Revises provisions relating to specialty courts. (BDR 14-842)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 222 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 222.
You're tracking AB 222
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 222 — Revises provisions relating to specialty courts. (BDR 14-842)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 388.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
AN ACT relating to specialty courts; revising provisions relating to the eligibility of certain defendants for participation in certain programs in specialty courts; authorizing certain courts to enter a judgment of conviction against a defendant before placing the defendant on probation and requiring the defendant to participate in certain programs in specialty courts; authorizing certain courts to set aside a judgment of conviction of a defendant upon completion of certain programs in specialty courts under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
287 added · 307 removed287 line(s) added, 307 removed.
(ReprintedAssembly withBill amendmentsNo. adopted on May 24, 2019) THIRD REPRINT A.B.
222222–Committee ASSEMBLYon BILLJudiciary NOCHAPTER.......... .
222–COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY F EBRUARY 21, 2019 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to specialty courts.
(BDR 14-842) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
(NRS 176A.260) The Nevada Supreme Court has held that subsection 2 of NRS 176A.290, which provides that the court may not assign a defendant who is a veteran or member of the military to a program without the prosecuting attorney stipulating to (Statethe v.assignment, violates the separation of powers clause in the Nevada Constitution.
Hearn,language 134providing Nev.for such a stipulation by the prosecuting attorney is severable from the statute, thereby rendering all defendants who committed a violent offense or who have previously been convicted of a violent felony ineligible for assignment to the program.
Adv.
Op.
96 (2018)) The Court further held that thetution.
language providing for such a stipulation by the prosecuting attorney is severable *AB222_R3* – 2 – from the statute, thereby rendering all defendants who committed a violent offense or who have previously been convicted of a violent felony ineligible for assignment to the program.
(1) remove the language in the statute found unconstitutional by the Nevada Supreme Court that requires the stipulation by the prosecuting attorney before the court may assign to the program a defendant who committed a violent offense or who has previouslyhas beencommitted convicteda ofcategory A felony or a violentsexual felony;offense punishable as a category Bwho felony is ineligible for assignment to the program.
andSection (2)1 provideof thatthis abill, defendantwhich who has committed a category A felony or a sexual offense punishable as a category B pertains to a program of treatment for defendants with mental illness or intellectual disabilities, makes similar changes.
Existing law authorizes a district court, justice court or municipal court, as applicable, to, without entering a judgment of conviction, suspend further proceedings and place a defendant on probation and require the defendant to complete a program for defendants who are veterans or members of the military under certain circumstances.
Upon the defendant’s fulfillment of the terms and conditions of the program, existing law requires the district court, justice court or - 80th Session (2019) – 2 – municipal court, as applicable, to discharge the defendant and dismiss the proceedings.
(1) retains existing law as applicable to justiceenter courtsa judgment of conviction against the defendant for certain felony or grossurt misdemeanor offenses before placing the defendant on probation and municipalrequiring courts;the defendant to complete the program for defendants who are veterans or members of the military.
and (2) authorizes a district court to enter a judgment of conviction against the defendant for certain felony or gross defendant to complete the program for defendants who are veterans or members ofe the military.
(1) has previously been convicted of a felony under certain circumstances;the defendant has been previously convicted of a felony or has previously failed toIf complete a specialty court program, section 3 authorizes the district court to discharge and dismiss the proceedings against or set aside the judgment of conviction of the defendant.
or (2) has previously failed to complete a specialty court program.
If the defendant has been previously convicted of a felony or has previously failed to complete a specialty court program, section 3 authorizes the district court to discharge and dismiss the proceedings against or set aside the judgment of conviction of the defendant.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, if a defendant who suffers from mental illness or is intellectually disabled tenders a plea of guilty, guilty but mentally ill or nolo contendere to, or is found guilty or guilty but mentally ill of, any *AB222_R3* – 3 – offense for which the suspension of sentence or the granting of probation is not prohibited by statute, the court may [, without] :
If the offense committed by the defendant [involved the use or threatened use of force or violence or if the defendant was - 80th Session (2019) – 3 – previously convicted in this State or in any other jurisdiction of a felony that involved the use or threatened use of force or violence, the court may not assign the defendant to the program unless the prosecuting attorney stipulates to the assignment.] is a category A felony or a sexual offense as defined in NRS 179D.097 that is punishable as a category B felony, the defendant is not eligible for assignment to the program.
(a) The court may enter a judgment of conviction , if applicable, anddefendant proceedwas ascharged.d provided in the section pursuant to which the (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e) of subsection 2 of NRS 193.130, the court may order the defendant wasto charged.the custody of the Department of Corrections if the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e) of subsection 2 of NRS 193.130, the court may order the defendant to the custody of the Department of Corrections if the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison.
or (2)program.) Has previously failed to complete a specialty court program.5.
*AB222_R3* – 4 – 5.
The defendant may not be held thereafter under any law to be guilty of perjury or otherwise giving a false statement by reason of failure to recite or acknowledge that arrest, - 80th Session (2019) – 4 – indictment, information or trial in response to an inquiry made of the defendant for any purpose.
[the defendant:] (a) [Has previously been assigned to such a program;] The offense committed by the defendant was a category A felony or a sexual offense as defined in NRS 179D.097 that is punishable as a categorycat(b) B[Was] felony;The defendant was discharged or released from the Armed Forces of the United States, a reserve component thereof or the National Guard under dishonorable conditions.
or (b) [Was] The defendant was discharged or released from the Armed Forces of the United States, a reserve component thereof or the National Guard under dishonorable conditions.
(1) Without entering a judgment of conviction and with the consent of the defendant, suspend further proceedings and place the defendant on probation upon terms and conditions that must include attendance and successful completion of a program establishedestablishedclude pursuant to NRS 176A.280 [.] ;
or (2) Enter a judgment of conviction and place the defendant on probation upon terms and conditions that must include *AB222_R3* – 5 – attendance and successful completion of a program established pursuant to NRS 176A.280;
- 80th Session (2019) – 5 – 2.
For the purposes of this subsection, in determining whether an offense involved the use or threatened use of force or violence, the district court, justice court or municipalcircumstancesrt, court,surroundingle, asthelloffense,r applicable,tincluding,nd shall consider the facts and circumstances surrounding the offense, including, without limitation, whether the defendant intended to place another person in reasonable apprehension of bodily harm.
Show all 51 changed lines (11 more)
(b) The district court, justice court or municipal court, as applicable, may enter a judgment of conviction , if applicable, and proceed as provided in the section pursuant to which the defendant waswas(c) charged.Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e) of subsection 2 of NRS 193.130, the district court may order the defendant to the custody of the Department of Corrections if the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e) of subsection 2 of NRS 193.130, the district court may order the defendant to the custody of the Department of Corrections if the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison.
*AB222_R3* – 6 – (a) The district court [, justice court or municipal court, as applicable, shall] :
or - 80th Session (2019) – 6 – (II) Has previously failed to complete a specialty court program;
or (b) The justice court or municipal court, as applicable, shall discharge the defendant and dismiss the proceedings.proceedings.icable, shall 4.
4.
If a court conditionally dismisses the charges, the court shall notify the defendant that the conditionally dismissed charges are a conviction for the purpose of additional penalties imposed for second ororiction subsequent convictions or the setting of bail in a future case, but are not a conviction for purposes of employment, civil rights or any statute or regulation or license or questionnaire or for any other public or private purpose.
The defendant may not be held thereafter under any law to be guilty of *AB222_R3* – 7 – perjury or otherwise giving a false statement by reason of failure to recite or acknowledge that arrest, complaint, indictment, information or trial in response to an inquiry made of the defendant for any purpose.
- 80th Session (2019) – 7 – Sec.
If the defendant is charged with a violation of NRS 200.485, 484C.110 or 484C.120 and the charges are conditionally dismissed as provided in [subsection 5 of] NRS 176A.290, not sooner than 7 years after such a conditional dismissal and upon the filing of a petition by the defendant, the justice court, municipal court or district court, as applicable, shall order that all documents, papers and exhibits in the defendant’s record, minute book entries and entries on dockets, and other documents relating to the case in the custody of such other agencies and officers as are named in the court’s order be sealed.
*AB222_R3*~~~~~ 19 - 80th Session (2019)
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Reprint 3 View text pdf
- Reprint 2 View text pdf
- Reprint 1 View text pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Amendments
3 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 388.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
Senate Amendment Nos. 804 and 913 concurred in. To enrollment.
-
In Assembly.
-
From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Third reprint. To Assembly.
-
From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 913.) Reprinting dispensed with. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To printer.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 804.) To printer.
-
In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 40, Nays: None, Excused: 2.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 19.) To printer.
-
Taken from Second Reading File. Placed on Second Reading File for next legislative day.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Assembly Committee on Judiciary · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Assembly Committee on Judiciary
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (66)
66 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 66 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 222 do?
- AN ACT relating to specialty courts; revising provisions relating to the eligibility of certain defendants for participation in certain programs in specialty courts; authorizing certain courts to enter a judgment of conviction against a defendant before placing the defendant on probation and requiring the defendant to participate in certain programs in specialty courts; authorizing certain courts to set aside a judgment of conviction of a defendant upon completion of certain programs in specialty courts under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
- Who sponsors AB 222?
- AB 222 is sponsored by Assembly Committee on Judiciary.
- What is the current status of AB 222?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 21, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 222?
- Track AB 222 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 222
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 222
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →