Nevada 2017 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 412 — Revises provisions relating to the jurisdiction of courts over certain criminal charges. (BDR 14-601)

Last action — Approved by the Governor. Chapter 235.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 27, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 50% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

81 added · 92 removed

81 line(s) added, 92 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 20, 2017) FIRST REPRINT A.B.
Assembly Bill No.
412 A SSEMBLY B ILLN O.
412–Committee on Judiciary CHAPTER..........
412–COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY M ARCH 27, 2017 ____________ Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY—Revises provisions relating to the jurisdiction of courts over certain criminal charges.
(BDR 14-601) FISCAL NOTE:
Effect on Local Government:
No.
Effect on the State:
No.
~ EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
Existing law provides that municipal courts have jurisdiction over all misdemeanors committed in violation of the ordinances of their respective cities.
Existing law provides that municipal courts have jurisdiction over all (NRS 5.050) Existing law also provides that an indictment or information which is filed with a district court may include charges of two or more related felonies and gross misdemeanors.
filed with a district court may include charges of two or more related felonies and gross misdemeanors.
199 (2002)) This bill requires that certain misdemeanors which would otherwise be under the jurisdiction of municipal courts must be joined with related felonies and gross misdemeanors in the district courts.
199 (2002)) This bill requires that certain misdemeanors which would otherwise be under the jurisdiction of municipal courts must be joined with related felonies and gross misdemeanors in which is erroneously included in a criminal complaint that is filed in a municipalr court shall be deemed to be void ab initio and must be stricken.
This bill also provides that a charge for any such misdemeanor court shall be deemed to be void ab initio and must be stricken.led in a municipal THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new;
matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
- *AB412_R1* – 2 – 2.
2.
(b) If an indictment is brought or an information is filed in the district court for a felony or gross misdemeanor or both after the convening of a grand jury.
- 79th Session (2017) – 2 – (b) If an indictment is brought or an information is filed in the district court for a felony or gross misdemeanor or both after the convening of a grand jury.
5.050 1.
proceedings:1.
Municipal courts have jurisdiction of civil actions or proceedings:
Municipal courts have jurisdiction of civil actions or (a) For the violation of any ordinance of their respective cities.
(a) For the violation of any ordinance of their respective cities.
(c) Actions for the breach of any bond given by any officer or person to or for the use or benefit of the city, and of any action for damages to which the city is a party, and upon all forfeited recognizances given to or for the use or benefit of the city, and upon all bonds given on appeals from the municipal court in any of the cases named in this section, when the principal sum claimed does not exceed $2,500.
(c) Actions for the breach of any bond given by any officer or person to or for the use or benefit of the city, and of any action for damages to which the city is a party, and upon all forfeited recognizances given to or for the use or benefit of the city, and upon all bonds given on appeals from the municipal court in any of the not exceed $2,500.s section, when the principal sum claimed does (d) Actions for the recovery of personal property belonging to the city, when the value thereof does not exceed $2,500.
(d) Actions for the recovery of personal property belonging to the city, when the value thereof does not exceed $2,500.
(e) Actions by the city for the collection of any damages, debts or other obligations when the amount claimed, exclusive of costs or attorney’s fees, or both if allowed, does not exceed $2,500.
- *AB412_R1* – 3 – (e) Actions by the city for the collection of any damages, debts or other obligations when the amount claimed, exclusive of costs or attorney’s fees, or both if allowed, does not exceed $2,500.
Sec.
- 79th Session (2017) – 3 – Sec.
H - *AB412_R1*
~~~~~ 17 - 79th Session (2017)
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Approved by the Governor. Chapter 235.

  2. Enrolled and delivered to Governor.

  3. In Assembly. To enrollment.

  4. Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To Assembly.

  5. Read second time.

  6. Placed on Second Reading File.

  7. From committee: Do pass.

  8. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To committee.

  9. In Senate.

  10. Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.

  11. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  12. Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day.

  13. From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint .

  14. Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 414.) To printer.

  15. Placed on Second Reading File.

  16. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.

  17. From printer. To committee.

  18. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Sponsors

  • Judiciary · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 66 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Judiciary

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (66)

66 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 66 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 412?
AB 412 is sponsored by Judiciary.
What is the current status of AB 412?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 27, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 412?
Track AB 412 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 412

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 412

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →