Nevada 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 97 — Prohibits use in a criminal case of certain defenses based on the sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim. (BDR 15-559)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 44.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 24, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 50% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

AN ACT relating to crimes; prohibiting the use in a criminal case of certain defenses based on the sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

84 added · 94 removed

84 line(s) added, 94 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 15, 2019) FIRST REPRINT S.B.
Senate Bill No.
97 S ENATE B ILLN O.
97–Committee on Judiciary CHAPTER..........
97–COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY (ON BEHALF OF THE N EVADA YOUTH L EGISLATURE ) PREFILED JANUARY 24, 2019 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Prohibits use in a criminal case of certain defenses based on the sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim.
(BDR 15-559) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
LegExisting law provides that if a person commits certain crimes because of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of a victim:
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
(1) the person who committed the crime is subject to an additional penalty;
Existing law provides that if a person commits certain crimes because of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of a victim:
(2) unless a greater penalty is provided by law, the person who committed the crime is guilty of a gross misdemeanor;
unless a greater penalty is provided by law, the person who committed the crime is guilty of a gross misdemeanor;
(NRS 41.690, 193.1675, to establish a program for reporting crimes that is designed to collect, compile and analyze statistical data about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression.
(NRS 41.690, 193.1675, 207.185) Existing law also requires the Director of the Department of Public Safety to establish a program for reporting crimes that is designed to collect, compile and analyze statistical data about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on sexuThis bill provides that:
(NRS 179A.175) This bill provides that:
(1) for the purpose of determining the existence of an alleged state of passion in a defendant or the alleged provocation of a defendant by a victim, the alleged state of passion or provocation shall be deemed not to be objectively reasonable if it resulted from the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosure of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity another person based on the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosureinst of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim.
(1) for the purpose of determining the existence of an alleged state of passion in a defendant or the alleged provocation of a defendant by a victim, the alleged state of passion or provocation shall be deemed not to be objectively reasonable if it resulted from the discovery of, knowledge about or or expression of the victim;
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
and (2) a person is not justified in using force against another person based on the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosure of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim.
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
- *SB97_R1* – 2 – W HEREAS , The American Bar Association has urged legislative action to curtail the availability and effectiveness of the “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses, which seek to partially or completely excuse a defendant from full accountability for the commission of a violent crime on the grounds that the sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim is sufficient to arouse a state of passion in the defendant or serve as valid provocation or justification for the violent reaction of the defendant;
W HEREAS , The American Bar Association has urged legislative action to curtail the availability and effectiveness of the “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses, which seek to partially or completely excuse a defendant from full accountability for the commission of a violent crime on the grounds that the sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim is sufficient to arouse a state of passion in the defendant or serve as valid provocation or justification for the violent reaction of the defendant;
and W HEREAS , “Gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses characterize sexual orientation or gender identity or expression as objectively reasonable excuses for loss of self-control and thereby illegitimately mitigate the responsibility of a defendant for harm done to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons;
and W HEREAS , “Gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses characterize sexual orientation or gender identity or expression as objectively reasonable excuses for loss of self-control and thereby illegitimately - 80th Session (2019) – 2 – mitigate the responsibility of a defendant for harm done to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons;
and entirely incompatible with the express intent of Nevada law toes is provide increased protection to victims of bias-motivated crimes, transgender persons;
and W HEREAS , The use of “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses is entirely incompatible with the express intent of Nevada law to provide increased protection to victims of bias-motivated crimes, including crimes committed against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons;
anded against lesbian, gay, bisexual and W HEREAS , Continued use of these anachronistic defenses reinforces and institutionalizes prejudice at the expense of norms of self-control, tolerance and compassion, which the law should encourage, and marks an egregious lapse in the march toward a more just criminal justice system;
and W HEREAS , Continued use of these anachronistic defenses reinforces and institutionalizes prejudice at the expense of norms of self-control, tolerance and compassion, which the law should encourage, and marks an egregious lapse in the march toward a more just criminal justice system;
and W HEREAS , To end the antiquated notion that the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons are worth less than the lives of other persons and to reflect a modern understanding of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons as equal to other persons under the law, the use of “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses must end;
and W HEREAS , To end the antiquated notion that the lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons are worth less than the lives gay, bisexual and transgender persons as equal to other personsan, under the law, the use of “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses must end;
now, therefore, - *SB97_R1* – 3 – THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
now, therefore, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
4 Section 1.
Section 1.
For the purpose of determining the existence of an alleged state of passion in a defendant or the alleged provocation of a defendant by a victim, the alleged state of passion or provocation shall be deemed not to be objectively reasonable if it resulted from the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosure of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim, including, without limitation, under circumstances in which the victim made an unwanted nonforcible romantic or sexual advance towards the defendant, or if the relationship.
For the purpose of determining the existence of an alleged state of passion in a defendant or the alleged provocation of a defendant by a victim, the alleged state of passion or provocation shall be deemed not to be objectively reasonable if it resulted from the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosure of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim, including, without limitation, under circumstances in which the victim made an unwanted nonforcible romantic or sexual advance towards the defendant, or if the defendant and victim dated or had a romantic or sexual relationship.
victim dated or had a romantic or sexual 2.
2.
A person is not justified in using force against another person based on the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosure of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim, including, without limitation, under circumstances in which the victim made an unwanted nonforcible romantic or sexual advance towards the defendant, or if the defendant and victim dated or had a romantic or sexual relationship.
A person is not justified in using force against another person based on the discovery of, knowledge about or potential disclosure of the actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim, including, without limitation, - 80th Session (2019) – 3 – under circumstances in which the victim made an unwanted nonforcible romantic or sexual advance towards the defendant, or if the defendant and victim dated or had a romantic or sexual relationship.
H - *SB97_R1*
~~~~~ 19 - 80th Session (2019)
View plain text versions (3)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 44.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. In Senate. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. Preamble adopted. (Yeas: 36, Nays: 3, Excused: 2, Vacant: 1.) To Senate.

  5. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  6. Read second time.

  7. From committee: Do pass.

  8. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  9. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. Preamble adopted, as amended. (Yeas: 19, Nays: 2.) To Assembly.

  10. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 129.) To printer.

  11. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

  12. Read first time. To committee.

  13. From printer.

  14. Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

  • Senate Committee on Judiciary · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Senate Committee on Judiciary

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 97 do?
AN ACT relating to crimes; prohibiting the use in a criminal case of certain defenses based on the sexual orientation or gender identity or expression of the victim; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Who sponsors SB 97?
SB 97 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Judiciary.
What is the current status of SB 97?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 24, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 97?
Track SB 97 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 97

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 97

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →