Nevada 2021 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly Bipartisan · 7 D · 1 R cosponsors

AB 384 — Revises provisions governing sexual misconduct in institutions of the Nevada System of Higher Education. (BDR 34-939)

Last action — (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.3, no further action allowed.)

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1379 added · 1327 removed

1379 line(s) added, 1327 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
A.B.
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 20, 2021) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
384 A SSEMBLY BILL N O.
384 A SSEMBLY B ILL N O.
384–ASSEMBLYWOMEN T ORRES , NGUYEN , D URAN , GORELOW , PETERS;
384–A SSEMBLYMEN TORRES , N GUYEN , D URAN , G ORELOW , P ETERS;
A NDERSON , BROWN -MAY , CONSIDINE AND MARZOLA M ARCH 23, 2021 ____________ Referred to Committee on Education SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing sexual misconduct in institutions of the Nevada System of Higher Education.
ANDERSON , BILBRAY - A XELROD , ROWN -M AY, CONSIDINE, GONZÁLEZ , HARDY , LEAVITT , MARZOLA AND TOLLES M ARCH 23, 2021 ____________ Referred to Committee on Education SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing sexual misconduct in institutions of the Nevada System of Higher Education.
Effect on Local Government:
EEffect on the State:
Yes.:
Effect on the State:
Yes.
authorizing the Board of Regents of the University of Nevada to provide for the development of a climate survey on sexual misconduct and require the institutions within the System to administer the survey to students;
authorizing the Board of Regents of the University of Nevada to provide for the development of a climate survey on sexual misconduct and require the institutions within the System to additional requirements for the grievance process for sexualn of misconduct at an institution within the System;
authorizing the imposition of additional requirements for the grievance process for sexual misconduct at an institution within the System;
authorizing the Board of Regents to require each institution within the System to adopt a policy on sexual misconduct, enter into a memorandum of understanding with certain organizations and local law enforcement agencies and designate an advocate;
authorizing the Board of Regents to require each institution within the System to adopt a policy on sexual misconduct, enter into a memorandum of understanding with certain organizations and designate a victim’s advocate;
authorizing the Board of Regents to require a report from institutions within the System on certain information relating to sexual misconduct;
authorizing a student who has experienced sexual misconduct to request a waiver from certain requirements of scholarships or academic activities;
authorizing the Board of Regents to impose a fine in certain circumstances;
authorizing the Board of Regents to require an annual report from institutions within the System on certain information relating to sexual misconduct;
making certain information relating to incidents of sexual misconduct confidential;
- *AB384* – 2 – LegExisting federal law prohibits discrimination based on sex in programs or activities of education that receive federal funding.
- *AB384_R1* – 2 – LegExisting federal law prohibits discrimination based on sex in programs or activities of education that receive federal funding.
§§ 106Sections 3-11 of this bill define relevant terms.
§§ 106Sections 2.3-11 of this bill define relevant terms.
Section 12 of this bille IX.
Section 12 of this billIX.
authorizes the Board of Regents of the University of Nevada to appoint researchers employed at an institution within the Nevada System of Higher Education to develop a climate survey on sexual misconduct.
authorizes the Board of Regents of the University of Nevada, to the extent that money is available, to appoint researchers employed at an institution within the Nevada System of Higher Education to develop a climate survey on sexual misconduct.
Section 13 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to conduct a climate survey on sexual misconduct and section 14 of this bill sets forth the duties of the Board of Regents regarding the climate survey.
Section 13 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents, to the extent that money is available, to require an institution within the System to conduct a climate survey on sexual misconduct and section 14 of this bill sets forth the duties of the Board of Regents regarding the climate survey.
Section 15 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution to meet certain requirements related to the grievance process of the institution.
Section 15 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution to Section 16 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to adopt a policy on sexual misconduct and sets forth certain requirements related to the adoption of the policy.
within the System to adopt a policy on sexual misconduct and sets forth certainution requirements related to the adoption of the policy.
Section 18 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution to enter into a memorandum of understanding with an organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct and sets forth the provisions that may be included in such a memorandum of understanding.
Section 17.5 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution to enter into a memorandum of understanding with a local law enforcement agency relating to the prevention of and response to alleged incidents of sexual misconduct and sets forth the provisions that must be included in the memSection 18 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution to enter into a memorandum of understanding with an organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct and sets forth the provisions that may be included in such a memorandum of understanding.
Section 19 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution advocate.
Section 19 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to designate an advocate for parties to alleged incidents of sexual misconduct and provide training to the advocate.
Section 20 of this bill sets forth the duties of the victim’s advocate if such an advocate is designated by an institution.
Section 20 of this bill sets forth the duties of the advocate if such an advocate is designated by an institution.
Under existing law, certain communications between a victim and a victim’s advocate are deemed to be confidential.
Under existing law, certain communications between a victim and a victim’s advocate are as a person who works for certain programs that provide assistance to victims ofe certain acts.
(NRS 49.2546) Existing law defines a victim’s advocate as a person who works for certain programs that provide assistance to victims of certain acts.
Section 21 of this bill prohibits an institution within the System from misconduct for violating a policy of student conduct that occurred during or related to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct.
Section 21 of this bill prohibits an institution within the System from sanctioning a complainant or witness for violating a policy of student conduct that occurred during or related to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct.
Section 22 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to provide training on the grievance process of the institution to certain employees.
Section 22 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to provide training on the grievance process of the institution to require an institution within the System to provide programming on the awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct to students and employees of the institution.
Section 23 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to provide programming on the awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct to students and employees of the institution.
Section 24 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to determine the responsibility of a respondent to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct based on a preponderance of the evidence.
Section 24 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to conduct an investigation or hold a hearing regarding an requirements for conducting an investigation and holding a hearing, respectively.the Section 25 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to consider a request from a reporting party who is at least 18 years of age to keep the identity of the reporting party confidential unless state or - *AB384* – 3 – federal law requires disclosure or further action.
- *AB384_R1* – 3 – Section 26 of this bill sets forth the requirements for conducting an investigation.
Section 28 of this bill authorizes an institution to issue a no-contact directive in certain circumstances.
Section 25 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to consider a request from a complainant who is at least 18 years of age to keep the identity of the complainant confidential unless state or federal institution to issue a no-contact directive in certain circumstances.thorizes an Section 29 of this bill authorizes a student who has experienced sexual misconduct to request a waiver from certain requirements of various scholarships or academic activities.
Section 29 of this bill authorizes a student who has experienced sexual academic activities.
Section 30 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to require an institution within the System to submit a report on certain information relating to sexual and submit the compilation to the Director of the Department of Health and Human Services and to the Legislature or Legislative Committee on Education.
within the System to submit an annual report on certain information relating toution sexual misconduct.
Section 31 of this bill authorizes the Board of Regents to impose a fine against an institution within the System that does not comply with the requirements imposed by the Board of Regents pursuant to sections 2 to 32 of this bill.
Section 30 also requires the Board of Regents to compile the reports and submit the compilation to the Director of the Department of Health and Human Services and to the Legislature or Legislative Committee on Education.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 38.5 of this bill makes certain information generated pursuant to a by an institution within the system confidential.
(NRS 239.010)xual misconduct THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
As used in sections 2 to 32 of this act, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in sections 3 to 11, inclusive, of this act have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.
As used in sections 2 to 32 of this act, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in sections 2.3 to 11, inclusive, of this act have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.
2.3.
“Complainant” means a student or employee of an institution within the System who is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute sexual misconduct.
Sec.
Show all 330 changed rows (290 more)
Previous
Latest
2.7.
“Dating violence” has the meaning ascribed to it in 34 U.S.C.
§ 12291(a).
Sec.
“Domestic violence” means the commission of any act described in NRS 33.018.
“Domestic violence” has the meaning ascribed to it in 34 U.S.C.
§ 12291(a).
“Reporting party” means a student or employee of an institution within the System who reports being a victim of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct to the institution.
“Reporting party” means a person who reports an alleged incident of sexual misconduct to the institution.
“Responding party” means a student or employee of an institution within the System who has been accused of committing an alleged incident of sexual misconduct by a reporting party.
“Respondent” means a person who has been reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute sexual misconduct.
“Sexual assault” means a violation of NRS 200.366.
“Sexual assault” has the meaning ascribed to it in 20 U.S.C.
§ 1092(f)(b)(A)(v).
“Sexual harassment” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 176A.280.
“Sexual harassment” means conduct on the basis of sex, whether direct or indirect, implicit or explicit, verbal or - *AB384_R1* – 4 – nonverbal or in person or via virtual or electronic means, that includes one or more of the following:
1.
An employee of an institution within the System conditioning the provision of an aid, benefit or service of the institution or the terms, conditions or privileges of the participation of a person in the education programs or activities of the institution on the person’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct, including, without limitation:
(a) A sexual advance;
(b) A request for sexual favors;
or (c) Other conduct of a sexual nature.
2.
Unwelcome conduct determined by a reasonable person to be sufficiently severe, pervasive and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the education programs or activities of an institution within the System.
3.
Sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence or stalking.
“Sexual misconduct” means sexual violence, domestic violence, gender-based violence or harassment, violence based on sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, sexual assault, sexual harassment or stalking.
“Sexual misconduct” means dating violence, domestic violence, gender-based violence or harassment, violence based on sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, sexual assault, sexual harassment or stalking.
“Stalking” means a violation of NRS 200.575.
“Stalking” has the meaning ascribed to it in 34 C.F.R.
§ 106.30.
- *AB384* – 4 – Sec.
Sec.
Perpetrator methodology;
2.
Conducting an effective investigation;
3.
and 2.
and 4.
The Board of Regents may appoint researchers employed at one or more institutions within the System to develop a climate survey on sexual misconduct designed to be administered at an institution within the System.
To the extent that money is available, the Board of Regents may appoint researchers employed at one or more institutions within the System to develop a climate survey on sexual misconduct designed to be administered at an institution within the System.
(a) Use best practices from peer-reviewed research;
- *AB384_R1* – 5 – (a) Use best practices from peer-reviewed research;
- *AB384* – 5 – (c) Whether an alleged incident of sexual misconduct was perpetrated by a student, faculty member, staff member of an institution within the System, third party vendor or another person;
(c) Whether an alleged incident of sexual misconduct was perpetrated by a student, faculty member, staff member of an institution within the System, third party vendor or another person;
and (3) Informed of the prohibition against retaliation for reporting an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
and - *AB384_R1* – 6 – (3) Informed of the prohibition against retaliation for reporting an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(h) Demographic information that could be used to identify at- risk groups, including, without limitation, the gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, economic status, disability, gender identity or expression, immigration status and sexual orientation of the student to the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
(h) Demographic information that could be used to identify at- risk groups, including, without limitation, the gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, economic status, disability, gender identity or expression, immigration status and sexual orientation of the student taking the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
(k) Whether a student chose to withdraw or take a leave of absence from the institution or transfer to another institution because the student is the reporting party or responding party in an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(k) Whether a student chose to withdraw or take a leave of absence from the institution or transfer to another institution because the student is the complainant or respondent in an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(l) Whether a student withdrew from any classes or was placed on academic probation or otherwise disciplined as a result of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(l) Whether a student withdrew from any classes or was placed on academic probation, disciplinary probation or otherwise disciplined as a result of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(n) Whether a student experienced any negative health impacts as a result of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct or the - *AB384* – 6 – response of an institution within the System to the alleged incident of sexual misconduct, including, without limitation, post- traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, chronic pain or an eating disorder;
(n) Whether a student experienced any negative health impacts as a result of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct or the response of an institution within the System to the alleged incident of sexual misconduct, including, without limitation, post- traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, chronic pain or an eating disorder;
(o) The perception of the respondent of the survey of the attitudes of the community toward sexual misconduct, including, without limitation, the willingness of a person to intervene in an ongoing incident of sexual misconduct as a bystander;
(o) The perception of the participants in the survey of the attitudes of the community toward sexual misconduct, including, without limitation, the willingness of a person to intervene in an ongoing incident of sexual misconduct as a bystander;
The Board of Regents may require each institution within the System to conduct a climate survey on sexual misconduct at the institution biennially.
To the extent that money is available, the Board of Regents may require each institution within the System to conduct a climate survey on sexual misconduct at the institution biennially.
A climate survey on sexual misconduct conducted pursuant to subsection 1 must include the questions developed by researchers employed at an institution within the System pursuant to section 12 of this act.
A climate survey on sexual misconduct conducted pursuant to subsection 1 must include the questions developed by - *AB384_R1* – 7 – researchers employed at an institution within the System pursuant to section 12 of this act.
(a) Provide the survey to each student at the institution, including, without limitation, students studying abroad or on a leave of absence from the institution;
(a) Provide the survey to each student at the institution, including, without limitation, students studying abroad;
(b) Not require the disclosure of personally identifiable information by a respondent to the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
(b) Not require the disclosure of personally identifiable information by a participant in the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
(1) The responses to the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
(1) The summary of the responses to the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
- *AB384* – 7 – (2) The summary of the responses to the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
and (2) A link to the summary of the responses to the climate survey on sexual misconduct on the Internet website maintained by the Board of Regents.
and (3) A link to the summary of the responses to the climate survey on sexual misconduct on the Internet website maintained by the Board of Regents.
A climate survey on sexual misconduct must be administered through the Internet website maintained by an institution within the System and provide reasonable accommodations for students with a disability.
A climate survey on sexual misconduct must be administered electronically by an institution within the System and provide reasonable accommodations for students with a disability.
5.
An institution within the System may obtain a waiver from the Board of Regents to not administer a climate survey on sexual misconduct pursuant to this section due to the financial circumstances of the institution.
6.
An institution within the System may apply for and accept any gifts, grants, donations, bequests or other money from any source to carry out the provisions of this section.
7.
Any data or reports that underline the summaries generated pursuant to subsection 3 are confidential and are not a public record for the purposes of chapter 239 of NRS.
If the Board of Regents requires an institution within the System to conduct a climate survey on sexual misconduct pursuant to section 13 of this act, the Board of Regents shall:
Provide a copy of the questions developed by researchers employed at an institution within the System pursuant to section 12 of this act to each institution within a reasonable time after the Board of Regents receives the questions from the researchers who develop the questions;
If the Board of Regents requires an institution within the System to conduct a climate survey on sexual - *AB384_R1* – 8 – misconduct pursuant to section 13 of this act, the Board of Regents shall, to the extent money is available:
(a) Provide a copy of the questions developed by researchers employed at an institution within the System pursuant to section 12 of this act to each institution within a reasonable time after the Board of Regents receives the questions from the researchers who develop the questions;
(b) Establish a repository for the summaries of the climate survey on sexual misconduct submitted by each institution pursuant to section 13 of this act;
(c) Post each summary of the responses to a climate survey on sexual misconduct submitted by an institution pursuant to section 13 of this act on the Internet website maintained by the Board of Regents in a manner that does not disclose the identity of a student;
(d) Adopt a policy on the dissemination, collection and summation of the responses to the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
and (e) On or before February 1 of each odd-numbered year, report the summaries of the climate survey on sexual misconduct submitted by an institution pursuant to section 13 of this act to the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau for transmittal to the Senate and Assembly Standing Committees on Education.
Establish a repository for the summaries of the climate survey on sexual misconduct submitted by each institution pursuant to section 13 of this act;
Any data or reports that underline the summaries generated pursuant to subsection 1 are confidential and are not a public record for the purposes of chapter 239 of NRS.
3.
Post each summary of the responses to a climate survey on sexual misconduct submitted by an institution pursuant to section 13 of this act on the Internet website maintained by the Board of Regents in a manner that does not disclose the identity of a student;
4.
Adopt a policy on the dissemination, collection and summation of the responses to the climate survey on sexual misconduct;
and 5.
On or before February 1 of each odd-numbered year, report the summaries of the climate survey on sexual misconduct submitted by an institution pursuant to section 13 of this act to the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau for transmittal to the Senate and Assembly Standing Committees on Education.
Provide a reporting party and responding party with a copy of the policies of the institution regarding the submission and - *AB384* – 8 – consideration of evidence that may be considered during the grievance process;
Provide a complainant and respondent with a copy of the policies of the institution regarding the submission and consideration of evidence that may be considered during the grievance process;
Within 7 business days after a final determination of a report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct, inform the reporting party and the responding party of the result of the final determination;
Within 7 business days after a final determination of a report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct, inform the complainant and the respondent of the result of the final determination;
Unless otherwise required by state or federal law, not disclose the identity of a reporting party or responding party.
Unless otherwise required by state or federal law, not disclose the identity of a complainant or respondent.
Sec.
- *AB384_R1* – 9 – Sec.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to adopt a policy on sexual misconduct.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to adopt a policy on sexual misconduct consistent with applicable state and federal law.
(3) A victim’s advocate designated pursuant to section 19 of this act;
(3) An advocate designated pursuant to section 19 of this act;
- *AB384* – 9 – (b) Instructions on how an internal or external entity may provide comment on the initial policy on sexual misconduct or a substantive change to the policy;
(b) Instructions on how an internal or external entity may provide comment on the initial policy on sexual misconduct or a substantive change to the policy;
5.
- *AB384_R1* – 10 – 5.
(a) On a campus of the institution in locations where students regularly congregate, including, without limitation, a dining facility, recreational facility, library, bookstore, student union, student center or common area of campus housing;
(a) Upon request, to a prospective student, current student or employee of the institution;
(b) Upon request, to a prospective student, current student or employee of the institution;
and (b) On the Internet website maintained by the institution.
and (c) On the Internet website maintained by the institution.
As used in this section, “student” includes, without limitation, a former student of the institution who took a leave of absence or withdrew from the institution due to being a reporting party of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct.
As used in this section, “student” includes, without limitation, a former student of the institution who took a leave of absence or withdrew from the institution due to being a complainant of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct.
1.
(a) The procedures by which a student or employee at the institution within the System may report or disclose an alleged incident of sexual misconduct that occurred on or off a campus of the institution;
1.
(b) Obtaining emergency medical assistance after an alleged incident of sexual misconduct, including, without limitation:
The procedures by which a student or employee at the institution within the System may report or disclose an alleged incident of sexual misconduct that occurred on or off a campus of the institution;
(1) The name and location of the nearest medical facility where a student or employee may receive a forensic medical examination;
2.
(2) Options for transportation and reimbursement for travel costs associated with obtaining a forensic medical examination;
Supportive measures, including, without limitation:
(3) The telephone number and Internet website for a national 24-hour hotline and any other state or local resources that provide information on sexual misconduct;
(a) Changing academic, living, campus transportation or work arrangements;
and (4) Any programs that may provide financial assistance to a student for the cost of obtaining emergency medical assistance;
(b) Taking a leave of absence from the institution in response to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
- *AB384* – 10 – (c) The types of counseling and health, safety, academic and other support services available within the local community or through an organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct, including, without limitation, the contact information for any relevant providers of support services;
(c) How to request supportive measures;
(d) The name, contact information and a description of the role of and services provided by:
and (d) The process to have any supportive measures reviewed by the institution;
(1) An advisor who may serve as a confidential resource to a responding party;
3.
(2) A victim’s advocate designated by the institution pursuant to section 19 of this act;
Appropriate local, state and federal law enforcement agencies, including, without limitation, the contact information for a law enforcement agency;
(3) The Title IX coordinator of the institution;
and 4.
(4) An organization that supports persons accused of sexual misconduct;
The grievance process of the institution for investigating and resolving a report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, 20 U.S.C.
(5) An organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct;
and (6) Employees designated as responsible employees;
(e) The rights or obligations of a student or employee to:
(1) Notify or decline to notify a law enforcement agency of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(2) Receive assistance from the appropriate personnel on a campus of the institution in notifying a law enforcement agency of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(3) Obtain an order for protection, restraining order or injunction issued by a court;
or (4) Obtain an agreement between the reporting party and responding party to restrict contact;
(f) Procedures for a student or employee to notify an institution that an order for protection, restraining order or injunction has been issued under state or federal law;
(g) The responsibilities of the institution upon receipt of the notice of an order for protection, restraining order or injunction;
(h) Supportive measures, including, without limitation:
(1) Changing academic, living, campus transportation or work arrangements;
(2) Taking a leave of absence from the institution in response to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(3) How to request supportive measures;
and (4) The process to have any supportive measures reviewed by the institution;
(i) Appropriate local, state and federal law enforcement agencies, including, without limitation, the contact information for a law enforcement agency;
and (j) The grievance process of the institution for investigating and resolving a report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct - *AB384* – 11 – pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, 20 U.S.C.
Sec.
17.5.
1.
To the extent practicable, the Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to enter into a memorandum of understanding with a local law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction in which the main campus of the institution is located to establish the respective roles and responsibilities of the institution and the law enforcement agency relating to the prevention of and response to alleged incidents of sexual misconduct on-campus and off-campus.
Such a memorandum of understanding must, without limitation:
- *AB384_R1* – 11 – (a) Establish the jurisdiction of the local law enforcement agency based on criteria including, without limitation, the location and type of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(b) Provide for a cross-jurisdictional or multi-jurisdictional response or investigation, as appropriate;
(c) In accordance with state and federal law, establish protocols for the release of relevant documentation and information relating to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct to the law enforcement agency during an investigation conducted by the institution or the law enforcement agency in investigations where a student or employee of the institution consents to the release of such documentation or information;
and (d) Include methods for notifying the district attorney of the county where the main campus of the institution is located of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct, as appropriate.
As used in this section:
If an institution within the System enters into a memorandum of understanding pursuant to this section, the institution shall comply with applicable state and federal confidentiality and privacy laws.
(a) “Forensic medical examination” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 217.300.
3.
(b) “Student” includes, without limitation, a former student of the institution who took a leave of absence or withdrew from the institution because the student was a reporting party of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct.
If an institution is located in the jurisdiction of more than one local law enforcement agency, only one memorandum of understanding between the institution and a local law enforcement agency is necessary to comply with this section.
(I) Access to a health care provider who specializes in forensic medical examinations;
- *AB384_R1* – 12 – (I) Access to a health care provider who specializes in forensic medical examinations;
(II) Confidential services to a victim;
and (II) Confidential services to a victim;
and (III) Consultation on a report made by a victim or a case in which a victim is involved;
As used in this section:
The memorandum of understanding may include a fee structure for any services provided by an organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct.
(a) “Forensic medical examination” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 217.300.
3.
- *AB384* – 12 – (b) “Student” includes, without limitation, a former student of the institution who took a leave of absence or withdrew from the institution because the student was a reporting party of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct.
As used in this section, “forensic medical examination” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 217.300.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to designate a victim’s advocate.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to designate an advocate for parties to alleged incidents of sexual misconduct.
If the Board of Regents requires the designation of a victim’s advocate, an institution shall designate existing categories of employees who may serve as a victim’s advocate.
If the Board of Regents requires the designation of an advocate, an institution shall designate existing categories of employees who may serve as an advocate.
(a) Partner with an organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct to designate a victim’s advocate;
(a) Partner with an organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct to designate an advocate;
or (b) If the institution enrolls less than 1,000 students who reside in campus housing, partner with another institution within the System to designate a victim’s advocate.
or (b) If the institution enrolls less than 1,000 students who reside in campus housing, partner with another institution within the System to designate an advocate.
A victim’s advocate designated pursuant to subsection 1:
An advocate designated pursuant to subsection 1:
and (c) Must be designated based on the experience and demonstrated ability of the person to effectively provide victim services related to sexual misconduct.
(c) Must be designated based on the training or experience of the person to effectively provide services related to sexual misconduct;
and (d) Must have completed at least 20 hours of relevant training.
If an institution within the System designates a victim’s advocate pursuant to subsection 1, the institution shall provide training to the victim’s advocate on:
If an institution within the System designates an advocate pursuant to subsection 1, the advocate must be trained on:
An institution within the System that designates a victim’s advocate pursuant to subsection 1 shall ensure the availability of a victim’s advocate to students within a reasonable distance from the institution.
An institution within the System that designates an advocate pursuant to subsection 1 shall provide for the availability - *AB384_R1* – 13 – of an advocate to students within a reasonable distance from the institution or by electronic means if it is not practicable to provide for the availability of an advocate in person.
If a victim’s advocate is designated pursuant to section 19 of this act, the victim’s advocate shall:
If an advocate is designated pursuant to section 19 of this act, the advocate shall:
- *AB384* – 13 – (b) Inform a student or employee of, or provide resources about how to obtain information on:
(b) Inform a student or employee of, or provide resources about how to obtain information on:
(5) Counseling related to student loans including, without limitation, loan deferment, forbearance or other programs for students considering a leave of absence from, withdrawal from or part-time enrollment at the institution;
(5) Counseling related to student loans;
(8) Any limits on the ability of the victim’s advocate to provide privacy or confidentiality to the student or employee;
(8) Any limits on the ability of the advocate to provide privacy or confidentiality to the student or employee;
(h) At no cost to the reporting party, support a reporting party in obtaining supportive measures to ensure the reporting party has continued access to education;
(h) Support a complainant in obtaining supportive measures to ensure the complainant has continued access to education;
(i) Notify all staff of the institution who are involved in providing or enforcing supportive measures of the duties of the staff and ensure staff are trained;
- *AB384_R1* – 14 – (i) Notify all staff of the institution who are involved in providing or enforcing supportive measures of the duties of the staff and ensure staff are trained;
and (j) Inform a student or employee that supportive measures can also be obtained through disability services or the Title IX coordinator, if appropriate.
and (j) Inform a student or employee that supportive measures may be available through disability services or the Title IX coordinator.
- *AB384* – 14 – 2.
2.
If a victim’s advocate is designated pursuant to section 19 of this act, the victim’s advocate may:
If an advocate is designated pursuant to section 19 of this act, the advocate may:
and (b) Attend a disciplinary proceeding of the institution as the advisor or support person of a reporting party.
and (b) Attend a disciplinary proceeding of the institution as the advisor or support person of a complainant or respondent.
Notice to a victim’s advocate of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct or the performance of services by a victim’s advocate pursuant to this section must not be considered actual or constructive notice of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct to the institution within the System which designated the victim’s advocate pursuant to section 19 of this act.
Notice to an advocate of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct or the performance of services by an advocate pursuant to this section must not be considered actual or constructive notice of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct to the institution within the System which designated the advocate pursuant to section 19 of this act.
If a conflict of interest arises between the institution within the System which designated a victim’s advocate and the victim’s advocate in advocating for the provision of supportive measures by the institution to a reporting party, the institution shall not discipline, penalize or otherwise retaliate against the victim’s advocate for advocating for the reporting party.
If a conflict of interest arises between the institution within the System which designated an advocate and the advocate in advocating for the provision of supportive measures by the institution to a complainant or respondent, the institution shall not discipline, penalize or otherwise retaliate against the advocate for advocating for a complainant or respondent.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to not subject a reporting party or a witness who reports an alleged incident of sexual misconduct to a disciplinary proceeding or sanction for a violation of a policy on student conduct related to drug or alcohol use, trespassing or unauthorized entry of school facilities or other violation of a policy of an institution that occurred during or related to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct unless the institution determines that the:
The Board of Regents may prohibit an institution within the System from subjecting a complainant or a witness to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct to a disciplinary proceeding or sanction for a violation of a policy on student conduct related to drug or alcohol use, trespassing or unauthorized entry of school facilities or other violation of a policy of an institution that occurred during or related to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct unless the institution determines that the:
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to review any disciplinary action taken against a reporting party to determine if there is any connection between the alleged incident of sexual misconduct that was reported and the misconduct that led to the reporting party being disciplined.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to review any disciplinary action taken against a complainant or witness to determine if there is any connection between the alleged incident of sexual misconduct that was reported and the misconduct that led to the complainant or witness being disciplined.
Sec.
- *AB384_R1* – 15 – Sec.
- *AB384* – 15 – (a) How to respond to and otherwise address a report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(a) How to respond to and otherwise address a report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct;
(i) Ways to communicate appropriately with a reporting party;
(i) Ways to communicate appropriately with a complainant;
(j) Ways to communicate appropriately with a responding party, including, without limitation, an awareness of the emotional impact of being wrongly accused;
(j) Ways to communicate appropriately with a respondent, including, without limitation, an awareness of the emotional impact of being accused;
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to provide annual programming on awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct to all students and employees of the institution.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to provide programming on awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct to all students and employees of the institution.
If the Board of Regents requires an institution to provide programming on awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct, the programming must include, without limitation:
If the Board of Regents requires an institution to provide programming on awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct, the programming may include, without limitation:
(b) The manner in which drugs and alcohol may affect the ability of a person to consent to a sexual act or sexual conduct with another person;
- *AB384_R1* – 16 – (b) The manner in which drugs and alcohol may affect the ability of a person to consent to a sexual act or sexual conduct with another person;
(c) Information on options for reporting an alleged incident of sexual misconduct, the effects of each option and the method to - *AB384* – 16 – file a report under each option, including, without limitation, a description of the confidentiality and anonymity, as applicable, of a report;
(c) Information on options for reporting an alleged incident of sexual misconduct, the effects of each option and the method to file a report under each option, including, without limitation, a description of the confidentiality and anonymity, as applicable, of a report;
(f) If a victim’s advocate is designated pursuant to section 19 of this act, the name, contact information and role of the victim’s advocate;
(f) If an advocate is designated pursuant to section 19 of this act, the name, contact information and role of the advocate;
If an institution provides programming on awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct pursuant to subsection 1, the institution shall:
If an institution provides programming on awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct pursuant to subsection 1, the institution:
(a) Coordinate with the Title IX coordinator of the institution, a law enforcement agency and, if the institution entered into a memorandum of understanding with an organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct pursuant to section 18 of this act, that organization;
(a) Shall coordinate with the Title IX coordinator of the institution;
and (b) Require students or employees to attend the programming on the awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct.
(b) May coordinate with a law enforcement agency and, if the institution entered into a memorandum of understanding with an organization that assists victims of sexual misconduct pursuant to section 18 of this act, that organization;
and (c) Shall require students or employees to attend the programming on the awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct.
If an institution provides programming on awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct pursuant to subsection 1, the programming must be culturally responsive and address the unique experiences and challenges faced by students based on the race, ethnicity, national origin, economic status, disability, gender identity or expression, immigration status and sexual orientation of a student.
If an institution provides programming on awareness and prevention of sexual misconduct pursuant to subsection 1, the programming may be culturally responsive and address the unique experiences and challenges faced by students based on the race, ethnicity, national origin, economic status, disability, gender identity or expression, immigration status and sexual orientation of a student.
1.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System that receives a report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct that involves a student or employee of the - *AB384_R1* – 17 – institution, to determine the responsibility of a respondent based on a preponderance of the evidence.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System that receives a report or has reason to know of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct that involves a student or employee of the institution, to:
(a) If necessary, conduct an investigation pursuant to section 26 of this act;
(b) If necessary, hold a hearing pursuant to section 27 of this act;
and (c) If the alleged incident of sexual misconduct is determine to have occurred based on a preponderance of the evidence, take - *AB384* – 17 – reasonable steps in response to the incident of sexual misconduct, including, without limitation, addressing a hostile environment, if such an environment has been created, preventing the recurrence of the conduct and addressing the effects of the conduct.
2.
An institution shall be deemed to know, or reasonably should know, about a possible incident of sexual misconduct if a responsible employee identified pursuant to paragraph (d) of subsection 1 of section 17 of this act knew of the possible incident of sexual misconduct or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of, the possible incident of sexual misconduct.
3.
As used in this section, “hostile environment” means an environment where a student or employee experiences harassment that is sufficiently severe, persistent or pervasive enough to limit or deny:
(a) A student the ability to effectively participate in or benefit from the programs and education offered by the institution;
or (b) An employee the ability to effectively or comfortably work at the institution.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to accept a request from a reporting party who is 18 years of age or older to keep the identity of the reporting party confidential or take no investigative or disciplinary action against a responding party.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to accept a request from a complainant who is 18 years of age or older to keep the identity of the complainant confidential or take no investigative or disciplinary action against a respondent.
In determining whether to grant such a request, the institution shall consider whether:
In determining whether to grant such a request, the institution shall consider whether there is a risk that the respondent may commit additional acts of sexual misconduct, violence, discrimination or harassment, based on whether one or more of the following factors are present to a sufficient degree:
(a) There are any previous or existing reports of an incident of sexual misconduct against the responding party;
(a) There are any previous or existing reports of an incident of sexual misconduct, violence, discrimination or harassment against the respondent, including, without limitation, records of complaints against or the arrest of the respondent;
(b) The responding party allegedly used a weapon, physical restraint or otherwise engaged in battery;
(b) The respondent allegedly used a weapon;
(c) The responding party is a faculty or staff member of the institution with oversight of students;
(c) The respondent threatened violence, discrimination or harassment against the complainant or other persons;
(d) There is an imbalance of power between the reporting party and the responding party;
(d) The alleged incident of sexual misconduct was alleged to have been committed by two or more people;
(e) The reporting party believes that the reporting party will be less safe if the identity of the reporting party is disclosed, an investigation is conducted or disciplinary action is taken against the responding party;
(e) The circumstances surrounding the alleged incident of sexual misconduct indicate that the incident was premeditated and, if so, whether the respondent or another person allegedly premeditated the incident;
(f) The responding party can sufficiently respond to the allegations without knowing the identity of the reporting party;
(f) The circumstances surrounding the alleged incident of sexual misconduct indicate a pattern of consistent behavior at a particular location or by a particular group of people;
and (g) The institution is able to conduct a thorough investigation and obtain relevant evidence without the cooperation of the reporting party.
(g) The institution is able to conduct a thorough investigation and obtain relevant evidence without the cooperation of the complainant;
- *AB384* – 18 – 2.
and (h) There are any other factors that indicate the respondent may repeat the behavior alleged by the complainant or that the complainant or other persons may be at risk of harm.
If an institution within the System grants a request for confidentiality or to not take any investigative or disciplinary action pursuant to subsection 1, the institution shall take reasonable steps to, without initiating formal action against the responding party:
2.
(a) Respond to the report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct while maintaining the confidentiality of the reporting party;
If an institution within the System grants a request for confidentiality or to not take any investigative or disciplinary action pursuant to subsection 1, the institution shall take reasonable steps to, without initiating formal action against the respondent:
(a) Respond to the report of an alleged incident of sexual misconduct while maintaining the confidentiality of the complainant;
(c) Prevent the recurrence of any misconduct;
and - *AB384_R1* – 18 – (c) Prevent the recurrence of any misconduct.
and (d) Provide for the safety of the reporting party.
(c) Ensuring a reporting party is informed of and has access to appropriate supportive measures;
or (c) Ensuring a complainant, is informed of and has access to appropriate supportive measures.
or (d) Conducting additional climate surveys on sexual misconduct in accordance with sections 12, 13 and 14 of this act.
If an institution within the System grants a request for confidentiality or to not take any investigative or disciplinary action pursuant to subsection 1, the institution shall inform the reporting party that the ability of the institution to respond to the report of the alleged incident of sexual misconduct will be limited by the request.
If an institution within the System grants a request for confidentiality or to not take any investigative or disciplinary action pursuant to subsection 1, the institution shall inform the complainant that the ability of the institution to respond to the report of the alleged incident of sexual misconduct will be limited by the request.
(a) Inform the reporting party of the determination before disclosing the identity of the reporting party or initiating an investigation;
(a) Inform the complainant of the determination before disclosing the identity of the complainant or initiating an investigation;
(b) Provide for the safety of the reporting party;
(b) Provide supportive measures for the complainant;
and (c) If requested by the reporting party, inform the responding party that the reporting party asked the institution not to take investigative or disciplinary action against the responding party.
and (c) If requested by the complainant, inform the respondent that the complainant asked the institution not to take investigative or disciplinary action against the respondent.
(a) Provide the reporting party and the responding party the opportunity to identify witnesses and other evidence to assist the - *AB384* – 19 – institution in determining whether an alleged incident of sexual misconduct has occurred;
(a) Provide the complainant and the respondent the opportunity to identify witnesses and other evidence to assist the institution in determining whether an alleged incident of sexual misconduct has occurred;
(b) Inform the reporting party and the responding party that any evidence available to the party but not disclosed during the investigation might not be considered at a subsequent hearing;
(b) Inform the complainant and the respondent that any evidence available to the party but not disclosed during the investigation might not be considered at a subsequent hearing;
and (c) Use equitable guidelines for the collection and use of evidence, including, without limitation, providing that:
and (c) Equitably collect and use evidence, including, without limitation, providing that:
(1) Except as otherwise authorized by this section, an investigator may not consider the sexual history of a reporting party or responding party;
(1) Except as otherwise authorized by this section, an investigator may not consider the sexual history of a complainant or respondent;
(2) An investigator may not consider any previous or subsequent sexual history between the reporting party and any party other than the responding party unless the history is directly relevant to prove that any physical injuries alleged to have been inflicted by the responding party were inflicted by another person;
(2) An investigator may not consider any previous or subsequent sexual history between the complainant and any party - *AB384_R1* – 19 – other than the respondent unless the history is directly relevant to prove that any physical injuries alleged to have been inflicted by the respondent were inflicted by another person;
(3) An investigator may not consider the existence of a dating relationship or previous or subsequent consensual sexual conduct between the reporting party and the responding party unless the evidence is relevant to demonstrate how the parties communicated consent in previous or subsequent consensual sexual conduct;
and (3) An investigator may not consider the existence of a dating relationship or previous or subsequent consensual sexual conduct between the complainant and the respondent unless the evidence is relevant to demonstrate how the parties communicated consent in previous or subsequent consensual sexual conduct.
and (4) An investigator shall provide a written and verbal explanation to the reporting party and the responding party as to why consideration of any evidence is consistent with this paragraph before proffering any evidence for consideration in an investigation or hearing.
The fact that a reporting party and responding party engaged in any previous or subsequent consensual sexual relations is not by itself sufficient to establish that the conduct in question was consensual.
The fact that a complainant and a respondent engaged in any previous or subsequent consensual sexual relations is not by itself sufficient to establish that the conduct in question was consensual.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 27 of this act, an investigation conducted in response to an alleged incident of sexual misconduct shall take no more than 60 days.
An institution within the System shall provide periodic updates on the investigation to the complainant and the respondent regarding the timeline of the investigation.
An institution within the System shall provide periodic updates on the investigation to the reporting party and the responding party regarding the timeline of the investigation.
An institution within the System shall notify the complainant and the respondent of the findings of an investigation simultaneously.
5.
If an institution within the System imposes any disciplinary action based on the findings of an investigation on a respondent, such disciplinary action must be imposed in accordance with the grievance process of the institution.
1.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
After conducting an investigation pursuant to section 26 of this act, an institution within the System shall determine whether to hold a hearing.
In determining whether to hold a hearing, the institution may consider whether the reporting party and responding party cooperated in the investigation and whether each party had the opportunity to suggest questions to be asked of the other party or witnesses, or both, during the - *AB384* – 20 – investigation.
The following rules apply to any hearing conducted pursuant to this section:
(a) Except as otherwise determined by the hearing officer, the reporting party or responding party may not introduce evidence, including, without limitation, witness testimony, at the hearing that was not disclosed or available during the investigation conducted pursuant to section 26 of this act.
The hearing officer may accept such evidence for good cause.
(b) Except as otherwise required by federal law, any cross examination of the reporting party, the responding party or any witness may not be conducted directly by the reporting party or responding party, or an advisor to the reporting party or responding party, as applicable.
(c) The reporting party, the responding party or any witness may request to answer questions by videoconference.
(d) The reporting party and the responding party shall have the opportunity to submit written questions to the hearing officer in advance of the hearing.
At the hearing, the reporting party and the responding party shall have the opportunity to note an objection to any question posed by the other party.
The hearing officer may limit objections to written form.
The hearing officer shall note an objection on the record, but is not otherwise required to respond to an objection.
The hearing officer shall discard or rephrase any question the hearing officer deems to be repetitive, irrelevant or harassing.
In making a determination pursuant to this paragraph, the hearing officer may use, but is not bound by, the rules of evidence at common law.
(e) All determinations must be based on a preponderance of the evidence.
2.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an institution within the System that receives a report shall take not more than 60 calendar days to reach a final determination regarding the alleged incident of sexual misconduct.
An institution may take more than 60 calendar days to reach a final determination for good cause, which includes, without limitation, unworked holiday breaks, mutual agreement of the reporting party and the responding party or waiting for evidence that has been requested from a third party.
Good cause does not include, without limitation, worked holiday breaks, distance barriers that can be overcome through videoconferencing, graduation of one of the parties, unnecessary request for delay that the institution reasonably perceives to be delay tactics or police investigations that require more than a temporary delay.
- *AB384* – 21 – 3.
If the institution within the System includes an appeal process in its grievance, the institution shall inform the parties of the appeals process.
4.
An institution within the System shall provide periodic updates on any hearing or appeals process to the reporting party and responding party, including, without limitation, written notice of any delays.
Sec.
An institution within the System may issue a no- contact directive prohibiting the responding party and the reporting party from contacting each other during the pendency of an investigation and hearing.
An institution within the System may issue a no- contact directive prohibiting the complainant and the respondent from contacting each other.
An institution may issue a no- contact directive if the directive is necessary to:
An institution may issue a no-contact directive if the directive is necessary to:
(a) Protect the safety or well-being of either the reporting party or the responding party;
(a) Protect the safety or well-being of either the complainant or the respondent;
A no-contact directive issued after a decision of responsibility against the responding party has been made is unilateral and applies only against the responding party.
A no-contact directive issued after a decision of responsibility against the respondent has been made is unilateral and applies only against the respondent.
If an institution issues a mutual no-contact directive, the institution shall provide the reporting party and the responding party with a written justification for the directive and an explanation of the terms of the directive, including, without limitation, a description of the circumstances, if any, under which a violation of the directive may subject the party to disciplinary action.
If an institution issues a mutual no-contact directive, the institution shall provide the complainant and the respondent with a written justification for the directive and an explanation of the terms of the directive, including, without limitation, that a violation of the directive may subject the party to disciplinary action.
A waiver may be granted by a victim’s advocate designated pursuant to section 19 of this act, the Title IX coordinator of the institution, a law enforcement officer employed by the institution, an academic advisor or staff member of a disability resource center of the institution.
A waiver may be granted by an - *AB384_R1* – 20 – advocate designated pursuant to section 19 of this act, the Title IX coordinator of the institution, a law enforcement officer employed by the institution, an academic advisor or staff member of a disability resource center of the institution.
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to prepare and submit to the Board a report that includes, without limitation:
The Board of Regents may require an institution within the System to prepare and submit to the Board an annual report that includes, without limitation:
(a) The total number of reports of alleged incidents of sexual misconduct made to the institution;
(a) The total number of reports of alleged incidents of sexual misconduct allegedly committed by a student or employee of the institution made to the Title IX office of the institution;
- *AB384* – 22 – (b) The number of investigations initiated by a law enforcement agency in response to reports of alleged incidents of sexual misconduct, if known;
(b) The number of students and employees found responsible for an incident of sexual misconduct by the institution;
(c) The number of students and employees found responsible for an incident of sexual misconduct by the institution;
(c) The number of students and employees accused of but found not responsible for an incident of sexual misconduct by the institution;
(d) The number of students and employees accused of but found not responsible for an incident of sexual misconduct by the institution;
(d) The number of persons sanctioned by the institution as a result of a finding of responsibility for an incident of sexual misconduct;
(e) The number of sanctions or remedies imposed on a responding party by the institution as a result of a finding of responsibility for an incident of sexual misconduct;
and (e) The number of persons who submitted requests for supportive measures and the number of persons who received supportive measures.
(f) The number of requests for supportive measures and the number of requests for supportive measures that were granted;
and (g) The number of reporting parties who took a leave of absence, transferred to another institution or withdrew from the institution.
- *AB384_R1* – 21 – 6.
Any data or reports that underline the report prepared pursuant to subsection 3 are confidential and are not a public record for the purposes of chapter 239 of NRS.
1.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
The Board of Regents may, after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing, determine that an institution within the System failed to comply with a requirement imposed by the Board of Regents pursuant to sections 2 to 32, inclusive, of this act.
If the Board of Regents determines an institution failed to comply with a requirement imposed by the Board, the Board may, for each violation, impose a fine of not more than $150,000 or one percent of the annual operating budget of the institution, whichever is less, against the institution.
- *AB384* – 23 – 2.
The Board of Regents shall use any money collected from the imposition of a fine pursuant to subsection 1 to administer and enforce the provisions of sections 2 to 32, inclusive, of this act.
Sec.
The Board of Regents shall require each student who participates as a member of a varsity athletic team which represents the University of Nevada, Reno, or the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, to make satisfactory progress toward obtaining a degree as a condition of participation as a member of the team.
The Board of Regents shall require each student who participates as a member of a varsity athletic team which represents [the University of Nevada, Reno, or the University of Nevada, Las Vegas,] an institution within the System to make satisfactory progress toward obtaining a degree as a condition of participation as a member of the team.
and (d) [Maintain] Except as otherwise provided in section 29 of this act, maintain at least a 2.00 grade point average in each class and at least a 2.75 overall grade point average, on a 4.0 grading scale.
and (d) [Maintain] Except as otherwise provided in section 29 of this act, maintain at least a 2.00 grade point average in each class - *AB384_R1* – 22 – and at least a 2.75 overall grade point average, on a 4.0 grading scale.
- *AB384* – 24 – 3.
3.
and (3) Applies for the Millennium Scholarship not more than 6 years after he or she was regularly scheduled to graduate from high school;
and - *AB384_R1* – 23 – (3) Applies for the Millennium Scholarship not more than 6 years after he or she was regularly scheduled to graduate from high school;
- *AB384* – 25 – (d) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (e), maintained in high school in the courses designated by the Board of Regents pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection 2, at least:
(d) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (e), maintained in high school in the courses designated by the Board of Regents pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection 2, at least:
(1) The 6-year limitation on applications that is set forth in subparagraph (2) of paragraph (b) of subsection 1 and subparagraph (3) of paragraph (c) of subsection 1 and any limitation applicable to - *AB384* – 26 – students who are eligible pursuant to subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b) of subsection 1.
- *AB384_R1* – 24 – (1) The 6-year limitation on applications that is set forth in subparagraph (2) of paragraph (b) of subsection 1 and subparagraph (3) of paragraph (c) of subsection 1 and any limitation applicable to students who are eligible pursuant to subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b) of subsection 1.
or (c) Substantially participated in an antismoking, antidrug or antialcohol program during high school.
or - *AB384_R1* – 25 – (c) Substantially participated in an antismoking, antidrug or antialcohol program during high school.
- *AB384* – 27 – 6.
6.
(a) To pay for remedial courses.
- *AB384_R1* – 26 – (a) To pay for remedial courses.
- *AB384* – 28 – 3.
3.
The Millennium Scholarship must be administered by the eligible institution as other similar scholarships are administered and may be used only for the expenditures authorized pursuant to - *AB384* – 29 – subsection 6.
The Millennium Scholarship must be administered by - *AB384_R1* – 27 – the eligible institution as other similar scholarships are administered and may be used only for the expenditures authorized pursuant to subsection 6.
(c) [Have] Except as otherwise provided in section 29 of this act, have a college grade point average of not less than 3.5 on a 4.0 grading scale or, if enrolled at an academic institution that does not use a grade point system to measure academic performance, present - *AB384* – 30 – evidence acceptable to the Board that demonstrates a commensurate level of academic achievement;
(c) [Have] Except as otherwise provided in section 29 of this act, have a college grade point average of not less than 3.5 on a 4.0 - *AB384_R1* – 28 – grading scale or, if enrolled at an academic institution that does not use a grade point system to measure academic performance, present evidence acceptable to the Board that demonstrates a commensurate level of academic achievement;
- *AB384_R1* – 29 – Sec.
38.5.
NRS 239.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:
239.010 1.
Except as otherwise provided in this section and NRS 1.4683, 1.4687, 1A.110, 3.2203, 41.071, 49.095, 49.293, 62D.420, 62D.440, 62E.516, 62E.620, 62H.025, 62H.030, 62H.170, 62H.220, 62H.320, 75A.100, 75A.150, 76.160, 78.152, 80.113, 81.850, 82.183, 86.246, 86.54615, 87.515, 87.5413, 87A.200, 87A.580, 87A.640, 88.3355, 88.5927, 88.6067, 88A.345, 88A.7345, 89.045, 89.251, 90.730, 91.160, 116.757, 116A.270, 116B.880, 118B.026, 119.260, 119.265, 119.267, 119.280, 119A.280, 119A.653, 119A.677, 119B.370, 119B.382, 120A.690, 125.130, 125B.140, 126.141, 126.161, 126.163, 126.730, 127.007, 127.057, 127.130, 127.140, 127.2817, 128.090, 130.312, 130.712, 136.050, 159.044, 159A.044, 172.075, 172.245, 176.01249, 176.015, 176.0625, 176.09129, 176.156, 176A.630, 178.39801, 178.4715, 178.5691, 179.495, 179A.070, 179A.165, 179D.160, 200.3771, 200.3772, 200.5095, 200.604, 202.3662, 205.4651, 209.392, 209.3923, 209.3925, 209.419, 209.429, 209.521, 211A.140, 213.010, 213.040, 213.095, 213.131, 217.105, 217.110, 217.464, 217.475, 218A.350, 218E.625, 218F.150, 218G.130, 218G.240, 218G.350, 226.300, 228.270, 228.450, 228.495, 228.570, 231.069, 231.1473, 233.190, 237.300, 239.0105, 239.0113, 239.014, 239B.030, 239B.040, 239B.050, 239C.140, 239C.210, 239C.230, 239C.250, 239C.270, 239C.420, 240.007, 241.020, 241.030, 241.039, 242.105, 244.264, 244.335, 247.540, 247.550, 247.560, 250.087, 250.130, 250.140, 250.150, 268.095, 268.0978, 268.490, 268.910, 269.174, 271A.105, 281.195, 281.805, 281A.350, 281A.680, 281A.685, 281A.750, 281A.755, 281A.780, 284.4068, 286.110, 286.118, 287.0438, 289.025, 289.080, 289.387, 289.830, 293.4855, 293.5002, 293.503, 293.504, 293.558, 293.5757, 293.870, 293.906, 293.908, 293.910, 293B.135, 293D.510, 331.110, 332.061, 332.351, 333.333, 333.335, 338.070, 338.1379, 338.1593, 338.1725, 338.1727, 348.420, 349.597, 349.775, 353.205, 353A.049, 353A.085, 353A.100, 353C.240, 360.240, 360.247, 360.255, 360.755, 361.044, 361.2242, 361.610, 365.138, 366.160, 368A.180, 370.257, 370.327, 372A.080, 378.290, 378.300, 379.0075, 379.008, 379.1495, 385A.830, 385B.100, 387.626, 387.631, 388.1455, 388.259, 388.501, 388.503, 388.513, 388.750, 388A.247, 388A.249, 391.033, 391.035, 391.0365, 391.120, 391.925, 392.029, 392.147, 392.264, 392.271, 392.315, 392.317, 392.325, 392.327, 392.335, 392.850, 393.045, 394.167, 394.16975, 394.1698, 394.447, 394.460, 394.465, 396.3295, 396.405, 396.525, 396.535, 396.9685, 398A.115, 408.3885, 408.3886, 408.3888, 408.5484, 412.153, 414.280, 416.070, 422.2749, 422.305, 422A.342, 422A.350, 425.400, 427A.1236, 427A.872, 432.028, 432.205, 432B.175, 432B.280, 432B.290, 432B.407, 432B.430, 432B.560, 432B.5902, - *AB384_R1* – 30 – 432C.140, 432C.150, 433.534, 433A.360, 437.145, 437.207, 439.4941, 439.840, 439.914, 439B.420, 439B.754, 439B.760, 440.170, 441A.195, 441A.220, 441A.230, 442.330, 442.395, 442.735, 442.774, 445A.665, 445B.570, 445B.7773, 447.345, 449.209, 449.245, 449.4315, 449A.112, 450.140, 450B.188, 453.164, 453.720, 453A.610, 453A.700, 458.055, 458.280, 459.050, 459.3866, 459.555, 459.7056, 459.846, 463.120, 463.15993, 463.240, 463.3403, 463.3407, 463.790, 467.1005, 480.535, 480.545, 480.935, 480.940, 481.063, 481.091, 481.093, 482.170, 482.5536, 483.340, 483.363, 483.575, 483.659, 483.800, 484A.469, 484E.070, 485.316, 501.344, 503.452, 522.040, 534A.031, 561.285, 571.160, 584.655, 587.877, 598.0964, 598.098, 598A.110, 599B.090, 603.070, 603A.210, 604A.303, 604A.710, 612.265, 616B.012, 616B.015, 616B.315, 616B.350, 618.341, 618.425, 622.238, 622.310, 623.131, 623A.137, 624.110, 624.265, 624.327, 625.425, 625A.185, 628.418, 628B.230, 628B.760, 629.047, 629.069, 630.133, 630.2673, 630.30665, 630.336, 630A.555, 631.368, 632.121, 632.125, 632.3415, 632.405, 633.283, 633.301, 633.4715, 633.524, 634.055, 634.214, 634A.185, 635.158, 636.107, 637.085, 637B.288, 638.087, 638.089, 639.2485, 639.570, 640.075, 640A.220, 640B.730, 640C.580, 640C.600, 640C.620, 640C.745, 640C.760, 640D.190, 640E.340, 641.090, 641.221, 641.325, 641A.191, 641A.262, 641A.289, 641B.170, 641B.282, 641B.460, 641C.760, 641C.800, 642.524, 643.189, 644A.870, 645.180, 645.625, 645A.050, 645A.082, 645B.060, 645B.092, 645C.220, 645C.225, 645D.130, 645D.135, 645G.510, 645H.320, 645H.330, 647.0945, 647.0947, 648.033, 648.197, 649.065, 649.067, 652.228, 653.900, 654.110, 656.105, 657A.510, 661.115, 665.130, 665.133, 669.275, 669.285, 669A.310, 671.170, 673.450, 673.480, 675.380, 676A.340, 676A.370, 677.243, 678A.470, 678C.710, 678C.800, 679B.122, 679B.124, 679B.152, 679B.159, 679B.190, 679B.285, 679B.690, 680A.270, 681A.440, 681B.260, 681B.410, 681B.540, 683A.0873, 685A.077, 686A.289, 686B.170, 686C.306, 687A.110, 687A.115, 687C.010, 688C.230, 688C.480, 688C.490, 689A.696, 692A.117, 692C.190, 692C.3507, 692C.3536, 692C.3538, 692C.354, 692C.420, 693A.480, 693A.615, 696B.550, 696C.120, 703.196, 704B.325, 706.1725, 706A.230, 710.159, 711.600, sections 13, 14 and 30 of this act, sections 35, 38 and 41 of chapter 478, Statutes of Nevada 2011 and section 2 of chapter 391, Statutes of Nevada 2013 and unless otherwise declared by law to be confidential, all public books and public records of a governmental entity must be open at all times during office hours to inspection by any person, and may be fully copied or an abstract or memorandum may be prepared from those public books and public records.
Any such copies, abstracts or memoranda may be used to supply the - *AB384_R1* – 31 – general public with copies, abstracts or memoranda of the records or may be used in any other way to the advantage of the governmental entity or of the general public.
This section does not supersede or in any manner affect the federal laws governing copyrights or enlarge, diminish or affect in any other manner the rights of a person in any written book or record which is copyrighted pursuant to federal law.
2.
A governmental entity may not reject a book or record which is copyrighted solely because it is copyrighted.
3.
A governmental entity that has legal custody or control of a public book or record shall not deny a request made pursuant to subsection 1 to inspect or copy or receive a copy of a public book or record on the basis that the requested public book or record contains information that is confidential if the governmental entity can redact, delete, conceal or separate, including, without limitation, electronically, the confidential information from the information included in the public book or record that is not otherwise confidential.
4.
If requested, a governmental entity shall provide a copy of a public record in an electronic format by means of an electronic medium.
Nothing in this subsection requires a governmental entity to provide a copy of a public record in an electronic format or by means of an electronic medium if:
(a) The public record:
(1) Was not created or prepared in an electronic format;
and (2) Is not available in an electronic format;
or (b) Providing the public record in an electronic format or by means of an electronic medium would:
(1) Give access to proprietary software;
or (2) Require the production of information that is confidential and that cannot be redacted, deleted, concealed or separated from information that is not otherwise confidential.
5.
An officer, employee or agent of a governmental entity who has legal custody or control of a public record:
(a) Shall not refuse to provide a copy of that public record in the medium that is requested because the officer, employee or agent has already prepared or would prefer to provide the copy in a different medium.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.030, shall, upon request, prepare the copy of the public record and shall not require the person who has requested the copy to prepare the copy himself or herself.
- *AB384* – 31 – Sec.
- *AB384_R1* – 32 – Sec.
H - *AB384*
H - *AB384_R1*
View plain text versions (2)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.3, no further action allowed.)

  2. In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Education. To committee.

  3. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To Senate.

  4. Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 303.) Dispensed with reprinting. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To printer.

  5. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time.

  6. Notice of eligibility for exemption.

  7. From printer. To committee.

  8. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Education. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 53 not signed on

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (53)

53 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 53 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 384?
AB 384 is sponsored by Torres-Fossett, Selena (Democratic), Nguyen, Rochelle T. (Democratic), Anderson, Natha C. (Democratic), Brown-May, Tracy (Democratic), Considine, Venicia (Democratic), González, Cecelia (Democratic), Hardy, Melissa R.. (Republican), Glen Leavitt, Marzola, Elaine H. (Democratic), Jill Tolles, Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod, Peters, Sarah, Gorelow, Michelle, and Duran, Bea.
What is the current status of AB 384?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 384?
Track AB 384 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 384

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 384

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →