Nevada 32nd (2020) Special Session Status: Enacted

SB 2 — Revises provisions relating to peace officers. (BDR 23-11)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 6.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced August 01, 2020. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 50% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

AN ACT relating to peace officers; eliminating the prohibition on the use of a peace officer's compelled statement in a civil case; revising provisions regarding when a law enforcement agency may initiate an investigation into the alleged misconduct of a peace officer; revising provisions relating to the reassignment of a peace officer who is under investigation; authorizing a peace officer or representative to inspect certain evidence and submit a response after the conclusion of an investigation; revising provisions requiring the dismissal of civil and administrative proceedings against a peace officer under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

222 added · 239 removed

222 line(s) added, 239 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
S.B.
Senate Bill No.
2 S ENATE BILL N O.
2–Committee of the Whole CHAPTER..........
2–COMMITTEE OF THE W HOLE A UGUST 1, 2020 ____________ Referred to Committee of the Whole SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to peace officers.
(BDR 23-11) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law provides certain rights to peace officers which are commonly known as the “Peace Officer Bill of Rights.” (NRS 289.020-289.120) This bill makes various changes relating to those rights.
Existing law provides certain rights to peace officers which are commonly makes various changes relating to those rights.RS 289.020-289.120) This bill Section 1 of this bill eliminates the prohibition on the use of a peace officer’s compelled statement in a civil case against the peace officer without his or her consent.
Section 1 of this bill eliminates the prohibition on the use of a peace officer’s consent.d statement in a civil case against the peace officer without his or her Existing law authorizes a law enforcement agency to conduct an investigation of a peace officer in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has engaged in activities which could result in punitive action.
Existing law authorizes a law enforcement agency to conduct an investigation of a peace officer in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has engaged in activities which could result in punitive action.
Unless the alleged misconduct would be a crime punishable pursuant to state or federal law, a law activities of the peace officer occurred more than 1 year before the date of the filing of the complaint or allegation.
Unless the alleged enforcement agency is prohibited from conducting such an investigation if thew activities of the peace officer occurred more than 1 year before the date of the filing of the complaint or allegation.
(1) provides that an investigation must be commenced by the law enforcement within a - *SB2* – 2 – reasonable period of time after the date of the filing of the complaint or allegation with the law enforcement agency;
(1) provides that an investigation must be commenced by the law enforcement within a reasonable period of time after the date of the filing of the complaint or allegation with the law enforcement agency;
Section 2 also eliminates the prohibition on a law enforcement agency reopening an investigation unless prohibition on reassigning a peace officer during an investigation without the peace officer’s consent.
Section 2 also eliminates the the agency discovers new material evidence.
Section 2 further eliminates the prohibition on reassigning a peace officer during an investigation without the peace officer’s consent.
If the law enforcement agency recommends punitive action be imposed and the peace officer appeals the recommendation, the peace officer or any representative may review and copy the entUnder existing law, if an arbitrator or court determines that evidence was obtained during an investigation of a peace officer which was in violation of the rights of peace officers, the arbitrator or court, as applicable, is required to dismiss with prejudice the administrative proceeding or civil action.
If the law enforcement agency recommends punitive action be imposed and the peace officer appeals the - 32nd Special Session (2020) – 2 – recommendation, the peace officer or any representative may review and copy the entUnder existing law, if an arbitrator or court determines that evidence was obtained during an investigation of a peace officer which was in violation of the rights of peace officers, the arbitrator or court, as applicable, is required to dismiss with prejudice the administrative proceeding or civil action.
(NRS 289.085) Section 4 of this bill requires, instead, the arbitrator or court to:
(NRS 289.085) evidence if the evidence may be prejudicial to the peace officer;
(1) exclude such evidence if the evidence may be prejudicial to the peace officer;
and (2) dismiss theh administrative proceeding or civil action, with prejudice, if such evidence was obtained by a law enforcement agency in bad faith.
and (2) dismiss the obtained by a law enforcement agency in bad faith.ejudice, if such evidence was THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
Section 1.
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:D IN Section 1.
- *SB2* – 3 – 4.
4.
In a civil case, the court may review the statement in camera to determine whether the statement is inconsistent with the testimony of the peace officer and release any inconsistent statement to the opposing party for purposes of impeachment.] Sec.
In a civil case, the court may review the statement in camera to determine whether the statement is inconsistent with the testimony of the peace officer and release any inconsistent statement to the opposing party for purposes of impeachment.] - 32nd Special Session (2020) – 3 – 289.057 1.S 289Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an investigation of a peace officer may be conducted in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has engaged in activities which could result in punitive action.
2.
NRS 289.057 is hereby amended to read as follows:
289.057 1.
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, an investigation of a peace officer may be conducted in response to a complaint or allegation that the peace officer has engaged in activities which could result in punitive action.
Except as otherwise provided in a collective bargaining agreement, a law enforcement agency shall not suspend a peace officer without pay during or pursuant to an investigation conducted pursuant to this section until all investigations relating to the matter have concluded.
Except as otherwise provided in a collective bargaining agreement, a law enforcement agency shall not suspend a peace pursuant to this section until all investigations relating to the matter have concluded.
- *SB2* – 4 – (b) If, pursuant to a policy of a law enforcement agency or a labor agreement, the record of the investigation or the imposition of punitive action is subject to being removed from any administrative file relating to the peace officer maintained by the law enforcement agency, the law enforcement agency shall not, except as otherwise required by federal or state law, keep or make a record of the investigation or the imposition of punitive action after the record is required to be removed from the administrative file.
(b) If, pursuant to a policy of a law enforcement agency or a labor agreement, the record of the investigation or the imposition of punitive action is subject to being removed from any administrative agency, the law enforcement agency shall not, except as otherwiseent required by federal or state law, keep or make a record of the investigation or the imposition of punitive action after the record is required to be removed from the administrative file.
4.
- 32nd Special Session (2020) – 4 – 4.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, a law enforcement agency shall not reassign a peace officer temporarily or permanently without his or her consent during or pursuant to an investigation conducted pursuant to this section or when there is a hearing relating to such an investigation that is pending.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, a law enforcement agency shall not reassign a peace officer temporarily or permanently without his or her consent during or pursuant to an investigation conducted pursuant to this section or when there is a hea5.] 4.
5.] 4.
The presence of the second representative must not create an undue delay in either the scheduling or conducting of the interview.
The delay in either the scheduling or conducting of the interview.
- *SB2* – 5 – 4.
4.
5.
- 32nd Special Session (2020) – 5 – 5.
Any information that a representative obtains from the peace officer who is a witness concerning the investigation is confidential and must not be disclosed.
Any information that a representative obtains from the peace officer who is a witness concerning the investigation is confidential and7.ustAny information that a representative obtains from the peace officer who is the subject of the investigation is confidential and must not be disclosed except upon the:
7.
Any information that a representative obtains from the peace officer who is the subject of the investigation is confidential and must not be disclosed except upon the:
After the conclusion of the investigation, if a law enforcement agency intends to recommend that punitive action be imposed against the peace officer who was the subject of the investigation [or any representative of the peace officer may, if] , the law enforcement agency must notify the peace officer of such fact and give the peace officer or any representative of the peace officer a reasonable opportunity to inspect any evidence in the possession of the law enforcement agency and submit a response.
After the conclusion of the investigation, if a law enforcement agency intends to recommend that punitive action be imposed against the peace officer who was the subject of the investigation [or any representative of the peace officer may, if] , the law enforcement agency must notify the peace officer of such fact and give the peace officer or any representative of the peace officer a reasonable opportunity to inspect any evidence in the The law enforcement agency must consider any such responseonse.
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
Previous
Latest
The law enforcement agency must consider any such response before making a recommendation to impose punitive action against the peace officer.
before making a recommendation to impose punitive action against the peace officer.
If the law enforcement agency recommends punitive action be imposed against the peace officer and the peace officer appeals [a] the recommendation to impose - *SB2* – 6 – punitive action, the peace officer or any representative of the peace officer may review and copy the entire file concerning the internal investigation, including, without limitation, any evidence, recordings, notes, transcripts of interviews and documents contained in the file.
If the law enforcement agency recommends punitive action be imposed against the peace officer and the peace officer appeals [a] the recommendation to impose punitive action, the peace officer or any representative of the peace officer may review and copy the entire file concerning the internal investigation, including, without limitation, any evidence, recordings, notes, transcripts of interviews and documents contained in the file.
289.085 If an arbitrator or court determines that evidence was obtained during an investigation of a peace officer concerning conduct that could result in punitive action in a manner which violates any provision of NRS 289.010 to 289.120, inclusive, and that such evidence may be prejudicial to the peace officer, such withencprejudicemithe]leexcludee asuchratevidenceurtduring [danyiss administrative proceeding commenced or civil action filed against the peace officer.
289.085 If an arbitrator or court determines that evidence was obtained during an investigation of a peace officer concerning conduct that could result in punitive action in a manner which violates any provision of NRS 289.010 to 289.120, inclusive, and - 32nd Special Session (2020) – 6 – that such evidence may be prejudicial to the peace officer, such evidence is inadmissible and the arbitrator or court shall [dismiss with prejudice the] exclude such evidence during any administrative proceeding commenced or civil action filed against such evidence was obtained by a law enforcement agency in badnes that faith, the arbitrator or court must dismiss the administrative proceeding or civil action with prejudice.
If the arbitrator or court further determines that such evidence was obtained by a law enforcement agency in bad faith, the arbitrator or court must dismiss the administrative proceeding or civil action with prejudice.
H - *SB2*
~~~~~ 20 - 32nd Special Session (2020)
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 6.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. From committee: Do pass. Declared an emergency measure under the Constitution. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 25, Nays: 17.) To Senate. In Senate. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 13, Nays: 8.) To Assembly. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee of the Whole. To committee.

  5. Read second time.

  6. Read first time. Referred to Committee of the Whole. To printer. From printer. To committee. From committee: Do pass.

Sponsors

  • Senate Committee of the Whole · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Senate Committee of the Whole

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 2 do?
AN ACT relating to peace officers; eliminating the prohibition on the use of a peace officer's compelled statement in a civil case; revising provisions regarding when a law enforcement agency may initiate an investigation into the alleged misconduct of a peace officer; revising provisions relating to the reassignment of a peace officer who is under investigation; authorizing a peace officer or representative to inspect certain evidence and submit a response after the conclusion of an investigation; revising provisions requiring the dismissal of civil and administrative proceedings against a peace officer under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Who sponsors SB 2?
SB 2 is sponsored by Senate Committee of the Whole.
What is the current status of SB 2?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced August 01, 2020. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 2?
Track SB 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 2

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →