Revises provisions relating to orders for protection. (BDR 3-176)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 410 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 410.
You're tracking AB 410
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 410 — Revises provisions relating to orders for protection. (BDR 3-176)
Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 264.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
6 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
AN ACT relating to orders for protection; revising provisions relating to orders for protection against domestic violence or stalking, aggravated stalking or harassment; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
59 added · 65 removed59 line(s) added, 65 removed.
A.B.Assembly Bill No.
410410–Assemblymen ASSEMBLYKrasner, BTitus; ILLN O.
410–AFlores SSEMBLYMENand KFumo RASNERJoint ,Sponsors: TITUS;
FLORESSenators ANDSpearman; FUMO M ARCH 21, 2019 ____________ JOINT SPONSORS :
SENATORSand SPEARMANSettelmeyer ;CHAPTER..........
AND SETTELMEYER ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to orders for protection.
(BDR 3-176) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law authorizes a court to issue a temporary or extended order for aprotection temporaryagainst orderdomestic expiresviolence. within 30 days, unless an application for an extendedhat order is filed within the period of a temporary order or at the same time that an application for a temporary order is filed, in which case the temporary order remains in effect until the hearing on the extended order is held.
(NRS 33.080)33.020) SectionExisting 1law ofalso thisprovides billthat extendsa thetemporary periodorder ofexpires timewithin that30 adays, temporaryunless an application for an extended order is initiallyfiled valExistingwithin lawthe authorizesperiod of a persontemporary toorder petitionor aat courtthe same time that an application for a temporary ororder extendedis filed, in which case the temporary order forremains protectionin againsteffect stalking,until aggravatedthe stalkinghearing oron harassment.the extended order is held.
(NRS 200.591)33.080) Existing law also provides that a temporary order expires within 30 days, unless an application for an extended order is filed within the period of a temporary order or at the same time that an application for a temporary order is filed, in which case the temporary order remains in effect until the hearing on the extended order is temporary order is initially valid from 30 days to 45 days.oddays. of time that a - *AB410* – 2 – THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
the period of time that a temporary order is initially Existing law authorizes a person to petition a court for a temporary or extended order for protection against stalking, aggravated stalking or harassment.
(NRS 200.591) Existing law also provides that a temporary order expires within 30 days, unless an application for an extended order is filed within the period of a temporary order or at the same time that an application for a temporary order is filed, in which case the temporary order remains in effect until the hearing on the extended order is held.
(NRS 200.594) Section 2 of this bill extends the period of time that a temporary order is initially valid from 30 days to 45 days.
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
On 2 days’ notice to the party who obtained the temporary order, the adverse party may appear and move its dissolution or modification, and in that event the court shall proceed to hear and 80th Session (2019) – 2 – determine such motion as expeditiously as the ends of justice require.
On 2 days’ notice to the party who obtained the temporary order, the adverse party may appear and move its dissolution or modification, and in that event the court shall proceed to hear and require.edetermine such motion as expeditiously as the ends of justice 3.require.
3.
H~~~~~ -19 *AB410*80th Session (2019)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled As Enrolled Current pdf
- Introduced As Introduced pdf
Action History
-
Approved by the Governor. Chapter 264.
-
Enrolled and delivered to Governor.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.
-
Read second time.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.
-
Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 40, Nays: None, Excused: 2.) To Senate.
-
Read second time.
-
Taken from Second Reading File. Placed on Second Reading File for next legislative day.
-
From committee: Do pass.
-
From printer. To committee.
-
Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.
Sponsors
- Assemblywoman Lisa Krasner · Primary
- Assemblywoman Robin Titus · Primary
- Assemblyman Edgar Flores · Primary
- Senator James Settelmeyer · Primary
- Ozzie Fumo · Primary
- Pat Spearman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →6 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 61 not signed on
Sponsors (6)
- Assemblywoman Lisa Krasner
- Assemblywoman Robin Titus
- Assemblyman Edgar Flores
- Senator James Settelmeyer
- Ozzie Fumo
- Pat Spearman
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (61)
61 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 61 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 410 do?
- AN ACT relating to orders for protection; revising provisions relating to orders for protection against domestic violence or stalking, aggravated stalking or harassment; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.
- Who sponsors AB 410?
- AB 410 is sponsored by Assemblywoman Lisa Krasner, Assemblywoman Robin Titus, Assemblyman Edgar Flores, Senator James Settelmeyer, Ozzie Fumo, and Pat Spearman.
- What is the current status of AB 410?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 410?
- Track AB 410 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 410
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 410
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →