Nevada 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 132 — Revises provisions governing employment practices. (BDR 53-29)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 421.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 54% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

AN ACT relating to employment; prohibiting the denial of employment because of the presence of marijuana in a screening test taken by a prospective employee with certain exceptions; authorizing an employee to rebut the results of a screening test under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

53 added · 66 removed

53 line(s) added, 66 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 21, 2019) THIRD REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
132 A SSEMBLY B ILLN O.
132–Assemblymen Neal, McCurdy and Flores CHAPTER..........
132–A SSEMBLYMEN N EAL, M CC URDY AND F LORES FEBRUARY 13, 2019 ____________ Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor SUMMARY—Revises provisions governing employment practices.
(BDR 53-29) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
Increases or Newly Provides for Term of Imprisonment in County or City Jail or Detention Facility.
Effect on the State:
Yes.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law establishes various unlawful employment practices.
of NRS)ting law establishes various unlawful employment practices.
(Chapter 613 of NRS) denying employment to a prospective employee because the prospective employeem has submitted to a drug screening test and the test indicates the presence of marijuana.
(Chapter 613 Section 2 of this bill prohibits, with certain exceptions, an employer from denying employment to a prospective employee because the prospective employee has submitted to a drug screening test and the test indicates the presence of marijuana.
Section 2 further provides that if an employer requires an employee to submit to a screening test within his or her first 30 days of employment, the employer is required to accept and give appropriate consideration to the results of expense.ional screening test to which the employee submitted at his or her own THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 2 further provides that if an employer requires an employee to employer is required to accept and give appropriate consideration to the results of an additional screening test to which the employee submitted at his or her own expense.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
(Deleted by amendment.) - *AB132_R3* – 2 – Sec.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
3.
- 80th Session (2019) – 2 – 3.
If an employer requires an employee to submit to a screening test within the first 30 days of employment, the employee shall have the right to submit to an additional screening test, at his or her own expense, to rebut the results of the initial screening test.
If an employer requires an employee to submit to a screening test within the first 30 days of employment, the employee shall have the right to submit to an additional screening test, at his or her own expense, to rebut the results of the initial screening to the results of such a screening test.
The employer shall accept and give appropriate consideration to the results of such a screening test.
appropriate consideration 4.
4.
Sec.
Secs.
3.
3 and 3.5.
3.5.
(Deleted by amendment.) Sec.
H - *AB132_R3*
~~~~~ 19 - 80th Session (2019)
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (5)

Amendments

3 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 421.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. Senate Amendment No. 740 and 858 concurred in. To enrollment.

  4. In Assembly.

  5. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 12, Nays: 8, Not voting: 1.) To Assembly.

  6. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  7. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Third reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  8. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Second reprint. Read third time. Amended. (Amend. No. 858.) To printer.

  9. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 740.) To printer.

  10. In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To committee.

  11. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 33, Nays: 8, Excused: 1.) To Senate.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 616.) To printer.

  13. From printer. To committee.

  14. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To printer.

Sponsors

  • Assemblywoman Dina Neal · Primary
  • Assemblyman Edgar Flores · Primary
  • William McCurdy II · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 64 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (64)

64 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 64 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 132 do?
AN ACT relating to employment; prohibiting the denial of employment because of the presence of marijuana in a screening test taken by a prospective employee with certain exceptions; authorizing an employee to rebut the results of a screening test under certain circumstances; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Who sponsors AB 132?
AB 132 is sponsored by Assemblywoman Dina Neal, Assemblyman Edgar Flores, and William McCurdy II.
What is the current status of AB 132?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 132?
Track AB 132 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 132

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 132

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →