Revises provisions concerning the judicial review of decisions of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 59 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 59.
You're tracking SB 59
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 59 — Revises provisions concerning the judicial review of decisions of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada. (BDR 58-331)
Last action — Chapter 154.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 18, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
87 added · 102 removedPlain-language change summary
The key change in Senate Bill 59 is the prohibition against filing additional memoranda after the Commission and respondents have submitted their reply. This is important because it streamlines the judicial review process for decisions made by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada, making it more efficient by reducing potentially lengthy back-and-forth exchanges of documents. This change helps ensure that the process remains focused and avoids delays, protecting the interests of all parties involved.
(ReprintedSenate withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on April 16, 2021) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
5959–Committee Son ENATEGrowth Band ILLNInfrastructure O.CHAPTER..........
59–COMMITTEE ON GROWTH AND INFRASTRUCTURE (ON B EHALF OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF N EVADA ) PREFILED N OVEMBER 18, 2020 ____________ Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure SUMMARY—Revises provisions concerning the judicial review of decisions of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada.
(BDR 58-331) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Under the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act, any party who is identified in appliesan andadministrative whoproceeding isas aggrieved by a finalparty decisionof inrecord aby contestedan caseagency isto entitledwhich tothe Act judicial review of the decision.
(NRS 233B.130) The provisions of the NevadaNevadatled to Administrative Procedure Act do not apply to the judicial review of decisions of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada.
Under existing law, after a petitioner memorandum of points and authorities, the Commission and any other respondents a are required to serve and file a reply memorandum of points and authorities within 30 days.
-EXPLANATION *SB59_R1* – 2Matter –in THEbolded PEOPLEitalics OFis THEnew; STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
4.- 81st Session (2021) – 2 – party of record desiring to participate in the judicial review must file a statement of intent to participate in the petition for judicial review and serve the statement upon the Commission and every party within 15 days after service of the petition for judicial review.
The Commission shall participate in the judicial review.
Any party of record desiring to participate in the judicial review must file a statement of intent to participate in the petition for judicial review and serve the statement upon the Commission and every party within 15 days after service of the petition for judicial review.
The record may be shortened by stipulation of the parties to the pro6.edAproceedings. petitioner who is seeking judicial review must serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities within 30 days after the Commission gives written notice to the parties that the record of the proceeding under review has been filed with the court.
6.
A petitioner who is seeking judicial review must serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities within 30 days after the Commission gives written notice to the parties that the record of the proceeding under review has been filed with the court.
The Commission and any other respondents shall serve and file a reply memorandum of points and authorities within 30 days after service of the memorandum of points and authorities .
[,[,ys whereupon the action is at issue and the] Upon service and filing of the reply memorandum by the Commission and any other respondents:
- *SB59_R1* – 3 – 8.
The final decision of the Commission shall be deemed reasonable and lawful until reversed or set aside in whole or in part by the court.
The burden of proof is on the petitioner to show thatthatrt the final decision is invalid pursuant to subsection 11.
any10. civil action of a different nature pending in the court.e over 11.
All actions brought under this section have precedence over any civil action of a different nature pending in the court.
11.
(a)- 81st Session (2021) – 3 – (b) In violationexcess of constitutionalthe or statutory provisions;authority of the Commission;
(b) In excess of the statutory authority of the Commission;
H~~~~~ 21 - *SB59_R1*81st Session (2021)
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Chapter 154.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 32, Nays: 8, Excused: 1, Not voting: 1.) To Senate.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 16, Nays: 5.) To Assembly.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 228.) To printer.
-
Read first time. To committee.
-
From printer.
-
Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Growth and Infrastructure. To printer.
Sponsors
- Senate Committee on Growth and Infrastructure · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee on Growth and Infrastructure
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 59?
- SB 59 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Growth and Infrastructure.
- What is the current status of SB 59?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 18, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 59?
- Track SB 59 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 59
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 59
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →