Nevada 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 480 — Revises provisions relating to courts. (BDR 1-978)

Last action — Chapter 603.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 25, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 56% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

AN ACT relating to courts; revising provisions relating to the transaction of business by justice and municipal courts; revising provisions governing the jurisdiction of certain justice courts; revising provisions relating to the number of justices of the peace in each township; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

291 added · 317 removed

291 line(s) added, 317 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on June 3, 2019) THIRD REPRINT S.B.
Senate Bill No.
480 S ENATE B ILLN O.
480–Senators Goicoechea and Settelmeyer Joint Sponsor:
480–SENATORS GOICOECHEA AND SETTELMEYER M ARCH 25, 2019 ____________ JOINT SPONSOR :
Assemblyman Ellison CHAPTER..........
ASSEMBLYMAN ELLISON ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to courts.
(BDR 1-978) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Legislative Counsel’s Digest:
LegiExisting law provides that no court, except a justice court or a municipal court, may be opened or transact business on a Sunday or any day declared to be a legal holiday, except for certain purposes.
Existing law provides that no court, except a justice court or a municipal court, holiday, except for certain purposes.
If the schedule requires an additional justice of the peace due to an increased the peace in the township submit to the Legislature and the board of county justices of commissioners an opinion stating that the caseload of the court does not warrant an additional judge, the number of justices of the peace in that township is prohibited from being increased while the Legislature considers the opinion.
population of the township, existing law provides that if a majority of the justices of the peace in the township submit to the Legislature and the board of county commissioners an opinion stating that the caseload of the court does not warrant an additional judge, the number of justices of the peace in that township is prohibited from being increased while the Legislature considers the opinion.
(NRS 4.020) Section 2 of this bill revises this process by requiring the justices of the peace to consult with the board of county commissioners in reaching an opinion as to wheExisting law establishes the jurisdiction of justice courts.
(NRS 4.020) Section 2 of this bill revises this process by requiring the justices of the peace to consult with the board of county commissioners in reaching an opinion as to whether the caseload of the court warrants an additional judge.
(NRS 4.370) Section 3 of this bill extends the jurisdiction of justice courts, under certain circumstances, - *SB480_R3* – 2 – to include any action for the issuance of an ex parte or extended order for protection against high-risk behavior.
of this bill extends the jurisdiction of justice courts, under certain circumstances, to include any action for the issuance of an ex parte or extended order for protection against high-risk behavior.
291 of this session requires a court to issue an preponderance of the evidence that:
291 of this session requires a court to issue an ex parte order pursuant to a verified application if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that:
(1) a person poses an imminent risk of causing personal injury to himself or herself or another person by possessing or having under his or her custody or control or by purchasing or otherwise acquiring any firearm;
(1) a person poses an imminent risk of causing personal injury to himself or herself or another person by possessing or having under his or her custody or control or by purchasing or otherwise acquiring any options have been exhausted or are not effective.
(2) the person has engaged in high-risk behavior;
Section 4 of this bill makes aive technical correction.
and (3) less restrictive options have been exhausted or are not effective.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
Section 4 of this bill makes a technical correction.
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
- 80th Session (2019) – 2 – THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:D IN Section 1.
Section 1.
(e) For the issue of a writ of attachment, which may be issued on each and all of the days above enumerated upon the plaintiff, or some person on behalf of the plaintiff, setting forth in the affidavit required by law for obtaining the writ the additional averment as follows:
(e) For the issue of a writ of attachment, which may be issued on each and all of the days above enumerated upon the plaintiff, or required by law for obtaining the writ the additional averment asdavit follows:
All proceedings instituted, and all writs issued, and all official acts done on any of the days above specified, under and by virtue of this section, shall have all the validity, force and effect of proceedings - *SB480_R3* – 3 – commenced on other days, whether a lien be obtained or a levy made under and by virtue of the writ.
All proceedings instituted, and all writs issued, and all official acts done on any of the days above specified, under and by virtue of this section, shall have all the validity, force and effect of proceedings commenced on other days, whether a lien be obtained or a levy made under and by virtue of the writ.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, the number of justices of the peace in a township must be increased according to the population of the township, as certified by the Governor in even- numbered years pursuant to NRS 360.285, in accordance with and not to exceed the following schedule:
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, the number of justices - 80th Session (2019) – 3 – population of the township, as certified by the Governor in even- numbered years pursuant to NRS 360.285, in accordance with and not to exceed the following schedule:
(b) In a county whose population is 100,000 or more and less than 700,000, one justice of the peace for each 50,000 population of the township, or fraction thereof.
(b) In a county whose population is 100,000 or more and less the township, or fraction thereof.eace for each 50,000 population of (c) In a county whose population is less than 100,000, one justice of the peace for each [34,000] 50,000 population of the township, or fraction thereof.
(c) In a county whose population is less than 100,000, one justice of the peace for each [34,000] 50,000 population of the township, or fraction thereof.
If the schedule set forth in subsection 1 provides for an increase in the number of justices of the peace in a township and [, in the opinion of] a majority of the justices of the peace in that township, in consultation with the board of county commissioners, determine that the caseload does not warrant an additional justice of the peace, the justices of the peace shall notify the Director of the - *SB480_R3* – 4 – Legislative Counsel Bureau and the board of county commissioners of their opinion on or before March 15 of the even-numbered year in which the population of the township provides for such an increase.
If the schedule set forth in subsection 1 provides for an increase in the number of justices of the peace in a township and [, in the opinion of] a majority of the justices of the peace in that determine that the caseload does not warrant an additional justice of the peace, the justices of the peace shall notify the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau and the board of county commissioners of their opinion on or before March 15 of the even-numbered year in which the population of the township provides for such an increase.
If the justices of the peace transmit such a notice to the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau and the board of county commissioners, the number of justices must not be increased during that period unless the Legislature, by resolution, expressly approves the increase.
If the justices of the peace transmit such a notice to the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau and the board of - 80th Session (2019) – 4 – during that period unless the Legislature, by resolution, expressly approves the increase.
The clerk of the board of county commissioners shall, within 10 days after the election or appointment and qualification of any justice of the peace, certify under seal to the Secretary of State the election or appointment and qualification of the justice of the peace.
The clerk of the board of county commissioners shall, within days after the election or appointment and qualification of any justice of the peace, certify under seal to the Secretary of State the election or appointment and qualification of the justice of the peace.
(a) In actions arising on contract for the recovery of money only, if the sum claimed, exclusive of interest, does not exceed $15,000.
if the sum claimed, exclusive of interest, does not exceed $15,000.y, (b) In actions for damages for injury to the person, or for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, or for injury to real property where no issue is raised by the verified answer of the defendant involving the title to or boundaries of the real property, if the damage claimed does not exceed $15,000.
(b) In actions for damages for injury to the person, or for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, or for injury to real property where no issue is raised by the verified answer of the defendant involving the title to or boundaries of the real property, if the damage claimed does not exceed $15,000.
Bail bonds and other undertakings posted in criminal matters may be forfeited regardless of amount.
Bail bonds and other undertakings posted in criminal matters may be forfeited regardless of (e) In actions to recover the possession of personal property, if the value of the property does not exceed $15,000.
(e) In actions to recover the possession of personal property, if the value of the property does not exceed $15,000.
(f) To take and enter judgment on the confession of a defendant, when the amount confessed, exclusive of interest, does not exceed $15,000.
- *SB480_R3* – 5 – (f) To take and enter judgment on the confession of a defendant, when the amount confessed, exclusive of interest, does not exceed $15,000.
(h) Of actions when the possession of lands and tenements has been unlawfully or fraudulently obtained or withheld, when damages claimed do not exceed $15,000 or when no damages are claimed.
- 80th Session (2019) – 5 – been unlawfully or fraudulently obtained or withheld, whents has damages claimed do not exceed $15,000 or when no damages are claimed.
A justice court does not have jurisdiction in an action for the issuance of a temporary or extended order for protection against domestic violence:
A of a temporary or extended order for protection against domesticsuance violence:
A justice court does not have jurisdiction in an action for the issuance of an ex parte or extended order for protection against high-risk behavior:
A justice court does not have jurisdiction in an action for the issuance of an ex parte or extende(1) In a county whose population is 100,000 or more but less than 700,000;
(1) In a county whose population is 100,000 or more but less than 700,000;
Show all 53 changed rows (13 more)
Previous
Latest
or - *SB480_R3* – 6 – (3) If a district court issues a written order to the justice court requiring that further proceedings relating to the action for the issuance of the order for protection be conducted before the district court.
or (3) If a district court issues a written order to the justice court requiring that further proceedings relating to the action for the issuance of the order for protection be conducted before the district court.
(o) In an action for the issuance of a temporary or extended order for protection against harassment in the workplace pursuant to NRS 33.200 to 33.360, inclusive.
- 80th Session (2019) – 6 – (o) In an action for the issuance of a temporary or extended order for protection against harassment in the workplace pursuant to NRS 33.200 to 33.360, inclusive.
[(o)] (p) In small claims actions under the provisions of chapter 73 of NRS.
[(o)] (p) In small claims actions under the provisions of chapter [(p)] (q) In actions to contest the validity of liens on mobile homes or manufactured homes.
[(p)] (q) In actions to contest the validity of liens on mobile homes or manufactured homes.
Upon approval of the district court, a justice court may transfer original jurisdiction of a misdemeanor to the district court for the purpose of assigning an offender to a program established pursuant to NRS 176A.250 or, if the justice court has not established a program pursuant to NRS 176A.280, to a program established pursuant to that section.
Upon approval of the district court, a justice court may transfer original jurisdiction of a misdemeanor to the district court pursuant to NRS 176A.250 or, if the justice court has notablished established a program pursuant to NRS 176A.280, to a program established pursuant to that section.
- *SB480_R3* – 7 – 6.
6.
Sec.
- 80th Session (2019) – 7 – Sec.
The court shall issue an ex parte order if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence from facts shown by a verified application filed pursuant to section 11 of this act:
The court shall issue an ex parte order if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence from facts this act:a verified application filed pursuant to section 11 of (a) That a person poses an imminent risk of causing personal injury to himself or herself or another person by possessing or having under his or her custody or control or by purchasing or otherwise acquiring any firearm;
(a) That a person poses an imminent risk of causing personal injury to himself or herself or another person by possessing or having under his or her custody or control or by purchasing or otherwise acquiring any firearm;
If the verified application is filed by a law enforcement officer, the court may hold the hearing on the ex parte order by telephone, which must be recorded in the presence of the magistrate or in the immediate vicinity of the magistrate by a certified court reporter or by electronic means.
If the verified application is filed by a law enforcement officer, the court may hold the hearing on the ex parte order by telephone, which must be recorded in the magistrate by a certified court reporter or by electronicf the means.
- *SB480_R3* – 8 – 100,000, the court may be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including nonjudicial days and holidays, to receive communications by telephone and for the issuance of an ex parte order pursuant to subsection 4.
[7.] 6.
In a county whose population is less than 100,000, the court may be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a - 80th Session (2019) – 8 – communications by telephone and for the issuance of an ex parte order pursuant to subsection 4.
H - *SB480_R3*
~~~~~ 19 - 80th Session (2019)
View plain text versions (5)

Amendments

3 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Chapter 603.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  4. To enrollment.

  5. From printer. To re-engrossment. Re-engrossed. Third reprint.

  6. In Senate. Conference Committee appointed by Senate. To committee. From committee: Concur in Assembly Amendment No. 824 and further amend. Conference report adopted by Senate. Conference report adopted by Assembly. (Conference Amend. No. CA4.) To printer.

  7. Assembly Amendment No. 824 not receded from. Conference requested. Conference Committee appointed by Assembly. To Senate.

  8. Assembly Amendment No. 824 not concurred in. To Assembly. In Assembly.

  9. In Senate.

  10. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 39, Nays: None, Excused: 2, Vacant: 1.) To Senate.

  11. From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  12. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 824.) To printer.

  13. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  15. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.

  16. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 398.) To printer.

  17. From printer. To committee.

  18. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 64 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (64)

64 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 64 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 480 do?
AN ACT relating to courts; revising provisions relating to the transaction of business by justice and municipal courts; revising provisions governing the jurisdiction of certain justice courts; revising provisions relating to the number of justices of the peace in each township; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Who sponsors SB 480?
SB 480 is sponsored by Senator James Settelmeyer, Ellison, John (Republican), and Pete Goicoechea.
What is the current status of SB 480?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 25, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 480?
Track SB 480 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 480

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 480

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →