a misdemeanor, a battery pursuant to NRS 200.481, harassment pursuant to NRS 200.571, stalking pursuant to NRS 200.575 or a violation of a temporary or extended order for protection, after 2 years from the date of release from actual custody - *AB219_R1*81st –Session 4(2021) – or4 from– the date when the person is no longer under a suspended sentence, whichever occurs later;
ororno longer under a suspended (g) Any other misdemeanor after 1 year from the date of release from actual custody or from the date when the person is no longer under a suspended sentence, whichever occurs later.
and (d) Include information that, to the best knowledge and belief of the petitioner, accurately and completely identifies the records to be sealed, including, without limitation, the:
If the prosecuting [attorney who] agency that prosecuted the petitioner for the crime stipulates to the sealing of the records, the court shall apply the presumption set forth in NRS 179.2445 andandds, the seal the records.
If the prosecuting agency does not stipulate to the sealing of the records or does not file a written objection within 30 days after receiving notification pursuant to subsection 3 and the court makes the findings set forth in subsection 5, the court [may]may shall order the sealing of the records in accordance with subsection 5 without a hearing.
If the court does not order the sealing of the records or the prosecuting [attorney does not stipulate to the sealing of the records,] agency files a written objection, a hearing on the petition- must81st beSession conducted.(2021) – 5 – party presents evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption set forth in NRS 179.2445, the court shall apply the presumption and seal the records.
If5. no objecting party attends the hearing, the court shall apply the presumption set forth in NRS 179.2445 and seal the records.
- *AB219_R1* – 5 – 5.
6.to a conviction of:y not petition the court to seal records relating (a) A crime against a child;
A person may not petition the court to seal records relating to a conviction of:
(a) A crime against a child;
or (h)7.) AAIf violationthe court grants a petition for the sealing of NRSrecords 488.420pursuant orto 488.425.this section, upon the request of the person whose records are sealed, the court may order sealed all records of the civil proceeding in which the records were sealed.
7.
If the court grants a petition for the sealing of records pursuant to this section, upon the request of the person whose records are sealed, the court may order sealed all records of the civil proceeding in which the records were sealed.
(1)- Murder81st ofSession the(2021) first– degree6 committed– in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of sexual assault or of sexual abuse ororon sexual molestation of a child less than 14 years of age pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection 1 of NRS 200.030.
- *AB219_R1* – 6 – (4) Battery with intent to commit sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.400.
(7)involved Abusesexual ofabuse aor childsexual pursuantexploitation.00.508, to NRS 200.508, if the abuse involved(8) sexualAn abuseoffense orinvolving sexualpornography exploitation.and a minor pursuant to NRS 200.710 to 200.730, inclusive.
(8) An offense involving pornography and a minor pursuant to NRS 200.710 to 200.730, inclusive.
(16)to LuringNRS a201.560, childif orpunishable as a personfelony.h with mental illness pursuant (17) An attempt to NRScommit 201.560,an ifoffense punishablelisted asin athis felony.paragraph.
(17) An attempt to commit an offense listed in this paragraph.
- 81st Session (2021) – 7 – (a) Vacating the judgment;
and (b) Sealing all documents, papers and exhibits in the person’s record, minute book entries and entries on dockets, and other documents relating to the case in the custody of such other agencies andand2.ffiA officersperson asmay arefile nameda inpetition pursuant to subsection 1 if the court’sperson order.was convicted of:
2.(a) A violation of NRS 201.354, for engaging in prostitution or solicitation for prostitution, provided that the person was not alleged to be a customer of a prostitute;
A person may file a petition pursuant to subsection 1 if the person was convicted of:
- *AB219_R1* – 7 – (a) A violation of NRS 201.354, for engaging in prostitution or solicitation for prostitution, provided that the person was not alleged to be a customer of a prostitute;
and (c) The petitioner files a petition pursuant to subsection 1 with due diligence after the petitioner has ceased being a victim of trafficking or involuntary servitude or has sought services for victims of such trafficking or involuntary servitude.
If the prosecuting [attorney who] agency that prosecuted the petitioner for the crime stipulates to vacating the judgment of the petitioner- and81st sealingSession all(2021) documents,– papers8 and– exhibits related to the case, the court shall apply the presumption set forth in NRS 179.2445, vacate the judgment and seal all documents, papers and exhibits related to the case.
If the prosecuting agency does not stipulate to vacating the judgment of the petitioner and sealing all documents, papers and exhibits related to the case or does not file a written objection within 30 days after receiving notification pursuant to subsection 5 and the court makes the findings set forth in subsection 4, the court [may]may shall vacate the judgment and seal - *AB219_R1* – 8 – all documents, papers and exhibits in accordance with subsection 7 without a hearing.
If the court does not order the sealing of the records or the prosecuting [attorney does not stipulate to vacating the judgment and sealing the documents, papers and exhibits,] agency files a written objection, a hearing on the petition must be conducted.
IfAt nothe objectinghearing, partyunless attendsan theobjecting hearing,party thepresents courtevidence shallsufficient applyto rebut the presumption set forth in NRS 179.2445, the court shall vacate the judgmentjudgment, apply the the case.on and seal all documents, papers and exhibits related to the7. case.
7.
9.court shall also order sealed the records of the petitioner whiche relate to the judgment being vacated in accordance with paragraph (b) of subsection 7, regardless of whether any records relating to other convictions are ineligible for sealing either by operation of law or because of a deficiency in the petition.
If the court enters an order pursuant to subsection 8, the court shall also order sealed the records of the petitioner which relate to the judgment being vacated in accordance with paragraph (b) of subsection 7, regardless of whether any records relating to other convictions are ineligible for sealing either by operation of law or because of a deficiency in the petition.
or (b)- Any81st felonySession for(2021) which– there9 is– a substantial risk that force or violence may be used against the person or property of another inine or the commission of the felony.
- *AB219_R1* – 9 – (2) Any time 8 years after the arrest;
or (c) The court in which the acquittal was entered, at any time after the date of the acquittal, for the sealing of all records relating to the arrest and the proceedings leading to the dismissal, declination or acquittal.
(c) If the petition references NRS 453.3365, include a certificate of acknowledgment or the disposition of the proceedings for the recordsmaintain tosuch berecords;rom sealed from all agencies of criminal justice which maintain(d) suchInclude records;a list of any other public or private agency, company, official and other custodian of records that is reasonably known to the petitioner to have possession of records of the arrest and of the proceedings leading to the dismissal, declination or acquittal and to whom the order to seal records, if issued, will be directed;
(d) Include a list of any other public or private agency, company, official and other- custodian81st ofSession records(2021) that– is10 reasonably– known to the petitionerpetitioner, toaccurately have possession of records of the arrest and ofcompletely theidentifies proceedings leading to the dismissal,records declination or acquittal and to whombe thesealed, orderincluding, towithout seallimitation, records,the: if issued, will be directed;
and (e) Include information that, to the best knowledge and belief of the petitioner, accurately and completely identifies the records to be sealed, including, without limitation, the:
- *AB219_R1* – 10 – The prosecuting attorney and any person having relevant evidence may testify and present evidence at any hearing on the petition.
If the prosecuting agency does not stipulate to the sealing of the records or does not file a written objection within 30 days after receiving notification pursuant to subsection 4 or 5 and the court makes the findings set forth in subsection 7 or 8, as applicable, the court [may]may shall order the sealing of the records in accordance with subsection 7 or 8, as applicable, without a hearing.
If the court does not order the sealing of the records or the prosecuting [attorney does not stipulate to the sealing of the records,] agency files a written objectionobjection, to a petition, a hearing on the petition must be conducted.
IfAt nothe hearing, unless an objecting party attendspresents theevidence hearing,sufficient theto court- shall81st applySession (2021) – 11 – rebut the presumption set forth in NRS 179.2445179.2445, the court shall apply the presumption and seal the records.
(a) That there has been an acquittal [, that the prosecution was declined or that the charges were dismissed] and there is no evidence that further action will be brought against the person, the court [may] shall order sealed all records of the arrest and of the proceedings leading to the acquittal [, declination or dismissal] which are in the custody of any agency of criminal justice or any public or private company, agency, official or other custodian of records in the State of Nevada [.] ;
If the court finds that the conviction of the petitioner was set aside pursuant to NRS 458A.240, the court may order sealed all records relating to the setting aside of the conviction which are in - *AB219_R1* – 11 – the custody of any agency of criminal justice or any public or private company, agency, official or other custodian of records in the State of Nevada.
If the prosecuting attorney having jurisdiction previously declined prosecution of the charges and the records of the arrest have been sealed pursuant to subsection 7, the prosecuting attorney may subsequently file the charges at any time before the running of the statute of limitations for those charges.
(a) Any person who was convicted of that offense before the date on which the offense was decriminalized may submit a written - 81st Session (2021) – 12 – request to any court in which the person was convicted of that offense for the sealing of any record of criminal history in its possession and in the possession of any agency of criminal justice relating to the conviction.
(b) Upon receipt of a request pursuant to paragraph (a), the court shall, as soon as practicable, send written notice of the request to the office of the prosecuting attorney that prosecuted the offense.
- *AB219_R1* – 12 – (a) “Decriminalized” means that an offense is no longer punishable as a crime as the result of enactment of an act of the Legislature or the passage of a referendum petition or initiative petition pursuant to Article 19 of the Nevada Constitution.
or(b) ordinance“Traffic governingoffense” themeans operationa violation of aany motorstate vehicleor uponlocal any law highway within this State.
Hoperation of a motor vehicle upon any ~~~~~ 21 - *AB219_R1*81st Session (2021)
Show all 91 changed rows (51 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 403.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 862.) Reprinting dispensed with. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 20, Nays: 1.) To printer. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. To Assembly. In Assembly. Senate Amendment No. 862 concurred in. To enrollment.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time.
-
In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
From committee: Do pass, as amended. Placed on General File. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 33, Nays: 7, Excused: 2.) To Senate.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To committee.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 142.) Rereferred to Committee on Ways and Means. Exemption effective. To printer.
-
Notice of eligibility for exemption.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Steve Yeager · Primary
- Rochelle T. Nguyen · Primary
- Lisa Krasner · Primary
- Philip P.K. OâNeill · Primary
- Cecelia González · Cosponsor
- Melissa R.. Hardy · Cosponsor
- Elaine H. Marzola · Cosponsor
- David Orentlicher · Cosponsor
- Brittney M. Miller · Primary
- Lesley Cohen · Cosponsor
- Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 56 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- Yeager, Steve Democratic
- Nguyen, Rochelle T. Democratic
- Krasner, Lisa Republican
- Philip P.K. OâNeill
- Miller, Brittney M. Democratic
Co-sponsors (6)
- González, Cecelia Democratic
- Hardy, Melissa R.. Republican
- Marzola, Elaine H. Democratic
- Orentlicher, David Democratic
- Cohen, Lesley
- Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod
Not signed on (56)
56 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 56 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 219?
- AB 219 is sponsored by Yeager, Steve (Democratic), Nguyen, Rochelle T. (Democratic), Krasner, Lisa (Republican), Philip P.K. OâNeill, González, Cecelia (Democratic), Hardy, Melissa R.. (Republican), Marzola, Elaine H. (Democratic), Orentlicher, David (Democratic), Miller, Brittney M. (Democratic), Cohen, Lesley, and Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod.
- What is the current status of AB 219?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 09, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 219?
- Track AB 219 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 219
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 219
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →