Revises provisions relating to the population total used in determining the distribution of certain taxes. ...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 74 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 74.
You're tracking SB 74
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 74 — Revises provisions relating to the population total used in determining the distribution of certain taxes. (BDR 32-281)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 17.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 18, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
377 added · 411 removed377 line(s) added, 411 removed.
S.B.Senate Bill No.
7474–Committee SENATEon BILLRevenue NOand .Economic Development CHAPTER..........
74–COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (ON B EHALF OF THE D EPARTMENT OF TAXATION ) PREFILED N OVEMBER 18, 2020 ____________ Referred to Committee on Revenue and Economic Development SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to the population total used in determining the distribution of certain taxes.
(BDR 32-281) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
clarifying that the population totals certified by the Governor annually are used in determining the allocation and deposit of proceeds of the basic city-countycity- county relief tax;
Existing law requires the Department of Taxation to annually determine the population of each town, township, city and county and submit its determination to the Governor, who is required to certify the respective population totals on or before March 1 of each year.
The Department is required to use the populationorpopulation totals certified by the Governor for any tax that is collected for apportionment in whole or in part to any political subdivision where the basis of the apportionment is the population of the political subdivision.
(NRS 360.283, 360.285) Section 1 of this bill eliminates, for certain taxes, the requirement to use the population totals of the Bureau of the Census of the United States Department of Commerce in the casecaseotals of Existing law also requires the Department to determine the proportion of thea basicconflict city-countywith relief taxes collected each month from out-of-state businesses for each county, less the amount transferred to the State General Fund for the cost of collecting the tax, which the population oftotals each county bears to the total population of all the countiesGovernor. that impose the city-county relief tax.
(NRSExisting 377.055)law Sectionalso 2requires -the *SB74*Department –to 2determine –the proportion of thisthe billbasic clarifiescity-county thatrelief thetaxes populationcollected totalseach usedmonth from out-of-state businesses for each county, less the amount transferred to makethe theseState determinationsGeneral areFund for the cost of collecting the tax, which the population totalsof certifiedeach bycounty bears to the Governortotal annually.population of all the counties that impose the city-county relief tax.
Existing(NRS law377.055) requiresSection the2 calculation of the distributionpopulation oftotals thecertified supplemental amount distributed in the preceding fiscal year multiplied by one plus the lesserGovernor of:annually.
make these determinations are Existing law requires the calculation of the distribution of the supplemental city-county relief tax to certain counties in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount distributed in the preceding fiscal year multiplied by one plus the lesser of:
- 81st Session (2021) – 2 – EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
If, after making the allocation to each enterprise district for the month, the Executive Director determines there is not sufficient money available in the county’s subaccount in the Account totofficient allocate to each local government and special district the base monthly allocation determined pursuant to subsection 2, he or she shall prorate the money in the county’s subaccount and allocate to each local government and special district an amount equal to its proportionate percentage of the total amount of the base monthly allocations determined pursuant to subsection 2 for all local governments and special districts within the county.
Except as otherwise provided in subsections 6 and 7, for a county whose population is 100,000 or more, if the Executive Director determines that there is money remaining in the county’s - *SB74* – 3 – subaccount in the Account after the base monthly allocation determined pursuant to subsection 2 has been allocated to each local government, special district and enterprise district, he or she shall immediately determine and allocate each:
(I) The average percentage of change in the population of the local government over the 5 fiscal years immediately preceding the year in which the allocation is made, as certified by the Governor- pursuant81st toSession NRS(2021) 360.285,– except3 as– otherwise provided in subsection 8;
and to NRS 360.285, except as otherwise provided in (II) The greater of zero or the average percentage of change in the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the local government, including assessed valuation attributable to a redevelopment agency but excluding the portion attributable to the net proceeds of minerals, over the year in which the allocation is made, as projected by the Department, and the 4 fiscal years immediately preceding the year in which the allocation is made;
and (2) Using the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) to calculate and allocate to each local government an amount equal to the proportion that the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) bears to the total amount of the figures calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) of this paragraph and subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b), respectively, for the local governments and special districts located in the same county multiplied by the total amount available in the subaccount, except that if the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) is less than zero, that figure must be treated as being zero for purposes of determining the allocation be pursuant to this subparagraph;
and (2) Using the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) to calculate and allocate to each special district an amount equal to the proportion that the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) bears to the total amount of the figures calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) of this paragraph and subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a), respectively, for the local governments and special - *SB74* – 4 – districts located in the same county multiplied by the total amount available in the subaccount.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 7, for a county whose population is less than 100,000, if the Executive Director determines that there is money remaining in the county’s subaccount in the Account after the base monthly allocation determined pursuant- to81st subsectionSession 2(2021) has– been4 allocated– to each local government, special district and enterprise district, the Executive Director shall immediately determine and allocate each:
and (II) Average percentage of change in the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the local government, including assessed valuation attributable to a redevelopment agency but excluding the portion attributable to the net proceeds of minerals, over the year in which the allocation is made, as projected by the Department, and the 4 fiscal years immediately preceding the year in whichwhic(2) Using the allocationfigure iscalculated made;pursuant to subparagraph (1) to calculate and allocate to each local government an amount equal to the proportion that the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) bears to the total amount of the figures calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) of this paragraph and subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b), respectively, for the local governments and special districts located in the same county multiplied by the total amount available in the subaccount;
and (2) Using the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) to calculate and allocate to each local government an amount equal to the proportion that the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) bears to the total amount of the figures calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) of this paragraph and subparagraph (1) of paragraph (b), respectively, for the local governments and special districts located in the same county multiplied by the total amount available in the subaccount;
(1) Multiplying one-twelfth of the amount allocated pursuant to NRS 360.680 by 1 plus the average change in the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the special district, including assessed valuation attributable to a redevelopment agency but excluding the portion attributable to the net proceeds of minerals, over the year in which the allocation is made, as projected by the Department, and the 4 fiscal years immediately preceding the year in which the allocation is made;
andandmmediately preceding the year (2) Using the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) to calculate and allocate to each special district an amount equal to - *SB74* – 5 – the proportion that the figure calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) bears to the total amount of the figures calculated pursuant to subparagraph (1) of this paragraph and subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a), respectively, for the local governments and special districts located in the same county multiplied by the total amount available in the subaccount.
- The81st StateSession Treasurer(2021) shall– remit5 the– amount allocated to each local government or special district pursuant to this subsection.subsection.ach local 6.
6.
The Executive Director shall not allocate any amount to a local government or special district pursuant to subsection 4, 5 or 6 unless the amount distributed and allocated to each of the local or 6 governments and special districts in the county in each preceding month of the fiscal year in which the allocation is to be made was at least equal to the base monthly allocation determined pursuant to subsection 2.
(a) Determine the amount by which the base monthly allocations determined pursuant to subsection 2 for each local government and special district in the county for the preceding months of the fiscal year in which the allocation is to be made exceeds the amounts actually received by the local governments and special districts in the county for the same period;
andrnments and special districts in (b) Compare the amount determined pursuant to paragraph (a) to the amount of money remaining in the county’s subaccount in the Account to determine which amount is greater.
- *SB74* – 6 – If the Executive Director determines that the amount determined pursuant to paragraph (a) is greater, he or she shall allocate the money remaining in the county’s subaccount in the Account pursuant to the provisions of subsection 3.
If the Executive Director determines that the amount of money remaining in the county’s subaccount- in81st theSession Account(2021) is– greater,6 he– or she shall first allocate the money necessary for each local government and special district totoate the receive the base monthly allocation determined pursuant to subsection 2 and the State Treasurer shall remit that money so allocated.
(b) If] , if a new method of determining population is established pursuant to NRS 360.283, be adjusted in a manner that will result in the percentage change being based on population determined pursuant to the new method for both the fiscal year in which the allocation is made and the fiscal year immediately preceding the year in which the allocation is made.
(1) Equal to or less than the population total initially issued by the Bureau of the Census, the State Treasurer shall transfer the total amount in the separate interest-bearing account, including interest but excluding any administrative fees, to the LocalLocalding Government Tax Distribution Account for allocation among the local governments in the county pursuant to subsection 4, 5 or 6, as appropriate.
(2) Greater than the population total initially issued by the Bureau of the Census, the Executive Director shall calculate the - *SB74* – 7 – amount that would have been allocated to the local government pursuant to subsection 4, 5 or 6, as appropriate, if the population total finally determined pursuant to the appeal had been used and the State- Treasurer81st shallSession remit(2021) to– the7 local– government an amount equal to the difference between the amount actually distributed and thetheal amount calculated pursuant to this subparagraph or the total amount in the separate interest-bearing account, including interest but excluding any administrative fees, whichever is less.] 9.
Show all 52 changed lines (12 more)
and (b) Provide to each local government, special district and enterprise district an estimate of the amount that local government, special district or enterprise district would receive based upon the estimate made pursuant to paragraph (a) and calculated pursuant to the provisions of this section.
That proportion of the total amount of taxes which derive from that portion of the tax levied at the rate of one-half of 1 percent collected pursuant to this chapter during the preceding month fromfromercent out-of-state businesses not maintaining a fixed place of business within this State, less the corresponding amount transferred to the State General Fund pursuant to subsection 3 of NRS 377.050, which the population of that county , as certified by the Governor pursuant to NRS 360.285, bears to the total population of all counties , as certified by the Governor pursuant to NRS 360.285, which have in effect a city-county relief tax ordinance, - *SB74*81st Session (2021) – 8 – and, except as otherwise required to carry out NRS 360.850 and 360.855, deposit the money in the Local Government TaxTax60.850 and Distribution Account created by NRS 360.660 for credit to the respective subaccounts of each county.
(1) The percentage change in the total receipts from the supplemental city-county relief tax for all counties and from out-of- state businesses, from the fiscal year 2 years preceding thethem out-of- immediately preceding fiscal year to the fiscal year preceding the immediately preceding fiscal year;
[If the Bureau of the Census of the United States Department of Commerce issues population totals that conflict with the totals certified by the Governor pursuant to NRS 360.285, the percentage change calculated pursuant to subparagraph (2) for the ensuing fiscal year must be an estimate of the change in population for the calendarof year,the basedCensus.]based upon the population totals issued by the Bureau of the Census.] (b) All other counties, the amount remaining after making the distributions required by paragraph (a) to each of these counties in the proportion that the amount of supplemental city-county relief tax collected in the county for the month bears to the total amount of supplemental city-county relief tax collected for that month in the counties whose distribution will be determined pursuant to this paragraph.
2.- 81st Session (2021) – 9 – collected in a county listed in paragraph (a) of subsection 1 for the most recent months for which information concerning the actual amount collected is available on February 15 of any year exceeds by more than 10 percent the amount distributed pursuant to paragraph (a) to that county for the same period, the State Controller shall distribute that county’s portion of the proceeds from the supplemental city-county relief tax pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection 1 in all subsequent fiscal years, unless a waiver is granted pursuant to subsection 3.
If the amount of supplemental city-county relief tax collected in a county listed in paragraph (a) of subsection 1 for the 12 most recent months for which information concerning the actual - *SB74* – 9 – amount collected is available on February 15 of any year exceeds by more than 10 percent the amount distributed pursuant to paragraph (a) to that county for the same period, the State Controller shall distribute that county’s portion of the proceeds from the supplemental city-county relief tax pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection 1 in all subsequent fiscal years, unless a waiver is granted pursuant to subsection 3.
The request must be filed on or before February 20 next preceding the fiscal year for which the county will first receive its portion of the proceeds from the supplemental city- county relief tax pursuant to paragraph (b) of subsection 1 and must be accompanied by evidence which supports the granting of thethend must waiver.
A county which is granted a waiver pursuant to this subsection is not required to obtain a waiver in any subsequent fiscal year to continue to receive its portion of the proceeds from the supplemental city-county relief tax pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection 1 unless the amount of supplemental city-county relief tax collected in the county in a fiscal year again exceeds the thresholdthr4. established in subsection 2.
4.
Douglas......................................................................$580,993 Esmeralda......................................................................53,093 Lander..........................................................................155,106- Lincoln...........................................................................72,97381st LyonSession ............................................................................356,858(2021) Mineral........................................................................118,299– Nye..............................................................................296,60910 -– *SB74*Lander........................................................................$155,106 –Lincoln...........................................................................72,973 10Lyon –............................................................................356,858 Pershing.......................................................................$96,731Mineral........................................................................118,299 Pershing.........................................................................96,7319 Storey.............................................................................69,914 White Pine...................................................................158,863 5 [6.
(c) “Special district” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRSSec.NRS 360.650.] Sec.
H~~~~~ 21 - *SB74*81st Session (2021)
Show all 52 changed rows (12 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 17.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 35, Nays: 7.) To Senate.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Revenue. To committee.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
Read first time. To committee.
-
From printer.
-
Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Revenue and Economic Development. To printer.
Sponsors
- Senate Committee on Revenue and Economic Development · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee on Revenue and Economic Development
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 74?
- SB 74 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Revenue and Economic Development.
- What is the current status of SB 74?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 18, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 74?
- Track SB 74 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 74
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 74
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →