SB 2 — Revises provisions relating to peace officers. (BDR 23-11)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 6.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced August 01, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
AN ACT relating to peace officers; eliminating the prohibition on the use of a peace officer's compelled statement in a civil case; revising provisions regarding when a law enforcement agency may initiate an investigation into the alleged misconduct of a peace officer; revising provisions relating to the reassignment of a peace officer who is under investigation; authorizing a peace officer or representative to inspect certain evidence and submit a response after the conclusion of an investigation; revising provisions requiring the dismissal of civil and administrative proceedings against a peace officer under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
222 added · 239 removed222 line(s) added, 239 removed.
S.B.Senate Bill No.
22–Committee Sof ENATEthe BILLWhole NCHAPTER.......... O.
2–COMMITTEE OF THE W HOLE A UGUST 1, 2020 ____________ Referred to Committee of the Whole SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to peace officers.
(BDR 23-11) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law provides certain rights to peace officers which are commonly knownmakes asvarious changes relating to those rights.RS 289.020-289.120) This bill Section 1 of this bill eliminates the “Peaceprohibition Officeron Billthe use of Rights.”a (NRSpeace 289.020-289.120)officer’s Thiscompelled billstatement makesin variousa changescivil relatingcase toagainst thosethe rights.peace officer without his or her consent.
Section 1 of this bill eliminates the prohibition on the use of a peace officer’s consent.d statement in a civil case against the peace officer without his or her Existing law authorizes a law enforcement agency to conduct an investigation of a peace officer in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has engaged in activities which could result in punitive action.
Unless the alleged misconductenforcement wouldagency beis aprohibited crimefrom punishableconducting pursuantsuch toan stateinvestigation orif federalthew law, a law activities of the peace officer occurred more than 1 year before the date of the filing of the complaint or allegation.
(1) provides that an investigation must be commenced by the law enforcement within a - *SB2* – 2 – reasonable period of time after the date of the filing of the complaint or allegation with the law enforcement agency;
Section 2 also eliminates the prohibitionthe on a law enforcement agency reopeningdiscovers annew investigationmaterial unlessevidence. prohibition on reassigning a peace officer during an investigation without the peace officer’s consent.
Section 2 further eliminates the prohibition on reassigning a peace officer during an investigation without the peace officer’s consent.
If the law enforcement agency recommends punitive action be imposed and the peace officer appeals the - 32nd Special Session (2020) – 2 – recommendation, the peace officer or any representative may review and copy the entUnder existing law, if an arbitrator or court determines that evidence was obtained during an investigation of a peace officer which was in violation of the rights of peace officers, the arbitrator or court, as applicable, is required to dismiss with prejudice the administrative proceeding or civil action.
(NRS 289.085) Sectionevidence 4if ofthe thisevidence billmay requires,be instead,prejudicial to the arbitratorpeace orofficer; court to:
(1)and exclude(2) suchdismiss evidencetheh administrative proceeding or civil action, with prejudice, if thesuch evidence maywas beobtained prejudicialby toa thelaw peaceenforcement officer;agency in bad faith.
andEXPLANATION (2)– dismissMatter the obtained by a law enforcement agency in badbolded faith.ejudice,italics ifis suchnew; evidence was THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Sectionmatter 1.between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:D IN Section 1.
- *SB2* – 3 – 4.
In a civil case, the court may review the statement in camera to determine whether the statement is inconsistent with the testimony of the peace officer and release any inconsistent statement to the opposing party for purposes of impeachment.] Sec.- 32nd Special Session (2020) – 3 – 289.057 1.S 289Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an investigation of a peace officer may be conducted in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has engaged in activities which could result in punitive action.
2.
NRS 289.057 is hereby amended to read as follows:
289.057 1.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an investigation of a peace officer may be conducted in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has engaged in activities which could result in punitive action.
Except as otherwise provided in a collective bargaining agreement, a law enforcement agency shall not suspend a peace officer without pay during or pursuant to an investigation conducted pursuant to this section until all investigations relating to the matter have concluded.
- *SB2* – 4 – (b) If, pursuant to a policy of a law enforcement agency or a labor agreement, the record of the investigation or the imposition of punitive action is subject to being removed from any administrative file relating to the peace officer maintained by the law enforcement agency, the law enforcement agency shall not, except as otherwiseotherwiseent required by federal or state law, keep or make a record of the investigation or the imposition of punitive action after the record is required to be removed from the administrative file.
- 32nd Special Session (2020) – 4 – 4.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, a law enforcement agency shall not reassign a peace officer temporarily or permanently without his or her consent during or pursuant to an investigation conducted pursuant to this section or when there is a hearinghea5.] relating4. to such an investigation that is pending.
5.] 4.
The presence of the second representative must not create an undue delay in either the scheduling or conducting of the interview.
- *SB2* – 5 – 4.
- 32nd Special Session (2020) – 5 – 5.
Any information that a representative obtains from the peace officer who is a witness concerning the investigation is confidential and7.ustAny information that a representative obtains from the peace officer who is the subject of the investigation is confidential and must not be disclosed.disclosed except upon the:
7.
Any information that a representative obtains from the peace officer who is the subject of the investigation is confidential and must not be disclosed except upon the:
After the conclusion of the investigation, if a law enforcement agency intends to recommend that punitive action be imposed against the peace officer who was the subject of the investigation [or any representative of the peace officer may, if] , the law enforcement agency must notify the peace officer of such fact and give the peace officer or any representative of the peace officer a reasonable opportunity to inspect any evidence in the possessionThe of the law enforcement agency andmust submitconsider aany response.such responseonse.
Show all 45 changed lines (5 more)
The law enforcement agency must consider any such response before making a recommendation to impose punitive action against the peace officer.
If the law enforcement agency recommends punitive action be imposed against the peace officer and the peace officer appeals [a] the recommendation to impose - *SB2* – 6 – punitive action, the peace officer or any representative of the peace officer may review and copy the entire file concerning the internal investigation, including, without limitation, any evidence, recordings, notes, transcripts of interviews and documents contained in the file.
289.085 If an arbitrator or court determines that evidence was obtained during an investigation of a peace officer concerning conduct that could result in punitive action in a manner which violates any provision of NRS 289.010 to 289.120, inclusive, and - 32nd Special Session (2020) – 6 – that such evidence may be prejudicial to the peace officer, such withencprejudicemithe]leexcludeeevidence asuchratevidenceurtduringis [danyissinadmissible and the arbitrator or court shall [dismiss with prejudice the] exclude such evidence during any administrative proceeding commenced or civil action filed against such evidence was obtained by a law enforcement agency in badnes that faith, the peacearbitrator officer.or court must dismiss the administrative proceeding or civil action with prejudice.
If the arbitrator or court further determines that such evidence was obtained by a law enforcement agency in bad faith, the arbitrator or court must dismiss the administrative proceeding or civil action with prejudice.
H~~~~~ 20 - *SB2*32nd Special Session (2020)
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 6.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
From committee: Do pass. Declared an emergency measure under the Constitution. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 25, Nays: 17.) To Senate. In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 13, Nays: 8.) To Assembly. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee of the Whole. To committee.
-
Read second time.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee of the Whole. To printer. From printer. To committee. From committee: Do pass.
Sponsors
- Senate Committee of the Whole · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee of the Whole
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2 do?
- AN ACT relating to peace officers; eliminating the prohibition on the use of a peace officer's compelled statement in a civil case; revising provisions regarding when a law enforcement agency may initiate an investigation into the alleged misconduct of a peace officer; revising provisions relating to the reassignment of a peace officer who is under investigation; authorizing a peace officer or representative to inspect certain evidence and submit a response after the conclusion of an investigation; revising provisions requiring the dismissal of civil and administrative proceedings against a peace officer under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
- Who sponsors SB 2?
- SB 2 is sponsored by Senate Committee of the Whole.
- What is the current status of SB 2?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced August 01, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 2?
- Track SB 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →